1,864
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,864

PostOct 25, 2016#2551

If the sales tax is only applied to the BPV property then I say let them have it.

1,523
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,523

PostOct 26, 2016#2552

chaifetz10 wrote:If the sales tax is only applied to the BPV property then I say let them have it.
As I understand it this will be an additional % added to sales tax -Which I think would make it like CID tax on sales in the district - I don't have any problem with that

As far as design - This turned out better than I was anticipating - especially given what was produced a few years back when Stifel Nicolaus was looking at the site

I know there has been plenty of frustration with timing on this, but honestly given some of the options of the past this might be the right time for this development - Keeping the ball rolling (though very slowly) downtown

Between Centene, Wash U's campus development, the other big downtown projects (Jeff Arms, etc...) The Foundry, Cortex, BPV II, BJC and whatever ends up in the CWE on the vacant lots the next 4 years could be the most transformative in the last 50

1,585
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,585

PostOct 26, 2016#2553

beer city wrote:
Between Centene, Wash U's campus development, the other big downtown projects (Jeff Arms, etc...) The Foundry, Cortex, BPV II, BJC and whatever ends up in the CWE on the vacant lots the next 4 years could be the most transformative in the last 50
That's a major reason for my optimism. The city has some real momentum right now and the Cardinals can now join in and ride it as opposed to trying to create it.

103
Junior MemberJunior Member
103

PostOct 26, 2016#2554

Not to get to ahead of ourselves but it was nice to read in one of the articles that they plan to build on the remaining 3 lots in the future. I think he said possibly a hotel, more office, and commercial. He also said there was no timetable and it could be right after phase 2 is complete.

1,864
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,864

PostOct 26, 2016#2555

^If the leasing goes quick, I would be money that a phase 3 is announced mid phase 2. Similar to Power & Light. Now we'll get to see what the residential demand for BPV really is!

PostOct 26, 2016#2556

One final thought (for now at least): if/when construction gets started for Phase 2, the current parking lot will pretty much be taken up for staging, materials, and other construction needs. The current BPV operations will need to be tweaked to allow for their food/beverage deliveries as they currently have loading docks on the East & West side. I'm also curious to see what they do with the current concert stage outside. I would guess they go back to a portable set up version and host concerts in the parking lots once everything is built as well as continuing to utilize the indoor one too.

3,433
Life MemberLife Member
3,433

PostOct 26, 2016#2557

Just came from Boston where development around Fenway Park has been taking off, with retail (City Target) as well as residential. Hopefully BPV Phase II could spur similar development around it.

1,218
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,218

PostOct 26, 2016#2558

With this announcement, the Cards are committing to Busch-III. With Busch-II only lasting 40 years, I feared Busch-IV would be proposed some time around 2046 in a different location. Now that looks unlikely if they build this phase.

2,327
Life MemberLife Member
2,327

PostOct 26, 2016#2559

gary kreie wrote:Just came from Boston where development around Fenway Park has been taking off, with retail (City Target) as well as residential. Hopefully BPV Phase II could spur similar development around it.
Look at all those surface lots! What a travesty!!

2,430
Life MemberLife Member
2,430

PostOct 26, 2016#2560

gary kreie wrote:Just came from Boston where development around Fenway Park has been taking off, with retail (City Target) as well as residential. Hopefully BPV Phase II could spur similar development around it.
It would be nice if the next phase can draw some retail beyond the bars/restaurant especially as there will be some office workers and residents, but I'm not sure what would be the right fit in an area that will still lack high density even when included the surrounding blocks. Things like a CVS or small Target, if they are interested in downtown, seem to make more sense north of Market. But maybe something like an Under Armour or Nike store could work well.

195
Junior MemberJunior Member
195

PostOct 26, 2016#2561

Mark Groth wrote:With this announcement, the Cards are committing to Busch-III. With Busch-II only lasting 40 years, I feared Busch-IV would be proposed some time around 2046 in a different location. Now that looks unlikely if they build this phase.
40 years is an eternity by modern standards too. Derek Jeter had a longer career than Turner Field did.

2,634
Life MemberLife Member
2,634

PostOct 26, 2016#2562

Hopefully this can get the ball rolling on the Mike Shannon's property or the block directly to the East of the stadium. Maybe even a transformation of the Millennium Hotel? Damn you blind but infectious optimism.

215
Junior MemberJunior Member
215

PostOct 26, 2016#2563

Any chance that the height restriction on The Mike Shannon property would be raised in the event that new development were proposed?

Also, is it possible for Bpv to expand its physical footprint if the owners acquired adjecent properties? Like the garages or mike Shannon's property for example.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

5,261
Life MemberLife Member
5,261

PostOct 27, 2016#2564

user28 wrote:Any chance that the height restriction on The Mike Shannon property would be raised in the event that new development were proposed?

Also, is it possible for Bpv to expand its physical footprint if the owners acquired adjecent properties? Like the garages or mike Shannon's property for example.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If the Cordish Companies and the Cardinals agree, they could very well purchase the 2 garages and the Mike Shannons site. But I only see them buying the Mike Shannons site in the event they do want to expand their footprint since the Garages wouldn't add much to the Village. But the garages do need a renovation.

PostOct 27, 2016#2565

Has anyone seen an Article with the Cordish Companies mentioned in it for this Phase 2. I don't recall seeing their name in any of the new stories. If their isn't, I guess the Cordish Companies are hiding away from this project now in a way.

PostOct 27, 2016#2566

I think it is interesting to look back over the past decade and see how much Ballpark Village has changed. Although the remaining Ballpark Village Phases will be transformational, I don't think we will see anything nearly as badass as the plan from 2006. But we are getting close. If we want to have a really good looking project, the remaining lots for Phase 3 should be all high-rise, no mid or low rise.
THE PAST RENDERINGS





THE PRESENT COMPLETED


THE FUTURE



But I cant wait to see the return of the high rise into Downtown especially on the Southern End of downtown where the skyline isn't as full as the Northern End of the Skyline. I also cant wait to see the return of Cranes to downtown. phase 2 and the Cuypples X Building will both bring cranes. But I am sure we all cant wait until phase 3 is announced and whatever comes along in the city in the next few years.

6,123
Life MemberLife Member
6,123

PostOct 27, 2016#2567

This should be about how it will look from across the river.



Not a dramatic addition, but visible. From the riverfront it should look about the same height as the Millennium. (Very very approximately.) The site plan is deep enough that you should see it anyway, but it won't stand out dramatically at 320ish a few blocks behind a 290 foot tower. (I failed to check the elevation difference, so that might not be quite right, but it should be closeish.) It will look more dramatic from the stadium immediately to the south, when you're seeing the skinny side and looking up more.

5,261
Life MemberLife Member
5,261

PostOct 27, 2016#2568

symphonicpoet wrote:This should be about how it will look from across the river.



Not a dramatic addition, but visible. From the riverfront it should look about the same height as the Millennium. (Very very approximately.) The site plan is deep enough that you should see it anyway, but it won't stand out dramatically at 320ish a few blocks behind a 290 foot tower. (I failed to check the elevation difference, so that might not be quite right, but it should be closeish.) It will look more dramatic from the stadium immediately to the south, when you're seeing the skinny side and looking up more.
Cool mock up image of what the city would look like with the building. I noticed it right away.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

6,123
Life MemberLife Member
6,123

PostOct 27, 2016#2569

I suspect it's a little too wide. I ganked the base skyline photo from the Wikimedia Commons. It's by a user that goes by Pwu2005. I'm not quite certain where they were standing, but I'm guessing probably the observation platform. And the portion of the building visible south of the Millennium would probably not be visible from there. So it's not far off, but probably a little.

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostOct 27, 2016#2570

Nice job, Poet.

I'd like to think it will stand out more, but you're probably pretty close. It's weird how Downtown seems to sink as it moves west. This tower will certainly help fill-in the south edge of DT, anyway. Maybe they'll add some dramatic lighting at the top.

428
Full MemberFull Member
428

PostOct 27, 2016#2571

Yea for those crossing interstate 64 it'll be a very nice addition to see.

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostOct 27, 2016#2572

joelo wrote:Yea for those crossing interstate 64 it'll be a very nice addition to see.
Same for those of us who come in on 44!

2,327
Life MemberLife Member
2,327

PostOct 27, 2016#2573

I'm thinking about Fox Cardinal broadcasts/MLB highlights!
The nation thinks we're a stagnant/dying city, nothing like cranes to start changing perceptions.

8,912
Life MemberLife Member
8,912

PostOct 27, 2016#2574

I really like the design of the residential tower. I want more glass building like this please.


13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostOct 27, 2016#2575

I hope "bpv^2" is a place holder.

Read more posts (3081 remaining)