Tapatalk

Ferguson and St. Louis protests discussion thread

Ferguson and St. Louis protests discussion thread

1,218
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,218

PostAug 14, 2014#1

Is there a residency requirement for police and politicians in Ferguson? What is the term of office for the mayor and aldermen. Are the alderman elected by the Ferguson people or are they appointed by the mayor?

45
New MemberNew Member
45

PostAug 14, 2014#2

From the city website (not currently shut down by Anonymous):
The City Council consists of six council members and a mayor. Two council members are elected from each of the three wards, for three-year overlapping terms. The mayor is elected at large and also serves a three-year term. As elected officials, they are responsible for setting policies for the city and passing ordinances that have the force of law.
All council members and the mayor shall be qualified voters of the city. The council members elected by wards shall be residents of the wards from which they are elected during their entire term of office
I couldn't find anything regarding residency requirement for police.

1,218
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,218

PostAug 14, 2014#3

^Thanks. This helps.

1,299
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,299

PostAug 28, 2014#4

Does Ferguson deserve it's own thread? The unfolding story is so much more than a "crime thread".

1,218
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,218

PostAug 28, 2014#5

I started one in the county section.

3,311
Life MemberLife Member
3,311

PostSep 01, 2014#6

I hope the city of Ferguson retains it's diversity and white residents as well as black stay and continue to redevelop this city. Has everyone on the board supported businesses there? I need to get up there to support them.

1,064
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,064

PostSep 01, 2014#7

Ferguson suffers from the lack of a well-developed and built-up downtown - it's not totally lacking, but what does exist is a little too sparse and autocentric. One unique attribute of Fson is it has a surprisingly good assortment of prewar homes in some neighborhoods. If that could be paired with something like the Excelsior and Grand development in St. Louis Park MN - a dense 3-5 story multi-use "downtown" development that replaced several blocks of autocentric strip malls - Ferguson could diversify its housing stock and add a core adjacent to the nice '20s nabes west of their existing downtown. The key would be moving this development south of the creek, where it all falls apart.

60
New MemberNew Member
60

PostSep 01, 2014#8

I know there is a future plan to buyout allot of the land currently occupied by post WW1/WW2 housing south of Suburban because that area abuts Northpark and the city feels that would be perfect for redevelopment. They recently surrendered rights to roads that are in NP close to this area.

8,915
Life MemberLife Member
8,915

PostSep 02, 2014#9

Centene to build claims center in Ferguson, creating up to 200 jobs
http://www.bizjournals.com/stlouis/news ... guson.html

3,311
Life MemberLife Member
3,311

PostOct 01, 2014#10

Was Ferguson "designed to decline" as it's been suggested on nextstl? While I am no fan of an autocentric, suburban style layout, I think the issues of Ferguson go far beyond its lack of street grid. Was north city and many other areas of the city "designed to decline"? I don't think they were.

1,218
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,218

PostOct 01, 2014#11

Ferguson's (former) PR guy:
Devin James, the marketing consultant who was removed from a paid position managing Ferguson’s public relations efforts after disclosures that he had once been convicted of reckless homicide, also claimed in his job application that he has a college degree, but now he acknowledges he does not.
http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/crim ... 1739f.html

9,598
Life MemberLife Member
9,598

PostOct 01, 2014#12

there aren't many street grids in Chesterfield and its doing fine.... :shock: :) :) :)

1,064
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,064

PostOct 01, 2014#13

Urban or suburban, no place is designed to support 100,000+ dirt poor refugee-immigrants from a foreign culture concentrated in one place.

9,598
Life MemberLife Member
9,598

PostOct 01, 2014#14

onecity wrote:Urban or suburban, no place is designed to support 100,000+ dirt poor refugee-immigrants from a foreign culture concentrated in one place.
South City/County worked well for 70,000 Bosnians.....

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostOct 01, 2014#15

Can't say what Chesterfield's future will be, but we know places like Ferguson, St. Ann, and Crestwood were doing fine in the past and are now facing growing challenges.

1,064
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,064

PostOct 01, 2014#16

Despite language and religion, the bosnians probably came from a more similar culture, being continental europeans, even if eastern europeans, than did southern blacks, coming from the jim crow south. They also weren't barred from education and good jobs in their home country, so they likely came here with more skills, and probably more money than southern blacks, and their kids look more or less white, so they aren't necessarily subject to racial discrimination. And they weren't forced into one part of the city by law. It's apples and gravel.

1,792
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,792

PostOct 01, 2014#17

The Bosnians came well after the racial laws of segregation had been disolved. They may have come with skills but by and large they came with very little money. Same could be said for Asians and Indians who very much look different than continental europeans. It's not an unfair comparison. It's been 50 year since the repeal of Jim Crow laws. Structural racism is definitly a problem but the black community can't place the blame of their entrenched poverty problem entirly on that. I don't have the solution but part of the solution has to come from inside the black community itself.

1,644
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,644

PostOct 01, 2014#18

onecity wrote:Despite language and religion, the bosnians probably came from a more similar culture, being continental europeans, even if eastern europeans, than did southern blacks, coming from the jim crow south. They also weren't barred from education and good jobs in their home country, so they likely came here with more skills, and probably more money than southern blacks, and their kids look more or less white, so they aren't necessarily subject to racial discrimination. And they weren't forced into one part of the city by law. It's apples and gravel.
That's the biggest load of sh*t ever. Can we set a date when the excuses stop? How about 2100? 2200?

The Bosnians in St. Louis rose above more extreme challenges than just about any recent Americans anywhere in the country. Maybe you aren't impressed but I sure am.

1,064
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,064

PostOct 01, 2014#19

Jim Crow was made illegal 50 years ago, but it hardly ended 50 years ago, and judging by the rhetoric of the tea party, certainly hasn't stopped being felt in much of the south. I think black kids born today, if they have the right socioeconomic status, might get to experience what it's like to be a full citizen. But I think that's a relatively recent development.
Can we set a date when the excuses stop?

When the US, but particularly the white south and its leaders, matures enough to have a serious adult conversation about reparations. Till then, more "excuses."

4,489
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
4,489

PostOct 01, 2014#20

STLEnginerd wrote:The Bosnians came well after the racial laws of segregation had been disolved. They may have come with skills but by and large they came with very little money. Same could be said for Asians and Indians who very much look different than continental europeans. It's not an unfair comparison. It's been 50 year since the repeal of Jim Crow laws. Structural racism is definitly a problem but the black community can't place the blame of their entrenched poverty problem entirly on that. I don't have the solution but part of the solution has to come from inside the black community itself.
Wowww. You mean to tell me there's been a whole whopping 50 years to reverse 349 years of chattel slavery, slave codes, Black Codes and Jim Crow? That's really enough time to reverse over three centuries of overt and covert bigotry and systemic racism. Ahem....Ferguson is a great example of how far we (and the St. Louis cesspool) have come. :roll:

Quick History Lesson
1619, First African Captives arrive in Jamestown, VA.
1639-1865, Slave Codes
1863, Emancipation Proclamation
1865-1900's Black Codes, (Video)
1876-1965, Jim Crow
1954, Brown v. Board of Education
1964, Employment Non-Discrimination Act
1965, Voting Rights Act
1968, Fair Housing Act

Yes, many new recent immigrants have arrived with usable skills - particularly Bosnians. Skills and higher education usually transfer into economic progress faster. Also, many immigrants of color have benefited from the hard work and sacrifices put in mostly by African-Americans to change America.

Sure many immigrants have arrived poor and hungry, but Bosnians, Indians and other immigrants have had the luxury of checking their excess baggage with Lady Liberty when they arrive. Further, Bosnians and recent Asian immigrants didn't face prejudice/bias like the Irish or Italians etc. did upon their arrivals even. All they had to do is just come here and "be" - no legacy sh*t.

Conversely, when Southern Blacks arrived seeking a better way of life they were met with the East St. Louis riots/massacre, property covenants and red lines in St. Louis. Even progressive Blacks with high skill-sets, college degrees, upwardly-mobile philosophies and entrepreneurial spirit were still excluded by the mainstream - some even to this day. This led to the creation of black associations, banks, colleges and universities, newspapers etc. etc.

In essence, the African-American story IS a totally different story from the "traditional" immigrant story, which cannot be denied. Don't minimize or simplify the African-American journey in this country.

Also, Jim Crow may have ended in the late 60's, but much of the RESIDUE lingers with us to this day. Again FERGUSON is the perfect example. Look at the tomfoolery and actions of the school board, police department and city hall. It doesn't take a genius to see that SYSTEMS (educational, judicial, economic, etc.) still play a significant role in how people live and are treated. Despite the still RAMPANT racism in places like St. Louis, where the KKK adopted a highway and the Rosa Parks Highway sign was continuously vandalized, Blacks have worked down poverty levels over the last 50+ years. The biggest drop of ANY group.



Further, look at women and the various women's movements. Despite various women's and feminists movements, women still don't get equal pay for equal work. Systems control women's abortion rights and where they can get abortions. Women are fired for getting pregnant or for taking off time to tend to their children's needs by some employers. Again, systems.

White males, by and large, DO NOT have to worry about these structural systems to the extent that other groups must. Therefore, it's easy to say "It's your fault", or "get your act together". Why do you think employers like Emerson and Centene are planning job trainings and hirings in Ferguson? They recognize there's a problem.

With that said, Blacks make up the second largest racial group in this country. And yes, there are corners of the black community that could do better despite real racist barriers, nonetheless, it still doesn't excuse those who create barriers - like the traffic ticket racket in north county, for example, or the lack of black officers on the St. Louis County or Ferguson police departments.

The way I see it, everybody needs to get their sh*t together.

1,644
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,644

PostOct 01, 2014#21

During the slavery years, 1.4% of Americans owned a slave (4.8% in the South). I've always found those numbers to be amazing. I think we all lost. Slavery was obviously terrible and America ultimately lost it's great European-style cities in the process. Thanks 4.8%ers.

These numbers are based around the mid-1800s.

641
Senior MemberSenior Member
641

PostOct 01, 2014#22

Reparations? You've got to be kidding me. I'm white and all my ancestors came from Germany in the 1890's. I ain't paying schitt. Let's throw more money at a problem and watch it get worse....which is what we've been doing since the late 30's...

180
Junior MemberJunior Member
180

PostOct 01, 2014#23

That whole story is so absurd. And to think he was getting paid $150 an hour--hilarious, if a little unsettling.

1,064
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,064

PostOct 01, 2014#24

I imagine a system of reparations in which the southern states would pay 5x more than America would.

180
Junior MemberJunior Member
180

PostOct 01, 2014#25

leeharveyawesome wrote:During the slavery years, 1.4% of Americans owned a slave (4.8% in the South). I've always found those numbers to be amazing. I think we all lost. Slavery was obviously terrible and America ultimately lost it's great European-style cities in the process. Thanks 4.8%ers.

These numbers are based around the mid-1800s.
For one I think those numbers are a little off. I haven't dusted off my Civil War history books in a bit but I'm pretty sure the figures are more like 1/4th to 1/3rd of Southern families/households owned slaves (around the time of the war). So that 5 percent figure may be accurate but if you multiply by average family size, say 5, then it begins to resemble my numbers.

But even if the percent of Southerners who owned slaves was very low--and it's definitely true that the majority of Southerners weren't slaveholders--that still obscures the fact that nearly everyone in the South had a stake in upholding the institution that formed the very basis of their society. Slavery gave non-slaveowning whites a measure of social distinction, of not being the bottom of society, and also a mode of social advancement/upward mobility.

And that's not even considering that some in the North had economic interests in slavery too. Where do you think all the cotton in the Northern textile mills came from?

So it's less "thanks to the small percentage of slaveowners" and more "thanks to pretty much the entirety of American society which either practiced, supported, benefited from, or condoned slavery until 1860"

Read more posts (643 remaining)