1,770
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,770

PostNov 07, 2007#401

TGE-ATW wrote:The house voted to override bushies veto of the water resources bill that contains funding for Chouteau's Pond. The Senate is set to do the same in a few days.

link


Sorry, had to do this to make it come up as an update.

3,429
Life MemberLife Member
3,429

PostNov 08, 2007#402

TGE-ATW wrote:
TGE-ATW wrote:The house voted to override bushies veto of the water resources bill that contains funding for Chouteau's Pond. The Senate is set to do the same in a few days.

link


Sorry, had to do this to make it come up as an update.


http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/s ... enDocument

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostNov 08, 2007#403

Republican Whip Roy Blunt of Missouri was the only member of the bistate delegation voting to sustain the veto.


Thanks, buddy.

476
Full MemberFull Member
476

PostNov 08, 2007#404

He's the quintessential "party man" in the rep party. But I guess thats why he's the whip

5,631
Life MemberLife Member
5,631

PostNov 08, 2007#405

The Senate overrided the water bill veto today, marking the first veto override in Bush's presidency. Ref: http://tinyurl.com/369tmk. Isn't funding for the Greenway in this bill? If so, that should be good for us.

1,026
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,026

PostNov 08, 2007#406

so is it a done deal - is that a fuill veto? is it law

466
Full MemberFull Member
466

PostNov 08, 2007#407

if memory from 4th grade serves me right, that's it. ¡¡¡let's get a hells yeah here!!!

17

PostNov 08, 2007#408

School House Rock taught me everything I need to know about the legislative process....



www.school-house-rock.com/Bill.html

5,631
Life MemberLife Member
5,631

PostNov 08, 2007#409


8,910
Life MemberLife Member
8,910

PostNov 08, 2007#410

and that three's the magic number... http://youtube.com/watch?v=yPzAjiLr5Zw

5,705
Life MemberLife Member
5,705

PostNov 09, 2007#411

Raining on the parade here. I believe the Water Resources Bill is an authorization bill versus an appropriation or spending bill. We will have to wait on the funding for the time being. Hopefully I'm mistaken.

1,768
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,768

PostNov 09, 2007#412

I thought it authorized the appropriated funds.

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostNov 09, 2007#413

Nope. Dredger's right. Some of the projects will probably not be funded in the end. Perhaps with the support of our MO politicians, we'll still see the funding for the river projects and the Chouteau plan.

5,631
Life MemberLife Member
5,631

PostNov 09, 2007#414

Dredger wrote:Raining on the parade here. I believe the Water Resources Bill is an authorization bill versus an appropriation or spending bill. We will have to wait on the funding for the time being. Hopefully I'm mistaken.
Dredger appears to be correct.



http://tinyurl.com/3x8xkq

"The U.S. Senate has voted 79-14 to override a presidential veto of a water resources bill that would authorize for Georgia $127 million in water infrastructure projects. The actual funding for the projects would come later during the appropriations process, according to Georgia Sens. Johnny Isakson and Saxby Chambliss."

2,430
Life MemberLife Member
2,430

PostNov 16, 2007#415

Railroad yard may yet return to a lake

By David Nicklaus

ST. LOUIS POST-DISPATCH

11/16/2007



Inspiration often comes from surprising sources. For Richard Baron, it came from a cost overrun.



The old warehouse he was rehabbing into a Westin Hotel was sinking, which led to expensive stabilization work. It also led Baron to study old maps and discover that the warehouse had been built on the site of a natural lake, which was filled in after a cholera epidemic in the 1840s.



The lake may have been dysfunctional in 19th-century St. Louis, he reasoned, but it would be a wonderful amenity for 21st-century office workers and loft dwellers.



Thus, nearly a decade ago, began Baron's vision for the Chouteau Lake and Greenway. For most of the time since then, the project has been little more than a set of dreamy-looking drawings showing a water feature on the south edge of downtown and a greensward stretching west to Forest Park.



As of last week, however, the lake has official status: It's a line item in the federal government's brand-new Water Resources Development Act, which Congress enacted by overriding President George W. Bush's veto.



To be sure, the act only authorizes $10 million for Baron's project, and even that can't be spent unless Congress includes it in a future appropriation bill. That may take another long fight.



Baron, though, is feeling encouraged. The congressional authorization, he said, will allow him to negotiate an agreement with Union Pacific Railroad, which would have to move its tracks to make room for the lake.


Read More

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostNov 18, 2007#416

Good news. Keep pushing, Mr. Baron.

237
Junior MemberJunior Member
237

PostMay 02, 2008#417

i was flying home from a business trip last night and was reading the airline mag and saw an article about Indianapolis's 50 million cultural trail. seemed like a pretty impressive project for linking together interesting sites around the city. seems like they raised about 80% of the funding for the project already (40M out of 50M) and are well on their way.



http://www.indyculturaltrail.info/



i really hope this Choteau Lake and greenway project comes to fuition one day.

8,910
Life MemberLife Member
8,910

PostFeb 13, 2009#418

Friday, February 13, 2009

Downtown development: What’s moving forward?



Chouteau Lake and Greenway

Developer: Richard Baron of McCormack Baron has supported the project since its its conception.



Cost: $400 million



Location: An area covering nearly 200 acres, with the goal of linking the downtown riverfront to Forest Park with bike paths and landscaped areas. A 16-acre lake is planned south of the new Busch Stadium. However, only a small portion of the entire project, about 10 acres, is owned by McCormack Baron. A bulk of the property is owned by the Missouri Pacific Raildroad Co.



Originally proposed: 2000



Current status: U.S. Sen. Christopher “Kit” Bond spoke in favor of the project at a press conference held downtown in October 2007. But no progress has been made on moving the project forward in recent months.







http://stlouis.bizjournals.com/stlouis/ ... ocus4.html

923
Super MemberSuper Member
923

PostFeb 15, 2009#419

The biggest challenge for this project is getting MoPac to agree to relocate or bury the rail lines - neither of which I see happening any time soon. Rail may not be the industry it once was, but freight rail is still profitable.



Questions about this project that I would like to know is -



1. Who's responsible for the maintenance of the lake? Public, private, combination? Where does MSD come in?



2. How does the project propose to integrate with the surrounding areas, or will is be another virtual gated community like the BPV and TBD plans as originally conceived?



3. What enforcement measures will be taken to ensure any water traffic on the lake is respectful and appropriate? What additional police resources, if any, are required?



And so on

6,775
Life MemberLife Member
6,775

PostFeb 15, 2009#420

migueltejada wrote:3. What enforcement measures will be taken to ensure any water traffic on the lake is respectful and appropriate? What additional police resources, if any, are required?


My guess is that water traffic will be limited to rental rowboats, like in Forest Park. Hoosiers will not be allowed to bring their motor boat.

5,705
Life MemberLife Member
5,705

PostFeb 16, 2009#421

I think the word pond would be more appropriate then a lake. Then again, St. Louis with its affinity for open spaces we might as well as go full out for a lake.

18
New MemberNew Member
18

PostApr 10, 2009#422

Greetings from a newb.



I saw some blog entry about this Chouteau Greenway and got very excited about it...then I started reading more and noticed that this thread started in 2004 and very quickly my excitement faded.



So, what gives? Can anyone give an update on the current state of this? Will it happen in my next 3 years at WashU?

2,005
Life MemberLife Member
2,005

PostApr 10, 2009#423

No

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostApr 10, 2009#424

^ No.



It's a somewhat far flung vision proposed by developer Richard Baron. Some land has been acquired by either the city or Richard and could be used for the greenway. I think the removal of some railroad storage, moving of the main rail line along the valley from downtown to approximately Kingshighway is the main issue. The Union Pacific (I think it's them anyway) owns the vast majority of this land.

6,775
Life MemberLife Member
6,775

PostApr 10, 2009#425

Probably 10-20 years away, if ever.

Read more posts (521 remaining)