Nuisance Abatement Vehicle

Skinker and Delmar 3/18/12 about noon.
![]()
Skinker and Delmar 3/18/12 about noon.

i'm not saying it's ethical to keep information from the public but a knee-jerk story about this in STLToday is not going to have any kind of useful or positive impact. i'd rather they wait until they have all the facts; just look at the last few posts on here and see how the mob size went from thousands to hundreds to a hundred to just a fight in a parking lot.leeharveyawesome wrote:...don't you think it deserves a spot on STLTODAY at the moment instead of a debate about gun laws and neighborhood watch groups?
Seriously, is this story being suppressed, and why?
i'm sure they'd be happy to hear your suggestions. martial law, perhaps?pat wrote:The city or the cops need to get this kind of stopped immediately.
yep. along with the Shell station across the street.quincunx wrote:That damn Church;'s Chicken has got to go.
Are you implying that they're doing enough? Do you really think they are taking every rational means available right now to stop it? It certainly does not seem that they are. Yeah, problems will come about from time to time no matter the location, but this has been happening more often as a of late in the Loop. And now it has gotten more severe. Its one thing for kids to get together and get rowdy. Its another for them to start shooting at each other. A line is being crossed.pat wrote:
The city or the cops need to get this kind of stopped immediately.
i'm sure they'd be happy to hear your suggestions. martial law, perhaps?
what exactly is "enough"? what are all these "rational means" that they're failing to implement? people often say "they need to stop this" but it's just not that easy. a curfew is great so long as there are enough uniforms on the street to enforce it, but if we concentrate cops in U. City we take them away from other parts of the city. should we up the police presence in U. City permanently? then either other areas will suffer or we'll need to hire more cops, which means higher taxes. i completely agree that something needs to be done to prevent this, but i think blaming the police for "allowing" it to happen is easy but inappropriate.pat wrote:Are you implying that they're doing enough? Do you really think they are taking every rational means available right now to stop it? It certainly does not seem that they are. Yeah, problems will come about from time to time no matter the location, but this has been happening more often as a of late in the Loop. And now it has gotten more severe. Its one thing for kids to get together and get rowdy. Its another for them to start shooting at each other. A line is being crossed.
A curfew perhaps (like some have suggested) for those under 21 and not with a parental guardian would do a lot in my opinion.
You're putting words in my mouth. I never gave blame to the city or the cops. I simply said this needs to be stopped, and I think they could be doing more, whatever that may be (more cops, shorter curfew). Its not criticizing the job of the officers currently there or a knock on the city. Its just a fact that the current situation is not safe enough and it needs to become safer, soon.pat wrote:
Are you implying that they're doing enough? Do you really think they are taking every rational means available right now to stop it? It certainly does not seem that they are. Yeah, problems will come about from time to time no matter the location, but this has been happening more often as a of late in the Loop. And now it has gotten more severe. Its one thing for kids to get together and get rowdy. Its another for them to start shooting at each other. A line is being crossed.
A curfew perhaps (like some have suggested) for those under 21 and not with a parental guardian would do a lot in my opinion.
what exactly is "enough"? what are all these "rational means" that they're failing to implement? people often say "they need to stop this" but it's just not that easy. a curfew is great so long as there are enough uniforms on the street to enforce it, but if we concentrate cops in U. City we take them away from other parts of the city. should we up the police presence in U. City permanently? then either other areas will suffer or we'll need to hire more cops, which means higher taxes. i completely agree that something needs to be done to prevent this, but i think blaming the police for "allowing" it to happen is easy but inappropriate.