1,868
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,868

PostDec 19, 2024#1576

TheWayoftheArch_V2.0 wrote:
Dec 19, 2024
The ArcGIS doesn't confirm that swath along 44, but otherwise a really interesting idea, especially with the southern and northern broad swaths actually adjacent or near adjacent. 
Isn't that mostly park/conservation area?

2,425
Life MemberLife Member
2,425

PostDec 19, 2024#1577

dbInSouthCity wrote:
Dec 19, 2024
STL city and gray areas.  Population 630,000
This is really cool. Do you know what the total land area is of the gray areas? It would be interesting to know what the population density is.

985
Super MemberSuper Member
985

PostDec 19, 2024#1578

This does seem to be something that has a strong chance of picking up steam in the coming years. Picture some of the political barriers are starting to fall related to finances, disparities between City/County, and boomer resistance being less of a factor as they fade in relevence and replaced with younger generations who may not have some of the biases that inhibit this.

One factor that could push this along is state government threatening to step in more. Since that could force a solution since the City and County officials and population may prefer to do it on own terms than have it dictated by Jefferson City.

3,426
Life MemberLife Member
3,426

PostDec 21, 2024#1579

I heard exactly the same argument when I moved here in 1975. That is, when the current old people move on, us younger generation can make the merger happen. No. The same parochial attitudes that have existed since 1876 will show up for you as it did for us. Unless a super-credible leader emerges who can make the argument. And those have never been in shorter supply for our region. Good luck.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostDec 21, 2024#1580

I always get a kick out of people saying that the "next generation" will be different. Alas, time has a way of changing people. 

As Winston Churchill said:  "If you're not a liberal at 20, you've got no heart; if you're not a conservative at 40, you've got no brain".  

A huge generalization, of course, but you get the idea. 

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostMar 13, 2025#1581

A Community Conversation – One St. Louis

The second in a series of meetings sponsored by State Rep. Ian Mackey on possible city-county merger -- will be held this Friday, March 14, 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., at the Millennium Student Center -Student Government Chamber, University of Missouri-St. Louis, 17 Arnold B. Grobman Drive, St. Louis, MO 63121.

PostMar 13, 2025#1582

Introduced by Rep Mackey

HB 456 would require munis with less the 5000 residents in Stl County to disband their police department within 5 years
https://house.mo.gov/Bill.aspx?bill=HB4 ... 025&code=R

HJR 27 - Proposes a constitutional amendment relating to the consolidation of St. Louis County and St. Louis City
https://house.mo.gov/Bill.aspx?bill=HJR ... 025&code=R
^The Metropolitan City plan

Neither has progressed in MOLeg

PostMar 13, 2025#1583

The Stop the City-County Merger  FB page is still active. Sad.

2,672
Life MemberLife Member
2,672

PostMar 13, 2025#1584

quincunx wrote:The Stop the City-County Merger  FB page is still active. Sad.
Yeesh. I just went to read. Supports my opinion that many people don’t have the emotional intelligence to vote, drive, or participate in social media.

913

PostMar 13, 2025#1585

Since the state wants to get involved with everything here, I hope they force the issue and get this done sooner rather than later. The city and county don’t seem to be making any progress on their own. Just fighting with each other.

2,419
Life MemberLife Member
2,419

PostMar 14, 2025#1586

If there were anything I would ever be okay with the state of Missouri imposing over the city of St. Louis, it's that. 

2,260
Life MemberLife Member
2,260

PostJul 15, 2025#1587

This is my attempt at what I think a decent City-County merger could look like. My ideal is to retain municipal governments, unlike a county merger like Indianapolis, Louisville, or Nashville. What I came up with was 5 different municipalities in my reimagined St. Louis County.

Red- St. Louis: 661k people, ~D+58, 47% white, 43% black, 4.7% Asian, 4% Hispanic, 1.8% other.

Blue- Florissant: 141.3k, ~D+35, 47% white, 45% black, 3.7% Hispanic, 2% Asian, 2.2% other.

Green- Oakville: 152.8k, ~R+5, 89% white, 3.2% Asian, 2.6% black, 2.3% Hispanic, 1.8% other.

Light blue- Chesterfield: 189.9k, ~R+13, 83.5% white, 8.4% Asian, 3% black, 2.8% Hispanic, 1.6% other.

Orange: Kirkwood: 160.6k, ~D+11, 75.7% white, 9.7% Asian, 9% black, 3.6% Hispanic, 1.5% other

Under this new border, St. Louis' density would be ~4.1k/sq mi, as the city would be ~160 square miles.

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostAug 23, 2025#1588

149 years ago

Stl Mag - St. Louis’ Great Divorce: A complete history of the city and county separation and attempts to get back together

https://www.stlmag.com/news/politics/st ... -together/

137
Junior MemberJunior Member
137

PostAug 23, 2025#1589

quincunx wrote:
Aug 23, 2025
149 years ago

Stl Mag - St. Louis’ Great Divorce: A complete history of the city and county separation and attempts to get back together

https://www.stlmag.com/news/politics/st ... -together/
Maybe we can get some momentum around 150 years? (I know it’s not happening but a man can dream).

3,426
Life MemberLife Member
3,426

Post1:57 PM - Jan 19#1590

I think we need a symbol we could put on T-shirts or buttons that show personal support for merging governments in the metro area.
Something politicians will see and cannot ignore to save their own parochial jobs.  And something the media will notice and confront politicians about.

I suggest:   SAINTLOUIS.  No space.   Or, to make it more clear, add the words posted by JaneJacobsGhost in an earlier post:   SAINTLOUIS.  MERGE OR DIE.

Just as "Join or Die" was used by the founding father Benjamin Franklin, "merge or die" is not a threat.  It is a prediction.
      

1,607
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,607

Post3:06 PM - Jan 19#1591

Given that some yokel just proposed decoupling KC from Jackson, I don't think we can rely on our state legislature to push this.  We need our elites and business leaders to tell the proletariat that this is needed in small, definitive words. 

3,426
Life MemberLife Member
3,426

Post4:11 PM - Jan 19#1592

I like what Jarrad Holst proposed.  Instead of a massive Better Together style merger that scared everyone to death as change tends to do here (we don't do big change), Jarrod proposes a simple ballot measure that merges in name only at first.  The City rejoins the County in name, but no institutions merge .  And it includes the creation of a committee that looks for things that can merge where it makes sense, similar to the merger of MSD.  Not so scary.  I suppose it could even include language that would limit all mergers in some areas for X years to further ease minds.  In Oklahoma City, they voted for a 5-year plan to revitalize downtown after the Murrah building bombing with a 5-years-only sales tax.  At the end of 5 years, trust in the plan leaders and results convinced people to renew for another 5 years, including education this time.  Here is the SLBJ interview with Jarrad podcast from January 8th if you haven't heard it yet.  Very good.


Post4:22 PM - Jan 19#1593

I love how AI can create free artwork from prompts.  Public Domain.

Post4:57 PM - Jan 19#1594

Maybe I should use the version where the bird looks mean and menacing instead.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

Post6:11 PM - Jan 19#1595

gary kreie wrote:
4:11 PM - Jan 19
merges in name only at first
How does that work? It's easy to think up a magic trick.
And it includes the creation of a committee that looks for things that can merge where it makes sense, similar to the merger of MSD.
It was a Board of Freeholders. We would have had that, but Mayor Jones didn't nominate any members.

3,426
Life MemberLife Member
3,426

Post10:20 PM - Jan 19#1596

This bird looks more serious.  From AI.  Public Domain.
SAINTLOUIS Cardinal Merge or Die - mean.png (4.31MiB)

Post10:40 PM - Jan 19#1597

quincunx wrote:
6:11 PM - Jan 19
gary kreie wrote:
4:11 PM - Jan 19
merges in name only at first
How does that work? It's easy to think up a magic trick.
And it includes the creation of a committee that looks for things that can merge where it makes sense, similar to the merger of MSD.
It was a Board of Freeholders. We would have had that, but Mayor Jones didn't nominate any members.
We need to take it out of the hands of politicians.  They all believe the worst thing that could happen to America would be for them to not be re-elected.

9,526
Life MemberLife Member
9,526

Post11:03 PM - Jan 19#1598

Jarrad is an idiot. There is no in name only merger.  City is either part of the county or it isn’t. You can’t have a government that functions as a county keeping its county functions while sitting in another county

1,607
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,607

Post12:27 AM - Jan 20#1599

Thank you DB, I was scurrying to write a very similar post. If you see Jarrad’s stuff on LinkedIn it’s brutal, poorly backed high level hand waving.

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

Post12:41 AM - Jan 20#1600

gary kreie wrote:
10:40 PM - Jan 19
quincunx wrote:
6:11 PM - Jan 19
gary kreie wrote:
4:11 PM - Jan 19
merges in name only at first
How does that work? It's easy to think up a magic trick.
And it includes the creation of a committee that looks for things that can merge where it makes sense, similar to the merger of MSD.
It was a Board of Freeholders. We would have had that, but Mayor Jones didn't nominate any members.
We need to take it out of the hands of politicians.  They all believe the worst thing that could happen to America would be for them to not be re-elected.
How do you do that? State initiative petition? It takes an initiative petition to start a Board of Freeholders, but politicians pick the members. People in munis can put on the ballot disincorporation via petition.

Read more posts (104 remaining)