10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostNov 29, 2005#26

And the listing agent for those buildings is Andrew Murphy.

39

PostNov 29, 2005#27

Yes and Yes with more to come!



"Thats all I have to say about that" - Forest Gump

15
New MemberNew Member
15

PostNov 29, 2005#28

Chouteau's Lake and Chouteau's Landing are two completely different developments. The Lake is being proposed by Greenway in order to connect Central STL with Downtown. The problem is they are planning on having the lake fed by the Mississippi river. I don't know about you all, but I was under the assumption that water cannot flow uphill?? Not to mention the spring/summer floods. Having some green space with a park-like setting would be a wonderful asset to the city.

The re-development that is going on is awesome! STL needs this to be revitalized. And since Chouteau's Landing will be stones throw away from the new Ballpark Village, one can only imagine how popular the New Landing will become.

1,026
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,026

PostNov 29, 2005#29

In response to Matt ....



are you saying that those mid-rise towers on the riverfront are actually a go ... or are you just saying that people have begun torenovate buildings in Choteau's Landing?

1,355
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,355

PostNov 29, 2005#30

Just that renovation has begun.

15
New MemberNew Member
15

PostNov 29, 2005#31

I believe that you will see more progress in the Fourth Street Disctrict after the first of the year. There is going to be a lot of activity down there soon.

1,610
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,610

PostNov 30, 2005#32

In response to Jent, the Lake will use river water while not directly connected to the river, inhibiting backup flooding. It's not much different than how City drinking water comes from the river, but in the case of the Lake, the water won't require near as much treatment, since not potable water within the Lake.[/quote]

15
New MemberNew Member
15

PostDec 05, 2005#33

Thank you for the clarification. From what I've been hearing about the project, I feel like it's a disaster waiting to happen. Don't get me wrong, I fully support bringing life back into the city and revitalizing these beautiful old buildings, I just don't want to see more problems coming about as a result.

3
New MemberNew Member
3

PostDec 09, 2005#34

The first building to come online on 4th Street is 904 S. 4th Street.

Here is the brochure for that building. I am the listing broker on the project.



http://www.naidesco.com/PDFs/Retail/bro ... %20new.pdf



Delivery date will be next year.

1,054
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,054

PostDec 09, 2005#35

Does that building have a cast-iron storefront facade?



Congrats on choosing rehabing!

3
New MemberNew Member
3

PostDec 09, 2005#36

SMSPlanstu wrote:Does that building have a cast-iron storefront facade?



Congrats on choosing rehabing!


It has a cast iron front, plus a replica wherever needed.

1,282
AdministratorAdministrator
1,282

PostJan 18, 2006#37

The area is being considered to be listed on the national register of historic places.

http://stlouis.missouri.org/citygov/pla ... s/S4th.pdf

801
Super MemberSuper Member
801

PostJan 25, 2006#38

I went to BB's on Broadway after Christmas and I see a lot of potential for this area now that the stadium is right next to all of these bars and not separated by a vast parking lot. Does anyone else see this becoming our version of Wrigleyville? Along with Chouteau's Landing and Chouteau's Pond, this should really connect Downtown with Soulard and the other neighborhoods.

1,518
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,518

PostJan 25, 2006#39

Bastiat wrote:I went to BB's on Broadway after Christmas and I see a lot of potential for this area now that the stadium is right next to all of these bars and not separated by a vast parking lot. Does anyone else see this becoming our version of Wrigleyville? Along with Chouteau's Landing and Chouteau's Pond, this should really connect Downtown with Soulard and the other neighborhoods.


Better than Wrigleyville, cause the team does not suck. :lol:



Actually I really like the Wrigleyville neighborhood, I don't think we will get that, this is a former residential neighborhood (as evident by the Field house) that has been mostly industrial for the last 60 years, Wrigleyville is a pretty tight nit all residential hood, more along the lines of Soulard.



That being said I think there is a lot of potential, and rumors are starting to surface about the last unoccupied buildings south of the stadium being rehabbed as bars.



The most important step to making a unique hood thought would be to get rid of the surface lots. Considering those are gold mines on game days, that could be difficult.

2,953
Life MemberLife Member
2,953

PostJan 25, 2006#40

There's way too much crap down there right now. By crap I mean surface lots, fast food restaurants, businesses that really aren't used by the public. And knowing that there used to be the kind housing stock we're used to in STL, yet it was torn down for much of that crap...it's frustrating. We could have had something better than Wrigleyville, instead, we'll just have a few cool bars and stuff.

407
Full MemberFull Member
407

PostJan 25, 2006#41

If enough development starts popping up in the area around Busch Stadium that could eventualy change. If property values keep going up, the urge to sell will grow. All it would take is one of those lot owners to build a garage and they could quickly change the whole area.

1,610
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,610

PostJan 25, 2006#42

Parking lot owners could also subdivide just street-fronting portions of larger lots and allow infill to be built immediately along the area's streets. For example, parking could remain for now along 6th or west of 7th, but target infill along 4th, Broadway and the east side of 7th. 6th street will end up being where the revised last Missouri exit and replaced eastbound 40 exit (formerly 8th street ramp) feed. However, 4th/Broadway and 7th/8th provide better pedestrian connections from Downtown to Soulard.



South 7th has the least gas stations and fast food places (only the walk-in Eat-Rite) but it still has the physical barrier of the MacArthur bridge remnants, just north of Chouteau. Maybe Purina/Nestle could help clean this block up. The other barrier of the I-55 underpass as well as the entire South 7th streetscape will be improved by a future enhancements project. The Art of Living building and Ice House District are recent area developments.



As for 4th/Broadway, recent historic nominations just north of Chouteau on South 4th are hopefully signs of rehab and infill coming to the area.

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostJan 25, 2006#43

Does anyone know if the old bar at 4th and Gratiot is being renovated? It looks like there is some kind of temporary fencing around the entrance to the building.

480
Full MemberFull Member
480

PostJan 25, 2006#44

DeBaliviere wrote:Does anyone know if the old bar at 4th and Gratiot is being renovated? It looks like there is some kind of temporary fencing around the entrance to the building.


Is that the one that looks like a wall almost fell down? If so, I think it is being rehabbed, as evidenced by people working on it and trying to save that wall. I think the whole row of buildings by that imos there are being rehabbed, at least it looks like somethings going on.

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostJan 26, 2006#45

I think I know the one you're talking about, but the one I was referring to is the one with the Bud sign on it in this pic:




1,400
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,400

PostJan 26, 2006#46

People often complain about 70, but here I think 40 is just as much of a pain in the *ss and I think it creates just as much of a psychological barrier.

1,610
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,610

PostJan 26, 2006#47

I always wondered if it would be possible to hang vines from the double-decker 40. Then, maybe this towering structure wouldn't create as much of a visual barrier to the near-southside from downtown.

480
Full MemberFull Member
480

PostJan 26, 2006#48

southslider wrote:I always wondered if it would be possible to hang vines from the double-decker 40. Then, maybe this towering structure wouldn't create as much of a visual barrier to the near-southside from downtown.


I really don't think it would be a barrier with the right decoration, but I think vibrant stuff meant to catch the eyes would be better, even a sign that says, "Welcome to the near south side" or something. Use it as an entrance rather than a barrier.

801
Super MemberSuper Member
801

PostJan 26, 2006#49

A cool idea would be a Cardinal's mural going along underneath the overpass, or maybe something depicting St. Louis' role in jazz, blues, and rock 'n roll would be cool too (how many people know about Miles Davis, Chuck Berry, and Scott Joplin's connection to St. Louis?). Hopefully some of these bars will connect to the musical past as well as serve Cardinals and Blues fans. Something that is lost on too many people from the coasts is that St. Louis is a Mississippi river city -- it has more in common with Memphis and New Orleans than the Midwest (which everyone seems to equate with "boring"). My friends from the South are amazed at how different the city is from their original perception of "that midwest city with a big arc" and feel more comfortable here than other northern cities.



Also some signs to Lafeyette Square, Soulard, and the Brewery, etc would help out-of-towners and county residents discover more of the city than downtown.

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostJan 26, 2006#50

Those are some good ideas, guys! With the murals, maybe northbound drivers/walkers would see a Cards mural, heading towards the stadium with southbound drivers/walkers seeing a blue mural as they head towards the B.B.'s/Broadway Oyster Bar area.

Read more posts (288 remaining)