3,775
Life MemberLife Member
3,775

PostOct 30, 2012#276

^I'm just curious and maybe I'm totally missing something here. Where did the idea
that Stan Kroenke owns Union Station come from? My understanding is that THF
was close to buying Union Station, but LHM actually purchased it. THF would "possibly"
be the developer, but does not own it. Many Rams fans have been making themselves feel better, by reading into Stan's alleged purchase of Union Station, as a reason to believe he will not move the team. It was viewed as a positive, that he is investing in STL. What is the connection between LHM and THF besides the owner, LHM, possibly letting Stan's company (the one he just took over), develop Union Station for him. Stan would be working for LHM, not taking on any actual ownership in Union Station. Am I missing something here?


http://www.stltoday.com/business/local/ ... 0f31a.html
Bob O'Loughlin – whose Lodging Hospitality Management is scheduled to close this week on the station's purchase

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostOct 30, 2012#277

^ Right. Stan/THF did not purchase Union Station. They may, however, be a partner in its development. That's all we know.

3,775
Life MemberLife Member
3,775

PostOct 31, 2012#278

Alex, have you heard anything at all regarding the soccer stadium?

Are they keeping quiet, still denying it..etc... ?

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostOct 31, 2012#279

All quiet. They're still exploring the idea, but it takes quite a bit of time. The upside to finding out early is knowing about it, the downside is knowing about it months if not years ahead of any formal agreement/announcement.

1,320
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,320

PostFeb 01, 2013#280

Renderings from a Downtown Partnership meeting this morning. They don't tell us much. LHM is spending $63 million on the project. Over $9 million will go to restore the actual shed. We'll get conference space, renovated hotel, museum space, railroad excursions.






536
Senior MemberSenior Member
536

PostFeb 01, 2013#281

Did they mention anything about the MLS stadium? Also in the first picture it kinda looks like the trains are moving, is that the platform for the excursions? could be kinda cool

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostFeb 01, 2013#282

I'm more confused than ever. Those trains would have to jump over the lake to go anywhere, and why does it look like an unemployment office under the shed?

136
Junior MemberJunior Member
136

PostFeb 01, 2013#283

framer wrote:I'm more confused than ever. Those trains would have to jump over the lake to go anywhere, and why does it look like an unemployment office under the shed?
Those trains (I would bet) are stationary and part of the museum component.

195
Junior MemberJunior Member
195

PostFeb 01, 2013#284

^Those trains are likely part of a museum installation, Bob O'Laughlin mentioned that the museum was going to be a transportation museum.

He did, however, say several times that one of the goals of the project was to make Union Station an active train station again. As Presbyterian said, they are planning to add excursion trains. It sounded like the focus was going to be on sports packages for weekend jaunts to places like KC and Chicago. He said they were trying to partner with local teams to have them take the train to their destination with the fans. I think he said they were looking at the Rams preseason game in KC next year.
Did they mention anything about the MLS stadium? Also in the first picture it kinda looks like the trains are moving, is that the platform for the excursions? could be kinda cool
No mention of an MLS stadium. It sounded like they were going to focus on making it an attractive convention venue to keep the hotel viable and add office space.

He mentioned something about bringing in a Disney Christmas show for next year, but the details (or my memory of them) were vague.

4,553
Life MemberLife Member
4,553

PostFeb 01, 2013#285

Charterd antique trains to Louisville for the Derby or Cincy for Cards-Reds would be incredible, and there wouldn't be any competition from Amtrak:


195
Junior MemberJunior Member
195

PostFeb 04, 2013#286

^ Now that you mention it I think I remember O'Laughlin mentioning a Derby excursion.

126
Junior MemberJunior Member
126

PostApr 22, 2013#287

O'Loughlin says work to begin by the end of this month. He again mentions "excursion trains", which I don't understand. Would these compete with Amtrak?

http://stlouis.cbslocal.com/2013/04/22/ ... -to-begin/

1,864
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,864

PostApr 22, 2013#288

^I think the answer is yes and no. I'm assuming the trains will be for event specific dates and times and not for people just wanting to commute back and forth for work/personal reasons; similar to a private tour bus. It would be cool to take one down to Cape Girardeau for a day or down to Lake of the Ozarks though.

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostApr 22, 2013#289

Perhaps to Indy for the 500 or Louisville for the Derby, etc. Those wouldn't compete with Amtrak in any way.

7,813
Life MemberLife Member
7,813

PostApr 24, 2013#290

Another article about the renovation.

http://www.stltoday.com/business/local/ ... 4abe8.html

The comments section is pure comedy gold.

And off topic: what is this Ed Golterman's deal? Sometimes he has a good point, but most of the time he's one short step from Illuminati/Tri-Lateral Commission/9-11 Conspiracy territory.

35
New MemberNew Member
35

PostApr 24, 2013#291

dweebe wrote:Another article about the renovation.

http://www.stltoday.com/business/local/ ... 4abe8.html

The comments section is pure comedy gold.

And off topic: what is this Ed Golterman's deal? Sometimes he has a good point, but most of the time he's one short step from Illuminati/Tri-Lateral Commission/9-11 Conspiracy territory.
He thinks the Kiel Opera House can solve ALL of metropolitan St. Louis' problems and he doesn't like gay people. In a nutshell.

1,320
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,320

PostApr 24, 2013#292

Gotta love Ed. His Linkedin page lists "Public Relations and Social Media" as his top skills. And you have to admit, life would be less interesting without him. :D

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostApr 24, 2013#293

I thought an upscale retailer was in the works... I guess not.

Hopefully the excursion train works out.... seems like they could utilize a museum/interpretive portion as part of that project to help as a small attraction.
btw, an excursion train opened a year or to ago in the Columbia area:
http://dinnertrain.com/
JPCosgrove wrote:
dweebe wrote:And off topic: what is this Ed Golterman's deal? Sometimes he has a good point, but most of the time he's one short step from Illuminati/Tri-Lateral Commission/9-11 Conspiracy territory.
He thinks the Kiel Opera House can solve ALL of metropolitan St. Louis' problems and he doesn't like gay people. In a nutshell.
Really? I hadn't noticed that latter aspect of Golterman.

7,813
Life MemberLife Member
7,813

PostApr 24, 2013#294

roger wyoming II wrote:I thought an upscale retailer was in the works... I guess not.

Hopefully the excursion train works out.... seems like they could utilize a museum/interpretive portion as part of that project to help as a small attraction.
btw, an excursion train opened a year or to ago in the Columbia area:
http://dinnertrain.com/
JPCosgrove wrote:
dweebe wrote:And off topic: what is this Ed Golterman's deal? Sometimes he has a good point, but most of the time he's one short step from Illuminati/Tri-Lateral Commission/9-11 Conspiracy territory.
He thinks the Kiel Opera House can solve ALL of metropolitan St. Louis' problems and he doesn't like gay people. In a nutshell.
Really? I hadn't noticed that latter aspect of Golterman.
I saw the his recent posts where he got pretty ticked off about Pride Fest being moved downtown to the area around Soldier's Memorial.

It just seems that any article about the city involves him claiming that most of our problems could be solved by the Peabody hosting Broadway plays 300 nights a year.

35
New MemberNew Member
35

PostApr 24, 2013#295

He seems totally oblivious to the fact that the Kiel HAS been restored and it's not having the effect he thinks it should--more proof that silver bullet projects don't magically transform neighborhoods (see: Peabody, Busch Stadium, Union Station, etc.)

Even if it did have Broadway plays 300 nights a year (which is insane), that alone is not going to turn Market into Michigan Ave.

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostApr 24, 2013#296

JPCosgrove wrote:He seems totally oblivious to the fact that the Kiel HAS been restored and it's not having the effect he thinks it should--more proof that silver bullet projects don't magically transform neighborhoods (see: Peabody, Busch Stadium, Union Station, etc.)

Even if it did have Broadway plays 300 nights a year (which is insane), that alone is not going to turn Market into Michigan Ave.
His argument is that Kiel Center should have been done as a performing arts center and not as just another venue with an occasional show and competing for weddings and banquets. I really don't know the capacity/potential of the Kiel facility itself, but it is not insane to expect downtown to have 300 or so nights a year. A downtown performing arts center would be huge, especially helping during winter months. Vibrant downtown performing arts aren't silver bullet, but they help diversify the attractions and bring a steady stream of heavy spenders on a consistent basis. I'd love for downtown Saint Louis to have another 1 million+ visitors a year. Again, I don't know if the Kiel itself could fulfill that role, but the market is there.

7,813
Life MemberLife Member
7,813

PostApr 24, 2013#297

roger wyoming II wrote:
JPCosgrove wrote:He seems totally oblivious to the fact that the Kiel HAS been restored and it's not having the effect he thinks it should--more proof that silver bullet projects don't magically transform neighborhoods (see: Peabody, Busch Stadium, Union Station, etc.)

Even if it did have Broadway plays 300 nights a year (which is insane), that alone is not going to turn Market into Michigan Ave.
His argument is that Kiel Center should have been done as a performing arts center and not as just another venue with an occasional show and competing for weddings and banquets. I really don't know the capacity/potential of the Kiel facility itself, but it is not insane to expect downtown to have 300 or so nights a year. A downtown performing arts center would be huge, especially helping during winter months. Vibrant downtown performing arts aren't silver bullet, but they help diversify the attractions and bring a steady stream of heavy spenders on a consistent basis. I'd love for downtown Saint Louis to have another 1 million+ visitors a year. Again, I don't know if the Kiel itself could fulfill that role, but the market is there.
I know I'm sending this further off-tangent so I apologize.

But when you and Ed say "performing arts center" what do you mean? Can you give an example in another city?

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostApr 24, 2013#298

I hesitate to weigh in, but Ed's constantly talking about how KC is just killing STL is every respect you can possibly imagine. It's crap, bunk, BS, a mirage. The Peabody is a busy venue. It's a great addition to downtown - simply nothing to complain about there.

The venue was closed for 20 years and did 90 ticketed events, 80 private events and 16 weddings in its first year back. ~150,000 people attended events there.

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostApr 24, 2013#299

Alex Ihnen wrote:I hesitate to weigh in, but Ed's constantly talking about how KC is just killing STL is every respect you can possibly imagine. It's crap, bunk, BS, a mirage. The Peabody is a busy venue. It's a great addition to downtown - simply nothing to complain about there.
And the Fox doesn't seem to be suffering these days, either.

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostApr 24, 2013#300

dweebe wrote:But when you and Ed say "performing arts center" what do you mean? Can you give an example in another city?
A performing arts center is having a number of theaters in the same complex or district under one management roof.... the Kennedy Center in D.C. and Lincoln Center in New York are perhaps the most famous, but they also exist in medium sized cities as well, KC just opened the Kaufman Center. They may provide a range of offerings from ballet to opera to Broadway to whatever.

The one I'm most familiar with is Clevland's Playhouse Square and I think it is most apt in comparison to Saint Louis. Like Saint Louis, the Cleveland Orchestra is located elsewhere but Playhouse Square downtown has the Allen, State, Ohio, Palace and Hannah theaters all in the same compact area under management of the Playhouse Square Foundation. Besides sheer volume, one of the major benefits is that the multiple large-capacity theaters allow for extended Broadway runs of the most popular shows while bringing in other shows at the same time. So Cleveland can have Book of Mormom for an extended run while also hosting another Broadway show for a two week run at the same time, plus resident companies such as the Cleveland Opera, Great Lakes Theater, comedy and music acts, university partnerships and children's shows and whatever else is going on at the time.

Actually, here is the line-up for the next few weeks and its crazy active:
http://www.playhousesquare.org/default. ... ts-Tickets

Edit: The problem with Saint Louis is we only had the Fox stage for Broadway and that ties a lot of hands.... imagine if there were two or three other 2-3,000 seat theaters right next to it. The Peabody helps a bit, but I think only a coordinated performing arts center would allow the city to truly elevate its draw as a major performing arts destination.

Read more posts (49 remaining)