Twitter's full statement...
I'm sure you can't possibly believe that 57% of Americans are on the "far left"...dredger wrote: ↑Jan 08, 2021First, doing a second impeachment vote 12 days of Biden becoming President and going nowhere in the Senate is only appeasing Far Left, more Divide.
Dredger must also think that a few GOP senators and congresspeople, along with people in Trump's own cabinet, are in the far left.
- 9,674
This clown is getting everything he deserves right now. All his donors are calling on him to resign and or saying that supporting him for the worst mistake of their life.
^ Good good I hadn’t seen that edit yet. Gonna have to share that with a few folks haha.
^That edit is probably a good thing for the IL congresswoman who went around saying that Hitler was right!
There is an actual value in doing an impeachment, even this late in the game... no, it won't result in him being removed from office, because McConnell has already said the Senate won't take the issue up before January 20th. That said, if the House successfully impeaches Trump for a second time before the 20th, it won't just go away that day if the Senate hasn't yet taken it up. As soon as VP Harris has been sworn in and Sens-elect Warnock and Ossoff have been sworn in (which might not actually happen until January 23rd, apparently), Chuck Schumer will become the Senate Majority Leader, and the Senate can then commence an impeachment trial. Yes, you can still hold an impeachment trial after a president has left office. So if he were to be convicted, what would be the point, since he's already out of office? The point would be that the Senate could then bar him from ever running for elected office again for the rest of his life. It immediately kills any speculation about Trump 2024, because he'll be constitutionally prohibited from seeking re-election again down the road.
But more importantly, it will send the message that what happened Wednesday was absolutely unacceptable, and that the people who fomented the violence will face real consequences for their role in that tragedy. Could they get 67 votes in the scenario? My gut says no, but the stakes would be much lower for Republican senators, and they wouldn't have to worry about being on the receiving end of a mean tweet from His Royal Orangeness if they did the right thing. Plus, it takes a real monkey wrench out of any aspirations any of them might have for 2024. If Trump is allowed to run again in 2024 and he does, do not discount the possibility of him being renominated. If the GOP primaries were today, he would absolutely win and it wouldn't even be close. Why not nip this thing in the bud so it's not even a potential concern?
But more importantly, it will send the message that what happened Wednesday was absolutely unacceptable, and that the people who fomented the violence will face real consequences for their role in that tragedy. Could they get 67 votes in the scenario? My gut says no, but the stakes would be much lower for Republican senators, and they wouldn't have to worry about being on the receiving end of a mean tweet from His Royal Orangeness if they did the right thing. Plus, it takes a real monkey wrench out of any aspirations any of them might have for 2024. If Trump is allowed to run again in 2024 and he does, do not discount the possibility of him being renominated. If the GOP primaries were today, he would absolutely win and it wouldn't even be close. Why not nip this thing in the bud so it's not even a potential concern?
Not to get too conspiracy-theorist, but I'm beginning to think that their may have been some inside help on this thing from within the ranks of the U.S. Capitol Police. Not just as it was transpiring, but before it happened. I think some of them knew it was coming, and fully intended to assist in the effort.
There is absolutely no explanation for how someone was so easily able to get into the personal office of the United States Speaker of the House. None.
There is absolutely no explanation for how someone was so easily able to get into the personal office of the United States Speaker of the House. None.
Lack of anticipation, preparation and training, understaffing, underestimation, complacency and poor management. Any combination of those provides a reasonable explanation.DTGstl314 wrote: ↑Jan 09, 2021There is absolutely no explanation for how someone was so easily able to get into the personal office of the United States Speaker of the House. None.
If the Capitol Police leadership thought January 6th would be like any other Wednesday afternoon at the Capitol or any other electoral college vote certification, or that this "protest" would be similar to the dozens/hundreds that they've witnessed and managed over the last 4 years (both by Trump supporters and opposers), then they were simply very, tragically wrong. But, with all respect to Congressman Clyburn, no conspiracy is needed for any/all of that to be case.
^I tend to agree.
They were offered more help and turned it down. They should have known better and been prepared for it not to stay peaceful.
They were offered more help and turned it down. They should have known better and been prepared for it not to stay peaceful.
Maybe it's not the fault of the Capitol Police. Maybe it's in the FBI's purview.
But somebody was just unfathomably incompetent (or complicit). It's just inexcusable how a bunch of armed white guys can post (under real names) about how they're going to Washington to shoot (insert politician) and law enforcement had no plan.
Terrorists of a darker skin tone are plotting on encrypted communications and still get caught by the feds pretty often. These clowns did it in the open, visible to anyone.
This local guy got caught over the summer for some pretty similar stuff.
https://www.kmov.com/news/st-louis-man- ... 7d967.html
But somebody was just unfathomably incompetent (or complicit). It's just inexcusable how a bunch of armed white guys can post (under real names) about how they're going to Washington to shoot (insert politician) and law enforcement had no plan.
Terrorists of a darker skin tone are plotting on encrypted communications and still get caught by the feds pretty often. These clowns did it in the open, visible to anyone.
This local guy got caught over the summer for some pretty similar stuff.
https://www.kmov.com/news/st-louis-man- ... 7d967.html
Welp, looks like Lin Wood probably got himself disbarred (among other consequences)...
The newly-elected West Virginia State House lawmaker that broke into the Capitol who said he wasn't going to resign has done so. My guess is he was going to be ousted somehow by either the Governor or Legislature.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/derrick-ev ... s-capitol/
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/derrick-ev ... s-capitol/
- 20
Who cares. The Special Forces got Pelosi's laptop! It's going to be interesting what they find on that evil witches computer. That's why she freaking out right now and trying to get Trump removed. Not gonna happen...DTGstl314 wrote:There is an actual value in doing an impeachment, even this late in the game... no, it won't result in him being removed from office, because McConnell has already said the Senate won't take the issue up before January 20th. That said, if the House successfully impeaches Trump for a second time before the 20th, it won't just go away that day if the Senate hasn't yet taken it up. As soon as VP Harris has been sworn in and Sens-elect Warnock and Ossoff have been sworn in (which might not actually happen until January 23rd, apparently), Chuck Schumer will become the Senate Majority Leader, and the Senate can then commence an impeachment trial. Yes, you can still hold an impeachment trial after a president has left office. So if he were to be convicted, what would be the point, since he's already out of office? The point would be that the Senate could then bar him from ever running for elected office again for the rest of his life. It immediately kills any speculation about Trump 2024, because he'll be constitutionally prohibited from seeking re-election again down the road.
But more importantly, it will send the message that what happened Wednesday was absolutely unacceptable, and that the people who fomented the violence will face real consequences for their role in that tragedy. Could they get 67 votes in the scenario? My gut says no, but the stakes would be much lower for Republican senators, and they wouldn't have to worry about being on the receiving end of a mean tweet from His Royal Orangeness if they did the right thing. Plus, it takes a real monkey wrench out of any aspirations any of them might have for 2024. If Trump is allowed to run again in 2024 and he does, do not discount the possibility of him being renominated. If the GOP primaries were today, he would absolutely win and it wouldn't even be close. Why not nip this thing in the bud so it's not even a potential concern?
Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk
Not sure what you mean by that.kipfilet wrote: ↑Jan 09, 2021Dredger must also think that a few GOP senators and congresspeople, along with people in Trump's own cabinet, are in the far left.
I think what I stated. That the political reality is any articles of impeachment in House will not get what is desired. Heck, they might not even brought up in Senate Chambers with 10 days left in Trumps Presidency.. From political calculus you have only two years before mid-terms and the Democrats hold only a slim majority in the house and the only reason why they have majority in Senate is because Trump couldn't quit lying and Kamala Harris as VP is now the tie breaker. Another way to put it, all you have to do is look back at the first mid term election after Obama first year in the office to see how things can change on you very quickly.
As to DTG comments on impeachment has value as it shows accountability. Yes I agree to that, but it is mostly to the base and maybe some independents that might remember but come 2022 I don't think it will mean a whole in my opinion.
- 3,762
she's trying to remove Trump because, according to you, there's something scandalous on her laptop? LOL. logic. "special" forces, indeed.STL_4_LIFE wrote: ↑Jan 10, 2021Who cares. The Special Forces got Pelosi's laptop! It's going to be interesting what they find on that evil witches computer. That's why she freaking out right now and trying to get Trump removed. Not gonna happen...
Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk
- 9,674
Special Forces? You’re literally insane. The terrorist that stole a laptop got one that’s used for PowerPoints in meetings and that’s it. As someone who’s worked on classified gov projects, laptops with sensitive info aren’t just sitting around the officeSTL_4_LIFE wrote: ↑Jan 10, 2021Who cares. The Special Forces got Pelosi's laptop! It's going to be interesting what they find on that evil witches computer. That's why she freaking out right now and trying to get Trump removed. Not gonna happen...DTGstl314 wrote:There is an actual value in doing an impeachment, even this late in the game... no, it won't result in him being removed from office, because McConnell has already said the Senate won't take the issue up before January 20th. That said, if the House successfully impeaches Trump for a second time before the 20th, it won't just go away that day if the Senate hasn't yet taken it up. As soon as VP Harris has been sworn in and Sens-elect Warnock and Ossoff have been sworn in (which might not actually happen until January 23rd, apparently), Chuck Schumer will become the Senate Majority Leader, and the Senate can then commence an impeachment trial. Yes, you can still hold an impeachment trial after a president has left office. So if he were to be convicted, what would be the point, since he's already out of office? The point would be that the Senate could then bar him from ever running for elected office again for the rest of his life. It immediately kills any speculation about Trump 2024, because he'll be constitutionally prohibited from seeking re-election again down the road.
But more importantly, it will send the message that what happened Wednesday was absolutely unacceptable, and that the people who fomented the violence will face real consequences for their role in that tragedy. Could they get 67 votes in the scenario? My gut says no, but the stakes would be much lower for Republican senators, and they wouldn't have to worry about being on the receiving end of a mean tweet from His Royal Orangeness if they did the right thing. Plus, it takes a real monkey wrench out of any aspirations any of them might have for 2024. If Trump is allowed to run again in 2024 and he does, do not discount the possibility of him being renominated. If the GOP primaries were today, he would absolutely win and it wouldn't even be close. Why not nip this thing in the bud so it's not even a potential concern?
Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk
It's not just about a symbolic show of accountability - it potentially guarantees Trump can't run again in 2024. While I'm inclined to think he probably won't anyway, I'd just prefer he not even have the option to suggest that he might. Also, I believe it will take away his Secret Service detail. his lifetime pnesion, and the $1M per year in taxpayer money that he's entitled to for his presidential office.dredger wrote: ↑Jan 10, 2021Not sure what you mean by that.kipfilet wrote: ↑Jan 09, 2021Dredger must also think that a few GOP senators and congresspeople, along with people in Trump's own cabinet, are in the far left.
I think what I stated. That the political reality is any articles of impeachment in House will not get what is desired. Heck, they might not even brought up in Senate Chambers with 10 days left in Trumps Presidency.. From political calculus you have only two years before mid-terms and the Democrats hold only a slim majority in the house and the only reason why they have majority in Senate is because Trump couldn't quit lying and Kamala Harris as VP is now the tie breaker. Another way to put it, all you have to do is look back at the first mid term election after Obama first year in the office to see how things can change on you very quickly.
As to DTG comments on impeachment has value as it shows accountability. Yes I agree to that, but it is mostly to the base and maybe some independents that might remember but come 2022 I don't think it will mean a whole in my opinion.
Welcome to the forum, Q.STL_4_LIFE wrote: ↑Jan 10, 2021Who cares. The Special Forces got Pelosi's laptop! It's going to be interesting what they find on that evil witches computer. That's why she freaking out right now and trying to get Trump removed. Not gonna happen...DTGstl314 wrote:There is an actual value in doing an impeachment, even this late in the game... no, it won't result in him being removed from office, because McConnell has already said the Senate won't take the issue up before January 20th. That said, if the House successfully impeaches Trump for a second time before the 20th, it won't just go away that day if the Senate hasn't yet taken it up. As soon as VP Harris has been sworn in and Sens-elect Warnock and Ossoff have been sworn in (which might not actually happen until January 23rd, apparently), Chuck Schumer will become the Senate Majority Leader, and the Senate can then commence an impeachment trial. Yes, you can still hold an impeachment trial after a president has left office. So if he were to be convicted, what would be the point, since he's already out of office? The point would be that the Senate could then bar him from ever running for elected office again for the rest of his life. It immediately kills any speculation about Trump 2024, because he'll be constitutionally prohibited from seeking re-election again down the road.
But more importantly, it will send the message that what happened Wednesday was absolutely unacceptable, and that the people who fomented the violence will face real consequences for their role in that tragedy. Could they get 67 votes in the scenario? My gut says no, but the stakes would be much lower for Republican senators, and they wouldn't have to worry about being on the receiving end of a mean tweet from His Royal Orangeness if they did the right thing. Plus, it takes a real monkey wrench out of any aspirations any of them might have for 2024. If Trump is allowed to run again in 2024 and he does, do not discount the possibility of him being renominated. If the GOP primaries were today, he would absolutely win and it wouldn't even be close. Why not nip this thing in the bud so it's not even a potential concern?
Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk
- 3,762
i wonder if NY will get a presidential golf course or a presidential strip club in lieu of a library.
Trump changed his legal residence to Florida.urban_dilettante wrote: ↑Jan 10, 2021i wonder if NY will get a presidential golf course or a presidential strip club in lieu of a library.
Updated poll. These are more the numbers I would expect over the UGov poll.
- 53
So why BLM got away with looting fires all summer then? What happen in DC was horrible but BLM dose deserve the same push back.
Also do you all really think josh hawley will lose any election in MO? ( he wont) Impeachment after trump would be bad politics why waste Biden's first 100 days going after a guy that will not be in office while a pandemic is gearing up for covid 2.0 and the us economy is in taters.
Also do you all really think josh hawley will lose any election in MO? ( he wont) Impeachment after trump would be bad politics why waste Biden's first 100 days going after a guy that will not be in office while a pandemic is gearing up for covid 2.0 and the us economy is in taters.
- 9,674
Got away? Didn’t get the same push back? You’re delusional. Biden said in July anyone involved in looting or burning is a criminal and should be held accountable. And the fact that you’re trying to whataboutism with last summer and insurrection and people chanting hang Mike pence as they make their way in the Capitol is pathetic.Thatguy644 wrote: ↑Jan 10, 2021So why BLM got away with looting fires all summer then? What happen in DC was horrible but BLM dose deserve the same push back.
Also do you all really think josh hawley will lose any election in MO? ( he wont) Impeachment after trump would be bad politics why waste Biden's first 100 days going after a guy that will not be in office while a pandemic is gearing up for covid 2.0 and the us economy is in taters.
And looting fires all summer? Here there was one night where a store got set on fire (june 1 or 2) and that’s it






