4,553
Life MemberLife Member
4,553

PostMar 24, 2021#1326

^Republicans have expressed interest in passing an infrastructure bill before. Trump wanted to but never made it happen. You earmark enough for roads and bridges in Alaska, Maine, WV, Utah, etc.... and an infrastructure bill might pass. 

438
Full MemberFull Member
438

PostMar 24, 2021#1327

wabash wrote:
Mar 24, 2021
^Republicans have expressed interest in passing an infrastructure bill before. Trump wanted to but never made it happen. You earmark enough for roads and bridges in Alaska, Maine, WV, Utah, etc.... and an infrastructure bill might pass. 
And the House has lifted its ban on earmarks--might be a little pork barrel action is just what's needed to grease the rails on the infrastructure train and get it out of the station. The situation appears fluid in the Senate, but as they say, money talks and bullsh*t walks...

9,674
Life MemberLife Member
9,674

PostMar 24, 2021#1328

Blunt better bring home some bacon in his last year and a half.  Hawley is worthless.   Although Cori Bush is responsible for the City getting $500M, she pushed for the city to be counted as both the city and a county. 

438
Full MemberFull Member
438

PostMar 24, 2021#1329

dbInSouthCity wrote:
Mar 24, 2021
Blunt better bring home some bacon in his last year and a half.  Hawley is worthless.   Although Cori Bush is responsible for the City getting $500M, she pushed for the city to be counted as both the city and a county. 
Re Cori Bush--is that why we're getting so much compared to KC for example? Cara Spencer mentioned on the debate last night that it was because we're so damn poor (my words, not hers), but it also makes some sense that we'd get both city and county-related money since we technically are both. Has anyone seen a formula or other rationale for how the funds were calculated? Just curious. Thanks.

9,674
Life MemberLife Member
9,674

PostMar 24, 2021#1330

SB in BH wrote:
Mar 24, 2021
dbInSouthCity wrote:
Mar 24, 2021
Blunt better bring home some bacon in his last year and a half.  Hawley is worthless.   Although Cori Bush is responsible for the City getting $500M, she pushed for the city to be counted as both the city and a county. 
Re Cori Bush--is that why we're getting so much compared to KC for example? Cara Spencer mentioned on the debate last night that it was because we're so damn poor (my words, not hers), but it also makes some sense that we'd get both city and county-related money since we technically are both. Has anyone seen a formula or other rationale for how the funds were calculated? Just curious. Thanks.
I dont think we are any more poor then cleveland or Indy or other peer cities, most of the extra money is bc we are double dipping

sc4mayor
sc4mayor

PostMar 24, 2021#1331

SB in BH wrote:
Mar 24, 2021
dbInSouthCity wrote:
Mar 24, 2021
Blunt better bring home some bacon in his last year and a half.  Hawley is worthless.   Although Cori Bush is responsible for the City getting $500M, she pushed for the city to be counted as both the city and a county. 
Re Cori Bush--is that why we're getting so much compared to KC for example? Cara Spencer mentioned on the debate last night that it was because we're so damn poor (my words, not hers), but it also makes some sense that we'd get both city and county-related money since we technically are both. Has anyone seen a formula or other rationale for how the funds were calculated? Just curious. Thanks.
I think the formula had something to do with how many community block grants or something in that arena a city gets.

The vast majority of Kansas City is low density suburbs...even in the official city limits (which is also the case for nearly all of our closest peers).  Their urban core has plenty of sh*t too but all those mostly stable suburbs offset their urban issues (like high crime and poverty rates, depopulation and building age)...hence less money.

The extra money the city got because it’s technically a county was only about $60 million-ish...the vast majority of what the city received was allocated due to those other parameters...I think about $450 million or so came from that.

Edit: This isn’t exactly a detailed explanation...but might provide a little clarity:
The federal relief bill signed by President Joe Biden is expected to result in around a half-billion dollars being sent to St. Louis. Mayor Lyda Krewson shared the reason why the city is getting so much compared to other area towns. She said that congress developed a formula to allocate the money based on poverty, the age of buildings, and the growth-gap. St. Louis ranks very high in all of those areas.
https://fox2now.com/news/the-reasons-wh ... -stimulus/

Edit 2: Here’s a bit more from the BJ, though this article was published before the bill was passed so the numbers are bit different.
St. Louis emerges as the biggest municipal winner because the bill used a formula based not on population, but Community Development Block Grant allocations. That takes into account unemployment levels, age of housing and other metrics.
https://www.bizjournals.com/stlouis/new ... inner.html

474
Full MemberFull Member
474

PostMar 24, 2021#1332

Is age of housing a common metric for federal funding formulas?

8,924
Life MemberLife Member
8,924

PostMar 29, 2021#1333

Sorry if I missed it, but the Second Gentleman, Doug EMHOFF, was in town meeting with Bob Clark at the Clayco offices to discuss the stimulus monies.

2,791
Life MemberLife Member
2,791

PostMar 31, 2021#1334

I really hope STLs best planners/leaders are ready to write grants and WIN.






Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

9,674
Life MemberLife Member
9,674

PostMar 31, 2021#1335

Uncle Joe is on a clear path to be the most influential president since FDR. He’s going to single handily nail the trickle down economics coffin

1,868
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,868

PostMar 31, 2021#1336

dbInSouthCity wrote:
Mar 31, 2021
Uncle Joe is on a clear path to be the most influential president since FDR.  He’s going to single handily nail the trickle down economics coffin
If he's able to actually pass this stuff, it'll be hard to argue with that. He'll have to reshape DC just to make this stuff happen, e.g. eliminating the filibuster or bringing back earmarks.

4,553
Life MemberLife Member
4,553

PostMar 31, 2021#1337

MarkHaversham wrote:
Mar 31, 2021
dbInSouthCity wrote:
Mar 31, 2021
Uncle Joe is on a clear path to be the most influential president since FDR.  He’s going to single handily nail the trickle down economics coffin
If he's able to actually pass this stuff, it'll be hard to argue with that. He'll have to reshape DC just to make this stuff happen, e.g. eliminating the filibuster or bringing back earmarks.
Fortunately for Joe earmarks are already on their way back with bipartisan support.

5,721
Life MemberLife Member
5,721

PostApr 06, 2021#1338

Senate Parliamentarian ruled that Dems could use budget reconciliation for one or two more pieces of legislation this year so an avenue opened for simple majority on Infrastructure/Jobs bill.  However, I think a few Democratic Senators are hinting at some major changes to Biden's plan for it to be doable in their eyes.  Of course, my two cents in go bigger on brick & mortar, in the ground, internet infrastructure and pull back on some of the other items.  In other words; states, cities and counties got a big plug of cash with Covid aid and can apply some of that aid to job force training, etc.  

 https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/05/us/p ... cture.html

https://www.cnn.com/2021/04/05/politics ... index.html
https://www.politico.com/news/2021/04/0 ... lan-479058

2,940
Life MemberLife Member
2,940

PostApr 06, 2021#1339


4,553
Life MemberLife Member
4,553

PostApr 07, 2021#1340

gone corporate wrote:
Apr 06, 2021
STL Biz Journal: Former MO Sec State Jean Carnahan is POTUS' nominee to run GSA
Robin Carnahan.

744
Senior MemberSenior Member
744

PostApr 07, 2021#1341

wabash wrote:
Apr 07, 2021
gone corporate wrote:
Apr 06, 2021
STL Biz Journal: Former MO Sec State Jean Carnahan is POTUS' nominee to run GSA
Robin Carnahan.

Ha! I get those two confused too. Robyn bought my cousin's house in Dogtown when they moved to New Jersey in the late 90s. You think that would help me keep them straight. 

6,158
Life MemberLife Member
6,158

PostApr 07, 2021#1342

^That's a nice piece of news. I hope she does well at GSA.

2,940
Life MemberLife Member
2,940

PostApr 07, 2021#1343

wabash wrote:
Apr 07, 2021
gone corporate wrote:
Apr 06, 2021
STL Biz Journal: Former MO Sec State Jean Carnahan is POTUS' nominee to run GSA
Robin Carnahan.
My bad. Thanks for catching that, Wabash. Cheers to her nomination with hopes STL can get some good things from it. 

947
Super MemberSuper Member
947

PostApr 08, 2021#1344

gone corporate wrote:
Apr 07, 2021
wabash wrote:
Apr 07, 2021
gone corporate wrote:
Apr 06, 2021
STL Biz Journal: Former MO Sec State Jean Carnahan is POTUS' nominee to run GSA
Robin Carnahan.
My bad. Thanks for catching that, Wabash. Cheers to her nomination with hopes STL can get some good things from it. 
Former Sen. Jean Carnahan is probably a little old for the job, given that she's almost 90.

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostApr 12, 2021#1345

Stltoday - Missouri gets a C-minus in White House report on states’ infrastructure needs

https://www.stltoday.com/news/local/sta ... 3bedf.html

9,674
Life MemberLife Member
9,674

PostApr 16, 2021#1346

Apparently some Republican house members started a white supremacist caucus and it’s so bad that even gop house leader Kevin McCarthy had to call it out


sc4mayor
sc4mayor

PostApr 16, 2021#1347

The new Nazi Party. Is anyone really surprised at this point?

6,158
Life MemberLife Member
6,158

PostApr 17, 2021#1348

To be completely fair, our nativist dog-whistles significantly predate European fascism. The "Know Nothings" are a pretty good early example. Heck, before the Civil Rights movement most nativist politicians in the US blew their whistles at more ordinarily audible ranges. Nothing secret about it.

1,213
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,213

PostApr 17, 2021#1349

The funny thing is that many of those shouting about Anglo-Saxon stuff are most likely of Scots-Irish heritage hence not Anglo-Saxon

947
Super MemberSuper Member
947

PostApr 17, 2021#1350

kipfilet wrote:
Apr 17, 2021
The funny thing is that many of those shouting about Anglo-Saxon stuff are most likely of Scots-Irish heritage hence not Anglo-Saxon
For the purposes of Marjorie Taylor-MAGA and Paul Gosar's new Caukkkus, "Anglo-Saxon" is a not very subtle dogwhistle for "white".

Read more posts (80 remaining)