Do we name change this one or create a new one? 


https://x.com/MBinFPSE/status/1730240172204130471?s=20
https://x.com/MBinFPSE/status/1730240172204130471?s=20

Nice - ArriveKC looks more in line with what I'd expect from this site.Chris Stritzel wrote: ↑Nov 30, 2023Core at Berkley Riverfront is another one of theirs. Same with the “ArriveKC” development at 31st and Baltimore/Wyandotte. Arrive is under construction now.
The grade here makes me think of the Landing and how perfect something like this with some brick facade would have been where the Burg garden is. Or, the parking garage, but flooding issues of course.
I think that’s the most important change isn’t it? A more reputable developer?SouthCityJR wrote:So this whole plan hinges on the city approving demo, but didn’t the city deny Lux demo? What besides the developer has changed that will allow the city justification for changing its tune on demo?
A new proposal could be different (smaller) and have neighborhood and alder support.SouthCityJR wrote: ↑Dec 04, 2023So this whole plan hinges on the city approving demo, but didn’t the city deny Lux demo? What besides the developer has changed that will allow the city justification for changing its tune on demo?
reputation of a developer isn't a select criteria in approving anything. Now there is a push to make it one but idk how that would be scoredDebaliviere91 wrote: ↑Dec 04, 2023I think that’s the most important change isn’t it? A more reputable developer?SouthCityJR wrote:So this whole plan hinges on the city approving demo, but didn’t the city deny Lux demo? What besides the developer has changed that will allow the city justification for changing its tune on demo?
Generally does not comply. The 1000 block of S. Kingshighway and surrounding streets
comprise a mix of small scale residential, commercial and institutional buildings. The 7-
story, block-long building would unavoidably dwarf the surrounding residential
neighborhood to the east, comprising mostly of 2-story residential structures, with
adjacent low-rise institutional buildings to the north and south.
Propose something a bit smaller, get neighborhood and alder support, and it'll be approved, I reckon.The architectural articulation of the proposed new construction also is not compatible
with its surrounding built environment. The design is inspired by industrial inspirations
and the general makeup of the fenestration and vertical and horizontal elements do not fit this location in any cohesive manner. Oversized cornice references, storefronts and
large expanses of uninterrupted brick do not fit the streetscape. However, the use of red
brick and darker stucco panels would be to some extent compatible with the historic
fabric and color palette of the neighborhood.
is adding the WashU lot to the development a realistic opportunity?doellingd wrote: ↑Jan 18, 2024NorthPoint is spearheading a lot of community engagement to gather and incorporate feedback over the next couple of months. This came from a meeting last night with a group of residents.









