1,677
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,677

PostJan 04, 2020#26

^ a mid sized concert venue that could attract big acts would be a big win for that part of DT West.  One of my favorites in all of STL.

2,929
Life MemberLife Member
2,929

PostJan 08, 2020#27

STL Post-Dispatch: St. Louis hires Prop NS program manager
The city has hired a manager to oversee a new program to stabilize vacant properties, the result of a ballot measure approved by voters nearly three years ago.

Sean Thomas, a veteran community organizer active in the effort to get Proposition NS passed in 2017, reported to work at the St. Louis Development Corp. on Monday...

Proposition NS — the “NS” stands for neighborhood stabilization — was designed to provide a pool of money to help pay for limited repairs to buildings owned by the Land Reutilization Authority, the city’s land bank, ensuring that those properties could still be rehabilitated for future occupancy. Prop NS raises property taxes by $11 per $100,000 assessed value, allowing the city to secure up to $40 million in bonds. 

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostJan 09, 2020#28

Sean Thomas of Old North fame? Good to hear.

6,119
Life MemberLife Member
6,119

PostJan 09, 2020#29

^Give him a budget and hopefully he can be even more effective. :)

6,661
AdministratorAdministrator
6,661

PostJan 09, 2020#30

This is a good hire. Makes me feel better about not applying.

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostJan 17, 2020#31

Word on the street is that the roof of the Palladium Building in Grand Center is collapsing. 

6,119
Life MemberLife Member
6,119

PostJan 22, 2020#32

^Sadly, that wouldn't at all surprise me. :(

80
New MemberNew Member
80

PostJan 22, 2020#33

framer wrote:
Jan 17, 2020
Word on the street is that the roof of the Palladium Building in Grand Center is collapsing. 
Looking at it on Google Maps satellite view, at least two good sized portions of the roof are already collapsed as of whenever that photo was taken.

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostJan 22, 2020#34


2,630
Life MemberLife Member
2,630

PostJan 22, 2020#35

7230 S Broadway (corner building) is now gone. Fencing still up around rest of complex. Owner appears to have left most of the doors open (front and back) throughout the rest of complex and windows are now broken
Untitled.png (1.41MiB)

6,119
Life MemberLife Member
6,119

PostJan 25, 2020#36

^We really need some kind of ordinance to prevent owners from simply sitting on buildings and allowing them to deteriorate so they can get their way.

32
New MemberNew Member
32

PostJan 27, 2020#37

symphonicpoet wrote:
Jan 25, 2020
^We really need some kind of ordinance to prevent owners from simply sitting on buildings and allowing them to deteriorate so they can get their way.
The best solution would be a land value tax. It would fundamentally change the way land is used and developed in STL for the better.

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostFeb 01, 2020#38


339
Full MemberFull Member
339

PostFeb 04, 2020#39

Photo of 7230 S. Broadway in its current state. The fence extends around most of the 7200 block aswell. This is a major loss for the Patch neighborhood :(
IMG_2458.PNG (6.11MiB)

5,261
Life MemberLife Member
5,261

PostFeb 06, 2020#40

Elek.borrelli wrote:
Feb 04, 2020
Photo of 7230 S. Broadway in its current state. The fence extends around most of the 7200 block aswell. This is a major loss for the Patch neighborhood :(
This is Carondelet, but either way, it is a huge loss. We all should've seen this coming. The owner let the building rot and made it clear that vandals were welcome. The owner wanted this building gone and didn't give a damn about the surrounding community. South Broadway has a lot of potential, but we are slowly losing the old buildings that made this area a thriving business district back in the day. 

2,430
Life MemberLife Member
2,430

PostFeb 06, 2020#41

^ Elek is correct; it's Patch.  Looks like the building  dates to 1888.

34
New MemberNew Member
34

PostFeb 06, 2020#42

I don't care which neighborhood these buildings are in, but it's a damned shame that the owner is allowed to destroy this entire historic block and no one can do beans about it.  Just a block north someone has listed a row of commercial buildings for sale.  Couldn't he have done this?

5,261
Life MemberLife Member
5,261

PostFeb 06, 2020#43

STLer wrote:I don't care which neighborhood these buildings are in, but it's a damned shame that the owner is allowed to destroy this entire historic block and no one can do beans about it.  Just a block north someone has listed a row of commercial buildings for sale.  Couldn't he have done this?
You see, that’s too smart and common sense of an idea. This guy doesn’t give a damn.

3,762
Life MemberLife Member
3,762

PostFeb 06, 2020#44

st. louis is plagued by a property-hoarding boomer+ population that couldn't care less about how the states of their properties affect the lives of city residents. they're just looking to cash out. (this is not a commentary on all boomer+s, but i suspect that many decaying properties in the city—like this one—are owned by people over 50 who don't actually live in the city).

34
New MemberNew Member
34

PostFeb 06, 2020#45

You are 100% correct that St. Louis is full of older landbankers who bought up cheap property years, if not decades, ago and are just waiting to see what happens to the land regardless of whether or not the historic buildings and landscapes survive. 

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostFeb 06, 2020#46

The mailing address of the owner is in south county.
The last permits were water tap destroy issued last September, completed Jan 16, 2020

6,119
Life MemberLife Member
6,119

PostFeb 07, 2020#47

^The Patch is Carondelet. The core of old Carondelet is mostly or entirely in "the Patch." It's really a terrible and confusing name, given that every third thing there is called "Carondelet." That said, the owners should be ashamed of themselves. And also fined every dime they make out of the "deal" and then a few more dimes besides.

16
New MemberNew Member
16

PostMar 20, 2020#48

Here's one I pass on 70 nearly every day. 

https://www.google.com/maps/@38.6365701 ... 312!8i6656

This building is simple. It's just an old storage warehouse. Not meant to be fancy or attractive, it's just there. I would love to see this thing restored. I feel like it would be a loft lovers dream but that's probably eons away. There's not much within walking distance and I can't see this being an attractive property for development even if the XFL becomes a staple.

1,864
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,864

PostMar 20, 2020#49

Being where it's at on the fringes of downtown but not far from the new NGA, would be a perfect opportunity for a geospatial company looking to expand.

339
Full MemberFull Member
339

PostMar 20, 2020#50

That whole block is well overdue for redevelopment. It is probably not economically feasible, however.

Read more posts (32 remaining)