Never too late to bring the Chouteau Lake back!
Exactly.STLcommenter wrote:
Never too late to bring the Chouteau Lake back!
Sent from my SM-A366U using Tapatalk
Chouteau lake makes me think about another unused opportunity and there used to be a plan for bringing 10K new residents to the areas around Forest Park I remember. I feel like the Zoo could partner with some firm on the funding and could serve as a huge lifeline for future revenue streams... and the area has given the Zoo so much support that man it would be nice to see them do more housing/hotel developments as they develop a zoo outside of the city. And if you did a parking garage you could advertise so much easier and more fun and the zoo spends quite a bit of $$ on ads.
Right next to the park would be the easiest marketing for any apartment firm... ignore the jog in Oakland Ave, I didn't care enough to try and fix it, but the goal was to fit those brick buildings along the park strip. I also realize that's park land, but my thought was you would trade the neighborhood an awesome dog/kids park for moving Turtle park, or just keep the housing to the west of the bridge.
Right next to the park would be the easiest marketing for any apartment firm... ignore the jog in Oakland Ave, I didn't care enough to try and fix it, but the goal was to fit those brick buildings along the park strip. I also realize that's park land, but my thought was you would trade the neighborhood an awesome dog/kids park for moving Turtle park, or just keep the housing to the west of the bridge.
Oh absolutely not... I would fight tooth, nail, fire and brimstone against the removal of Turtle Park. That is a city landmark! Full rage mode would engage. ...hypothetically speaking, for a hypothetical scenario.pattimagee wrote: ↑2:04 PM - Sep 08Chouteau lake makes me think about another unused opportunity and there used to be a plan for bringing 10K new residents to the areas around Forest Park I remember. I feel like the Zoo could partner with some firm on the funding and could serve as a huge lifeline for future revenue streams... and the area has given the Zoo so much support that man it would be nice to see them do more housing/hotel developments as they develop a zoo outside of the city. And if you did a parking garage you could advertise so much easier and more fun and the zoo spends quite a bit of $$ on ads.
Right next to the park would be the easiest marketing for any apartment firm... ignore the jog in Oakland Ave, I didn't care enough to try and fix it, but the goal was to fit those brick buildings along the park strip. I also realize that's park land, but my thought was you would trade the neighborhood an awesome dog/kids park for moving Turtle park, or just keep the housing to the west of the bridge.
All cool with me! ...just move more housing further west where the park section is underused - honestly that Hampton/Oakland lot is the biggest underutilized spot. I have also pitched a few years ago tunneling 64 from the SW corner of Forest Park further east would also unlock so many awesome spots for some big apartment complexes on the west side of that area also.SRQ2STL wrote: ↑2:16 PM - Sep 08Oh absolutely not... I would fight tooth, nail, fire and brimstone against the removal of Turtle Park. That is a city landmark! Full rage mode would engage. ...hypothetically speaking, for a hypothetical scenario.pattimagee wrote: ↑2:04 PM - Sep 08Chouteau lake makes me think about another unused opportunity and there used to be a plan for bringing 10K new residents to the areas around Forest Park I remember. I feel like the Zoo could partner with some firm on the funding and could serve as a huge lifeline for future revenue streams... and the area has given the Zoo so much support that man it would be nice to see them do more housing/hotel developments as they develop a zoo outside of the city. And if you did a parking garage you could advertise so much easier and more fun and the zoo spends quite a bit of $$ on ads.
Right next to the park would be the easiest marketing for any apartment firm... ignore the jog in Oakland Ave, I didn't care enough to try and fix it, but the goal was to fit those brick buildings along the park strip. I also realize that's park land, but my thought was you would trade the neighborhood an awesome dog/kids park for moving Turtle park, or just keep the housing to the west of the bridge.
While it makes some sense to turn that underutilized park space into residential, it's just never going to happen with the Charter amendment that requires a public vote to use existing park land for anything but park land. Although given what the BOA did with Interco Plaza, maybe it's not so impossible...
I think if you partnered it with a housing plan and the idea was to lower housing costs and increase population in the city... I feel like this vote would be 80% for... we've just never tried it before. Granted if it went to a vote we leave Turtle park alone, lolMattnSTL wrote: ↑3:48 PM - Sep 08While it makes some sense to turn that underutilized park space into residential, it's just never going to happen with the Charter amendment that requires a public vote to use existing park land for anything but park land. Although given what the BOA did with Interco Plaza, maybe it's not so impossible...
And honestly just have FPF do the project... they own the land already.
Or replace the highway with a boulevard and zone the remaining extra space for mixed used buildings 10 stories or higher
Oh yeah - could you imagine them facing up against Oakland and then your backyard is literally Forest Park... that immediately becomes the best apartment location in the midwest, and connects Dogtown more directly to the park... would be amazing. Its honestly a similar issue with Downtown and the archGoHarvOrGoHome wrote: ↑1:42 PM - Sep 09Or replace the highway with a boulevard and zone the remaining extra space for mixed used buildings 10 stories or higher
With retail spilling onto a wide "boardwalk" style section of the Brickline Greenway 
40 isn't my first choice for highway removal, but you're going to make me a believer. Maybe let it start at the Amaco sign? Sure. Gut 40 like a fish and build up to the park. (And for the love of god, will someone force the damn zoo to do something with the hospital lot?)
That's a lot of spires/antennae. But at least LKS is out of the floodplain.
-RBB
-RBB
This one is particularly hilarious. It's supposed to be depicting the view from the renovated 7 UP/ WTC in Clayton:
How would it ever have that style of windows? Maybe the very top floor?SRQ2STL wrote: ↑6:21 PM - 5 days agoThis one is particularly hilarious. It's supposed to be depicting the view from the renovated 7 UP/ WTC in Clayton:
A friend of mine and I were discussing how cool Pittsburgh’s yellow bridges are- they really represent the city’s spirit and character. What if we painted our downtown bridges in the colors of the St. Louis flag? Could really refresh the cityscape, and despite the jurisdictional questions spanning two states, it seems like it would be relatively inexpensive to do. St. Louis needs to look for the low-hanging fruit- there are so many aesthetic improvements that require little more than paint, lighting or landscaping.
This is heinousstlgasm wrote: ↑2:24 AM - 5 days agoA friend of mine and I were discussing how cool Pittsburgh’s yellow bridges are- they really represent the city’s spirit and character. What if we painted our downtown bridges in the colors of the St. Louis flag? Could really refresh the cityscape, and despite the jurisdictional questions spanning two states, it seems like it would be relatively inexpensive to do. St. Louis needs to look for the low-hanging fruit- there are so many aesthetic improvements that require little more than paint, lighting or landscaping.
STL1223 wrote: ↑2:33 AM - 5 days agoThis is heinousstlgasm wrote: ↑2:24 AM - 5 days agoA friend of mine and I were discussing how cool Pittsburgh’s yellow bridges are- they really represent the city’s spirit and character. What if we painted our downtown bridges in the colors of the St. Louis flag? Could really refresh the cityscape, and despite the jurisdictional questions spanning two states, it seems like it would be relatively inexpensive to do. St. Louis needs to look for the low-hanging fruit- there are so many aesthetic improvements that require little more than paint, lighting or landscaping.
I wouldn't mind seeing the MLK repainted a silly color but I think its day are numbered. Stan span looks nice white but needs a power wash. Eads should remain the same color. PSB... idk if it's possible to make that thing not look awful
I don't think it needs that exact color scheme, but anything is better than the concrete utilitarian 'meh' entry point that is the PSB.
I miss the "Welcome to St. Louis" sign at the end of the MacArthur.. something simple like this would be cool.
I miss the "Welcome to St. Louis" sign at the end of the MacArthur.. something simple like this would be cool.
I think Gasm is on to something. My circle has discussed this as well. MLK, McKinley and the MacArthur should be painted while Eads is re-illuminated. Stan span stays as is. Was thinking yellow and light blue (UN blue). Tough to get a train bridge painted.
