259
Full MemberFull Member
259

PostMay 13, 2020#326

If it moves similarly to Streets of St. C, it's a slow n' steady build out. The first part of that project was built in 2013 and the most recent additions were complete a year or two ago. (2013-2019).  Also, with that project, the infrastructure "street grid" was not built all at once. They developed access as the project expanded. 

3,762
Life MemberLife Member
3,762

PostMay 13, 2020#327

i'm still not a fan of this development. they could consolidate a lot of the units into larger buildings that front Grand and/or Chouteau and leave the rest for future phases, especially now that they're reducing the size of the garage-attached apartment building (no reduction in parking spaces though, i'm sure). just dumb. instead lets develop half the site as a low-density strip mall.

2,037
Life MemberLife Member
2,037

PostMay 23, 2020#328

I am now, more than ever, skeptical that there is any demand for a development like this in the City. Adding commercial retail space at present strikes me as lunacy.

20
New MemberNew Member
20

PostOct 30, 2020#329

Any updates on this project?

Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk


5,261
Life MemberLife Member
5,261

PostOct 30, 2020#330

STL_4_LIFE wrote:
Oct 30, 2020
Any updates on this project?

Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk
Cullinan is currently working on a lease with an anchor tenant. They hope to have it fully secured by the end of the year. Construction on Phase 1 should start in late Q1/early Q2 2021.

20
New MemberNew Member
20

PostOct 30, 2020#331

Thank you, Chris. I can't wait to see construction equipment on site!

Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk


12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostOct 30, 2020#332

Retail or office tenant?

5,261
Life MemberLife Member
5,261

PostOct 30, 2020#333

framer wrote:
Oct 30, 2020
Retail or office tenant?
Wasn't specified but my guess is a retail tenant since Phase 1 includes the apartments, retail, parking garage, and the infrastructure for future phases. If it's office, great but I wouldn't hold my breath on that end.

5,703
Life MemberLife Member
5,703

PostOct 30, 2020#334

^ I assume Iron Hills might have an opportunity with medical arts considering its location next to new bright shiny hospital vs other nearby developments with office phase (whehter it be Foundry, Armory and or even McKay's down the street) but in same breadth I assume SSM would be looking at the same for its own hospital property on the corner that hasn't be developed yet either 

2,481
Life MemberLife Member
2,481

PostOct 30, 2020#335

chriss752 wrote:
Oct 30, 2020
framer wrote:
Oct 30, 2020
Retail or office tenant?
Wasn't specified but my guess is a retail tenant since Phase 1 includes the apartments, retail, parking garage, and the infrastructure for future phases. If it's office, great but I wouldn't hold my breath on that end.
Yeah, if it was described as an "anchor tenant", in a project like this, it has to be retail. And there's only one company that would be an anchor tenant that is also currently doing very well and doing all they can to expand in urban areas...

3,762
Life MemberLife Member
3,762

PostOct 30, 2020#336

^ Gun Emporium?

Unnecessarily Large Trucks & SUVs 'R' Us?

2,419
Life MemberLife Member
2,419

PostOct 30, 2020#337

I'd love for it to be a city Target with apartments over it.

Sent from my SM-A716U using Tapatalk


2,481
Life MemberLife Member
2,481

PostOct 30, 2020#338

urban_dilettante wrote:
Oct 30, 2020
^ Gun Emporium?

Unnecessarily Large Trucks & SUVs 'R' Us?
Lol. Cabela's!

I meant Target ofc. Can't imagine anything else going here.

PostNov 17, 2020#339

Loopnet - Grand & Chouteau

This listing says the Iron Hill lot is currently for sale. I don't know if this is correct, but note that the listing says "Last updated: 11/2/20". 

5,261
Life MemberLife Member
5,261

PostNov 17, 2020#340

urbanitas wrote:Loopnet - Grand & Chouteau

This listing says the Iron Hill lot is currently for sale. I don't know if this is correct, but note that the listing says "Last updated: 11/2/20". 
That listing has been on there since before Iron Hill was even announced.

I’ve messaged people at SLUMRC about this project and it’s still moving ahead

2,481
Life MemberLife Member
2,481

PostNov 17, 2020#341

chriss752 wrote:
Nov 17, 2020
urbanitas wrote:Loopnet - Grand & Chouteau

This listing says the Iron Hill lot is currently for sale. I don't know if this is correct, but note that the listing says "Last updated: 11/2/20". 
That listing has been on there since before Iron Hill was even announced.

I’ve messaged people at SLUMRC about this project and it’s still moving ahead
When was your last conversation?

5,261
Life MemberLife Member
5,261

PostNov 17, 2020#342

urbanitas wrote:
chriss752 wrote:
Nov 17, 2020
urbanitas wrote:Loopnet - Grand & Chouteau

This listing says the Iron Hill lot is currently for sale. I don't know if this is correct, but note that the listing says "Last updated: 11/2/20". 
That listing has been on there since before Iron Hill was even announced.

I’ve messaged people at SLUMRC about this project and it’s still moving ahead
When was your last conversation?
Friday morning

2,672
Life MemberLife Member
2,672

PostApr 04, 2021#343

Of all “mega” developments proposed in the last few years, I’m happy this one is dead.

SLU needs build the street grid and infrastructure, divide up the site, and take this one block/parcel at a time with multiple (3+) developers. It’ll look better, it’ll feel more like a neighborhood, and is the most economically sound.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

5,261
Life MemberLife Member
5,261

PostApr 04, 2021#344

Yes, I forgot to post this earlier, but the project is apparently dead. 
  • The "Now Leasing" sings on site have been gone for a few weeks. 
  • The project website has been deleted. 
  • Cullinan removed the project page from their website and only one mention of the project remains (in the form of a Press Release that was issued in April 2020 regarding the approval of the TIF).
  • Clayco also deleted the page on their website about providing design and construction services. 
I've reached out to both the MRC and Cullinan but have yet to hear back. I also messaged some brokers and developers that I know about this and they said that if cancelled, it's the least surprising thing to come out of the real estate world in 2021. The project headed into this year on a rocky foundation and slowly faded away. 

I'm a bit sad that this is going away, but I expect something better will be proposed in the near future. And if I was Pier Property Group, I'd be celebrating the reduced potential competition (for now at least). And who knows, maybe this project is still in the works, just that it's being heavily altered. But I doubt it. 

991
Super MemberSuper Member
991

PostApr 04, 2021#345


9
New MemberNew Member
9

PostApr 04, 2021#346

It is still listed as a project on the midtown redevelopment page, but your right the link leads to page not found on Cullinan. As a new resident of the area we were looking forward to this. And Target would have been nice 😫


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostApr 04, 2021#347

addxb2 wrote:
Apr 04, 2021
Of all “mega” developments proposed in the last few years, I’m happy this one is dead.

SLU needs build the street grid and infrastructure, divide up the site, and take this one block/parcel at a time with multiple (3+) developers. It’ll look better, it’ll feel more like a neighborhood, and is the most economically sound.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Amen

4,553
Life MemberLife Member
4,553

PostApr 04, 2021#348

Was wondering about the status of this one when I saw the other day that the property is now listed on LoopNet: 

https://www.loopnet.com/Listing/Grand-Chouteau-Saint-Louis-MO/13775878/

2,481
Life MemberLife Member
2,481

PostApr 04, 2021#349

addxb2 wrote:
Apr 04, 2021
Of all “mega” developments proposed in the last few years, I’m happy this one is dead.

SLU needs build the street grid and infrastructure, divide up the site, and take this one block/parcel at a time with multiple (3+) developers. It’ll look better, it’ll feel more like a neighborhood, and is the most economically sound.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Yes. No surprise, Cullinan was the wrong developer for this parcel from the beginning, pandemic or no.

And yes to dividing up and gridding the site. I will just add that now there is an opportunity for SLU to acquire and include the properties north of Gratiot as well, and make a real neighborhood out of it, without a giant effing precast concrete parking garage dropped in the middle of it, looming over everything...

At the very least, the city needs to make sure the Foundry retail is all open and mostly occupied before any significant amount of retail is subsidized at Iron Hill. Unfortunately, with a TIF already approved, I'm afraid someone is going to try to pick this up and get it amended as a big box retail development.

PostApr 04, 2021#350

Mends1 wrote:
Apr 04, 2021
It is still listed as a project on the midtown redevelopment page, but your right the link leads to page not found on Cullinan. As a new resident of the area we were looking forward to this. And Target would have been nice 😫


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I guarantee that you will still get your Target, somewhere in the Midtown-FPSE area, and soon. 

Read more posts (49 remaining)