3,541
Life MemberLife Member
3,541

PostMay 29, 2014#751

STLEnginerd wrote:^i don't think it's stupidity. There a legit reason to think the loop trolley will not be successful. It makes me a little ill to think that St. Louis is investing millions into a trolley from on Metrolink station to the next one down the tracks. The worst aspect is that it's failure will likely reflect poorly on the notion of expanded transit, despite the fact that the failure here is actually going to be over capacity.

It's only because it has such a staunch and respected backer that it actually is close to being built. It's unfortunate that Joe Edwards was so insistent that it go to the loop. A streetcar on grand (grand center to south grand) would have been a much better proposal.

That said its pretty late in the game to start trying to oppose or apply new financing restrictions on it now.
From a transit standpoint its meh, but from a development standpoint its gold. I don't think this was ever intended to be a major transportation project, its been noted for years that this is a tourist attraction. I don't see how it will fail, I assume it will be a novelty like the historical streetcars in a dozen of other cities and if its expanded to Forest Park, I could see thousands of suburbanites that would never use Metrolink taking it to the Zoo or Art Hill to Fitz and Blueberry Hill. Yes, it would have been much better on Grand Avenue and would probably be rolling by now, but nobody in the city has the nuts or vision to propose something like this but Joe Edwards. U-City leadership talking about ripping the rails out of the ground because it would be a big failure, just sounds stupid as hell and reeks of 1950s ideology. The fact that an elected official from one of our most urban suburbs would say that is absolutely mind boggling. No wonder 90% of Washington University graduates hightail it out of town. Do these people ever leave St. Louis? GOSH!

1,982
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,982

PostMay 29, 2014#752

Why exactly would they need to rip the rails out in the first place even if it's not a great success? How badly do we wish we still had rails in place all around the city now?

Just because something isn't successful now doesn't mean you tear up all the costly infrastructure.

Maybe it has a bigger impact on the roads than I'm envisioning, though.

933
Super MemberSuper Member
933

PostMay 29, 2014#753

In order for it to become truly useful to residents, it should connect to the Central Corridor Streetcar.

388
Full MemberFull Member
388

PostMay 29, 2014#754

Thats if the central corridor street car gets built. sorry not trying to sound pessimistic I just wish they stop with all the qualms and get things started its already been delayed long enough

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostJun 05, 2014#755

They aren't giving up

West End Word - Appeal In Loop Trolley Lawsuit
A federal judge on April 28 dismissed a lawsuit against The Loop Trolley Transportation Development District (TDD). One month later to the day, the four plaintiffs in the suit have filed an appeal.
http://www.westendword.com/Articles-Uni ... z33jJaky9r

1,868
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,868

PostJun 05, 2014#756

jstriebel wrote:Why exactly would they need to rip the rails out in the first place even if it's not a great success? How badly do we wish we still had rails in place all around the city now?

Just because something isn't successful now doesn't mean you tear up all the costly infrastructure.

Maybe it has a bigger impact on the roads than I'm envisioning, though.
I'm not an expert, but wouldn't they need to remove the rails the next time they did routine road resurfacing or whatever? Wouldn't leaving the rails in make maintenance more costly going forward for little or no benefit (if the trolley failed)?

9,546
Life MemberLife Member
9,546

PostJun 05, 2014#757

^ no, not at all...you can resurfce around it.

1,868
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,868

PostJun 05, 2014#758

dbInSouthCity wrote:^ no, not at all...you can resurfce around it.
Alright then, I guess they're just idiots. Sorry, U-City residents.

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostJun 05, 2014#759

Seeing where lines used to be located when the paving wears away in spots can be a neat discovery. Just recently noticed old track exposed on Olive in front of the Big Bro/Big Sis building.

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostJun 06, 2014#760

Well, sure, you can resurface pavement around and on top of the old rails, but you can't just uncover old rail and start running trains on it. Any future rail-transit system would have to rip out the old stuff and put in all-new roadbed and all-new rail.

3,762
Life MemberLife Member
3,762

PostJun 06, 2014#761

^ If the Loop Trolley fails I'm guessing we'll all be long dead before the tracks are uncovered and ripped up for new rail.

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostJun 19, 2014#762

STL Business Journal - History Museum property on Delmar to be used for Loop Trolley
The long-vacant land the Missouri History Museum owns on Delmar Boulevard will be put to use at last by the Loop trolley project.
http://www.bizjournals.com/stlouis/morn ... d-for.html

91
New MemberNew Member
91

PostJul 01, 2014#763


3,758
Life MemberLife Member
3,758

PostJul 01, 2014#764

^Great news! Finally!

1,877
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,877

PostJul 01, 2014#765

Well that was easy.

-RBB

2,037
Life MemberLife Member
2,037

PostJul 01, 2014#766

Isn't there still an appeal on the lawsuit that was dismissed?

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostJul 15, 2014#767

Good point about the rent. Don't know where the startups are supposed to go in the eastern part since most everything was torn down and new buildings tend to be expensive.

KMOX - Delmar Loop Business Owners Laud Fiber Optic Cables
Cafe owner Patrick Liburto says that could help attract start-ups, if building owners don’t price them out of the market.

“Start-up companies normally can’t afford high rent,” he says. “So, it will be up to the commercial property owners to see what kind of attractive offers they’re going to give to allow for that growth to happen.”

Liburto says that growth could happen on the Loop’s east side, where rents would likely be cheaper.
http://stlouis.cbslocal.com/2014/07/15/ ... ic-cables/

4,553
Life MemberLife Member
4,553

PostJul 15, 2014#768



Railway Age reports that there will be a meeting on July 24th to discuss new plans and renderings.

http://www.railwayage.com/index.php/pas ... input.html

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostJul 24, 2014#769

Hope it's popular enough they expand the service.

Three vehicles
20 min frequency
Sun-Thurs 11-6pm
Fri-Sat 11-Midnight

4,553
Life MemberLife Member
4,553

PostJul 24, 2014#770

^Agreed. Also, wouldn't mind them shifting weekdays from 11-6 to 2-9.

91
New MemberNew Member
91

PostJul 25, 2014#771

Any news from the meeting tonight?

1,982
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,982

PostJul 25, 2014#772

What will the pricing being on the trolley?

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostJul 25, 2014#773

One of the posters said "Consistent with Metro"

1,982
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,982

PostJul 25, 2014#774

quincunx wrote:One of the posters said "Consistent with Metro"
What would be better is if it was literally consistent with Metro and you could use a two hour pass to hope off the MetroLink and then ride the trolley.

2,037
Life MemberLife Member
2,037

PostJul 25, 2014#775

jstriebel wrote:
quincunx wrote:One of the posters said "Consistent with Metro"
What would be better is if it was literally consistent with Metro and you could use a two hour pass to hope off the MetroLink and then ride the trolley.
I can only imagine that happening if Metro was the eventual operator of the trolley. I doubt that Bi-State would be willing to share revenue with a private company.

Read more posts (1569 remaining)