In fact, many of us have questioned rankings where St. Louis is ranked as one of the most literate cities in America. And it is due to the same flawed ranking system. They do something like count the number of libraries, and divide by the population. As the population goes down, but libraries don't, St. Louis shoots up the most literate cities list.Moorlander wrote:Come on, that's human nature not the St. Louis mindset.ttricamo wrote:the act of complaining about this ranking only perpetuates the dreaded St. Louis Mindset.
Tell me, would anyone sit here and complain if we were ranked as the #1 SAFEST city in America yet the overall metro area took us down to #103? Would we all sit here and try and "invalidate" the "questionable statistics" that were used to make the ranking (read: city boundaries)? Questioning the data is a weak defense at best.
Nobody disputes the raw statistics. Nobody says we don't have a crime issue in the city. Its the RANKING that makes no sense, since it is comparing apples to oranges. Explain how St. Louis goes from 1 to 103 when ranking cities vs. metro area, whereas Houston with sprawling city limits goes the other way -- from 45 in the cities list, up to 27th in the metro areas list. If you live in the distant suburbs of Houston, better move to the core for your own safety. The flawed ranking implies your personal safety can be improved just by redrawing city limits. The ranking masks the fact that other cities may have worse core crime AND worse suburban crime than our area. Do we deserve to lose the DNC convention and China hub when those cities point to this ranking?






