592
Senior MemberSenior Member
592

PostApr 16, 2013#501

^That sounds like a good way to make customers and businesses quite feisty about paying extra property and sales tax for the project.

5,631
Life MemberLife Member
5,631

PostApr 16, 2013#502

stlhistory wrote:^That sounds like a good way to make customers and businesses quite feisty about paying extra property and sales tax for the project.
Its called supply and demand. Besides, if it's convenient and fairly inexpensive to pay for parking, I wouldn't mind.

118
Junior MemberJunior Member
118

PostApr 16, 2013#503

I sense that when the BPV lot opens up it will be such easy money for the Cardinals that they will not want to take on the risk of developing those sites. In which I guess the best case is that some of the lots and garages a little further away will become less profitable and perhaps cause those owners to look for a higher and better use. It would be great to see high rises looking down into the stadium from BPV but I don't think we'll ever see that unfortunately. What a shame too.

209
Junior MemberJunior Member
209

PostApr 16, 2013#504

americancitizen wrote:I sense that when the BPV lot opens up it will be such easy money for the Cardinals that they will not want to take on the risk of developing those sites.
My fear as well. It's going to be interesting to see how it works out. The large lot directly across Broadway from the stadium seems full every game. IIRC those spots go for no less than $20. I would think the new spots at BPV will likely go for a $20 minimum as well. This will be a large number of additional $20 spots coming on the market. I recall $10 prices just a block or so south of the stadium at lots off of Gratiot. It would be interesting to track the stats on this as it happens: DT parking supply vs demand, price points, customer behavior, increased parking opportunities vs decrease ballgame Metrolink ridership, etc.

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostApr 20, 2013#505




1,054
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,054

PostApr 21, 2013#506

^ Marvelous. Although the design is meh, I do think it will have a positive effect on the area north of 64 and south of Market. It's great to finally see it moving along!

827
Super MemberSuper Member
827

PostApr 21, 2013#507

This should hopefully be a both/and addition to downtown, capturing St. Louis Countians, et al., who woulda come in right at game time or zipped back home right after the game. This beginning will also offer a piece of the St. Louis Cardinals to fans and visitors alike 365ish days a year.

PostApr 21, 2013#508

^Rather than an either/or addition, stealing from Wash Ave., Soulard, etc.

3,548
Life MemberLife Member
3,548

PostApr 21, 2013#509

^ I also see Ballpark Village being a successful development. Our answer to the Power and Light district, but with a more consistent and lucrative base in Cardinals fans. I imagine this place will be rocking when the Cards make the playoffs and future phases will come sooner than we think.

2,687
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
2,687

PostApr 22, 2013#510

Alex Ihnen wrote:Free after 7pm in CWE during the week.
I'm fine with free neighborhood parking, but I mean downtown. In my neighborhood in Chicago we have plenty of free parking, as well as paid parking, and permit parking. The pay parking is on the commercial areas of the neighborhood, in front of bars, restaurants, and storefronts. The residential areas are a mixture of permit and free parking. If I were to park now, it's Sunday night, I'd probably not find much, or have to circle around for 20 minutes until I catch a person pulling out. We all get tickets very often too. While up here it really is overkill, there are days when I've worked 18 hours straight and I'm getting back at the dead of night, with not a spot around. I'm so exhausted a 60 dollar ticket is worth not having to drive around for 30 minutes to only find parking 6 blocks away. In addition, people have been shot in my neighborhood for stupid reasons, usually at these odd hours I get home. Now being an urbanist , I'm down with not having to use my car much at all, but my job requires it sadly.

719
Senior MemberSenior Member
719

PostApr 22, 2013#511


An attempt to put some of the official renderings in the context of the project area:
Ballpark Village Construction Underway

PostApr 22, 2013#512

^ I would love to hear the nextSTL forum members' take on phase one of Ballpark Village. What do you think will happen? Will it be built as is, with no changes for a decade? Or will investors and developers be energized by this first phase? I'm disappointed with current plans but if it leads to a quality development I guess I'd be willing to give it a (weak) thumbs up.

4,553
Life MemberLife Member
4,553

PostApr 23, 2013#513

My expectations are extremely low. I expect to see a lot of parking lot for years to come. Even if they do build more, my expectations are that it will be something saccarin and suburban and not add very much to Downtown. If they ever do announce another office or residential tower, I'll greet it with a strong dose of Show Me State skepticism.

That being said, my expectations for downtown as a whole could not be higher.

3,548
Life MemberLife Member
3,548

PostApr 23, 2013#514

My thoughts.

Ballpark Village has surely been a disappointment up to this point with so many delays and scale downs, but I'm rather optimistic moving forward. My view of Ballpark Village is one of missed opportunities and future potential.

missed opportunities:

1) Not immediately restoring the street grid.
2) A rather insular development with little context to the downtown as a whole.
3) Like #2, no incorporation of the hideous stadium garages into future plans.
4) A very passive development strategy, seems like there is little confidence in the downtown market despite explosive growth and demand.
5) No details or solid plans for future phases. No renderings of what the NEW completed project may look like.
6) No attempts at trying to pre-lease condos or office space, something that other cities do all the time. This should be some of the most valuable real estate in the region with arch view, close proximity to stadium, and a burgeoning downtown residential/start up scene. I think they would be surprised at how fast apartments and condos would be leased in this "baseball crazed" town.

future potential:

1)I believe the Ballpark Village is within the Civic Center/Ballpark TOD planning area. Maybe Cordish, the Cardinals, and Metro could partner on something unique and truly make it a village.
2) Downtown's nearly complete form based code may help guide future development.
3) Shovels in the ground may spark investment interest in and around Ballpark Village.
4) Proximity to Busch Stadium will obviously benefit this place and make it a money maker no mater how cheesy it is.
5) Changed perceptions of downtown for many suburbanites.
6) We will no longer have a huge crater in the middle of our downtown when Cardinal games are national syndicated.

Overall, the future potential outweighs the missed opportunities (IMHO). Missed opportunities also have the potential to be fixed.

PostApr 23, 2013#515

the count wrote:
An attempt to put some of the official renderings in the context of the project area:
Ballpark Village Construction Underway
If you dont mind me asking Count, what program do you use to do your renderings.

1,320
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,320

PostApr 23, 2013#516

What they've put out there so far is a sea of asphalt with a cutesy little building in the middle. I do believe there's potential that a developer or three could do something great with the outparcels and turn this project area around. I hope for that, but I'm prepared to be disappointed if necessary.

722
Senior MemberSenior Member
722

PostApr 23, 2013#517

Presbyterian wrote:I hope for that, but I'm prepared to be disappointed if necessary.
I long for the days when we don't have to couch every single future development prediction this way.

1,054
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,054

PostApr 23, 2013#518

the count wrote:^ I would love to hear the nextSTL forum members' take on phase one of Ballpark Village. What do you think will happen? Will it be built as is, with no changes for a decade? Or will investors and developers be energized by this first phase? I'm disappointed with current plans but if it leads to a quality development I guess I'd be willing to give it a (weak) thumbs up.
Actually, I have a feeling it will be very successful, and that we will see a residential tower or more mixed use in the area by 2020. Laugh as you will, but I seriously believe that.

722
Senior MemberSenior Member
722

PostApr 23, 2013#519

^ No sense in laughing at being hopeful for something great happening in this city! I think we're all hopeful; it's what we have in common on this forum.

I don't share your optimism, though. I'm afraid they might be skittish to continue development after what a pain this first phase has been... and they might make too much money via the parking lot model to justify taking more risks. But I've been wrong before, and I certainly hope I am here.

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostApr 23, 2013#520

^^ 7 more years - that's likely not too optimistic - though it puts the residential tower 14 years after development plans were announced

719
Senior MemberSenior Member
719

PostApr 23, 2013#521

goat314 wrote:If you dont mind me asking Count, what program do you use to do your renderings.
Photoshop.

PostApr 23, 2013#522

rawest1 wrote:^ No sense in laughing at being hopeful for something great happening in this city! I think we're all hopeful; it's what we have in common on this forum.

I don't share your optimism, though. I'm afraid they might be skittish to continue development after what a pain this first phase has been... and they might make too much money via the parking lot model to justify taking more risks. But I've been wrong before, and I certainly hope I am here.
I am worried about that as well, as they will make plenty no-risk money on the parking. This will be a popular lot, not only for Cards games but also for the Arch grounds/museum and Kiener Plaza, once the lid is on.

722
Senior MemberSenior Member
722

PostApr 23, 2013#523

the count wrote:
rawest1 wrote:^ No sense in laughing at being hopeful for something great happening in this city! I think we're all hopeful; it's what we have in common on this forum.

I don't share your optimism, though. I'm afraid they might be skittish to continue development after what a pain this first phase has been... and they might make too much money via the parking lot model to justify taking more risks. But I've been wrong before, and I certainly hope I am here.
I am worried about that as well, as they will make plenty no-risk money on the parking. This will be a popular lot, not only for Cards games but also for the Arch grounds/museum and Kiener Plaza, once the lid is on.
Yeah, I mean I think there's a reason there's so much parking downtown, much to the chagrin of us all, and that is it's market-driven. For the past few decades until just the past ten years or so, that was probably about the only kind of development that "promised" safe profits.

35
New MemberNew Member
35

PostApr 24, 2013#524

What I'm worried about is the sea of parking surrounding it becoming permanent. Sure they say that they're going to develop it later, but I think people are going to get so used to having that convenient surface parking that if they try to develop it we'll hear suburbanites' typical "OMG where are we going to park there's nowhere to park downtown blah blah blah." I think it'd be better if they just left the dirt in place to avoid that temptation.

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostApr 24, 2013#525

Would have been nice for the city to have a moratorium on new surface parking in place. I just can't get the image of the top decks of Ballpark east & west garages empty during games out of my head...

Read more posts (5131 remaining)