5,631
Life MemberLife Member
5,631

PostAug 21, 2007#2051

STLight wrote:no..good point, I like where you are going which is why I asked the question...out of curiosity how much does everybody think these bad boys will sell for...(I mean if you can watch a game from your balcony....NICE) Let me be the first to guess these will start somewhere in the million dollar range if that kind of view is an option
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I heard about $400/sq ft.

76
New MemberNew Member
76

PostAug 21, 2007#2052

Here in ATL, I live in a 250 odd condo building @ 16 units per floor and the building is about 230 ft tall. For a tower, 16 units per floor is at the upper end. So, if all the res units were in one building, it would be a nice addition to the southern skyline. However, I rather split them into at least two buildings, could hit different target prices, and add density. Or, less units per floor could get you a tall building and more density, the variables are many.

729
Senior MemberSenior Member
729

PostAug 21, 2007#2053

innov8ion wrote:
southsidepride wrote:I'm fine with starting with only 250 condos, more can be added in the next phases if these sell out. Better to leave 'em wanting more than to have folks b**** and moan if they didn't fill to capacity.
Enthusiasm is one thing, flooding the loft market is another. One has to be careful and build out downtown residential in a measured manner. Otherwise, home prices may to take a hit. Think about that one, oh wise urbanists. Perhaps 250 is ok, but something tells me it wasn't the greatest idea if their arms were twisted to do it.


The downtown area is made up of many multi-block areas that eventaully will fuse into one. BPV will be one more multi-block area added and with only 250 condos in the 6 block area I don't think you will have to worry about over flooding the market. There will be those who will pay top dollar for these units and there will be others who will want to live close, so they can walk in but not have to live among the hassles of game day congestion. Kind of like Wash Avenue. Some want to live right on the strip but others would rather avoid the noise and live just off but be within walking distance.

1,770
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,770

PostAug 21, 2007#2054

Encouraging, but notice that they have pushed it back again. Now they are saying late fall or early winter.

4,489
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
4,489

PostAug 21, 2007#2055

^Not surprising. They just got pertinent financing. Seems like things are being shored up. I think as long as progress is being made, we are okay. These projects aren't built overnight. Then considering the delays in Kansas City............

6,775
Life MemberLife Member
6,775

PostAug 21, 2007#2056

Gatechie wrote:Here in ATL, I live in a 250 odd condo building @ 16 units per floor and the building is about 230 ft tall. For a tower, 16 units per floor is at the upper end. So, if all the res units were in one building, it would be a nice addition to the southern skyline. However, I rather split them into at least two buildings, could hit different target prices, and add density. Or, less units per floor could get you a tall building and more density, the variables are many.


IIRC, somewhere in the original plans there were 3-4 story condo buildings spead out along Walnut, on the north end of the district.

835
Super MemberSuper Member
835

PostAug 21, 2007#2057

Are there any obstacles left to stand in BPV's way? It's about time already. I thought my unborn children would have pubes before this thing ever got built.



And I thought Bi-State was slow!

385
Full MemberFull Member
385

PostAug 21, 2007#2058

JivecitySTL wrote:I thought my unborn children would have pubes before this thing ever got built.


:lol: Another one for the Urban St. Louis Hall of fame!

124
Junior MemberJunior Member
124

PostAug 21, 2007#2059

JivecitySTL wrote:Are there any obstacles left to stand in BPV's way? It's about time already. I thought my unborn children would have pubes before this thing ever got built.



And I thought Bi-State was slow!


We still haven't heard any agreement come from the Bowling Hall of Fame and Museum, other than that, how much money is still needed? The post's article the other day said they were still looking for 115, which would include the ~30 from the state. Does that mean they still have to find sources for the remaining 85 million?

2,687
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
2,687

PostAug 21, 2007#2060

I hope not. ^

2,821
Life MemberLife Member
2,821

PostAug 21, 2007#2061

JivecitySTL wrote:Are there any obstacles left to stand in BPV's way? It's about time already. I thought my unborn children would have pubes before this thing ever got built.



And I thought Bi-State was slow!
They still have to finance the project, which, I might add, would have been much easier, not to mention cheaper, 2 years ago.

1,768
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,768

PostAug 21, 2007#2062

Jrathert wrote:
JivecitySTL wrote:Are there any obstacles left to stand in BPV's way? It's about time already. I thought my unborn children would have pubes before this thing ever got built.



And I thought Bi-State was slow!


We still haven't heard any agreement come from the Bowling Hall of Fame and Museum, other than that, how much money is still needed? The post's article the other day said they were still looking for 115, which would include the ~30 from the state. Does that mean they still have to find sources for the remaining 85 million?


City TIF.

25
New MemberNew Member
25

PostAug 21, 2007#2063

TheWayoftheArch wrote:
Jrathert wrote:
JivecitySTL wrote:Are there any obstacles left to stand in BPV's way? It's about time already. I thought my unborn children would have pubes before this thing ever got built.



And I thought Bi-State was slow!


We still haven't heard any agreement come from the Bowling Hall of Fame and Museum, other than that, how much money is still needed? The post's article the other day said they were still looking for 115, which would include the ~30 from the state. Does that mean they still have to find sources for the remaining 85 million?


City TIF.


The $115mm is the total city and state subsidy. The project cost is $387mm. $272mm has to come from elsewhere.

362
Full MemberFull Member
362

PostAug 21, 2007#2064

Do we know how many condos the plan called for? I just think that 250 is not that many based on the original plan and renderings. There were a lot of small-mid rises in their development. If those are built and most of the upper floors are condos, I could see getting to 250 without any of the proposed towers in phase 3. I mean you can fit pretty many condos in 5-6 10 story buildings.



But, at least it is moving ... a little ... and only on paper.

1,585
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,585

PostAug 21, 2007#2065

I'm glad we got 250 condos, because for awhile it was looking like we weren't going to get any.

2,190
Life MemberLife Member
2,190

PostAug 21, 2007#2066

Do we know how many condos the plan called for? I just think that 250 is not that many based on the original plan and renderings.


Depends on how you define "original." The 2001 McCormack Baron proposal called for 1,000 (condos and apartments). 250 is the number that shows up in the stories about Cordish from the past 18 months or so.

2,821
Life MemberLife Member
2,821

PostAug 21, 2007#2067

^Cordish's own website still says 1200 residential units.



Ballpark Village

1,768
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,768

PostAug 22, 2007#2068

FloInSoulard wrote:
TheWayoftheArch wrote:
Jrathert wrote:

We still haven't heard any agreement come from the Bowling Hall of Fame and Museum, other than that, how much money is still needed? The post's article the other day said they were still looking for 115, which would include the ~30 from the state. Does that mean they still have to find sources for the remaining 85 million?


City TIF.




The $115mm is the total city and state subsidy. The project cost is $387mm. $272mm has to come from elsewhere.


He asked where the other 85 mil in public monies was coming from. THe Cards and Cordish plan to sell bonds to finance their portion of the project cost, IIRC.

8,904
Life MemberLife Member
8,904

PostAug 22, 2007#2069

I wish they'd hurry up and release those final plans already...

2,386
Life MemberLife Member
2,386

PostAug 22, 2007#2070

Final plans would be terrific right about now...or a few months ago when they proposed the project for local and state financing. A final rendering, including floor plans, etc, means that a sales center can concievably start running, which hopefully means great pre-sale numbers, which means a MUCH easier time getting financing for the 272 mil. However, I'm going to put my 2 cents in and state my personal beliefs that condos will sell well in bpv if they are put on top of smaller residential buildings, but there is no chance we are going to see these fly off the shelves if they are 4-5 stories up spread out across the project. Towers looking into the ballpark with 30-50 stories I personally believe would sell at a never before seen rate for downtown, but 4-5 stories without views of the field....

366
Full MemberFull Member
366

PostAug 22, 2007#2071

When i heard about these residential units going up, i had a dream to one day buy one and see every home game from the comfort of my couch

291
Full MemberFull Member
291

PostAug 22, 2007#2072

newstl2020 wrote:Final plans would be terrific right about now...or a few months ago when they proposed the project for local and state financing. A final rendering, including floor plans, etc, means that a sales center can concievably start running, which hopefully means great pre-sale numbers, which means a MUCH easier time getting financing for the 272 mil. However, I'm going to put my 2 cents in and state my personal beliefs that condos will sell well in bpv if they are put on top of smaller residential buildings, but there is no chance we are going to see these fly off the shelves if they are 4-5 stories up spread out across the project. Towers looking into the ballpark with 30-50 stories I personally believe would sell at a never before seen rate for downtown, but 4-5 stories without views of the field....


I went to a Cordish meeting last winter when they rolled out the 3-D model of the project. At that time, a proposed residential/commercial tower would go in right across from the stadium, but they didn't know at that time whether that would happen in Phase I. Regardless, they were building the pads for that and other towers on top of the Phase I project during Phase I so they could add towers later if/when needed.



Based on that, I'd think the residential portion could be a combined residential commercial tower with the residentail on the top floors. If they created a combined residential/commercial tower in Phase I, I'd think it could be impressive and would command, as you suggested, prices previously unheard of in downtown St. Louis.

43
New MemberNew Member
43

PostAug 23, 2007#2073

I lurk a lot - I don't post a lot, or often either. But I read almost every post regardless.



But this news requires me to.



I am in Indiana right now, and stltoday.com is one of my first stops when I get home from work to see what's going on back in STL.



I almost pissed myself when I saw this headline - "Ballpark Village --with condos -- wins state financing."



:shock:



Thank god. thank god. thank god. thank god thank god thank god thank god!!!



now - can we break ground before "fall or winter?" jeez.



that is all. :D

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostAug 23, 2007#2074

Everybody talks about condos with a view of the field. But what about the units on the other side of the building...you know, the ones that don't face the field? Of course, they should have a pretty cool view of Downtown and the Arch, but let's face it; they won't be nearly as popular as those facing the stadium.

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostAug 23, 2007#2075

Framer wrote:Everybody talks about condos with a view of the field. But what about the units on the other side of the building...you know, the ones that don't face the field? Of course, they should have a pretty cool view of Downtown and the Arch, but let's face it; they won't be nearly as popular as those facing the stadium.


If the retail portion of this development is successful these condos should be in demand as well. This is assuming there's a market/grocery, pharmacy, theatre, eating options, dry cleaner . . .

Read more posts (2685 remaining)