KCs population had it not chased the suburbs.
![]()
![]()
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
KC Public Library likes to bring Strongtowns to KC a few times a year. They usually give a private presentation to the Chamber of Commerce and local politicians followed by a public one at the Plaza library. These events are VERY well attended - it is always a more than full house with people driving over an hour to hear what they have to say. Strong towns and their local partners have been diving deep into KC and giving presentations about this new research to the local ULI and other groups. A lot of non-urbanist businesspeople and decision-makers are being exposed to the movement now. I wish that STL would at least bring them in for their non-localized series.sc4mayor wrote: ↑Jun 28, 2020^ Speaking of chasing the suburbs, Strong Towns is doing a pretty deep dive into Kansas City's suburban experiment. Really interesting stuff. Pretty good read if anyone is interested. There are several parts and I think they plan to do several more.
Here's one of them:
https://www.strongtowns.org/journal/202 ... experiment
Some are suggesting the city actually de-annex some areas, though I wouldn't say it's mainstream yet. I could see a case being made for everything north of the river becoming it's own municipality, while KCMO retains the rest south of the river. At the same time though I think there are some disadvantages to that too.
KC's core saw maybe a 50% cut. Probably less in the central corridor. Compare that to STL's 66% decline. I think the issue is that STL was soo much larger population-wise that a fall of only 16% more left a ton of stuff abandoned. Another issue is that a lot of STL's industry was in the immediate vicinity of its downtown (at least that's what I have been told and seen in photos). Most of this has been abandoned or bulldozed leaving huge scars. KC's historic heavy industrial zones - East Bottoms, West Bottoms, Fairfax - are separated from downtown by rivers and hills. These areas saw some decline but infilled pretty successfully with light manufacturing and logistics.PlatinumBlues wrote: ↑Jun 27, 2020Downtown STL was basically left for dead and I don’t believe Downtown KC seen the amount of abandonment and vacancy as STL had/did. Downtown STL has come a very long ways so has KC’s downtown. I think a few more high rises in downtown STL would do wonders for momentum and progress eventually what’s left to rehab will take time but I do think Downtown STL is on the verge for more new high rise development either way both cities are still holding their own when it comes to development. I like your passion for both Chris
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Two Light has hit ~99% now as well. I am told the open units are some of the lowest tier ones in the building. Two Light studios are going for $2.60 to $3+ per sqft.ldai_phs wrote: ↑Jun 26, 2020Cordish residential has done very well in KC during co-vid.
One Light has gone from 96% full in January to 99% full today. Two Light has the same number of vacancies(4 units) but went from 3 open highest end units to 3 open studios.
The E Side is starting to turn with an unusual amount of public and private development last several years, especially Prospect and Troost. New Prospect/Troost MAX lines, new grocery stores and quite a few residential projects. Probably $200M-$300M last few years, maybe more if including Hospital Hill spillover along Troost. The number of private residential projects is pretty impressive for the most struggling part of city.ldai_phs wrote: ↑Jun 28, 2020KC's core saw maybe a 50% cut. Probably less in the central corridor. Compare that to STL's 66% decline.
$40 million apartment project to start this week on a Troost adjacent block.hobo digitale wrote:The E Side is starting to turn with an unusual amount of public and private development last several years, especially Prospect and Troost. New Prospect/Troost MAX lines, new grocery stores and quite a few residential projects. Probably $200M-$300M last few years, maybe more if including Hospital Hill spillover along Troost. The number of private residential projects is pretty impressive for the most struggling part of city.ldai_phs wrote: ↑Jun 28, 2020KC's core saw maybe a 50% cut. Probably less in the central corridor. Compare that to STL's 66% decline.
ldai_phs wrote: ↑Jul 01, 2020https://twitter.com/reverbkc/status/1278382521110220801?s=21
Introducing “The Mercury Room” at Reverb. Designed by Manica Architecture.
The mixture of housing types in this development is great. Even though 12 townhomes is a small amount, it's good that these will have some more permanent residents. 200 apartments is also no small number. While I would've preferred more, I understand that Tracks 215, which is more or less part of this project (Freight House District), will add more to the area. This development also sits across 20th from the City Club apartment complex and a few blocks away from the Artistry KC. So there will be no shortage of apartments in this area and based on how well the rental market does, I expect most of these apartments will be filled contributing a lot to the area. Business (both restaurants and shops alike) will benefit from all of this development.Loscher94 wrote: ↑Jul 15, 2020On a brighter note, full details have been released for the Freighthouse Redevelopment. Made me forget all about Kimpton!
https://www.flatlandkc.org/news-issues/ ... -and-main/
- 150 room hotel
- 12 for-sale townhomes
- 18 story office tower
- Two mid rises containing 200 apartment units
- Will incorporate the proposed Greenbelt pathway (also spearheaded by Bryant)












