3,433
Life MemberLife Member
3,433

PostJun 12, 2013#626

rbb wrote:
gary kreie wrote:Too bad the part labelled Busch II infield isn't right on top of and aligned with what was actually the Busch II infield. I don't think it is looking at the top-down view.
There's a video "tour" of the build site on the Cardinal website narrated by Bill Dewitt III. He says in the video that the Busch II infield is in fact in the exact same spot as the actual Busch II infield. (EDIT: Link)

It's also mentioned on the description of Ballpark Village on their site:
WHERE BASEBALL PAST, PRESENT & FUTURE COME TOGETHER



Laid out along the same lines as the old ballpark's diamond, the Busch 2 Infield will give fans a chance to walk the sacred ground once tread upon by legends. Complemented by food booths and a videoboard, the site will offer a prime gathering space for pregame ceremonies and activities, as well as movie nights and other events when baseball takes a break.
-RBB
You are correct sir. I didn't realize the old infield was that close to the new stadium left field stands and Clark Road. But look at this photo of the overlap plaque. Old Busch first base almost touches Clark Street.


10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostJun 12, 2013#627

framer wrote:The current site of Shannon's would make a great site for an office tower.
I agree. I believe that was part of the Downtown Now plan issued around 2000 or so.

525
Senior MemberSenior Member
525

PostJun 12, 2013#628

Ballpark village would make a great site for an office tower too.

7,810
Life MemberLife Member
7,810

PostJun 20, 2013#629

Somewhat related:

So let's see:
-the city of Detroit is dead dog broke
-yet they helped the Tigers build a new ballpark
-yet they helped the woeful Lions build a new domed football stadium
and now they're helping the Redwings build a new $650 million hockey arena?
http://www.mlive.com/business/detroit/i ... it.html#/7
The $650 million development would be funded with a mix of $365.5 million in private investment and an estimated public investment of $284.5 million, and Jackson and others were quick to stress that no money would come from the general funds of the financially beleaguered city or county.
Sounds like the Redwings are selling everyone on the proposal by including the following developments:
Meanwhile, projects that could be apart of the $200 million district surrounding the arena, as spelled out in the MOU approved Wednesday, include:

A 140,000-square-foot mixed office and retail development at Woodward and Sproat Street

A 25,000-square-foot office and retail development along Woodward

Several parking structures with a total of 25,000 square feet of retail

Renovation of the Detroit Life Building at 2210 Park Ave. for 3,645 square feet of retail and 35 residential units

Renovation of the Blenheim Building at 81 W. Columbia St. for 1,833 square feet of retail and 16 residential units
I wouldn't call it a "hockey arena village": but not far from it.

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostJun 20, 2013#630

dweebe wrote:]I wouldn't call it a "hockey arena village": but not far from it.
Interesting project. Money aside, it certainly seems to make sense to have the arena closer to the woodard/midtown district. It also is interesting that I-75 "depressed lanes" will separate the hockey district from the Tigers/Ford Field/Theater district. Currently, the area is largely surface parking and google has a good streetview look at pedestrian traffic for a day game at Tigers Stadium.... it doesn't look like they need a "park over lid" to safely get to their destination!

Anyway, while it is nice to see some real energy in downtown Detroit, I think it shares in common with Cleveland the cautionary tale that focusing on downtown isn't necessarily a recipe for success. Saint Louis benefits from stronger neighborhoods than what I believe these other two cities offer, but its a reminder that a city's health is really won or lost with its neighborhoods rather than how fancy downtown is.

4,489
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
4,489

PostJun 26, 2013#631


8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostJul 08, 2013#632

Hmmm.... will Pittsburgh become Hockey Town?

"Based on information contained in a recent transportation study of the arena site, the Penguins are planning 1,192 residential units; 200,101 square feet of retail space; 691,962 square feet of office space; a 150-room hotel; and 2,957 off-street and 330 on-street parking spaces on the property."

Read more: http://www.post-gazette.com/stories/loc ... z2YUDLXIsz

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostJul 09, 2013#633

I noticed during the Cards game the other night that the framework for the terraced rooftop seating is in place. It's been fun to watch this project take shape - hopefully the sight of real, tangible progress will generate additional tenant interest.

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostJul 10, 2013#634

Geeze, Pittsburgh wants to be Hockey Town and now Minneapolis wants to be NFL Town:

http://www.twincities.com/localnews/ci_ ... ite-coming

Wells Fargo has indicated interest in buying the top 12 floors of the two 20 story office towers proposed in what would be a $400 million, five-block mixed use district.

Too bad Ballpark Village is just muddling through.

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostJul 10, 2013#635

roger wyoming II wrote:Geeze, Pittsburgh wants to be Hockey Town and now Minneapolis wants to be NFL Town:

http://www.twincities.com/localnews/ci_ ... ite-coming

Wells Fargo has indicated interest in buying the top 12 floors of the two 20 story office towers proposed in what would be a $400 million, five-block mixed use district.

Too bad Ballpark Village is just muddling through.
If we had an office tenant make that kind of commitment, it wouldn't be. There are several companies that have had their chance to do it, but have passed on the opportunity.

722
Senior MemberSenior Member
722

PostJul 10, 2013#636

debaliviere wrote:
roger wyoming II wrote:Geeze, Pittsburgh wants to be Hockey Town and now Minneapolis wants to be NFL Town:

http://www.twincities.com/localnews/ci_ ... ite-coming

Wells Fargo has indicated interest in buying the top 12 floors of the two 20 story office towers proposed in what would be a $400 million, five-block mixed use district.

Too bad Ballpark Village is just muddling through.
If we had an office tenant make that kind of commitment, it wouldn't be. There are several companies that have had their chance to do it, but have passed on the opportunity.
I could be mistaken but I believe Minneapolis has a much stronger corporate base than we do.

I wonder if Minneapolis and Pittsburgh's downtown areas compete with some version of Clayton the way ours does... like when Centene reneged on their intentions to build at Ballpark Village and instead built that big shiny modern building in the heart of downtown Clayton.

8,912
Life MemberLife Member
8,912

PostJul 10, 2013#637

Well Minneapolis has St. Paul....

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostJul 10, 2013#638

^^ I think just about every major city has at least one significant "Edge City" -- an area that was once sleepy residential or agriculture but rose up to become a major competing commercial area to the traditional downtown CBD.

4,553
Life MemberLife Member
4,553

PostJul 10, 2013#639

^Agreed. But I think Clayton is a bit bigger than most. I think it started a little earlier, white flight in STL was a little stronger, and for whatever reason, we had fewer companies stick it out downtown. I'm pretty sure Clayton trounces whatever suburban CBDs KC, Cinci, Pittsburgh, Cleveland and B'more have.

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostJul 10, 2013#640

I think the problem in STL is the further suburban locations of our largest corporations. There's also the dispersal of existing downtown corporations - Ameren, Purina, AB-Inbev, Wells-Fargo...none are really downtown and so do not support restaurants and retail.

7,810
Life MemberLife Member
7,810

PostJul 10, 2013#641

wabash wrote:^Agreed. But I think Clayton is a bit bigger than most. I think it started a little earlier, white flight in STL was a little stronger, and for whatever reason, we had fewer companies stick it out downtown. I'm pretty sure Clayton trounces whatever suburban CBDs KC, Cinci, Pittsburgh, Cleveland and B'more have.
Agreed I can't think of many mid-sized cities that also have a Clayton sized CBDs that compete and suck life from the "main" downtown.

Toss out twin cities like Tampa/St. Pete, Miami/Fort Lauderdale, Dallas/Fort Worth, Minneapolis/St. Paul and San Francisco/Oakland. Do any of these single city metropolitan areas have a Clayton sized CBDs? Not that I can think of.
-Memphis
-Nashville
-New Orleans
-Houston
-Phoenix
-Denver
-Portland
-Milwaukee
-Chicago
-Indianapolis
-Cincinnati
-Columbus
-Cleveland
-Atlanta
-Charlotte
-Orlando
-San Diego

They might have areas equal to Westport Plaza, but St. Louis is in a very short list of non-twin cities that have a major secondary central business district like Clayton.

8,912
Life MemberLife Member
8,912

PostJul 10, 2013#642

Atlanta has Buckhead however it is still in the city proper.

Not on your list but Seattle has Bellevue.

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostJul 10, 2013#643

Indy has Carmel - a suburb maybe as far from downtown as Kirkwood is from downtown STL.

7,810
Life MemberLife Member
7,810

PostJul 10, 2013#644

moorlander wrote:Not on your list but Seattle has Bellevue.
I completely forgot that one. To be honest Seattle & Bellevue is about the only equal to St. Louis & Clayton that I can think of.

You could throw Century City & Los Angeles and Jersey City & Manhattan in there: but that's New York and LA.

PostJul 10, 2013#645

Alex Ihnen wrote:Indy has Carmel - a suburb maybe as far from downtown as Kirkwood is from downtown STL.
But it's not on the scale of Clayton. Is there anything in Carmel taller than 4 or 5 stories? Not challenging you: I just can't remember.

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostJul 10, 2013#646

^ Right, along 31 yes, but Carmel is more of a Kirkwood/Manchester @270/office park hybrid.

2,093
Life MemberLife Member
2,093

PostJul 10, 2013#647

Due to zoning laws or lack thereof doesn't Houston have two downtowns?

I was tempted to mentionFranklin--20 minutes south of Nashville. However their "CBD" is really a historic district along the lines of Kirkwood or Main Street St. Charles. Most of the large businesses in Franklin (Nissan, Verizon,) are sprawled outside of that area.

Probably similar to Carmel.

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostJul 10, 2013#648

dweebe wrote:
moorlander wrote:Not on your list but Seattle has Bellevue.
I completely forgot that one. To be honest Seattle & Bellevue is about the only equal to St. Louis & Clayton that I can think of.

You could throw Century City & Los Angeles and Jersey City & Manhattan in there: but that's New York and LA.

Even after excluding "twin cities" that may have been well established, Phoenix, Houston, Detroit, Miami, and D.C. all come to mind as having formidable newer cbds/edge cities that I think are comparable to Clayton. For a more mid-sized city what comes closest in my mind is Towson, MD... its very similar to Clayton in that it is a county seat (Baltimore Co.) adjacent to the independent namesake city.

PostJul 10, 2013#649

southsidepride wrote:Due to zoning laws or lack thereof doesn't Houston have two downtowns?
Uptown has a pretty impressive skyline. At least that one is still in in Houston.

5,705
Life MemberLife Member
5,705

PostJul 10, 2013#650

rawest1 wrote:
debaliviere wrote:
roger wyoming II wrote:Geeze, Pittsburgh wants to be Hockey Town and now Minneapolis wants to be NFL Town:

http://www.twincities.com/localnews/ci_ ... ite-coming

Wells Fargo has indicated interest in buying the top 12 floors of the two 20 story office towers proposed in what would be a $400 million, five-block mixed use district.

Too bad Ballpark Village is just muddling through.
If we had an office tenant make that kind of commitment, it wouldn't be. There are several companies that have had their chance to do it, but have passed on the opportunity.
I could be mistaken but I believe Minneapolis has a much stronger corporate base than we do.

I wonder if Minneapolis and Pittsburgh's downtown areas compete with some version of Clayton the way ours does... like when Centene reneged on their intentions to build at Ballpark Village and instead built that big shiny modern building in the heart of downtown Clayton.
I believe Wells Fargo has their mortgage business unit based out of Minneapolis/St. Paul and thus the strong presence/large back office force. Like Wells Fargo Securities, I believe they are consolidating external offices to one consolidated location. That is why you actually have some people coming down from Twin Cities with Wells Fargo Securities.

I honestly think you could see something similiar for Wells Fargo Securities if McKee could pull off a gateway mall book end office tower for west downtown as per northside plan.

On a different note, It would sure be nice to see Brown Shoe give up on there development aspirations and move downtown along with Kellwood.

Neither Downtwon and to lesser extent Clayton Business District (outside of Centene) have benefited from any of the major corporate expansions from Express Scripts, Edward Jones, RGA, Montsano and Scottrade. Montsano can understand as it has to do more with their research and EJ had built out existing facilities. But it sure would have been nice to see RGA and Scottrade move downtown as I believe their build outs are greenfield or at least had Express Scripts start off downtown.

Read more posts (5006 remaining)