455
Full MemberFull Member
455

PostJun 03, 2014#251

The Crisis in American Walking

http://www.slate.com/articles/life/walk ... nism_.html
Simply by going out for a walk, I had become a strange being, studied by engineers, inhabiting environments whose physical features are determined by a rulebook-enshrined average 3 foot-per-second walking speed, my rights codified by signs. (Why not just write: “Stop for People”?) On those same signs in Savannah were often attached additional signs, advising drivers not to give to panhandlers (and to call 911 if physically intimidated), subtly equating walking with being exposed to an urban menace—or perhaps being the menace. Having taken all this information in, we would gingerly step into the marked crosswalk, that declaration of rights in paint, and try to gauge whether approaching vehicles would yield. They typically did not. Even in one of America’s most “pedestrian-friendly” cities—a seemingly innocent phrase that itself suddenly seemed strange to me—one was always in danger of being relegated to a footnote.
Please Feed The Meters: The Next Parking Revolution

http://www.collectorsweekly.com/article ... he-meters/
“The idea in force in American law at the start of the 20th century, that thoroughfares were for the movement of traffic—with certain specific exceptions such as the loading and unloading of goods and passengers—gave way fairly quickly to the idea that took root in the popular mind that parking of vehicles on the street was a right and not a privilege,” writes Kerry Segrave in “Parking Cars in America, 1910-1945.” In response, ill-conceived regulations helped cement the concept of free parking as a public good across America, fueling our dependence on automobiles.

PostJun 08, 2014#252

Parking Craters: Scourge of American Downtowns


Whether parking craters are formed due to the meteors of 20th Century bad policy, a city's erosion of manufacturing or housing, the abandoned scraps leftover by freeway building or just plain unfortunate luck, they absolutely destroy sections of city downtowns and make the environment more inhospitable and unattractive for livable streets. In these areas there is virtually no street life.or vitality. You'll find little greenery or open space. In hotter cities the heating of the asphalt and parked cars make the air oppressive. It's hell on earth. It is a parking crater.
What If the Best Way to End Drunk Driving Is to End Driving?

http://www.citylab.com/commute/2014/06/ ... ng/372089/
Over these past six car-free years, I've developed a zero-tolerance policy on drinking and driving for myself, and that in turn has colored my perspective on the kinds of cities I'd ever be willing to live in. There are tons of great reasons to choose walkable, transit-friendly neighborhoods and cities over places where driving is more or less required—the environmental impact, the cost, the nightmare of traffic jams—but for me, the number one reason is that I like being able to have a few drinks and never having to worry about driving.

And I don't think I'm alone.

PostJun 10, 2014#253

Short blurb on how a few people can turn around a city:

The Entrepreneurs Who Saved Seattle

http://www.fastcompany.com/3031544/hit- ... ed-seattle
In 1979, Seattle was the last place you’d think to find a growth business. It had more in common with today’s Rust Belt than Silicon Valley--its economy centered on a declining manufacturing base and the lumber industry. The Economist had labeled Seattle the "city of despair" and a billboard appeared saying “Will the last person leaving Seattle--turn off the lights.’

So what changed? Two Seattle natives decided to move their 13-employee company there in 1979 from Albuquerque. The two natives were Bill Gates and Paul Allen. And the company was Microsoft.

So one thing that has always annoyed me when I visit other popular cities is that many people seem to think that just living in the "IT" city makes up for a ton of things that negatively affect quality of life. For instance, I met a girl while traveling once who basically said something along the lines of "I have to live with 5 roommates on half your income in the ghetto but my life is better than yours because I live in New York City" and I was just blown away at how ignorant that is. We have to get the word out across the country that you can start and live a good life in St. Louis. The Atlantic did a few articles recently on "Where Millennials Can Make It" http://www.citylab.com/special-report/w ... n-make-it/ and I was a bit sad that we didn't get the free publicity.

Young and in Debt in New York City
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/08/reale ... -home.html
For young people, moving to New York City hasn’t made much mathematical sense for decades. The jobs don’t pay enough, the internships don’t pay at all, and the rents are prohibitive by any sane standard.

But now add a new economic fact of life to that list: soaring student loan debt. More students are taking out bigger loans than ever before, and in the last 10 years alone, education debt tripled, reaching over $1 trillion. A record number of college students are graduating knee deep in a financial hole before they begin their adult lives.

PostJun 11, 2014#254

The suburbs around Washington, DC are rapidly urbanizing:

The Colossal Expectations of D.C.'s Newest Metro Line
There's not much riding on the Silver Line except the future of the American suburb as we know it.

http://www.citylab.com/commute/2014/06/ ... ne/372423/
The current plan for Tysons, adopted in 2010, envisions 100,000 residents and twice as many daytime workers by 2050. In mid-May, the county's Board of Supervisors approved a proposal by Capital One, which already has a 26-acre campus in Tysons, to build a new 470-foot-tall office tower. When finished, it will be the second-highest occupied structure in the region, after the Washington Monument. More critically, it will be close to the McLean Silver Line stop. Fairfax County has said it wants at least three-quarters of new development planned for Tysons to occur within a half-mile of one of its four Silver Line stations. Another 45 million square feet of construction is planned for the coming decades, one of the largest construction projects on the East Coast.

296
Full MemberFull Member
296

PostJun 11, 2014#255


13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostJun 11, 2014#256

Planetizen - Two-Way Streets Can Fix Declining Downtown Neighborhoods
Here is one simple and affordable strategy to renew our downtown neighborhoods: immediately convert multi-lane one-way streets back to two-way traffic. Such conversions reduce car speeds and encourage greater pedestrian and bike mode-share. As a response of calmer residential streets, neighborhoods become more livable, more prosperous, and safer.
http://www.planetizen.com/node/69354

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostJun 12, 2014#257

^If only it were that easy.

455
Full MemberFull Member
455

PostJun 12, 2014#258

Interesting article from NYT on how Uber will allow more people to live car-free lifestyles in middle to small size cities:

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/12/techn ... r-own.html
It could well transform transportation the way Amazon has altered shopping — by using slick, user-friendly software and mountains of data to completely reshape an existing market, ultimately making many modes of urban transportation cheaper, more flexible and more widely accessible to people across the income spectrum.

Uber could pull this off by accomplishing something that has long been seen as a pipe dream among transportation scholars: It has the potential to decrease private car ownership.

In its long-established markets, like San Francisco, using Uber every day is already arguably cheaper than owning a private car.

PostJun 15, 2014#259

A New Portal to Pair Eager Developers and Underused Properties

http://www.citylab.com/work/2014/06/a-p ... rs/372722/
A new venture called OpportunitySpace aims to make it easier for developers to find potential investment opportunities—and for residents to figure out who owns the distressed or vacant properties in their communities.

According to CEO and cofounder Alex Kapur, OpportunitySpace is an "information-rich marketplace that enables real-estate development and investment in place-based projects." The website uses data provided by cities to populate a map, which shows users information about properties at a variety of levels.

"The missing link between plans and people who invest is that communication layer," says OpportunitySpace vice-president and cofounder Cristina Garmendia. "You don’t know what you don’t know."

PostJun 17, 2014#260

The Triumphant Return of Private U.S. Passenger Rail
http://www.citylab.com/commute/2014/06/ ... il/372808/
Beginning in 2016, All Aboard Florida will run 32 departures a day between Miami, Fort Lauderdale, and West Palm Beach, with service extending to Orlando soon afterwards. With a maximum speed of 125 miles per hour, the trains will complete the 240-mile journey in less than three hours. In South Florida, around the three initial stations, the company will develop 4.2 million square feet of real estate. In Orlando, the terminus will be located at the airport and connect to a new commuter rail line at a sparkling, state-funded $215 million transportation hub.

1,792
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,792

PostJun 17, 2014#261

^Interesting. A passenger rail terminus at the airport does make a lot of sense in some ways. Like how rail could be viewed as a way to augment air-travel for lesser destinations... i.e. someone from Springfield IL could ride to Lambert via Amtrak, and then fly out of STL to any destination. Theoretically travel planning sites could implement seamless ticketing. I get the desire to drop people off downtown, but the rails downtown are largely obstructive rather than constructive and there is metrolink as an option for passengers to get to downtown... I would have to think on it more before I was convinced though.

7,808
Life MemberLife Member
7,808

PostJun 18, 2014#262

Millennials consider leaving Washington (DC) as the city becomes more costly

http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/mil ... _local_pop

455
Full MemberFull Member
455

PostJun 19, 2014#263

Building Bigger Roads Actually Makes Traffic Worse

http://www.wired.com/2014/06/wuwt-traff ... ed-demand/
As a kid, I used to ask my parents why they couldn’t just build more lanes on the freeway. Maybe transform them all into double-decker highways with cars zooming on the upper and lower levels. Except, as it turns out, that wouldn’t work. Because if there’s anything that traffic engineers have discovered in the last few decades it’s that you can’t build your way out of congestion. It’s the roads themselves that cause traffic.

PostJun 24, 2014#264

How Denver Is Becoming the Most Advanced Transit City in the West
But the key question remains: Will metro residents give up their cars?

http://www.citylab.com/commute/2014/06/ ... st/373222/
In the center of the metropolis, the Beaux-Arts façade of a grand old railway terminus, finished in robin egg-hued terracotta stone, is cradled by the daring swoop of a canopy of brilliant white Teflon. On one of eight tracks, a double-decked passenger train has stopped to refuel. A few hundred yards away, German-built light rail vehicles arrive from distant parts of the city, pulling into a downtown of soaring condo towers and multifamily apartment complexes. Beneath the feet of rushing commuters, express buses pull out of the bays of an underground concourse, and articulated buses shuttle straphangers through the central business district free of charge. A businessman, after swinging his briefcase into a basket, detaches the last remaining bicycle from a bike-share stand next to the light rail stop, completing the final leg of his journey-to-work on two wheels.

An out-of-towner could be forgiven for thinking she'd arrived in Strasbourg, Copenhagen, or another global poster child for up-to-the-minute urbanism. The patch of sky framed in the white oval of the Union Station platform canopy, however, is purest prairie blue. This is Denver, a city that, until recently, most people would have pegged as an all-too-typical casualty of frontier-town, car-centric thinking.
Denver gets it.

PostJun 26, 2014#265

I've been traveling to several cities in the mid atlantic over the last couple of weeks and just went back to Richmond, where I went to school for several years at VCU. I think it is shaping up to be a model for what an urban university should look like and how it should meld into neighborhoods around it. I thought so much of it that I felt the need to report back here on what they're doing well and what our local universities can learn.

The area has changed so much for the better that its almost unrecognizable compared to a few decades ago. I'll start with the street views:

http://goo.gl/n9ncHf
VCU has taken over an entire stretch of historic mansions along Franklin street and turned them into administrative buildings. Years ago, they were much more run down and I could no longer find a single example of a boarded up building on that street anymore.

http://goo.gl/1ueYTe
On Laurel, they've built a parking deck with ground level retail. The northeast corner is slated to become a residential highrise.

http://goo.gl/2E2dZM
This is the old streetview of some empty storefronts along broad street. They've all now have been entirely filled in with either commercial or repurposed as VCU classrooms. VCU buildings have filled in where there were gaps in the street wall. I was very impressed that the street wall continued along the main street here for nearly as far as the eye could see.

http://goo.gl/FsTNs9
They built a new highrise to complete a corner of highrises around the central lawn of the university

I snapped some pictures of stuff that was happening thats not updated on street view yet:

http://i.imgur.com/gYStqw3.jpg
Haha, I remember this corner. It was a parking lot with some sort of nightclub behind where the now chipotle is. I saw a man get shot in front of the building where the Noodles and Company is now. Big change.

http://i.imgur.com/Dll92t5.jpg
This is an example of some of the modern VCU construction. Builds up the street wall. Street level student support offices. Actually not too different from what "The Standard" will look like I suppose.

http://i.imgur.com/cJccDFF.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/tFWqmGV.jpg
Further down the street, another school highrise is going up. This was built on another parking lot.

http://i.imgur.com/ggWAz0I.jpg
It goes right up to the surrounding townhouses, contributing to the street wall.

http://i.imgur.com/nWmUQBN.jpg
Further down the street, another VCU building is going up. I wanted to show off the mural though. VCU has a top ranked arts school and the city and property owners freely invite the students to paint the city so murals like this are everywhere.

http://i.imgur.com/2sri2LT.jpg
Another mural just down the street.

This is in no way an advertisement for VCU or Richmond but in a lot of ways, I am very envious. I remember that city having an identical reputation to St. Louis back in the 90s for being dangerous and blighted. I remember seeing empty storefronts and boarded up homes as far as the eye could see. It has now entirely reversed, particularly around the college campus. It has dropped off the crime lists. Its now considered one of the best places to live. I talked to one of my old professors and she said that "we realized about 10 years ago that everybody under the age of 25 apparently wants to live in NYC so we set out to build a little piece of it here." I was talking to a student randomly about how everything had changed and he said that "yeah man, Richmond is now gentrified as f*ck." I shed a tear thinking that I couldn't yet say the same about St. Louis.

The major differences are that it developed a strong urban state university during this time and that it never went through the mass demolition and urban renewal that we did. I really think we shot ourselves in the foot with that one but we can't change the past now. Richmond is half the size of St. Louis and it behaves as if it were a big city. Its developing like it will be twice its size in 30 years. I'd say the majority of that has been the city and the state deciding to plop down a university with 30,000 students and an urban mission and letting time take its course.

In summary, I think our universities and leaders could learn a lot from what VCU has contributed to Richmond. Don't get me wrong, I love STL and I think SLU, WashU, UMSTL, and Harris-Stowe have and continue to do a lot of good for the city and metro; but they are not massive urban state universities and don't quite play the same role. St. Louis is still waiting for its version of VCU.

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostJun 26, 2014#266

^ Apparently the University of Cincinnati also has been having a pretty transformative impact on urban development in the surrounding area.

I'd love to see that long strip of vacant land owned by Sigma-Aldrich that is on the south side of Olive between Wells-Fargo & Harris-Stowe developed into a mixed-use project that could have campus-oriented elements. That would help stitch up an unfortunate dead zone in a key area. Of course we're losing the Castle Ballroom across the street, but such a project would also give momentum to the north side of the street and give us pretty much continuous development all the way from CWE to downtown.

An intriguing addition to the college scene in downtown or midtown would also be Lindenwood University, which seems to be ever-expanding. I believe their Lindenwood-Belleville campus is now having a Collinsville offshoot. Somewhere in Midtown might be a nice, affordable location for developing a modest City presence if it wants its own buildings, or of course leasing some existing downtown space. It comes to mind as I write this that it would be kind of cool actually if Lindenwood built a campus on that vacant Sigma-Aldrich property... that way you could have a pretty awesome "University Row" comprised of three universities between Grand Center and downtown.

455
Full MemberFull Member
455

PostJul 04, 2014#267

Cleveland's renaissance continues to get national attention:

An Energized Cleveland Takes a Bipartisan Tack to Wooing Conventions
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/04/us/cl ... tions.html
Attention, Internet wits: Cleveland has heard all your jokes — about “the mistake by the lake,” about its sports teams failing year after year, about its river so polluted that it once caught fire — and it wants you to know that is tired, worn-out stuff.

Downtown Cleveland is busily rehabilitating. The restaurant scene is percolating, and young newcomers are giving faded neighborhoods west of downtown, where brew pubs and bistros are opening, a patina of hipness.

And now, Cleveland is a candidate for both the Republicans’ and Democrats’ 2016 conventions — the only city to make both lists.

178
Junior MemberJunior Member
178

PostJul 05, 2014#268

Growing up in Buffalo and frequenting Cleveland, occasionally passing through Pittsburgh, those cities were MUCH worse off that STL ever was, so when things get moving in the right direction it's going to be big news. I was in Cleveland a few years ago, nice strides but STL offered then and still offers much more already.

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostJul 07, 2014#269

^ I don't think that is really true. Pittsburgh and Cleveland still had 50% or more of their peak population in 2000 while STL City's had been cut in half by 1990; overall, we have lost a greater percentage than both cities. In fact, Cleveland was doing pretty well in the 90's and described as a Comeback City by many.... turned out they had lost 5% over the decade but STL had a steeper decline during that time. The recession was brutal in Cleveland over the naughts, but as with STL City it still managed significant population growth in downtown.... it is great to see that is continuing and broadening out a bit.

Whether Pittsburgh, Cleveland, Saint Louis or Detroit, even struggling Rust Belt cities are seeing some pretty neat Central Corridor progress; the key issues moving forward are how far can recovery go and whether the more decimated parts start to benefit as well.

4,553
Life MemberLife Member
4,553

PostJul 07, 2014#270

St. Louis certainly seems positioned better than Buffalo, Cleveland, Pittsburgh, and Detroit: considering its metro population is bigger than the others (except for Detroit), has more fixed rail transit infrastructure and ridership, its population is growing unlike the others (Pittsburgh has a barely growing MSA, but not CSA - Cleveland's CSA and MSA are shrinking at a surprising rate), it has the best universities (perhaps comparable with Pittsburgh), and the least post-industrial/apocalyptic wasteland to reintegrate.

They all face huge challenges and have a lot to learn from each other in how to (and how not to) deal with them.

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostJul 07, 2014#271

^ I sure am rooting for them all. I do think Big isn't necessarily Better when it comes to turning around Rust Belt Cities.... it is relatively easy to make progress on downtown and central corridors, but how do you reach the vast tracts of troubled neighborhoods not so fortunate to be close to the action? Probably a bit easier in Pittsburgh, with just 55 square miles, than Detroit, with 138.

For Saint Louis, some comparative challenges we face are the lesser regional cooperation (in part due to our being an independent county) and a lack of any strong anchors in North City.... we're basically relying on a Northside Regeneration Hail Mary while some other cities have some stronger institutional anchors that can help spur surrounding development in poor areas, like the monster Cleveland Clinic on the Eastside.

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostJul 10, 2014#272

StreetsBlog.net - The Secrets of Successful Transit Projects — Revealed!
The secret sauce is fairly simple, when you get down to it: Place a transit line where it will connect a lot of people to a lot of jobs and give it as much grade-separated right-of-way as possible, and it will attract a lot of riders.
http://usa.streetsblog.org/2014/07/10/n ... ly-cities/

455
Full MemberFull Member
455

PostJul 11, 2014#273

Transit Projects Are About to Get Much, Much Easier in California
http://www.citylab.com/commute/2014/07/ ... ia/374049/
Level of service was a child of the Interstate Highway era. The LOS concept was introduced in the 1965 Highway Capacity Manual, at the very moment in American history when concrete ribbons were being tied across the country, and quickly accepted as the standard measure of roadway performance. LOS is expressed as a letter grade, A through F, based on how much delay vehicles experience; a slow intersection scores worse on LOS than one where traffic zips through. Planners and traffic engineers use the metric as a barometer of congestion all over the United States.
...
It was the state's love for basketball, oddly enough, that compelled a change. In September 2013, the legislature passed Senate Bill 743, a bill securing a new downtown basketball arena for the Sacramento Kings. The law also instructed the Governor's Office of Planning and Research to recommend a new CEQA metric for traffic analysis to replace level of service. As an extra caution, the law expressly forbade CEQA from relying on LOS in California's "transit priority areas"—in other words, its cities.

PostJul 11, 2014#274

A well written and in depth article from the NYT on what has been happening in Detroit recently. It seems like Dan Gilbert has set out to make Quicken into the anchor/savior of Detroit.

The Post-Post-Apocalyptic Detroit
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/13/magaz ... troit.html
In downtown Detroit, at the headquarters of the online-mortgage company Quicken Loans, there stands another downtown Detroit in miniature. The diorama, made of laser-cut acrylic and stretching out over 19 feet in length, is a riot of color and light: Every structure belonging to Quicken’s billionaire owner, Dan Gilbert, is topped in orange and illuminated from within, and Gilbert currently owns 60 of them, a lordly nine million square feet of real estate in all. He began picking up skyscrapers just three and a half years ago, one after another, paying as little as $8 a square foot. He bought five buildings surrounding Capitol Park, the seat of government when Michigan became a state in 1837. He snapped up the site of the old Hudson’s department store, where 12,000 employees catered to 100,000 customers daily in the 1950s. Many of Gilbert’s purchases are 20th-century architectural treasures, built when Detroit served as a hub of world industry. He bought a Daniel Burnham, a few Albert Kahns, a Minoru Yamasaki masterwork with a soaring glass atrium. “They’re like old-school sports cars,” said Dan Mullen, one of the executives who took over Quicken’s newly formed real estate arm. “These were buildings with so much character, so much history. They don’t exist anywhere else. And it was like, ‘Buy this parking garage, and we’ll throw in a skyscraper with it.’ ”

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostJul 11, 2014#275

^ thanks for the link.... I've felt for some time that we just need one mini Dan Gilbert to help swing the downtown jobs trajectory around.

I'm still not sure if the Centene tower at BPV was a real possibility or not (maybe it was more of a play to get more incentives out of the county) but that would have been a heck of a start. It would have brought hundreds of new jobs downtown and kept hundreds more (as the large law firm Armstrong Teasdale jumped from the Met to the new Centene Building); but just as important I think that would have triggered more such moves. (Perhaps we would have gotten Express Scripts as well, for example.)

Someone just needs to get the ball rolling with a signature move. I think it will happen but I'd rather see it sooner than later.

Read more posts (833 remaining)