2,386
Life MemberLife Member
2,386

PostMar 13, 2009#301

^I could listen to what you have to say all day. (Tangent)



While I am all for the development of IL (Very important to reaffirming downtown as the center of the region), I cannot help but feel disdain that this isn't being targeted for somewhere around downtown StL on the Missouri side. Everyone knows good soccer spectating begins the morning/afternoon of at the bar, and I honestly don't see collinsville being a location that will draw people in the slightest. I for one know of many (MANY) people who would go to these games if the stadium was located near/in downtown purely as a reason to drink.



Be honest here guys and gals, professional sports are highly social events, and I just don't think collinsville will get it done socially. That being said, I would take it in Collinsville rather than nowhere.



(I swear I am not an alcoholic, just honest)

5,720
Life MemberLife Member
5,720

PostMar 15, 2009#302

Gone Corporate, I hope your right. Getting MSL and being a four sport pro team would be a much better position for the region. No doubt. I would actually like to see an MSL over NBA even though Dr. J is my hero for life. I think you got a different fan base that would make a MSL team stick.



Getting back to Collinsville. I haven't read anything that gives the impression that money is in the bank let alone financing in place to build a stadium without the development around it going forward. Someone please tell me differently.

597
Senior MemberSenior Member
597

PostMar 15, 2009#303

Dredger wrote:Gone Corporate, I hope your right. Getting MSL and being a four sport pro team would be a much better position for the region. No doubt. I would actually like to see an MSL over NBA even though Dr. J is my hero for life. I think you got a different fan base that would make a MSL team stick.



Getting back to Collinsville. I haven't read anything that gives the impression that money is in the bank let alone financing in place to build a stadium without the development around it going forward. Someone please tell me differently.


This was always interesting to me


362
Full MemberFull Member
362

PostMar 18, 2009#304

Vancouver today. Rumors are Portland on Friday.



It's good for the Northwest. They will become a soccer hotbed with the Portland, Seattle, Vancouver rivalry ... the only league in which those 3 closely connected cities compete. Throw in San Jose, and the two LA franchises and the West Coast has a good thing going on.



Where we stand now I guess is anyone's guess. Cooper has mentioned in the past that USL-1 was an option and now that he has the soccer park, he can probably get one of those teams if he wants, do a few improvements at the Soccer Park and make a go of that. He still has the women's team, and I assume they will start playing at the Soccer Park as soon as the commitments to SIUE are finished.



Alternatively, he can keep screwing around with MLS, I guess. If I remember the plan was to get to 20, so there should still be 2 spots left. I am sure one of these teams will fail sooner rather than later, so he can always buy a team and move it here. The expansion fee is going to go up again I am sure, and if Cooper had trouble meeting it this time, it is probably going to be an even bigger detriment next time. Plus, the competition is not going to stop, especially if 20 is seen as the cap. Miami, Atlanta, Montreal, New York 2, etc. will probably make a run at it again.



Also, you would think the ownership group he had formed won't stick together. It's hard seeing Pujols and the other secret ownership folks continuing to stick with this bid after, what, the 4th failure?



Personally, if I were Cooper, I would just hang it up and be done with it. Some group is going to be put together to own the Rams, and he can probably get a small piece of that.



Like I said before, this has been the most frustrating process. Saint Louis, soccer's best friend in the United States, has been treated like dirt in my opinion, being passed over for sexier cities like Philly and Seattle, even though their stadium situations and potential fan base were never as firm as what Saint Louis had going for it. I get that Cooper is not the richest man in the world, but really how rich do we need to be here? Paul Allen rich? Whatever. The guy had passion, work ethic, business sense, connections, and enough money to get it done. I really feel badly for him.

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostMar 18, 2009#305

You're missing reality here. Many professional sports franchises take many years to come to fruition. By no means should Cooper or St. Louis give up on getting an MLS team. However, I wouldn't be surprised if someone other than Cooper eventually makes it happen.

362
Full MemberFull Member
362

PostMar 18, 2009#306

Well, according to the talk on BigSoccer, MLS has announced it wants 2 more in addition to Portland (not final yet) and Vancouver (total of 20) on the field by 2012.



So, the expansion game will continue. How it continues I guess we will have a couple more years to debate.



Of course, what this really signals is that the ONLY positive revenue stream in MLS right now is expansion fees and that the league will collapse without the $80-100 million in expansion fees every 2 years.



This is nonsense. I am more and more convinced that MLS will not survive. How they are going to find 2 more cities willing to pay $50 million in expansion fees is beyond me after Montreal, Atlanta and Miami already dropped out. Maybe the positive news here is that MLS is getting desperate and if no other bidders come forth soon, they may have no choice but to accept the Saint Louis bid. Subsequently, though, the league may collapse without the expansion revenue.

1,364
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,364

PostMar 18, 2009#307

I don't see us getting an MLS team anytime soon.



Seems like we are leverage.

5,433
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
5,433

PostMar 19, 2009#308

STLCardsBlues1989 wrote:I don't see us getting an MLS team anytime soon.



Seems like we are leverage.


I'm beginning to think you're right- it seems like little has changed since the last time Jeff Cooper was stood up by the MLS.



I'm also starting to think Cooper should look into purchasing and relocating an existing franchise if St. Louis fails to make the cut again. It was mentioned elsewhere that the DC United are not doing well. While it might be cost prohibitive to purchase an existing team and move it to St. Louis, OTOH, the cost could be greater if the MLS continues to jack up the expansion fee every time it adds teams.



And then there's the bigger point that Little Egyptian made- if the MLS is using these fees to sustain itself, how long is the league gonna last anyway? It's kind of like giving General Motors and Chrysler billions of dollars- might as well throw the $$$$$ into a bottomless pit if the powers that be can't make a go of it otherwise.



Oh, and FWIW, I don't get the negativity some people have about Collinsville and the Metro East in general. Hundreds of thousands of people cross those bridges across the Mississippi River daily and live to tell, believe it or not. :wink:

597
Senior MemberSenior Member
597

PostMar 19, 2009#309

sad this isn't going to happen at the moment I was looking forward to seeing the stadium go up. The more pressing matter, at the moment, is finding a home for Athletica. Hopefully it isn't Fenton. Hope Solo, Jorge Barcellos and the Athletica organization deserve better

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostMar 19, 2009#310

Little Egyptian wrote:


Of course, what this really signals is that the ONLY positive revenue stream in MLS right now is expansion fees and that the league will collapse without the $80-100 million in expansion fees every 2 years.


Good point. It really is starting to sound like a pyramid scheme.

362
Full MemberFull Member
362

PostMar 20, 2009#311

Money is the issue, according to Timmerman.



"We are pretty strong and have enough money for the expansion fee and the operating expenses," [Cooper] said. "We need someone in the extreme high net worth area. It's more a balance sheet issue than an inability to pay issue."



I guess I just don't get why MLS would care all that much whether the owner's net worth is $100 million, $500 million, $ 1 billion, $5 billion ... at what point is it meaningless?



If Cooper can pay the fees to buy it and has plenty of money to operate it ... what in the hell is MLS concerned about? I guess the only assumption here can be that MLS fully expects and intends for its clubs to lose money and needs the deep pockets to sustain the losses. Normally in the business ventures I have been a part of, if Cooper has enough to buy it and run it, one would expect that he would have MORE money at the end of the process? That's pretty much the point.



Again, if MLS is admitting it is a revenue negative operation heavily reliant on expansion fees into the foreseeable future, why in God's name would anyone want any of these teams? Blessing in disguise for Cooper. I know he is passionate and would probably find a way to make a profit off this, but if MLS is openly admitting that it doesn't foresee itself as profitable anytime soon, no wonder he is having trouble convincing people with deep pockets to sign on.



Forget it, I say. It is a shame though, I would have liked to see a SSS on the east side of the river to give people a legitimate reason to cross in the other direction.

2,940
Life MemberLife Member
2,940

PostMar 20, 2009#312

Crap.


Friday, March 20, 2009, 10:35am CDT | Modified: Friday, March 20, 2009, 11:42am

St. Louis shut out for 2011 pro soccer team

St. Louis Business Journal - by Kelsey Volkmann

It looks like St. Louis won’t score a soccer team for 2011.



Major League Soccer said Friday it will award a franchise to Portland, Ore., in 2011 and said earlier this week that it will expand to Vancouver the same year.



Attorney Jeff Cooper and his group, St. Louis Soccer United, have been pushing to land a professional soccer team for the St. Louis area for 2011 or 2012.



To bolster those efforts, Anheuser-Busch said last week that it plans to transfer the ownership of a Fenton soccer park to St. Louis Soccer United.



The news about Vancouver and Portland landing teams "does not slow our momentum or work behind the scenes," said Jim Woodcock, a spokesman for Cooper. "The league has no firm date in mind to announce the process involved in the next round, but two additional teams could be announced and start play as early as 2012."





kvolkmann@bizjournals.com
Source: http://stlouis.bizjournals.com/stlouis/ ... rround=lfn



Here's to 2012.

3,796
Life MemberLife Member
3,796

PostJul 21, 2009#313

After seeing the Seattle Sounders play on ESPN vs. Chelsea, I can understand why the league wants to get Seattle some regional rivals. I know it was a big deal to get a big time Premier League team here, but the fans up there were out of control. If soccer is this big in Seattle, I'd assume it would do well in that region in general, especially because those cities have few pro sports. The philosophy of MLS was to get Seattle some rivals. I hope that is a good sign for St. Louis and Jeff Cooper's group, not bad. They may want more Western teams. I feel the league should go with a west coast division, east coast and central. That would allow room for a St. Louis club. Only time will tell.

60
New MemberNew Member
60

PostJul 21, 2009#314

DOGTOWNB&R wrote:After seeing the Seattle Sounders play on ESPN vs. Chelsea, I can understand why the league wants to get Seattle some regional rivals. I know it was a big deal to get a big time Premier League team here, but the fans up there were out of control. If soccer is this big in Seattle, I'd assume it would do well in that region in general, especially because those cities have few pro sports. The philosophy of MLS was to get Seattle some rivals. I hope that is a good sign for St. Louis and Jeff Cooper's group, not bad. They may want more Western teams. I feel the league should go with a west coast division, east coast and central. That would allow room for a St. Louis club. Only time will tell.


I don't see how we can get a team unless some multi-billionaire steps up and wants to own one here. If Arthur Blank were to write a nice fat check to MLS tomorrow, they would proudly announce Atlanta even though no stadium or plan for one exists.

8,923
Life MemberLife Member
8,923

PostJul 21, 2009#315

If one of the biggest soccer cities in the country can't get an MLS team.... well that's just a shame.

3,796
Life MemberLife Member
3,796

PostMay 19, 2010#316

Update from Jeff Cooper....Guess all options are still on the table. Just wish his group could get some financial backing.

Cooper said the Collinsville project is still ready and waiting, though it’s complicated by the downturn in the economy since much of it was predicated on housing and retail to make it work. And the Corps of Engineers has not approved any expansion at the Soccer Park, though he seemed confident that it could happen.


http://interact.stltoday.com/blogzone/f ... ion-notes/

Read more posts (-9 remaining)