2,419
Life MemberLife Member
2,419

PostAug 11, 2022#401

I personally think the trains are going to add to the neighborhood. 

I'd love to be able to watch trains out my office or apartment window, so long as the walls and glass are noise-canceling at all.

I don't know what their vision is, but I think the trains on elevated tracks with occupied buildings beside them have the potential to help create a dense city feel that not many areas of St. Louis truly possess. 

6,120
Life MemberLife Member
6,120

PostAug 11, 2022#402

STLEnginerd wrote:
Aug 10, 2022
Hard to imagine this project getting going as long as the spaghetti of railroads run through there.  TO me these are a lot more of an impediment than I 64 which imposing but don't actually block much access to the Arch grounds.

I could imagine a couple new flyovers that connect the Macarthur Bridge track to the N/S tracks to retire and potentially repurpose for pedestrians the other flyovers north of Cedar St.  That would help a lot but with the grade changes and minimum turn radiuses i am NOT entirely sure its actually feasible.

Then there is the question of the MacArthur Bridge itself.  How long before it is retired, and if retired does ANY of the current rail infrustructure make any sense at all.  Including the flyovers, and switching yard on Chouteau's pond.
Yeah, the flyovers and yards are useful and sensible. The 23rd Street Yard, the one in Mill Creek Valley where Chouteau's Pond used to be, is probably the most dispensable, since it mostly serves local industry between here and Jefferson City. Some of that could maybe be handled out of Lesperance, or even Dupo, but Lesperance is pretty tight, and UP has to pay a toll for every car they drag across the bridge, so it's less than ideal to work the line from the other side of the river. As to the tangle of flyovers, each of them serves a pretty unique and important purpose. The west lead to the MacArthur is pretty obvious, since it's the best connection for both the UP and the BNSF to points south and west. The south approach to the MacArthur doesn't look as important, but it serves as a way for local switching lines to bypass most of the other traffic carrying cars from river industries to the major classification yards and terminal operations on the east side. On the middle level, the TRRA High Line, which ironically uses the tunnels under the Arch, is also important, since it's the link to the Merchant's Bridge and all the northside lines and yards. That line provides the north leg of what's called the Poplar Street Wye. The south leg is the concrete trestle linking UP's two downtown yards with one another. The east leg allows Lesperance to access the High Line. The east side is, if anything, even more interesting, since each of those long trestles leading to the MacArthur feeds into one of the areas two major classification yards: TRRA Madison and A&S Gateway, each of which is an important interchange point between railroads. The railroads don't trade cars between one another often or in too many places, but that tangle of tracks is one of the small handful of places where they really really do. Daily and in quantity. Chicago is another. Probably Memphis. Maybe Cincinnati. New Orleans.

Short version: that tangle is a vital link in our national transportation network. More vital even than the Poplar Street and Stan Span combined, I'd guess. It's not going anywhere. In fact all of it is slowly being replaced and rehabilitated. Largely at the railroads' own expense. It's been an ongoing project at least since the 90s. (With the removal of the UD bridge, the simplification of the Gratiot interlocking, and the replacement of the High Line's trestles.)

Anyway, don't mind me. I'll just be rubbing down my high horse over there by the barn.

2,687
Life MemberLife Member
2,687

PostAug 11, 2022#403


PostAug 11, 2022#404



2,327
Life MemberLife Member
2,327

PostAug 11, 2022#405

symphonicpoet wrote:
Aug 11, 2022
I'll just be rubbing down my high horse over there by the barn.
My nomination for ‘out-of-context’ quote of the year.

PostAug 11, 2022#406

Not sure where those image came form or how accurate but would LOVE to see 3-4 loading cranes right there.

Totally changes the vibe of downtown.

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostAug 11, 2022#407

It's from the presentation to the Port Authority.

Rehab of the Crunden-Martin buildings. Two residential towers at the north end. 

1,155
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,155

PostAug 11, 2022#408

That large drum just north of the bridge isn't an oil tank, right??
The cranes would be cool but hopefully they don't go widening roads to make room for trucks getting to and from the interstates. Getting between downtown and Soulard is already hard enough.

7,808
Life MemberLife Member
7,808

PostAug 11, 2022#409

addxb2 wrote:
Aug 11, 2022
Look at all those big trees where there are none now. :rolleyes:

708
Senior MemberSenior Member
708

PostAug 11, 2022#410

Ambitious to say the least!

I love the skyline with multiple copies of BoA Tower, 909 Chestnut, Laclede and others.

2,056
Life MemberLife Member
2,056

PostAug 11, 2022#411

I have to think residential just south of the arch grounds would be a huge win with your backyard being a national park. 

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostAug 11, 2022#412

They said two residential towers in the presentation, but it looks like three to me in the vision image. Lovely highway views :D

PostAug 11, 2022#413

They also spoke of a world-class skate park.

102
Junior MemberJunior Member
102

PostAug 11, 2022#414

That light blue object south of Cruden Martin looks like a giant swimming pool.

2,419
Life MemberLife Member
2,419

PostAug 11, 2022#415

Looks like it to me. 

I hope it is. 

I think a swimming pool could do really, really well over there by the river.

1,792
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,792

PostAug 11, 2022#416

If we consider that the 'tangle' is vital and untouchable, then i strongly posit that we should just expect to maintain the status quo in that part of downtown.  That's ok.  If we don't value what it could be more than what it is.  If we are lucky we could get some light industrial to move in there.  There are much better parts of downtown to build mixed use office, and residential.

I know there are a lot of rail fans out there, but lets not deceive ourselves.  If the rails are not an impediment to development, then why the area adjacent to the arch grounds are not already developed.  Please don't say the Poplar elevated lanes...

Its easy for me to think one river crossing (Merchant's) is as good as the next (MacArthur) without necessarily taking into account the intricacies of the primary uses of each.  That point is taken.  That said it may be vital now, but the role the MacArthur plays could be replaced at a cost.

FOR FUN this is my multibillion dollar dream plan to retire the MacArthur.  (all together i am guessing 2-3billion but probably way off on some things)

-Reroute the rail line that currently goes through Kirkwood north in the I-270 ROW up to Lambert and merge it with that branch line.  Expand capacity as needed.  Assuming roughly 5 million per mile (higher than typical rule of thumb but have to work around alot of exisitng infrustructure) for roughly 14 miles of dual tracks.  Obviously MoDOT and State of Missouri would need to be on board.  I'm sure there would be NIMBYs but keeping 270 from being more unsightly seems like a really silly hill to die on.
-Reroute the line running through Arnold to the river somewhere close to the quarry near BeeTreePark. probably another 4 miles of dual track.  Some significant land aquisition.  Definitely would be some NIMBYs here so dunno.  Sell the region that adding this rail allows for removal of a lot more.
-Expand capacity in the rail yards supporting the Merchants as needed to replace the MacArthur.  Mostly displacing low density uses such and junkyards and storage lots.
-Retire the MacArthur.  Disconnect from Highline under the arch which remains operational so that the train spotting junkies can get their fix.
-Build new Amtrack station in East St. Louis at the Eco Recycling place with easy access to Metrolink and  amazing views of downtown.  Another smaller stop at the museum of transportation (MoT).
-Repurpose MacArthur trestles where worthwile as pedestian highlines.
-Build Chouteaus Pond, Redevelop Rails to trails coordinating with developers 
-Expand metrolink through Webster Groves and Kirkwood to Museum of Transportation.  Kirkwood looses Amtrack but gains Metrolink connection to Amtrack at MoT  (Gotta have a metrolink fantasy scenario)
-Add Amtrack routes to New Orleans Indianapolis and Nashville.  Only routes that require new bridge crossing remain the River Runner and Texas Eagle. 

Made up numbers
500 million for new rail.
250 million for land acquisitions (Mostly uses exisiting ROW such as I 270 which helps alot, also some of the neighborhoods demolished for airport expansion)
200 million for new Amtrack station
250 million for new Metrolink extension
500 million for rail line reclaimation and developemnt with alot of public private partnerships.
1 Billion if you need another bridge

New development potential in some very hot markets
-South Gateway
-Broadway & 4th
-Chouteau's Pond
-Iron Hill/Armory/Steelcote
-Grove
-Dogtown/Hill
-Maplewood
-Webster Groves
-Kirkwood
-East St. Louis

And yes my silver plane shoots, silver missiles, that shoot silver bullets.

BTW if they pull off that rendered vision i will be extatic to be proven wrong.

491
Full MemberFull Member
491

PostAug 11, 2022#417

I'm old and cynical so the board's optimists can and should ignore me, but...

Come on, there isn't demand for this project.  this is pure rendering BS and pure spec and likely a grab for a huge tax subsidy. 

2,929
Life MemberLife Member
2,929

PostAug 11, 2022#418

WHOA!!!

They're looking to build a container yard with at least three gantry cranes JUST SOUTH OF THE MACARTHUR BRIDGE! 

That's container-on-barge docked and floating up the river! 

That's their revenue stream. 
That can justify the Port Authority and Brownfields to be authorized. 
And this will attract businesses to STL. 

Good times y'all. 

1,792
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,792

PostAug 11, 2022#419

I wouldn't say there is no demand, i just think there are other areas much better situated to capitalize on the demand.  Cortex, Midtown and DTW are getting pretty hot.  Grand Center could easily get there.  CWE and Grove have been hot for several years.   Loop seems to be slowing a bit but still pretty attractive.  Near north is much easier to develop.  etc. etc.

i wanted to say i could imagine the barge crane stuff but i dunno, seems better placed on the East side.  More and cheaper land, etc.

You gotta leave room for some billionare to just come and ElonMusk the hell out of it by betting his fortune to make it work, or , but i don't see any kind of traditional phased development plan working on the site under its current constraints (highways, rails, environmental remediation, etc.)

2,419
Life MemberLife Member
2,419

PostAug 11, 2022#420

I kind of understand why everyone would scoff at this and point to the Bottle District or McGowan-Walsh tower in the mid-2000s, but times have changed and I don't think St. Louis is in the market for a panacea. St. Louis is in a far better place, in my opinion, in 2022 than it was in 2005.

This has also been rumored about for a while. I guess I see more legitimacy in this attempt to remake our riverfront than I ever did with some of the other massive shot-in-the-arm projects that have been proposed and fallen through in the past.

66
New MemberNew Member
66

PostAug 11, 2022#421

Love it. Small detail but I noticed they plan on developing some parking lots on 4th street. Love the ambition of this project.

5,261
Life MemberLife Member
5,261

PostAug 11, 2022#422

Henning Larsen of Copenhagen is the architect.

525
Senior MemberSenior Member
525

PostAug 11, 2022#423

I would be interested in how they link this to downtown given the highway spaghetti there. You could walk up 2nd St to the arch grounds, but then you need to double back for anything on the south side of downtown like the ballpark. Gratiot would be an efficient way to get west of the highways, but I can't imagine walking under 9 lanes of barely elevated highway is going to a pleasant experience that people will want to do regularly without some major improvements to make that walk cleaner, brighter, and quieter.

103
Junior MemberJunior Member
103

PostAug 11, 2022#424


Here’s another rendering from today that I haven’t seen posted yet. This is just what STL needs folks. Fingers crossed it happens


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

2,929
Life MemberLife Member
2,929

PostAug 11, 2022#425

STL Biz Journal: $1.2B Chouteau's Landing project would launch with manufacturing, but questions remain

Lots of details in here. Looks like they'll have two 200K factories operating with tenants for them unnamed but in the wings. Companies that make "modular construction components"; yeah, I can see the need to have this so close to rail hubs and direct river transport. Factories come first, then the residential and retail. They're still nailing down the financing. This'll take ten years to complete. 

Also, seems I know some of the people listed in this article. Solid guys, great character and work ethic. Reasons for optimism. 

Read more posts (456 remaining)