Good question. My answer is the auto centric un-walkable cheap developments don't have a lot to fall back on when the bottom falls out socio-economically.jcity wrote:Was Ferguson "designed to decline" as it's been suggested on nextstl? While I am no fan of an autocentric, suburban style layout, I think the issues of Ferguson go far beyond its lack of street grid. Was north city and many other areas of the city "designed to decline"? I don't think they were.
To me a lot of the strip malls and subdivision developments in St. Peters aren't too different from the parts of North County that have seen decline recently.
So while an area like downtown Ferguson or old town St. Charles holds on even as development pushes further west the weaker links inbetween see more problems.
Certainly an area like St. Peters has not suffered the same poverty and issues with racism that have plagued the municipalities of NorCo, but it's easier to see how blight can move in there as long as sprawl continues and these pockets offer little in the way of sustainable walkable neighborhoods.
When you're built just to be the "new big thing" don't be surprised when you are overlooked when the next new big thing comes along.






