You can make the case that any undertaking by the city has serious political undertakings but you can say the same for Greater Stl. Inc. in mind. What I would argue is that a vibrant downtown is the underpinning of a successful city so a target investment in the largest building around and maybe, just maybe you start getting growth to the point where some of those 20,000 zombie properties and lots start gaining value.dbInSouthCity wrote: ↑Dec 12, 2023^ city cannot do that when it has 20,000 vacant buildings on its rolls that need the same thing. It would be political suicide for any elected official to propose it. Now Greater StL Inc for profit real estate arm would make much for sense
In same breath, I like your idea of Greater Stl Inc. as it would better for a few reasons starting with less cumbersome red tape/political agendas on any decision after the city were to purchase it but also trying to understand the mechanics. I believe Greater Stl Inc is buy in or incorporates more politic entities then just city itself so therefore you have different political pushback and consequences. Heck, a few of us thought the County approach to Convention Expansion was definitely hurtful to the city and region as a whole. However, understand that Greater Stl Inc has a private investment arm so see where they could buy 909 free of some of the politics aside, which is a huge plus. .






