362
Full MemberFull Member
362

PostFeb 26, 2008#226

ChrisInDownTown wrote:
I am not sure if there is actual talk of those cities getting teams. I think Bernie was just throwing them out there randomly to portray how pissed they'd all be if another city hopped ahead of us after everything Cooper has been through.


There is talk of Miami. Apparently local political leaders have approved money for construction of a Soccer Specific Stadium. But, I have not heard that they have an investor yet to own the team and pay the league fee. The other possible scenario is that New York will get a second team. There has been talk and movement on this for a while and if all the pieces ever get aligned on it, they would probably jump ahead of us as well. This is the first time I have heard Tampa. There has also been speculation on a second Northwest city (Portland or Vancouver), Cleveland, Atlanta, Las Vegas, Phoenix and increasing talk of Montreal with the success of the Toronto franchise, although none of those cities are very far along in the process and barring some rapid progress in a short period of them should not be a threat to us for 2010 expansion. Of course, I would have said that about Seattle as well before they jumped ahead of us.



Our friends at Big Soccer caught a little snipit in Bernie's Press Box where Bernie said this:


Cooper has lined up additional investors. He's closing in on a deal, trying to decide between three or four proposals.



He also has a GM and coach in his sights.



-B


That is probably the most positive news to come out on this in months. I hope Bernie follows this up with a full article. Bernie has been doing good work on this deal, as has Cooper. We are fortunate to have some really good sports people in this town ... now if only MLS would realize that.

70
New MemberNew Member
70

PostMar 03, 2008#227

cant we just build it so there is extra insentive for the team to move here

2,386
Life MemberLife Member
2,386

PostMar 05, 2008#228

No.

2,772
Life MemberLife Member
2,772

PostMar 05, 2008#229

stl1991 wrote:cant we just build it so there is extra insentive for the team to move here


That would go over well...

1,768
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,768

PostJun 24, 2008#230

Nice piece on FOX 2 last night about Jeff Cooper and his bid and plans for the MLS and his proposed soccer complex.



http://www.myfoxstl.com/myfox/pages/New ... pageId=3.1

362
Full MemberFull Member
362

PostJun 25, 2008#231

Is it just me or is this guy starting to sound a whole lot more like a lawyer and a whole lot less like an avid fan?







"Were really close."



What the heck are we supposed to believe from that statement?



Someone should tell Jeff Cooper about the boy that cried wolf.

1,768
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,768

PostJun 26, 2008#232

The guy did sell his stake in SimmonsCooper to focus solely on the project. I think that means we're pretty close.

362
Full MemberFull Member
362

PostJun 26, 2008#233

TheWayoftheArch wrote:The guy did sell his stake in SimmonsCooper to focus solely on the project. I think that means we're pretty close.


Your right and I am trying not to lose patience here, but this is taking forever. I realize MLS is at fault here as Cooper probably delivered on what they asked, but MLS moved the goalposts on him after Philly and Seattle got their bids together. But, nevertheless, the waiting has got to be hurting the project. There was so much enthusiasm and support a year ago. Now, no one seems to care.



I just for the life of me can't understand what MLS's problem is. They are just using Saint Louis as a bargaining chip. They did it with the Salt Lake deal. They did it with the Seattle and Philly bids. And now they are using Saint Louis as a bargaining chip against Miami and NYC2 and whomever else. They are consistently screwing with the best Soccer city in America - and yet they say their goal is to build American soccer? Here is an idea, try not pissing off one of the few American cities where soccer has actually taken hold.



I am going to love the soccer team after this (if we ever get it), but I am going to forever hate MLS for what they are doing to us.

8,923
Life MemberLife Member
8,923

PostAug 01, 2008#234

Friday, August 1, 2008

Cooper, Collinsville closing in on MLS expansion teamGroundbreaking for $400 million, 400-acre mixed-use project awaits league decision

St. Louis Business Journal - by Matt Allen





Despite being passed over in February for a Major League Soccer (MLS) expansion team, St. Louis Soccer United Chairman Jeff Cooper said he is as confident as ever that Collinsville will receive a franchise once the makeup of his investor group is finalized.



Groundbreaking will occur on a planned $400 million stadium and mixed-use development called The Fields once the St. Louis area is awarded a team, possibly as soon as later this year, Cooper said.



Cooper is in the later stages of lining up investors, which, he said MLS officials told him, is the final missing piece to the puzzle. He declined to discuss how much funding is needed or to name investors who have already committed.



"The minute we accomplish that, we will have done everything asked of us," Cooper said.



Robert Knabel, Collinsville's city manager, said Cooper told him it is just a matter of time before Cooper receives the required financial backing MLS requires. Knabel said Collinsville officials have not cooled on the idea as the waiting process grows longer.





http://stlouis.bizjournals.com/stlouis/ ... cus11.html

1,585
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,585

PostAug 01, 2008#235

And how many times have we heard this?

362
Full MemberFull Member
362

PostAug 01, 2008#236

Shimmy wrote:And how many times have we heard this?


Yep.



Cooper and Bill DeWitt Jr. should have dinner some time. They have a lot in common.

597
Senior MemberSenior Member
597

PostAug 22, 2008#237

St. Louis is getting/already has a WPS team and with WPS's ties to MLS I think its almost certain for St. Louis to get a team and certainly announced sometime this year. I just looked at the stadium renderings they look incredible.



I heard the womens team and mens team are going to have the same name any truth to that? I like the idea.

362
Full MemberFull Member
362

PostAug 22, 2008#238

Architect Finishes Design for Soccer Complex



That is good. That Cooper is still sinking money in the design of the complex is a good sign.



__



Also, in this interview on KMOX (on left about 3-4 down) Cooper says the ownership group is finalized and includes a couple U.S. investors and at least one European investor. Since the ownership group is (apparently) finished, Cooper says he plans on submitting the final paperwork to MLS in the next couple weeks.



He is expecting us to start play in 2011 ...



We'll see. We have heard good things before, but it does look like Cooper may have accomplished the one last outstanding roadblock.

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostAug 23, 2008#239

Cooper's the man. He's gonna get this thing done.

597
Senior MemberSenior Member
597

PostAug 27, 2008#240

Framer wrote:Cooper's the man. He's gonna get this thing done.


+1.



He definitely is the man. http://www.bizjournals.com/stlouis/stor ... ily59.html
“Coach Barcellos will be an asset to our entire organization, contributing his expertise to not only the WPS team, but also to our extensive youth system,” said Jeff Cooper, owner of the St. Louis WPS team, in a statement. “Our area’s young female athletes, who aspire to be just like their Olympic heroes, now have an unparalleled opportunity to train under one of the world’s greatest soccer coaches.”




he just hired Brasil's WNT's coach. Very exciting. I've got my fingers crossed hoping they could somehow get Marta. My initial reaction is I feel bad for Brasil still not having a women's league but the opportunity to see Marta live is awesome.



The WPS has a real chance to become the best women's league in the world. The US women's team is a contender every WWC and Olympics so you can argue we have the best players already.



This stadium is going to get done. I can't wait until its finished. :D



Now if we could just lose the blues and the NHL all together.... :twisted: [/quote][/url]

8,923
Life MemberLife Member
8,923

PostAug 27, 2008#241

Arch_Genesis wrote:


Now if we could just lose the blues and the NHL all together.... :twisted:


There have been some really bad ideas posted on this board... but this certainly takes the cake. :maddown:

597
Senior MemberSenior Member
597

PostAug 27, 2008#242

Moorlander wrote:
Arch_Genesis wrote:


Now if we could just lose the blues and the NHL all together.... :twisted:


There have been some really bad ideas posted on this board... but this certainly takes the cake. :maddown:


:lol: I'm not a hockey fan and the league is a mess financially, it really has nothing to do with me liking hockey or not it just goes back to St. Louis not being able to support the 4 major leagues.



Nothing personal, but hey hopefully St. Louis will see a boom in population/economy and we can all be happy. :wink:



Anywho, for anyone who sees this please go a page back and check my previous post on the Barcellos signing.

1,768
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,768

PostAug 29, 2008#243

Arch_Genesis wrote:
Moorlander wrote:
Arch_Genesis wrote:


Now if we could just lose the blues and the NHL all together.... :twisted:


There have been some really bad ideas posted on this board... but this certainly takes the cake. :maddown:


:lol: I'm not a hockey fan and the league is a mess financially, it really has nothing to do with me liking hockey or not it just goes back to St. Louis not being able to support the 4 major leagues.




Explain...How is a league that set all time attendance records 2 years running in a gate driven sport suffering?



Soccer is an even greater niche sport in america than hockey, so I'm sure those fans won't be a detriment to the other teams. An NBA team may be a strain, but I think soccer fits comfortably into the St. Louis Sports Landscape.



And I think that it does have something to do with you not liking hockey... :P

597
Senior MemberSenior Member
597

PostAug 29, 2008#244

^^ interesting but I think you're jumping the gun a bit.



http://puckstopshere.blogspot.com/2008/ ... dance.html


I was emailed by Mojo Tooth and asked my opinion of this article where the NHL raves about setting attendance records in the regular season this year. Apparently 21,236,255 people "attended" an NHL game this season compared to 20,861,787 last year. The main reason to take these numbers with a grain of salt is that the NHL uses tickets distributed as a proxy for attendance. For example, if a team gives away tickets to the local YMCA so that underprivileged youths can attend games, it counts in the attendance figures whether or not all the people who were given free tickets actually attend a game.


The article does point out that the NHL increased revenue this year but if you compare the numbers to the MLS. MLS is growing pretty steadily. I don't see Soccer being a Niche sport in this country for more than 10-15 years.



My argument against the blues and the NHL is just based on the crux that, the league isn't that popular its had lockouts bad television coverage bad ownership. Also the blues haven't won more than a division title in 41 years.



The MLS/WPS will be bigger than hockey, but thats not something I'm hoping for.

2,772
Life MemberLife Member
2,772

PostAug 29, 2008#245

It doesn't matter how the league is doing financially, it's absolutely moronic to say you wish St Louis would lose the Blues. Is it bothering you that they are there? Reminds me of the idiot who randomly entered this thread and said he didn't want there to be an MLS team because he doesn't like soccer.

1,768
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,768

PostAug 29, 2008#246

^^



I'm jumping the gun? Nice that you tried to find a way to knock down attendance statement, despite the fact that league revenue has increased each year since the lockout. Tried to breeze over that did we. But you obviously have seen the books, otherwise you wouldn't make claims about the fiscal integrity of the league.



The Blues had one bad owner, who was a billionaire. The league as a whole has very sound ownership, sans a couple franchises, which is the case in every sport. See Memphis Grizzlies, Florida Marlins, Pittsburg Pirates, Bill Bidwell, Orioles, Clippers, Supersonics, etc, etc.



And for you to determine the popularity of the league is laughable.



The Winter Classic was a TV hit amongst a lot of competition. The Stanley Cup finals were the most widely watched in nearly ten years. And the TV deal, while not ideal (espn please), is as expected coming out of the lockout.



The Blues not winning the Cup does not mean that they are not an excellent entertainment product, great tax resource and source of civic pride.



And on that note, our pretend soccer team hasn't won squat either, so your point is moot.



You'll wax poetic about soccer emerging from its niche in 10-15 years, but with a dismissive swipe of your hand would throw away a 40 year franchise in a 100+ year old sports league :roll: ...That makes sense.



My point in the beginning, was that we can sustain a 4th sports franchise, if its soccer. I would be wary of bringing an NBA team here.



Now go get your shine box. :P

597
Senior MemberSenior Member
597

PostAug 29, 2008#247

^^



if the MLS is to emerge out of a niche market, with st. louis plateauing at its current population, one of our 3 major sport franchises would have to leave. It just happens to be my preference that it be the blues. Don't get your panties in a bunch boys. Its not moronic, its not out of hatred of hockey,and I do hate hockey; it would just be a necessary evil. This is mostly theoretical by the way so again I stress cool your jets.



And yes I don't think the NHL is very popular its markets are very concentrated in the east and its not very successful at reaching other demographics. It has never been in its 100+ year history of the sport. Soccer is wildly more popular across the world and I think overtime it will be more popular and profitable. I'm not calling for the blues and the NHL to laydown at this moment but if push came to shove, it would just be my choice to keep the MLS/WPS franchises. The blues have a 40 year history of losing, what would you be hanging on to?



The Hawks won an nba championship here and were shipped out 10 years later. 40 years and no Stanley cup? I beam about the cardinals and their accomplishments I have no Civic Pride whatsoever for the blues.



I'm not trying to pit Soccer vs Hockey btw.



As far as the stanley cup being the most widely watched in the past 10 years? It was the detroit redwings, I hope that wasn't a shocker for you.


TheWayoftheArch wrote:My point in the beginning, was that we can sustain a 4th sports franchise, if its soccer. I would be wary of bringing an NBA team here.


You can sustain soccer for now. I'm talking about in the near future to make room for a league on par with the NHL or greater. Maybe conversely MLS will become the 4th major sport and the blues can be a niche market. Will that somehow make you happy?

1,585
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,585

PostAug 31, 2008#248

Ya see, apparently you fail to understand that there are tens of thousands of fans out there that support their team and wear their team's apparel with pride even when they lose. Those are the true fans. The Red Sox hadn't won a World Series for 87 years before they won in 2004, should Boston have just given them the boot in 1997 because they hadn't won a championship in 80 years? Should Chicago get rid of the Cubs? Should Buffalo give the Bills the finger? I fail to see the logic in getting rid of a team because they have a history of losing. Which, if you did your research or knew anything about that of which you speak, the Blues actually have a winning tradition....just not the Stanley Cup.



But, back on topic, I don't see soccer surpassing any of the major four sports in America in popularity anytime soon.

284
Full MemberFull Member
284

PostSep 01, 2008#249

Arch_Genesis wrote: I don't see Soccer being a Niche sport in this country for more than 10-15 years.


People have been making this argument for 30 years. For whatever reason, it hasn't happened.



And why, exactly, can't St. Louis support an MLB team, an NFL team, an NHL team and an MLS team? There's just not enough oxygen in this city for both the Blues and Cooper's someday soccer team? And so the Blues should go? That just doesn't make any sense.

2,821
Life MemberLife Member
2,821

PostSep 02, 2008#250

Arch_Genesis wrote:
“Our area’s young female athletes...now have an unparalleled opportunity to train under one of the world’s greatest soccer coaches.”
Ahem... :oops:

Read more posts (66 remaining)