But that's not actually true. Look at Chicago, New York, San Francisco. Parking is not ample and I'm not sure what you mean by accessible but it certainly is not cheap. Commuter get to these downtowns by other means (transit) and they are far more active downtowns than St. Louis' downtown or any of the other ones you reference.
I realize there is demand for parking. That demand decreases as its cost increases. You raise the cost by having less of it. Its not a easy needle to thread because businesses need to feel supported or they will move so i think to transition toward a more urban vision for St. louis you need engagement with and buy-in from the bussiness community. But an active, thriving downtown means people living and working IN downtown. The car commuter dependent model is broken.
I realize there is demand for parking. That demand decreases as its cost increases. You raise the cost by having less of it. Its not a easy needle to thread because businesses need to feel supported or they will move so i think to transition toward a more urban vision for St. louis you need engagement with and buy-in from the bussiness community. But an active, thriving downtown means people living and working IN downtown. The car commuter dependent model is broken.





