4,489
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
4,489

PostMay 25, 2007#1651

stlmike wrote: ^ Arch, let's be consistant. You are talking about a growth in business vs. residential space. JMedwick is talking about a growth in business vs residential tenants. I wouldn't downplay the former, but I think the latter is more significant. There has certainly been a much higher success rate of a net sum gain in residential tenants than business tenants. A lot of the new office is getting people moving from the buildings that are being rehabbed into residential and other buildings. Again, don't accuse me of saying there hasn't been any improvement, but the point that JMedwick has made is that the increase is much less significant in size than the residential and we have to be concentrating on luring businesses in mass quantities, whether they are small or large businesses.
stlmike, I think you need to go back and reread what JMedwick wrote,


JMedwick wrote:"I too worry that downtown is being as "one-sided" as it was in the 1980's (pushing residential development to then spur and support retail development vs. pushing office development to then spur and support retail development").


My response was........


"With this current resurgence, many pieces of the puzzle, regardless of their individual size, are underway - infrastructure, residential, office, retail, and commercial/entertainment."


There's no denying my assertion. Development in downtown St. Louis is more comprehensive than that it has been in a long, long time.

PostMay 25, 2007#1652

JMedwick wrote:And you know what Arch, almost every building on your list was once 100% non-residential space, and much of it not that long ago (ie. change since the 1980's).
Huh?



The point was that all of those buildings - new and reuse - that have been built or planned within the last seven years are contributing to the "office" expansion of downtown. Again, while not all of the spaces are in gleaming towers - office expansion has occured downtown - albeit not to the extent of residential development - new and reuse.

PostMay 25, 2007#1653

Sorry, I just caught this response while reading back.


JMedwick wrote:So back to the first question, what happens to the BPV in five years?
I think you are getting way ahead of yourself. But my answer would be....let the developers/owners and city decide just like they did with St. Louis Centre.



Period.


JMedwick wrote:
Now what about office space. As noted above, downtown office workers will play a role in both the long-term health of downtown and in the long-term success of the BPV. Thus far, while downtown has been moderately successful in adding some small firms to fill out office space, such as those mentioned in today’s Post article, clearly downtown has lost some heavy hitters.
I agree that downtown needs more workers. But the groundwork is being laid, IMO. Regardless, while downtown has lost some jobs, downtown has also gained and MAINTAINED some heavy hitters - AT&T, Jacobs/Sverdrup (from Maryland Heights), Deloitte, Macy's Midwest, Hardees plus government entities such as the DEA, Social Security Administration etc. Although I prefer gaining more workers, maintaining workers is almost just as significant as gaining new ones - and downtown has been doing a fairly good job at retention lately. These workers will be instrumental in the sustaining of the BPV as well.


JMedwick wrote:
I am sure you would agree Arch, that even with the most positive spin on those small firms added, office growth downtown has been the laggard in this downtown revitalization in the same way that residential development was a laggard in the 1980’s
Again, I disagree. There have been much office space/workers created/added in recent years although I can't say with absolute certainty in terms of overall net gain or losses. It would be nice if the city and/or the DSTLP did an annual chart on downtown move-ins and move-outs. That way, we would have a bigger clue. I submit that when heavy hitters announce a relocation (Union Pacific) or downsizing (May) we get alarmed, which we should, but we don't seem to respect enough the smaller guys and start-ups that have been making a continuous impact on downtown over the last several years. I think people would be surprised by the numbers. They all have expressed a commitment to downtown and I think that bodes well for office expansion - and hopefully at the BPV.


"(and btw, you don’t think that residential occupancy was growing in buildings like Mansion House when STL Center opened, and frankly is that so dissimilar to the office growth seen since 2000?)."
Come on now, JMedwick. You are grasping. I worked in downtown St. Louis for years before moving away to Texas. In fact, I worked across the street from the Mansion House as a part of the Adam's Mark's inaugural staff when it first opened. Trust me, there was no impact at MH or Plaza Square for that matter. Keep in mind that the city was still emptying of residents. People were trying to get out of Dodge - including myself. Furthermore, turning (and keeping) one of the MH buildings into a hotel (whenever that happened) doesn't say much or it says a lot.


Frankly, the downtown office market needs a big positive shot in the arm. Adding small firms is very important no doubt, but downtown continues to have a finite and shrinking amount of downtown office space, cramping attempts to add new firms. Simply look at all the office space taken off the market with the residential boom.
Agreed 1000%. Since the mid-90's, Bosley's Administration, there has been a dire need for more Class A office space (1-million sq ft). Each mayor since has asked for more Class A space. Perhaps the BPV will get a new tower. Let's keep our fingers crossed.


For the sake of the health of downtown, to reduce the risk of this boom falling apart, it is important that growth in downtown be a balance as possible. This means office growth much catch up to residential and retail growth.
I hear you, but I don't think it is that dire. Again, recent development is more comprehensive - although more office space could be built as mayors have been pleading for.



Also, I think residential is catching up to office, actually. Yes, more office is definitely needed and I strongly believe it is coming. Let's keep in mind too that there is not quite an office boom going on around the country like in the 90's. A lot of the expansion nationally has been housing, except in the usual places - NYC and Atlanta for example. When the real office boom hits the nation and region - downtown St. Louis will see its share.

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostMay 25, 2007#1654

:smt015

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostMay 26, 2007#1655

Uh, what were we talking about again?

2,831
Life MemberLife Member
2,831

PostMay 26, 2007#1656

:!: OK folks, posts only on BPV development/News from here on please.



Please PM to each other directly to continue discussion above.



Thank You. :wink:

212
Junior MemberJunior Member
212

PostMay 26, 2007#1657

thank you.

1,391
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,391

PostJun 17, 2007#1658

http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2007/rea ... une/4.html



I really hope Cordish isn't going to pay attention to what's happening in San Diego as a benchmark for BPV. The Cardinals actually have a real fan base that stretches over a vast area and anything unique associated with the Cardinals, especially a residence that looks into Busch Stadium is going to fly off the market.

366
Full MemberFull Member
366

PostJun 18, 2007#1659

Ya but they might have some broken windows from Mr. Pujols. :lol:

801
Super MemberSuper Member
801

PostJun 18, 2007#1660

TB1000 wrote:http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2007/rea ... une/4.html



I really hope Cordish isn't going to pay attention to what's happening in San Diego as a benchmark for BPV. The Cardinals actually have a real fan base that stretches over a vast area and anything unique associated with the Cardinals, especially a residence that looks into Busch Stadium is going to fly off the market.


That seems to be more a part of the housing bubble which was a national phenomenon. It also tended to affect the coastal areas more than the interior. By the time the BPV gets built that shouldn't be much of a problem.

2,821
Life MemberLife Member
2,821

PostJun 18, 2007#1661

^Hell, by the time BPV gets built, San Diego will be under water. :lol:

3,311
Life MemberLife Member
3,311

PostJun 19, 2007#1662

why, because of "global warming"? :roll:



Really, when are they supposed to break ground?

5,631
Life MemberLife Member
5,631

PostJun 19, 2007#1663

JCity wrote:why, because of "global warming"? :roll:



Really, when are they supposed to break ground?
I hear they're waiting to break bread with the messiah first.

359
Full MemberFull Member
359

PostJun 19, 2007#1664

JCity wrote:why, because of "global warming"? :roll:



Really, when are they supposed to break ground?


The Cardinals are breaking ground on the BPV after the Cubs win the World Series and St. Louis City Police finally arrest/charge Ed Boxx & the arsonists who get off burning down new developments.....That probably pins the date sometime around October 2079.

8,912
Life MemberLife Member
8,912

PostJun 19, 2007#1665

stlmizzoutiger wrote:
JCity wrote:why, because of "global warming"? :roll:



Really, when are they supposed to break ground?


after the Cubs win the World Series That probably pins the date sometime around October 2079.


Edit: This WILL NEVER HAPPEN!

5,631
Life MemberLife Member
5,631

PostJun 19, 2007#1666

bpe235 wrote:
stlmizzoutiger wrote:
JCity wrote:why, because of "global warming"? :roll:



Really, when are they supposed to break ground?


after the Cubs win the World Series That probably pins the date sometime around October 2079.


Edit: This WILL NEVER HAPPEN!
The Cubs and Ballpark Village better hurry up. Sir Isaac Newton posits the apocalypse may come no earlier than the year 2060. Ref: http://www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/science/06 ... index.html

2,821
Life MemberLife Member
2,821

PostJun 20, 2007#1667

JCity wrote:why, because of "global warming"? :roll:


Yep, that's what Al Gore tells me.

2,331
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
2,331

PostJun 20, 2007#1668

matguy70 wrote::!: OK folks, posts only on BPV development/News from here on please.



Please PM to each other directly to continue discussion above.



Thank You. :wink:


We need some news to prevent turning this into a thread about Al Gore or whatever axe someone has to grind :wink:

1,770
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,770

PostJun 20, 2007#1669

Maybe we could all go over to the site with shovels and just start digging? An impromptu groundbreaking by impatient city watchers might generate some publicity along the lines of "BP Village fans can't wait, take matters into their own hands." Of course, it would probably also generate arrests for trespassing and destruction of property.

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostJun 20, 2007#1670

TGE-ATW wrote:Maybe we could all go over to the site with shovels and just start digging? An impromptu groundbreaking by impatient city watchers might generate some publicity along the lines of "BP Village fans can't wait, take matters into their own hands." Of course, it would probably also generate arrests for trespassing and destruction of property.


That would be hilarious. Not the whole getting arrested thing, but you get my point.

5,433
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
5,433

PostJun 20, 2007#1671

TGE-ATW wrote:Maybe we could all go over to the site with shovels and just start digging? An impromptu groundbreaking by impatient city watchers might generate some publicity along the lines of "BP Village fans can't wait, take matters into their own hands." Of course, it would probably also generate arrests for trespassing and destruction of property.


I (and others on this forum) have suggested a similar preemptive strike against the skybridge over Washington Avenue at St. Louis Centre. 8)

2,821
Life MemberLife Member
2,821

PostJun 20, 2007#1672

TGE-ATW wrote:Maybe we could all go over to the site with shovels and just start digging? An impromptu groundbreaking by impatient city watchers might generate some publicity along the lines of "BP Village fans can't wait, take matters into their own hands." Of course, it would probably also generate arrests for trespassing and destruction of property.


Yes, destruction of the pristine ecological wonder that is The Pit...

291
Full MemberFull Member
291

PostJun 21, 2007#1673

If there's nothing new to say about this project, I wish people would refrain from talking nonsense. I keep coming back here for updates and NOTHING worthwile is being said. Hang it up unless you have some news.

5,433
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
5,433

PostJun 21, 2007#1674

^ As a moderator, I'm inclined to agree with you. But I can't blame others for harmless venting, especially when I'm pretty frustrated about the lack of news myself.



The crickets have been chirping at that site long enough. It would be great to see some action...like...yesterday.

2,190
Life MemberLife Member
2,190

PostJun 21, 2007#1675

The news is: There's no news. And that's big news, because it's prime construction season.



Ahhh, but this is a "very complicated project." We must simply be patient and trust. Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.

Read more posts (3085 remaining)