^I forgot about helicopter tours lol
Sent from my SM-A366U using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-A366U using Tapatalk
Luckily, we don't have deficit spending.gone corporate wrote:^Yeah, but that's currency disparities as well as massive, massive, massive deficit spending.
Pretty sure it can't change otherwise it would lose historic status for tax credits.spongboymebob00 wrote:Does anyone think that the exterior facade of the building will change?
Sent from my SM-A366U using Tapatalk
Yeah honestly if they can really change anything. I hope they change the glass color to Blue. would that be too much of a modificationDogtownBnR wrote:If they light up the exterior in grand fashion, major changes to the exterior will not be as necessary. That being said, the building is bland, but a reclad would add way too much expense, as much as I would love to see the with much more glass.
Unlikely. The state and federal tax credits being utilized by the developer would limit exterior modifications. Past projects that we have completed have had strict requirements regarding exterior. Replacement windows typically have to match exact original (wood with same details), mortar has to match original with mortar detail being provided, so on and so forth.spongboymebob00 wrote: ↑3:25 AM - Mar 04Does anyone think that the exterior facade of the building will change?
Sent from my SM-A366U using Tapatalk
I was a fan of the "Beacon on Chestnut" concept years back. It is simple, but lighting goes a long way.DogtownBnR wrote: ↑7:33 PM - Mar 04If they light up the exterior in grand fashion, major changes to the exterior will not be as necessary. That being said, the building is bland, but a reclad would add way too much expense, as much as I would love to see the with much more glass.

