2,675
Life MemberLife Member
2,675

Post9:36 PM - Mar 24#526

There is no mention in the BJ article of consideration of demo for RX. If there were, BJ would have multiple pieces on just that. National news would probably be picking up on it to. This is just sloppy local TV journalism. 

9,541
Life MemberLife Member
9,541

Post10:15 PM - Mar 24#527

As someone who works with journalists almost daily, the TV ones need the most hand holding, they aren’t experts in any topic they cover and they don’t have time to develop a story like writers that cover a specific beat for papers

Post10:28 PM - Mar 24#528

I got it taken down

1,607
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,607

Post11:59 PM - Mar 24#529

Nicely done that was blatantly misguiding.

450
Full MemberFull Member
450

Post12:14 AM - Mar 25#530

Charlie Gitto's is the exact type of building the city should be subsidizing to save. Losing it, especially by choice, would be a tragedy.

Sent from my SM-S936U using Tapatalk


2,425
Life MemberLife Member
2,425

Post1:13 AM - Mar 25#531

StlAlex wrote:
12:14 AM - Mar 25
Charlie Gitto's is the exact type of building the city should be subsidizing to save. Losing it, especially by choice, would be a tragedy.

Sent from my SM-S936U using Tapatalk
Agreed 100%. And there's not even a redevelopment plan on the table!  Historic buildings are our #1 competitive advantage - in fact, pretty much our only competitive advantage over other cities, yet we continue to squander our inherent selling points for NOTHING. Dumb, shortsighted moves like this is exactly why downtown St. Louis is painfully dull and desolate.  Downtown needs to hold on to every last granular, pedestrian-scaled building it has left, which are all too rare to begin with.

75
New MemberNew Member
75

Post2:33 AM - Mar 25#532

stlgasm wrote:
StlAlex wrote:
12:14 AM - Mar 25
Charlie Gitto's is the exact type of building the city should be subsidizing to save. Losing it, especially by choice, would be a tragedy.

Sent from my SM-S936U using Tapatalk
Agreed 100%. And there's not even a redevelopment plan on the table!  Historic buildings are our #1 competitive advantage - in fact, pretty much our only competitive advantage over other cities, yet we continue to squander our inherent selling points for NOTHING. Dumb, shortsighted moves like this is exactly why downtown St. Louis is painfully dull and desolate.  Downtown needs to hold on to every last granular, pedestrian-scaled building it has left, which are all too rare to begin with.
Can’t wait for this to be a giant surface lot for the next 10 years. And by the time Railway gets redeveloped, they’ll just build another parking garage on this site and call it a day.

450
Full MemberFull Member
450

Post3:03 AM - Mar 25#533

STLcommenter wrote:
stlgasm wrote:
StlAlex wrote:
12:14 AM - Mar 25
Charlie Gitto's is the exact type of building the city should be subsidizing to save. Losing it, especially by choice, would be a tragedy.

Sent from my SM-S936U using Tapatalk
Agreed 100%. And there's not even a redevelopment plan on the table!  Historic buildings are our #1 competitive advantage - in fact, pretty much our only competitive advantage over other cities, yet we continue to squander our inherent selling points for NOTHING. Dumb, shortsighted moves like this is exactly why downtown St. Louis is painfully dull and desolate.  Downtown needs to hold on to every last granular, pedestrian-scaled building it has left, which are all too rare to begin with.
Can’t wait for this to be a giant surface lot for the next 10 years. And by the time Railway gets redeveloped, they’ll just build another parking garage on this site and call it a day.
A modern parking garage with a better facade and more retail would objectively be an upgrade over what's there right now, with an exception for the restaurant building.

The city should really demand a real serious development here though. I know people love the BPV parking lots but I think this location would be an even better site for a real urban development. Unfortunately you're probably correct. Would be cool if we could get just 1 lucky break and have a suburban company relocate downtown and build a HQ tower here. We can dream until the next garage is built.

Sent from my SM-S936U using Tapatalk


919

Post3:45 AM - Mar 25#534

The demo of Gittos also assumes this block has to a be a mega development. Why not even consider partitioning the parcels for human scale, medium scale or organic mixed development (including Gittos rehab) to avoid this all sitting as a vacant lot for years? Is the only option to wholesale the RWX building and the parking garage block to one developer?

And, it would be a huge disappointment to ever see just another parking garage rise on this parcel. 1) Would hope we learn from our mistakes as we see the scar this particularly horrible massive parking garage has left on our city for years, it would literally be the definition of insanity and 2) there are almost 4 contiguous blocks of underutilized, ugly parking garages right there between RWX garage, central downtown garage owned by the city and keiner garages and this area has been the black hole of downtown for many years because of it


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

9,541
Life MemberLife Member
9,541

Post3:47 AM - Mar 25#535

STLcommenter wrote:
2:33 AM - Mar 25
stlgasm wrote:
StlAlex wrote:
12:14 AM - Mar 25
Charlie Gitto's is the exact type of building the city should be subsidizing to save. Losing it, especially by choice, would be a tragedy.

Sent from my SM-S936U using Tapatalk
Agreed 100%. And there's not even a redevelopment plan on the table!  Historic buildings are our #1 competitive advantage - in fact, pretty much our only competitive advantage over other cities, yet we continue to squander our inherent selling points for NOTHING. Dumb, shortsighted moves like this is exactly why downtown St. Louis is painfully dull and desolate.  Downtown needs to hold on to every last granular, pedestrian-scaled building it has left, which are all too rare to begin with.
Can’t wait for this to be a giant surface lot for the next 10 years. And by the time Railway gets redeveloped, they’ll just build another parking garage on this site and call it a day.
In no world was it ever not going to be rebuild as a garage for the railway development and for more closer parking for One Met

919

Post3:52 AM - Mar 25#536

dbInSouthCity wrote:
STLcommenter wrote:
2:33 AM - Mar 25
stlgasm wrote: Agreed 100%. And there's not even a redevelopment plan on the table!  Historic buildings are our #1 competitive advantage - in fact, pretty much our only competitive advantage over other cities, yet we continue to squander our inherent selling points for NOTHING. Dumb, shortsighted moves like this is exactly why downtown St. Louis is painfully dull and desolate.  Downtown needs to hold on to every last granular, pedestrian-scaled building it has left, which are all too rare to begin with.
Can’t wait for this to be a giant surface lot for the next 10 years. And by the time Railway gets redeveloped, they’ll just build another parking garage on this site and call it a day.
In no world was it ever not going to be rebuild as a garage for the railway development and for more closer parking for One Met
I will hold out for at least residential development on top of a large parking podium. We deserve at least that when the time comes. No reason in downtown that we can’t at least get 5 or so stories on top of a podium (ie, One Foundry Way)

For now, the priority is keeping the building stabilized and getting the property legally in the hands of the LCRA so this thing can be put out for sale to the right developer


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

134
Junior MemberJunior Member
134

Post1:19 PM - Mar 25#537

dbInSouthCity wrote:
3:47 AM - Mar 25
STLcommenter wrote:
2:33 AM - Mar 25
stlgasm wrote: Agreed 100%. And there's not even a redevelopment plan on the table!  Historic buildings are our #1 competitive advantage - in fact, pretty much our only competitive advantage over other cities, yet we continue to squander our inherent selling points for NOTHING. Dumb, shortsighted moves like this is exactly why downtown St. Louis is painfully dull and desolate.  Downtown needs to hold on to every last granular, pedestrian-scaled building it has left, which are all too rare to begin with.
Can’t wait for this to be a giant surface lot for the next 10 years. And by the time Railway gets redeveloped, they’ll just build another parking garage on this site and call it a day.
In no world was it ever not going to be rebuild as a garage for the railway development and for more closer parking for One Met
Agreed.  I still hold out hope that they can build a large enough garage to allow for the Kiener garages next door to be torn down for better development / activation along the mall. 

9,541
Life MemberLife Member
9,541

Post1:24 PM - Mar 25#538

Don’t hold out too much hope, party A building a garage does not incentivize party B to demolish theirs.
Kiener garages will not be torn down, they’re very profitable when the cardinals are good. I do expect them to sell this year

2,675
Life MemberLife Member
2,675

Post1:33 PM - Mar 25#539

They really just need capital investment. Paint them white or gray. Upgrade the interior/exterior of retail spaces. New elevators. New technology.

Projectors on the side facing Kiener Plaza.

134
Junior MemberJunior Member
134

Post1:36 PM - Mar 25#540

dbInSouthCity wrote:
1:24 PM - Mar 25
Don’t hold out too much hope, party A building a garage does not incentivize party B to demolish theirs.
Kiener garages will not be torn down, they’re very profitable when the cardinals are good.  I do expect them to sell this year
Oh I know, still a long held hope though.  Those garages would be an excellent spot for a high end hotel or apartments with grand entrances on Chestnut.

Having two blocks of buildings similar to 100, Albion, or Eleven in MN would make a great impact on downtown.

2,675
Life MemberLife Member
2,675

Post1:44 PM - Mar 25#541





Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

2,425
Life MemberLife Member
2,425

Post1:47 PM - Mar 25#542

addxb2 wrote:
1:33 PM - Mar 25
They really just need capital investment. Paint them white or gray. Upgrade the interior/exterior of retail spaces. New elevators. New technology.

Projectors on the side facing Kiener Plaza.
Employ local artists to paint MURALS on them. These hulks overlook Kiener Plaza and one of the most famous monuments in the country- any other big city would've done that by now, at minimum.  The garages were built to allow towers to be constructed on top of them, but that would require the owner to have an ounce of vision, which obviously is not the case based on the crappy condition of these monstrosities. They are a horrible blight on downtown.

2,053
Life MemberLife Member
2,053

Post2:09 PM - Mar 25#543

addxb2 wrote:
1:44 PM - Mar 25




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The grays matching the grey tiles on the Kiener plaza would be so easy to do... its a shame those two garages are such a slog. The city should just pay someone to do it for them... 

2,623
Life MemberLife Member
2,623

Post2:13 PM - Mar 25#544

I suspect these garages are profitable enough that ownership doesn't really care if the retail is occupied or not. It's going to take substantial efforts to refresh the garage enough to attract the chains that once called it home, an unfortunately if they are making enough selling parking spots they don't have to care.

I really hope new owners decide to invest in them, but I suspect the current retail environment downtown would keep potential rents low. At the bare minimum they need to do some work on the ground floor anyways. Chase Bank just opened a couple years ago and already looks like a disaster. Peeling paint everywhere. 

On the plus side, the RX garage being torn down will improve vibes around the north side of the Kiener garages. Maybe will help with leasing.

919

Post2:24 PM - Mar 25#545

The Keiner Garages are just too visible and in possibly the most prime position in the region to not eventually come down for a hotel, Class A Office or high end residential. May be a while but the city should always be looking to swoop in to make that an option. It’s not like the owners keep these up to any standard

In any rational city, the RWX parcel will be more than just another hulk parking garage. We saw how that works out and downtown will never come back if we keep letting every parcel become a parking garage or surface lot for another development

Doesn’t the city own the garage at 7th & Pine. Could they sell that garage to the developer of the RWX building and Gill building parcel as extra parking and incentive to get the developments done without adding another standalone garage?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

1,677
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,677

Post5:05 PM - Mar 25#546

stlgasm wrote:
1:47 PM - Mar 25
addxb2 wrote:
1:33 PM - Mar 25
They really just need capital investment. Paint them white or gray. Upgrade the interior/exterior of retail spaces. New elevators. New technology.

Projectors on the side facing Kiener Plaza.
Employ local artists to paint MURALS on them. These hulks overlook Kiener Plaza and one of the most famous monuments in the country- any other big city would've done that by now, at minimum.  The garages were built to allow towers to be constructed on top of them, but that would require the owner to have an ounce of vision, which obviously is not the case based on the crappy condition of these monstrosities. They are a horrible blight on downtown.
We rehash this idea every year it seems.

Who do we engage with to actually see what's possible?

173
Junior MemberJunior Member
173

Post7:16 PM - Mar 25#547

addxb2 wrote:
1:44 PM - Mar 25




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I asked Google AI to create some interesting architecture here in place of the garages (and told it the site was close to the Gateway Arch) and this is what it came up with:
AI Kiener.png (6.63MiB)

3,541
Life MemberLife Member
3,541

Post7:43 PM - Mar 25#548

stldotage wrote:
7:16 PM - Mar 25
addxb2 wrote:
1:44 PM - Mar 25




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I asked Google AI to create some interesting architecture here in place of the garages (and told it the site was close to the Gateway Arch) and this is what it came up with:
This is amazing but would require vision and leadership. 

2,675
Life MemberLife Member
2,675

Post8:05 PM - Mar 25#549

Gateway Arch Foundation is the only org capable of vision and their capacity is at Millennium

595
Senior MemberSenior Member
595

Post9:20 PM - Mar 25#550

stldotage wrote:
addxb2 wrote:
1:44 PM - Mar 25




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I asked Google AI to create some interesting architecture here in place of the garages (and told it the site was close to the Gateway Arch) and this is what it came up with:
This is Torcher


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Read more posts (49 remaining)