3,757
Life MemberLife Member
3,757

PostApr 29, 2024#1001

Glad demo is not an option. That would put a huge hole in our skyline that would not likely get replaced by anything close to 44 stories. 

915

PostApr 29, 2024#1002

dbInSouthCity wrote:
Apr 29, 2024
Building isn’t getting demolished.  Too much free tax credit money

Building can  handle parking decks but that will be the last resort.  Owner is looking to buy the lot behind where Bailey’s range was for a small garage.  

Also the building is in very good condition.
Good to see - when activated, the lights on this building will add to the skyline and feel of activity downtown. Although not a popular building, diverse architecture across decades is good, including brutalist. Downtown needs a handful of modern high rises to fill out and catch up for having only one new high rise build in the last 30 years, hopefully on the eastern edges between ballpark and arch and along the gateway mall. 

If they are going to build a new parking garage, I'd really like to see that at least have 5 stories of residential on top. We do not need any new  "parking garage only structures". We have too many of those from the 80s that eat up space and kill activity. The new way to build is at least to have residential on top and maximize use and revenue of the property. In the downtowns building up rapidly today that I have visited, all the new parking garages are the first several floors of the project, not only a parking garage 

6,118
Life MemberLife Member
6,118

PostApr 29, 2024#1003

^I used to enjoy seeing them do things with the lights at night. Saw it as a Christmas tree, or with a Cards logo for the playoffs. These are silly games, but it's the sort of thing that gives a city a bit of pride. I really hope they get it activated again. Not sure why it's unpopular. I love that building.

655
Senior MemberSenior Member
655

PostApr 30, 2024#1004

It was one of 50 buildings selected in this book describing highlights of St. Louis architecture: American City

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostApr 30, 2024#1005

The PD's art and architecture critic at the time described it as "unquestionably one of HOK's finest designs".

1,607
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,607

PostApr 30, 2024#1006

good, including brutalist. Downtown needs a handful of modern high rises to fill out and catch up for having only one new high rise build in the last 30 years, hopefully on the eastern edges between ballpark and arch and along the gateway mall.  
We have two. Robert’s Tower Apartment building. I always enjoy seeing it peak out of the skyline coming from market or olive.

8,904
Life MemberLife Member
8,904

PostApr 30, 2024#1007

TheWayoftheArch_V2.0 wrote:
good, including brutalist. Downtown needs a handful of modern high rises to fill out and catch up for having only one new high rise build in the last 30 years, hopefully on the eastern edges between ballpark and arch and along the gateway mall.  
We have two. Robert’s Tower Apartment building. I always enjoy seeing it peak out of the skyline coming from market or olive.
The 4 Seasons in downtown and is almost 300ft and was build in the last 20yrs.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

2,430
Life MemberLife Member
2,430

PostApr 30, 2024#1008

The Eagleton Courthouse of course is a federal building but it also was built in the past 30 years.... opened in 2000 so coming up on 25.  It's 550' and apparently the largest single courthouse in the nation.

6,118
Life MemberLife Member
6,118

PostApr 30, 2024#1009

framer wrote:
Apr 30, 2024
The PD's art and architecture critic at the time described it as "unquestionably one of HOK's finest designs".
I've always kind of hero-worshipped Obata from a distance. And now I have I think two friends who probably worked with him at some point or other. (Just in the last couple of years suddenly I start meeting architects. In orchestras, mind. Or German language clubs. So odd places. But still.) Finding floorplans for the place on this forum was a really cool moment. Learning how the elevators worked. Seeing that one oddball urbex video that was up for a while. Yeah. It's a really cool building. And AT&T is bonkers for abandoning it. (But they've clearly been bonkers for a while.)

1,607
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,607

PostMay 02, 2024#1010

moorlander wrote:
Apr 30, 2024
TheWayoftheArch_V2.0 wrote:
good, including brutalist. Downtown needs a handful of modern high rises to fill out and catch up for having only one new high rise build in the last 30 years, hopefully on the eastern edges between ballpark and arch and along the gateway mall.  
We have two. Robert’s Tower Apartment building. I always enjoy seeing it peak out of the skyline coming from market or olive.
The 4 Seasons in downtown and is almost 300ft and was build in the last 20yrs.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
All hail the skidhawk!

296
Full MemberFull Member
296

PostMay 07, 2024#1011


706
Senior MemberSenior Member
706

PostMay 07, 2024#1012

^ Paywalled. What's the consensus?

8,904
Life MemberLife Member
8,904

PostMay 08, 2024#1013

The tallest building in Ft. Worth, in one of the fastest growing regions in the country, just sold at a whopping 91% discount price is just 3 years. We are not alone.

https://x.com/triplenetinvest/status/17 ... KjVjNb_Kng

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostMay 09, 2024#1014

Yeah, these are weird times. 

2,622
Life MemberLife Member
2,622

PostMay 10, 2024#1015

That is one ugly building

5,704
Life MemberLife Member
5,704

PostMay 10, 2024#1016

framer wrote:
May 09, 2024
Yeah, these are weird times. 
I honestly don't think it is weird times for real estate.  

I think 909 Chestnut and the Fort Worth building shows how convoluted the tax code is as it relates to these large properties and transactions take place, how they are set up as stand alone entities/companies and sold off on pennies to the dollars.   These type of losses are being reported on someone's, some companies taxes as write off's, losses to either dampen their net income and or written off at a different date to generate some cash via tax refund.  

 By no stretch of the imagination a tax expert, or real estate expert, or expert of anything but I think you could make an argument that the tax code has favored some large players to play a shell game of riding the peaks and taking advantage of the lows with these real estate deals.  Keep reading articles on the crushing debt coming due on commercial loans/credit but somehow things are not collapsing.  My gut feeling is the collapse will not be what it is made out to be because the tax code lets the players involved carry and recover a significant chunk of the losses..   

1,793
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,793

PostMay 10, 2024#1017

The loan to value ratio on commercial real estate isn’t very high. That helps stave off collapse.

9,531
Life MemberLife Member
9,531

PostMay 14, 2024#1018

New owner is in town all this week for meetings with people. This is his 3rd multi day visit since April.

296
Full MemberFull Member
296

PostMay 27, 2024#1019

I write this with sobriety 
I have noticed the conversation here with regard to parking /AT&t building 
I also read the word fantasy and I wish written here  on numerous threats 
The classic old AT&T building that's sits  west of the Brutalist   AT&t building; what about retrofitting that building or part of it into parking?  I know it'd be cheaper to tear it all down and build a garage but did I mention the word fantasy and wishing. Could  the sequoia AT&T building  spare a few floors for parking?

18
New MemberNew Member
18

PostMay 27, 2024#1020

That is a terrible idea we do not need to turn any part of that building into parking.

PostMay 27, 2024#1021

There are at least 8 parking garages within a 3 block radius of AT&T and several surface parking lots. No way they should be doing anything to historic buildings

9,531
Life MemberLife Member
9,531

PostMay 27, 2024#1022

^ that’s irrelevant if the owner of att doesn’t control those

18
New MemberNew Member
18

PostMay 27, 2024#1023

Can they not rent spots or purchase one? Anything is better than disfiguring a historic building

474
Full MemberFull Member
474

PostMay 27, 2024#1024

@ugbrokeft you have to understand that people prefer parking within the same building where they work or in worst case adjacent building with a skywalk.

18
New MemberNew Member
18

PostMay 27, 2024#1025

I think it’s time we move past that type of thinking and focus on human-centered downtowns

Read more posts (390 remaining)