Wow, I have so much to add to this thread this morning!
Two (consecutive) weekdays off work for the classes.
$250 for the classes.
$120 (i think - can't quite remember) fee to the state to apply for the license.
$40 fingerprinting fee.
This of course doesn't even cover the cost of the firearm, ammunition, holsters, equipment, etc.
Now, I'm fortunate enough to have a good job and the relative flexibility to where I could manage this with minimal inconvenience. If I have the misfortune to be a poor guy in East St. Louis, taking two days off from my retail job, likely without pay is probably a nonstarter. I'm probably living paycheck to paycheck, so that financial burden is very high. And, ironically, if I take public transit to work (which I'm more likely to do), I'm prohibited from carrying there. This effectively means I can't carry at all on a day-to-day basis despite the fact that statistically, I'm much more likely to be a victim than fat, white, lucky audac1ty.
The current laws are absolutely discriminatory, and I would see some of the fees dropped or assessed on a "ability to pay" basis.
The general position of the NRA seems to be very pro-enforcement of gun laws that are currently on the books. Felony charges for things like straw purchases, violent crime, etc. They are also in favor of enhanced sentencing for people who commit crimes with guns. Its a generalization but, when you look past the rhetoric and bluster their position basically seems to be "We have laws on the books that need to be enforced strictly and properly before we can talk about making new laws that will generally inconvenience law abiding citizens far more than criminals."leeharveyawesome wrote:Does anyone know what the NRA has to say about illegal gun crimes or possession? Do they take a strong position like they do on the right to own? Do they lobby for any particular laws, sentencing, etc?
I believe you're being facetious here, but as a metro east resident, this is something I've actually written my legislators about. We only recently got CCW in IL, and its basically out of reach for people who need it the most. If you buy the idea that self defense is a right (if you don't, that's fine too - this isn't the place to argue about that), then what IL has in place is very similar to a poll tax. To get my CCW, I needed:MarkHaversham wrote:Do they support subsidizing conceal carry licenses for young men in the inner city? The wealth gap seems like an obvious oversight in CCW legislation.
Two (consecutive) weekdays off work for the classes.
$250 for the classes.
$120 (i think - can't quite remember) fee to the state to apply for the license.
$40 fingerprinting fee.
This of course doesn't even cover the cost of the firearm, ammunition, holsters, equipment, etc.
Now, I'm fortunate enough to have a good job and the relative flexibility to where I could manage this with minimal inconvenience. If I have the misfortune to be a poor guy in East St. Louis, taking two days off from my retail job, likely without pay is probably a nonstarter. I'm probably living paycheck to paycheck, so that financial burden is very high. And, ironically, if I take public transit to work (which I'm more likely to do), I'm prohibited from carrying there. This effectively means I can't carry at all on a day-to-day basis despite the fact that statistically, I'm much more likely to be a victim than fat, white, lucky audac1ty.
The current laws are absolutely discriminatory, and I would see some of the fees dropped or assessed on a "ability to pay" basis.





