Too bad they couldn't save the facades of those buildings for the new project.moorlander wrote:All of this would be lost.
Probably cost prohibitive.
Too bad they couldn't save the facades of those buildings for the new project.moorlander wrote:All of this would be lost.
I think the first Crossing on Clayton building is a 245 unit proposal, which would make an even 600 units between these two. It was last reported it was supposed to start construction this Spring... anyone have an update? If you throw in the 250 or so apartments proposed as the first phase of the project across 64/40, that is a heck of a lot of new construction multi-family that could be coming on the market in a year or so.arch city wrote:I like it. I think the glass and height alone will further modernize the skyline - especially if The Crossing goes up too. ?
Definitely one of the best elements of the design.arch city wrote: I like the soaring triangulated base accent design - which is also a departure from your typical base entrances.
Let me try to explain 1 point of view on this. I don't think anyone "hates" Clayton. I'm really glad that people like it and find it a great place to live/raise a family/root down and be part of. Wave that flag and be proud. Be happy you just got a big new tower. But here's the rub. Centene was going to build an HQ at BPV....things didn't pan out and they found a better situation in Clayton. Bad for St. Louis tax base, reputation and vibrancy. Good for Clayton tax base, reputation, vibrancy. A wash or general plus for "the region". What the big deal? It's all good, the majority of the region will say...St. Louis benefits from Montgomery and Centene and RGA , etc too what does it matter where they "actually" are. But, here's where you may feel some sourness on the whole Clayton vs. St. Louis thing from some St. Louisans: the endless b*tching about St. Louis from county people. What are their beefs? Horrible schools and horrible crime. My personal response has become (because fighting back is futile and I'm getting tired of the confrontation), you are either part of the problem or the solution. So, if one chooses to not pay St. Louis taxes (how schools are funded), not vote on St. Louis offices and ballot initiatives (how our leadership is defined), not work their ass off to help make it harder for criminals and thugs to operate in the city, and not work on making the city schools a better place and moving to the burbs where the schools and crime are already a-ok...well there's the thing. I think it's not hatred as you said, just getting tired of bait/switch and not being able to compete with your neighbor who has much greater resources and initiative. It's not an easy or pleasant situation. We need change for sure. I for one don't hate Clayton, I just wish St. Louis had more money and jobs and residents to help fund our schools and crime problems.BrickCity4470 wrote:I don't get the hatred towards Clayton?
I thought they were one in the same until someone mentioned them as separate things earlier today. Thought this was another updated rendering. Now I'm jealous for downtown.framer wrote:Seems to me that this design is quite similar to The Crossing a couple of blocks south.
I completely agree. We need a NS line, badly. Public Transportation is becoming 'in' and St Louis should capitalize on it. I am stunned STL hasn't built a commuter rail line from Downtown to Pacificnewstl2020 wrote: I am amazed the last year and a half hasn't sent everyone in the state clamoring to fund a N/S metrolink line, as well as an additional southwest line through the city. The common denominator of development in the region seems pretty obvious at this point.