455
Full MemberFull Member
455

PostMar 21, 2014#201

The Overprotected Kid
A preoccupation with safety has stripped childhood of independence, risk taking, and discovery—without making it safer. A new kind of playground points to a better solution.
http://www.theatlantic.com/features/arc ... ne/358631/
It’s hard to absorb how much childhood norms have shifted in just one generation. Actions that would have been considered paranoid in the ’70s—walking third-graders to school, forbidding your kid to play ball in the street, going down the slide with your child in your lap—are now routine. In fact, they are the markers of good, responsible parenting. One very thorough study of “children’s independent mobility,” conducted in urban, suburban, and rural neighborhoods in the U.K., shows that in 1971, 80 percent of third-graders walked to school alone. By 1990, that measure had dropped to 9 percent, and now it’s even lower. When you ask parents why they are more protective than their parents were, they might answer that the world is more dangerous than it was when they were growing up. But this isn’t true, or at least not in the way that we think.

PostMar 21, 2014#202

A 26-Story History of San Francisco
http://www.theatlanticcities.com/techno ... isco/8693/
140 New Montgomery is the San Francisco headquarters of Yelp. The local business information company occupies nine floors of a newly refinished building that once served as the headquarters of the Pacific Bell Telephone Company.

At the same time, this is a modern building designed for millennial appreciation: A smart elevator system, a xeriscaped courtyard, lots of bike storage, and excellent access to public transport. 2.3 million pounds of rebar and 10,000 tons of concrete have made the building more resilient.

The renovation by developers Wilson Meany Sullivan with Perkins+Will architect, Cathy Simon, is a success. The building's slogan is "The Art of Work." Occupancy is already high.

1,067
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,067

PostMar 26, 2014#203

^NN, to be fair, I'm sure I'm guilty of being an overly harsh critic, as I want STL to be a certain way in my mind that isn't reality (yet hopefully). I also probably jump to conclusions about other cities based on small examples that aren't necessarily the examples of grandeur that I make them out to be.

I suppose, however, that I mean we seem to be more affected in a negative way by the "economic" reasons for civic decline, and less affected in a positive way when things are booming than other citites. Cincinnati is a place I lived in for a good amount of time and I struggle watching certain trends that seem to have happened in a relatively fast amount of time compared to us in the context of a city that is classically known for similar conservative political stumbling. As a few examples: at a time when we lost our most promising swath of downtown development between 2006-2009 (Skyhouse, Centene, Nadira Place, Port STL, etc...) Cincinnati was marketing a new riverfront museum, rebuild Fountain Square and were constructing a massive new office tower. Across the river the have a Libeskind designed modern building and are now steamrolling the Over the Rhine district into what appears to be a healthy neighborhood. Other places like Portland, Charlotte, Denver, Pittsburgh also continue to gain what seems to be a disproportionate amount of press as "it places." We are making strides, for sure in terms of momentum in the tech sector and such, but sometimes the press seems to be more "look at the cute little Midwestern town try to play with the big boys." Again, this is likely my bias.

I'm sure if you asked an analogous panel of urban minded emotionally invested individuals from those cities, they would be equally displeased with the speed of progress. I find myself frustrated at the STL gap between passionate people and their ideas and the reality of civic-altering projects. I am a lay person in this field, so I understand that my emotions are not based in the contextual reality of urban rehabilitation, but I feel like more should be happening. I also fear that the people that can really change things don't really care. At its core, I'm probably behaving like a parent who's hard working child has a B average and I'm disappointed they are not in the running for valedictorian. I just hope that those intimate to the situation that can change the game have the high standards that I seem to from afar.

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostMar 26, 2014#204

^ nice post.

I think we did pretty well in recent years given our overall struggling economic climate in Saint Louis... pretty much I think we have to acknowledge it's a national trend for the central core to see renewed life, even in places like Saint Louis, Cleveland and Detroit. But what is really impressive to me is the rapid Cortex transformation going on right now... it is an unqualified success story that almost every city would love to have; I think its success is even surpassing the expectationsof a few years ago of its leaders (square footage commitments, etc. appear to be greater now than they originally said.)

I think where we lag behind many of our peers is that our corporate base continues to turn its back on downtown... this is very disturbing and does not bode well in our competition to make Saint Louis more attractive globally. Even in struggling economies like Cleveland and Detroit, there is a certain level of admiral corporate back-to-downtown activity/mentality.

Another thing that we have to keep in mind when we see other cities having shiny new buildings is that we have to ask whether the city directly backed that development... Cincy, KC and others do but we do not. Whether one agrees its a good idea to do that or not, it does impact the skyline.

(btw, I was a skeptic on Pittsburgh, but looking at it more closely I am convinced they have a really strong core.... downtown office occupancy is extremely high and they are also adding residents. Pretty enviable.)

1,064
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,064

PostMar 31, 2014#205

http://www.theatlanticcities.com/neighb ... urbs/8680/

How Baltimore used an ACLU lawsuit to address concentrated poverty in the form of housing voucher use restrictions. Good story, and STL should follow suit.

455
Full MemberFull Member
455

PostApr 01, 2014#206

The Urban Shift in the U.S. Start-Up Economy, in One Chart
http://www.theatlanticcities.com/jobs-a ... hart/8749/
San Francisco’s SoMa neighborhood; Cambridge, Massachusetts’ Kendall Square; Lower Manhattan: These are the dense, walkable neighborhoods that have become the new hubs of America’s tech scene, as the center of gravity for venture investment and start-up activity shifts from suburbs to urban centers.
The Practical Path to Driverless Cars
http://www.theatlanticcities.com/commut ... cars/8759/
His job is director at the University of South Florida's Center for Urban Transportation Research (CUTR, pronounced cutter, not cuter) — home, Bittner says, to the largest collection of full-time faculty studying public transportation in the country. That's 43 faculty researchers and about as many student-researchers, working on 180 projects, as well as a new division devoted entirely to driverless cars called the Autonomous Vehicle Institute, which Bittner was integral in developing. This is how far ahead CUTR plans: there are 23 saplings planted on the front lawn.

By the time those saplings mature, driverless cars may be here, and, like horseless carriages a century and a half earlier, they will be a quantum leap removed from their predecessors. We are just now taking the first baby steps towards that leap. Only four states (California, Florida, Michigan, and Nevada) allow driverless cars. And the federal government has only authorized a handful of public-road test beds — Tampa has one — for so-called "connected vehicles," which are not necessarily driverless.

PostApr 02, 2014#207

American Cities Are Haunted by Too Many Parking Spaces
http://www.businessweek.com/articles/20 ... ay-studies
Garrick isn’t sure how the cities settled on their different policies, but he says overemphasis on parking growth led to a decline in physical appeal. “When I came to Hartford 30 years ago, it was a much more attractive place,” he says. “You want cities where people are on the streets, where there are things to do, places to go. You don’t want a city that is a big office park.”

PostApr 03, 2014#208

Latin America’s New Superstar
How Gritty, Crime-Ridden Medellín Became a Model for 21st-Century Urbanism
http://nextcity.org/forefront/view/mede ... in-america?
Arriving on U.S. shores, the exploits of cocaine cowboys made Miami the murder capital of the world in the early ’80s, an ignominious title Medellín itself stole in 1991, when it topped out at 381 murders per 100,000 residents, 40 times what the United Nations considers “epidemic.” That rate, if translated to New York City, would equal an unfathomable 32,000 murders annually.

A decade later, in 2004, the city’s first Metrocable gondola line opened, inaugurating Medellín’s now celebrated urbanismo social (social urbanism) agenda. Now, ten years after that gondola first connected the city’s poorer hillside neighborhoods to its bustling central business district, Medellín finds itself on the global stage once again, this time as a city basking in the glow of admiration for pioneering a new type of urbanism. The city’s newfound fame will be on full view for attendees of next week’s UN-Habitat World Urban Forum (WUF). Suddenly, Medellín has become a best-practices case study for mayors and policymakers worldwide.

PostApr 04, 2014#209

Can Free College Save American Cities?
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/ ... 05366.html
For weeks there were whispers. And then one night in November 2005, hundreds of parents, teachers, and students crammed into a boardroom at a drab administration building south of downtown. Janice Brown, the superintendent of the Kalamazoo schools, had an announcement to make, and it was even more surprising than the rumors that had been flying around town: Kalamazoo, small, struggling Kalamazoo, best known for its strange name and the industries it was no longer home to, was about to launch the most generous municipal college scholarship program in the country, an audacious experiment not only in education reform but in re-engineering a troubled town

1,320
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,320

PostApr 05, 2014#210

JuanHamez wrote:Latin America’s New Superstar
How Gritty, Crime-Ridden Medellín Became a Model for 21st-Century Urbanism
http://nextcity.org/forefront/view/mede ... in-america?
I've been really impressed with what I've read about several cities in Columbia. Bogota and Cartagena look pretty amazing, too.

933
Super MemberSuper Member
933

PostApr 05, 2014#211

JuanHamez wrote:Can Free College Save American Cities?
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/ ... 05366.html
For weeks there were whispers. And then one night in November 2005, hundreds of parents, teachers, and students crammed into a boardroom at a drab administration building south of downtown. Janice Brown, the superintendent of the Kalamazoo schools, had an announcement to make, and it was even more surprising than the rumors that had been flying around town: Kalamazoo, small, struggling Kalamazoo, best known for its strange name and the industries it was no longer home to, was about to launch the most generous municipal college scholarship program in the country, an audacious experiment not only in education reform but in re-engineering a troubled town
I read that Detroit was going to try and lure new, young residents by offering to pay half of their college tuition. How they can do that is anybody's guess, but if they can do it, then good for them. If they had that program when I started college, I might have moved there to use it.

1,067
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,067

PostApr 05, 2014#212

Another dumb question:

All of these articles stream in from all over the country about how cities "got it wrong" with parking, interstates, non-pedestrian minded development, automobile emphasis, etc. At the time of these decisions, however, in STL and elsewhere, who are the ones fighting (and obviously winning) for the counter argument? Politics and lobbying likely are influential, however there must be some positive spin to doing things an alternative way. If someone thinks Hartford or STL was a much more attractive place 30 or 70 years ago, then there must be someone who thinks it is better off now post "bad decisions". We are in a biased environment on this forum, and no one needs to convince this crowd that urban minded decisions are "better". Sometimes, from an educational perspective I wish there was a thread on the counter ("non-urban"?) proposals and the data used to support them because I can't believe that the decisions that got us to where we are locally and in most cities around the country were made out of plain ignorance or spite.

Culture responds to the trends of the times and it is easy to retrospectively cast blame based on hindsight and personal preference. Whose to say that in 50 years there won't be reams of urban theorists claiming that America/The World "got it wrong" by going all in on the tech sector, developments like CORTEX, and the like? Much of this technology is nascent enough that we really can't know it's long term repercussions. I'm sure that many aspects of urban health are dogma that should yield civic health, but as humanity has proven, they are subject to change as technology and trends undergo inevitable evolution.

455
Full MemberFull Member
455

PostApr 07, 2014#213

^^

There was an article that discussed a similar issue:
http://www.theatlanticcities.com/commut ... stay/8428/
It might be a bitter pill for an urbanist to swallow, but the adversary here isn't officialdom, or the "automotive interests," or any other monolithic bogey man; it's the very people whose lives said urbanist seeks to improve. Americans don't drive because they lack an alternative. We drive because we love our cars, no matter the price — we cherish the individual freedom they offer over convenience, frugality, common sense.
I think that quote is at the heart of it. These things happened because they reflected people's preferences. Probably the majority of the people who abandoned their old neighborhoods felt like their lives were better for it. Probably the majority of people who switched from using public transit to cars felt like their lives were better for it. Probably the majority of businesses that demolished a neighborhing building to build parking felt better for it. Probably the people didn't realize or didn't care that as everybody got a car and felt entitled to free or nearly free parking, the dense city centers would no longer be sustainable.

Its just that we're in a world now where the preference is balancing out. Back then, cars were new and you had status if you owned one. Now that everybody has one and everybody needs one, it seems more like a leech that you have to support just to do one's daily tasks of survival. People are realizing that given a choice between living somewhere vibrant and having a car, some (but not all) would choose the former.

Its not simple and theres no universal answer. I like to think of it as a pendulum that swung too far in one direction and we are in the midst of a correction in the other direction in an effort to find an appropriate balance between city and suburb.

PostApr 07, 2014#214

The death of a great American city: why does anyone still live in Detroit?http://www.theguardian.com/cities/2014/ ... in-detroit?
There is a new sense of urgency to stabilise these communities after decades of population decline, with planners and academics unveiling innovative proposals to combat blight and reimagine the urban landscape, and governments and outside donors pledging hundreds of millions to help. But everyone knows that time is running out. In January, the city's newly elected mayor, Mike Duggan, pleaded with residents to hold on for six more months before moving elsewhere.

933
Super MemberSuper Member
933

PostApr 07, 2014#215



There are many empty Chinese cities like these. They were mostly built in very recent history and are mostly unoccupied at this point. When China becomes TOO overpopulated (because I guess they think it isn't already), these ghost towns will fill up. It's like reverse Detroit.

My idea was that maybe they could potentially turn Detroit into one of these in the case that the U.S. would allow that many immigrants to move to one place over a short amount of time like that.

It could be a very extreme version of what they did for the Bosnian community in the '90s.

455
Full MemberFull Member
455

PostApr 09, 2014#216

Can Houston Learn to Love Light Rail?
http://www.theatlanticcities.com/commut ... rail/8820/
A Texan will not walk if he can ride a horse. "People's attitudes haven't changed," he says. "You are dead in the water in Houston if you don't have a car." But the people themselves have changed — no American metro has grown faster than Greater Houston over the last quarter-century, making it one of the most diverse areas in the United States — and they might be taking the city with them. Stephen Klineberg, co-director of the Kinder Institute for Urban Research at Rice University, divides Houston's history into three periods: the sleepy streetcar town, the city structured by the freedom of the automobile, and the metropolis yearning for freedom from the automobile. "There's a vision: retail downstairs, residents upstairs, shade trees, sidewalk cafes," says Klineberg. "This is, in general, a city self-consciously reinventing itself for the 21st century."

PostApr 09, 2014#217

Here is a pretty detailed article suggesting that Chicago's crime numbers (and their miraculous drop in the last few years) are likely to be fudged:

The Truth About Chicago’s Crime Rates

http://www.chicagomag.com/Chicago-Magaz ... ime-rates/

178
Junior MemberJunior Member
178

PostApr 10, 2014#218

I just returned from Panama City Panama. They have an old neighborhood called the Casca Viejo built in the 1600s. It was very populated and beautiful until the 1980s when it saw a flight to the suburbs and urban decay. For the last 20 years it was pretty much abandoned and taken over by squatters.

Even my guidebook for 2 years old said it's a rough area and mostly dilapidated neighborhood.

Today the neighborhood is dotted with a mix of white washed Art Deco, historic preservation, and slums. There is construction everywhere. I saw a huge mix of creative restaurants, bars, and galleries. You can feel the rush and urgency to make this a great place again. People can't get it done fast enough to move back. It is an absolutely beautiful neighborhood.

Interestingly enough Panama City has a major traffic problem. Suburbs sprawled out similar to the US. They just opened their metro-train system last week, the first central American city to do so, and installed modern busses.

455
Full MemberFull Member
455

PostApr 14, 2014#219

A good lecture from Jeff Speck on the walkable city:


114
Junior MemberJunior Member
114

PostApr 15, 2014#220

A good read about why large river cities with great assets have lack luster growth The artical takes in depth about Cincinnati, Louisville, St Louis, and Pittsburgh.

http://www.urbanophile.com/2014/04/13/o ... iverfront/

455
Full MemberFull Member
455

PostApr 15, 2014#221

Interesting piece on Los Angeles's self reflection about its own possible decline:

Report Finds Los Angeles at Risk of Decline
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/10/us/re ... cline.html
The Los Angeles 2020 Commission presented a catalog of failings that it said were a unique burden to the city: widespread poverty and job stagnation, huge municipal pension obligations, a struggling port and tourism industry and paralyzing traffic that would not be eased even with a continuing multibillion-dollar mass transit initiative.

Their conclusions amounted to an indictment of a city and its culture, a place that the commission said was brimming with talent and resources but was nonetheless falling behind other major cities across the globe.

“Los Angeles is barely treading water, while the rest of the world is moving forward,” the commission said. “We risk falling further behind in adapting to the realities of the 21st century and becoming a city in decline.”

212
Junior MemberJunior Member
212

PostApr 16, 2014#222

Let's send this link along to the fine makers of Aventura, shall we?

http://bettercities.net/news-opinion/bl ... ruly-urban

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostApr 16, 2014#223

^ nice.... even thought its already built, maybe with some better street scaping the Aventurd could be redeemed a bit. But then again, I noticed today that it looks like there may not even be a new curb for Newstead next to Shriner's Hospital.... I really hope I'm wrong because it'll drive me crazy to know that millions are being spent but the public space is still crap.

151
Junior MemberJunior Member
151

PostApr 17, 2014#224


3,235
Life MemberLife Member
3,235

PostApr 17, 2014#225

America is only in the beginning stages of a historic urban reordering. After over a half-century of depopulation, cities have been filling up — and not just with young millennials, but with families and even older workers and retirees.


http://mobile.nytimes.com/2014/04/17/op ... &referrer=

Read more posts (883 remaining)