Vistronic wrote:
- After NLEC training, how difficult was it for you to obtain employment in the broadcast industry (outside of NLEC or NLEC-affiliated companies?)
It was a hard start as I had little money and no car.
(Later after 6 months) NLEC gave me a van to help. It helped for 5 years.
First, I'd like to say that I find your perspective refreshing and I'm appreciative of your comments.
I'm sorry your transition was a difficult one. That's nice that the NLEC provided you with a van but don't you think the transition would have been smoother had you been paid a salary for your hard work in the training program? You could have saved up money for a car or whatever else that would have made your transition smoother.
Vistronic wrote:When I was at NLEC I had food, clothing, and laundry machines.. I was on staff or as they say in the program.
At NLEC in some ways I had more stuff than I had for 5 years after.
All the clothes I could ever want, and I rarely eat sandwiches only if I wanted to. They had a food pantry and a lot of carry in donations.
Isn't there a distinction in treatment between the homeless clientele and that of the "staff?" It is my understanding from various interviews that the staff has access to washers/dryers and better food whereas the homeless clientele generally does not.
Vistronic wrote:The man who trained me in production left for a job at TBN in California so that is another positive case.
That's good. Now there are two documented cases. Would you consider these successes rare amongst those in the homeless training programs? As I have stated earlier, there appears to not be much data to support success of the programs.
Vistronic wrote:If the city would have sold or given Larry the old city hospital I think the 1411 locust building could have been released.... If the city would have followed up on shelters they promised... well its all if.....
That may or may not have been the case. When the NLEC tried to acquire the Abrams building in 2004, they would have maintained the 1401 Locust building in the process.
As for the city, they don't provide services. I believe they provide funding to and collaborate with private homeless care service providers. The city has done a lot recently, to include an innovative new program for homeless veterans. Of course, there is still room for improvement.
Vistronic wrote:Personally I would like to see the building sold and a new building designed for the homeless... they deserve a new building.
A brand new building with all the latest innovations, very high tech and "green". A bright example of hope. That is IMHO.
I do not know if Larry would ever consider that but who knows? If you approached Larry on the "green" aspect he might consider it.
Interesting perspective. Some homeless have told me they don't like the 1401 Locust location because many of them have drug/alcohol problems and that location is fairly conducive to slipping back to their demons.
That building is dilapidated, fails a variety of codes, and is not overly friendly for the elderly or handicapped who can't get around well (No elevators?). I can imagine that a newer facility would enable the NLEC to take better care of the homeless to include providing greater dignity, hope and safety.
Vistronic wrote:BTW- innov8ion,
I think your website (is it yours?) needs a more fair and balanced approach. Some of your points are worth discussing I do not say they have merit or not...
For example the 27k plus 8k Larry got in 2007.
LOL 35k in a multi million dollar ministry! And you give him a hard time!
Give me a break... He works very hard on staying on a personally low income! I have seen it.
The goal of the site is to discuss the issues in a factual manner and advocate for better treatment of the homeless. In the process, I do need to be conscious of potential bias and maintain fairness. If you have specific suggestions, please contact me.
Perhaps I need to clarify the salary issue. Of course he should be paid a reasonable wage for his work. No one is denying that. Just like the homeless staff should be paid a reasonable wage for theirs. The point was to show that he was justifying not paying his homeless staff by claiming he had not received a paycheck in 36 years. Obviously, he had.
Vistronic wrote:....but your message is lost in your POV that displays bias. If you are really serious about helping the homeless around this area of town you will need to negotiate with NLEC. Is your site helpful in doing that?
But threats, intimation and pressure will get no where with Larry IMHO. As a matter of fact it will empower him.
This part has proven difficult to me. IE, what is the best tact to address the issues that will help trigger positive change? I believe it is best to be both fair and direct.
And, is it possible to negotiate with the NLEC? Perhaps it can be done through intermediaries.