Yeah, all 400k people that live in St. Charles County across 600 sq miles would really create a good foundation for team support.whitherSTL wrote:I too believe there exists a real possibility that Bob Blixt is majority owner of an STL team. And I hope he has the ballz to put that stadium in St, Chuck. The county and the city don’t deserve it.
Stuff like this is a dead give away that you’re insane. Like in what fantasy world do you live in where a former lawyer (Bob is no longer involved because a witness) would get an nfl team and have a say where it’s location when that lawyer/firm have zero say over how any settlement is allocated.whitherSTL wrote: ↑Nov 22, 2021I too believe there exists a real possibility that Bob Blixt is majority owner of an STL team. And I hope he has the ballz to put that stadium in St, Chuck. The county and the city don’t deserve it.
The only people in the world who think St. Charles would be a better location for a pro sports team than St. Louis city or county are people who live in St. Charles county.whitherSTL wrote:And it is one of the worst. I travel. I know. It’s horrendous.
Yep. You’re still insane.whitherSTL wrote: ↑Nov 22, 2021Blitz still is involved behind the scenes and is leading TeamSTL, according to Randy K. He just can’t be in the courtroom. And he and his group still stand to make 35% of payout and dictate the exact details of settlement. He also is the lawyer who back in 2016, when he and Peacock began their quest to save the Rams, stated “somehow, someway we’ll remain an NFL city.” So it seems his interest does have an emotional component to it.
Finally, if you listen to Jeff Rainford on Kilkoyne’s podcast he states that an owner could receive the team for free in a settlement but then have to build the stadium his or herself to have a stake in the team.
So the city, the county and the stadium group get their cash….that’s all they want anyway. Page and Jones have zero interest in sports.
An owner gets the expansion team. If Blixt and his group (I said he’d be majority owner, not the sole owner) get $4-$6B (based on your guys’ above estimates) they could afford to build a stadium.
And then throw in Parson’s recent support for possible state help….
Parson is NOT going to help fund something in the city and county. It would be in a red county that is one of the fastest growing counties in the Midwest and is open for business and has LAND.
Am I still insane? Or is the guy who bends over backwards to make excuses for crime in one of the worst downtowns in America insane???
Hmmmm.
whitherSTL wrote: ↑Nov 23, 2021Great comeback, loser. Well thought out. Typical libtard response when challenged. And to Seattle native I live in Shrewsbury.
DB, you’re such a loser. Why? Because you back downtown. Look at all the hundreds of millions of $$ poured into DT last 10 years to achieve this kkkrappp. Empty skyscrapers and hotels….empty, gorgeous buildings. It’s a loser and so are you.
Well that went unintelligent quick.whitherSTL wrote:Great comeback, loser. Well thought out. Typical libtard response when challenged. And to Seattle native I live in Shrewsbury.
DB, you’re such a loser. Why? Because you back downtown. Look at all the hundreds of millions of $$ poured into DT last 10 years to achieve this kkkrappp. Empty skyscrapers and hotels….empty, gorgeous buildings. It’s a loser and so are you.
Forum should consider a breathalyzer usb test before clicking postLArchitecture wrote: ↑Nov 23, 2021Well that went unintelligent quick.whitherSTL wrote:Great comeback, loser. Well thought out. Typical libtard response when challenged. And to Seattle native I live in Shrewsbury.
DB, you’re such a loser. Why? Because you back downtown. Look at all the hundreds of millions of $$ poured into DT last 10 years to achieve this kkkrappp. Empty skyscrapers and hotels….empty, gorgeous buildings. It’s a loser and so are you.
Well... not necessarily. If the League were to offer to build a brand new stadium but they would want the usual sea of parking that surrounds it, meaning that it would take up acres of terrible land use (i.e., concrete parking lots for as far as the eye can see), then yeah build it in St. Charles.SeattleNative wrote: ↑Nov 22, 2021The only people in the world who think St. Charles would be a better location for a pro sports team than St. Louis city or county are people who live in St. Charles county.whitherSTL wrote:And it is one of the worst. I travel. I know. It’s horrendous.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Listen you can freely go bet everything you own that no stadium for the nfl will ever be built in st.Charles. You have 2 options4 Downtown STL or next to Gateway RacetrackLaife Fulk wrote: ↑Nov 23, 2021Well... not necessarily. If the League were to offer to build a brand new stadium but they would want the usual sea of parking that surrounds it, meaning that it would take up acres of terrible land use (i.e., concrete parking lots for as far as the eye can see), then yeah build it in St. Charles.SeattleNative wrote: ↑Nov 22, 2021The only people in the world who think St. Charles would be a better location for a pro sports team than St. Louis city or county are people who live in St. Charles county.whitherSTL wrote:And it is one of the worst. I travel. I know. It’s horrendous.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Why not? Placing it anywhere but our core continues to encourage sprawl.whitherSTL wrote: ↑Nov 22, 2021I too believe there exists a real possibility that Bob Blixt is majority owner of an STL team. And I hope he has the ballz to put that stadium in St, Chuck. The county and the city don’t deserve it.
Vernacular like this is a great indication we can all safely ignore any future posts without missing anything of consequence.whitherSTL wrote: ↑Nov 23, 2021Great comeback, loser. Well thought out. Typical libtard response when challenged. And to Seattle native I live in Shrewsbury.
DB, you’re such a loser. Why? Because you back downtown. Look at all the hundreds of millions of $$ poured into DT last 10 years to achieve this kkkrappp. Empty skyscrapers and hotels….empty, gorgeous buildings. It’s a loser and so are you.
In breaking news, the LA Times is now aware there is a lawsuit.courtland wrote: ↑Nov 23, 2021LA Times article:
https://www.latimes.com/sports/rams/sto ... is-lawsuit
There’s a bit of a difference in noting that St. Charles is not the heart of St. Louis and calling city residents libtards. In every social interaction I have with someone from west county or St. Charles county, I have to politely listen to them talk about how they’d never raise their children in somewhere as god forsaken as the city. I wish we’d stop with this suggestion that city residents are combative against St. Charles or West County when the entire history of St. Louis presents the opposite case.saintnotstlouis wrote:Some of this recent thread is sad. (Frankly, so is my contribution to this forum.) But alas. Here's my annual appeal for civil discourse.
Forums like this can be incredible drivers of creativity if people feel comfortable to share their opinions - even if those differ from your own, or (gasp), if that opinion comes from Saint Charles - which is, let us not forget, an important piece of the STL region and part/parcel to the whole region's path to success. So, let's continue to make this forum - and our city - a place of welcome. One post, one interaction at a time.
Long live Saint Louis.
Going forward can a moderator please delete all the posts that violate this rule? No more stadium or team talk is allowed.bprop wrote: ↑Nov 23, 2021I wish the talk of spending hopes and/or money on a new NFL team would stop. Football is dying, the NFL is dying, and spending capital in any form to lure a professional sports team in a is ... well..it would ironically suit St. Louis so well. It would be just the perfect irony to blow any type of settlement on another perpetually losing proposition like a pro football team.
