455
Full MemberFull Member
455

PostJan 03, 2014#151

How I Learned to Love New York City Stride by Stride
http://aeon.co/magazine/living-together ... by-stride/
When I was nine, my father found a new form of entertainment for me. Whenever our schedules were free, we took the subway from Manhattan’s Upper West Side to the end of the line and walked around, exploring the neighbourhood. We saw swampy marshes in Canarsie, Brooklyn, public housing projects in Astoria, Queens, and beautiful, forested Van Cortlandt Park in the Bronx. One time, my father poked his head into a pub and everyone scattered. We never found out why.

In this way, I learned to love New York City. I still do. And over the past four years, partly in homage to New York, but largely to furnish material for a book-length study, I’ve walked some 6,000 miles across the city’s built-up terrain — that’s 120,000 blocks. The question, for a professional sociologist such as me, is: was this the best way to study a city?
I find that the most powerful descriptions of cities are urban love stories like the one above. Going forward, we need stories about St. Louis like this and we can absolutely do without trash like Salvage City.

PostJan 04, 2014#152

For urban design, Menino era scores highs and lows
http://www.bostonglobe.com/arts/2014/01 ... story.html

This is a pretty balanced review of the Boston Mayor's term in office
In his 20-plus years in office, Mayor Thomas M. Menino began as the healer of Boston’s neighborhoods. Over time, he morphed into the commander of downtown development. The best thing Menino did for architecture, the change he deserves to be remembered for, isn’t a building or group of buildings. It’s the transformation, still in progress, of Boston from a patchwork of semi-isolated neighborhoods into a single whole city.

PostJan 04, 2014#153

A fascinating new study has revealed what many already know: cities aren't meant to be experienced from behind the wheel of a car.
http://www.planetizen.com/node/66686
The researchers found that participants who saw the video from the perspective of a car rated the actors higher on negative characteristics (threatening, unpleasant) than participants in the other three conditions. Participants who saw the video from the perspective of the pedestrian rated the actors higher on positive characteristics (considerate, well-educated) than those in the car condition.

These findings have a few interesting implications. For example, they may help explain the "war on cars" furor of the past several years. It's easy to imagine how some individuals, so married to their windshield perspective, could see any attempt to improve active or public transportation as a direct attack on their person. Those people on the street are so threatening and unpleasant, after all. Why should the city cater to people like that?

1,067
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,067

PostJan 04, 2014#154

In regards to love stories, using NYC as the benchmark is a lost cause. STL is full of love stories as to why people love it, they are just not the ones that urbanists want to hear because the stories always end with...."and then we drove home to Crestwood."

These stories' power come more from the fact that its New York City not from the guys' love for it.

455
Full MemberFull Member
455

PostJan 05, 2014#155

^^

Maybe, -the details are specific to NYC- but then we have stories like this that are love stories about essentially a soulless suburb:

Silicon Valley Lost, and Found
http://techcrunch.com/2014/01/04/silico ... and-found/
As a new year turns, it’s time to go through that silly (but actually necessary) exercise of pausing to reflect. In a world of endless e-mail and distractions, it’s hard to remember where we came from, or where we are collectively going. For better and worse, Silicon Valley suffers from a perpetual loss of memory.

I have three simple stories about reinvention, that hopefully present a historical arc of this place. They belong to my family. For three generations, we have come here — before the orchards were cut down for silicon chip factories, before the chip makers left for Asia, before the dot-com era transformed warehouses into startup offices and before drones and Bitcoin.
Every location is rich with stories about its people and where they came from, under the backdrop of the architecture of their surroundings (the sense of place).

PostJan 07, 2014#156

Europe's Most Congested City Contemplates going Car Free
http://www.theatlanticcities.com/commut ... free/8027/
If the city’s new mayor gets his way, Central Brussels will soon be essentially car-free. Socialist Party mayor Yvan Mayeur, sworn in last month as mayor of the Brussels City district, wants to turn the Belgian capital's central axis into a pedestrian zone.

The move would transform a handsome but car-snarled four-lane boulevard and a string of squares into a long, café-filled promenade. This new zone will join up with an existing pedestrian zone in the narrow streets around the city's Grand Place and Rue Neuve, turning Brussels’ core into a spacious, rambling open-air living room.

The change is long overdue. No European capital has been quite so ruined by motor vehicles as Brussels, which even last year was scorned by the French as a "sewer for cars."
Two Decades of Change Have Boston Sparkling
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/06/us/tw ... kling.html?
The transformation of the harbor from embarrassment to showcase is emblematic of the larger transformation of the city over the last quarter-century. “In the ’70s and ’80s, cities were thought to be dying, when high crime, out-migration and despair were the order of the day,” said Robert Sampson, an urban sociologist at Harvard. “But Boston has really blossomed,” he said, even as other cities have nose-dived.

PostJan 08, 2014#157

This is a really really interesting article exploring something we here on this forum have often suspected: that poor road design can directly lead to poor returns on the development that surround it:

Defining the Worst Type of Street Design
http://www.theatlanticcities.com/commut ... urbs/8033/
If you want to … truly understand why our development approach is bankrupting us, just watch your speedometer. Anytime you are traveling between 30 and 50 miles per hour, you are basically in an area that is too slow to be efficient yet too fast to provide a framework for capturing a productive rate of return. Instead, they create hideous, inefficient, and disposable environments that quickly lose value.

PostJan 10, 2014#158

Why I Bought A House In Detroit For $500
http://www.buzzfeed.com/drewphilp/why-i ... it-for-500
I wanted something nobody wanted, something that was impossible. The city is filled with these structures, houses whose yellowy eyes seem to follow you. It would be only one house out of thousands, but I wanted to prove it could be done, prove that this American vision of torment could be built back into a home. I also decided I would do it the old-fashioned way, without grants or loans or the foundation money pouring into the city. I would work for everything that went into the house, because not everyone has access to those resources. I also wanted to prove to myself and my family I was a man. While they were building things, I had been writing poems.

After college, as my friends left Michigan for better opportunities, I was determined to help fix this broken, chaotic city by building my own home in the middle of it. I was 23 years old.

PostJan 13, 2014#159

The NYT released a poverty map by census tract fairly recently:

http://www.nytimes.com/newsgraphics/201 ... verty-map/

The one thing I noticed is that in terms of percentage of residents under the poverty line, there are a number of areas of the northside that are doing pretty well. For instance census tract 119200 105500 have as few people under the poverty line as some places around clayton. Of course I'm sure the median incomes are very different but its still very interesting

PostJan 14, 2014#160

What the Interstate Highway System Should Have Looked Like
http://www.theatlanticcities.com/commut ... oked/8097/
Eisenhower himself didn't realize the Interstate Highway System would cut through American cities until a few years after construction began. Ike had wanted a national road network like the one he'd seen in Germany during World War II. But he'd also wanted these roads to stop at the doorsteps of cities, not push right past...

The U.S. experience illustrates that national transportation planning is best conceived as two systems — one inter-metropolitan and one intra-metropolitan — and that the institutions, goals, methods, and financing instruments for those two systems should differ.
Is there any way to actually get this implemented or is it too late for the US like the article is suggesting? To have a pool of money used for "intercity transport" which will largely go to high speed rail and interstates, and then a pool of money for "intracity transport" which will go to public transportation and local road systems, including the current "interstates" within metro boundaries.

1,792
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,792

PostJan 14, 2014#161

^
Boarnet argues that one branch of the Interstate Highway System should have been reserved entirely for intercity roads. These would be highways running through remote areas with cheap land and sparse populations, so it would make sense to prioritize traffic flow and vehicle capacity. Paying for this branch with a pooled fuel tax would also make sense, because the benefits of low-cost transport and trade redound on everyone.

The other branch of the system would be made up of intracity roads, those running within the city limits. Given the high cost of land and density of population in cities, creating sufficient road capacity and swift vehicle flow would become a pipe dream, so the wiser aim would be transport balance. The logical way to finance these roads, given the great demand for space on them, would be with direct user fees — ideally priced to reduce congestion.
So basically toll roads? It seems to me if i was a rural voter i'd be all in favor of this. The city dwellers pay a gas tax to support the vital "intercity" transportation corridors and the cities can support their "intracity" infrastructure on their own with tolls. What a deal! I'm not particularly against toll roads but the way the article presented it seems very imbalanced. Especially since the city dwellers generate a large chunk (if not a majority) of the gas tax but the vast majority of the money generated from it are spent in the "remote areas with cheap land".

455
Full MemberFull Member
455

PostJan 14, 2014#162

^^ I think the purpose is to acknowledge that the final goal of these regulations is to reduce the number of cars on the road in cities. Many dense cities already do this in one way or another. The Mass turnpike going into boston is toll. Many New York City bridges and tunnels have steep tolls. Highways in Washington DC have congestion based fees. In Singapore, registration fees for cars are 100% of their purchase cost, essentially doubling the cost of owning an automobile in their city.

Over time, people in metro areas would use cars less and thus have to pay less gas tax. In fact cities themselves may put incentives in place to decrease the gas tax money leaving the city leading to a faster transformation.

I think ultimately, the ideal ratio of automobiles to people in a metro area is about 0.5 to 1 per family... certainly nothing like 1 per adult that is common our region.

PostJan 14, 2014#163

How to Save Detroit: The Motor City needs help. Why not turn it into Hong Kong?
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB1 ... 2337146296
Hong Kong's per capita GDP is among the highest in the world. But it was once a worse mess than Detroit. Devastated by Japanese occupation, the British colony's population had declined from 1.6 million in 1941 to 600,000 by 1945. Then, after the 1949 communist victory on the mainland, a million refugees arrived. Most of them were penniless. Britain's Labor government was penniless, too. Maybe Hong Kong could have gone into Chapter 9. But who would have been the bankruptcy judge? Chairman Mao?
Apparently some in Detroit are trying to turn it into a special economic zone exempt from US taxes. It will be interesting to see what happens if they get what they want.

542
Senior MemberSenior Member
542

PostJan 16, 2014#164

JuanHamez wrote:What Will Happen to Grandma's House When No One Wants to Buy It?
http://www.theatlanticcities.com/housin ... y-it/7669/
The first time Arthur C. Nelson and I spoke about what he's come to call the "great senior sell-off," back in March, he was broadly worried that baby boomers would soon begin trying to sell large suburban single-family homes that no one would want to buy.

By Nelson's calculation, 20.1 million senior households will be trying to sell their homes between 2015 and 2030. As many as 7.4 million of them won't find a willing buyer – a number, as we outline in the magazine's Chartist feature, that could send us towards the next housing crash.
My parents (1939, 1941) are Silent, not Boom (according to the Strauss-Howe boundaries), but they are the poster children for this malaise.

In 1994, just two years before my mother's health started failing (post-polio syndrome), they bought an exurban ranch built in 1965 on an absolutely massive lot. The walk score of the neighborhood is zero. Zero. Not ten, not two, zero. You have to drive a minimum of five miles to get to anything, but the majority of their helathcare providers are at least half an hour away. My mother hasn't been able to walk since about 2004, but she wasn't bedridden until 2012. If they lived in the old folks' highrise in DeBaliviere place 0.3 miles from my house in Skinky-D, she would have had an additional eight years of mobility in her scooter that Medicare paid for 80% of. My father is nearly 75 and spends much of his summer battling vegetation on the massive lot. It's adjacent to a golf course. No one in the family plays golf.

They paid $150K for the house in 1994. The Zillow estimate is ballpark and it fluctuates, but it's settled around $185-190K. Once you correct for inflation, the house's value is probably lower than it was when they bought it. And even if they had the sense to move into something more appropriate for their age/health, I'd be surprised if it would fetch $190K, because the people who are willing to spend that on a house nowhere near anything are going to want something brand new. To even have a prayer of getting rid of the damn thing, they'd probably have to pour $50K into the kitchen.

Meanwhile, I live in a beautiful house in Skinky-D built in 1911 which is in great shape, and a 90-second walk from the FP/Deb metro.

455
Full MemberFull Member
455

PostJan 20, 2014#165

Cities Create Music, Cultural Festivals to Make Money
http://www.governing.com/topics/finance ... ivals.html
Municipal officials and entrepreneurs see the power of cultural events as a way to spur short-term tourism while shaping an image of the host city as a cool, dynamic location where companies and citizens in modern, creative industries can thrive.

592
Senior MemberSenior Member
592

PostJan 20, 2014#166

^^Regarding Grandma's house, I think the burbs are a little better placed to deal with the problem than urban areas of generations past, but maybe not. Two illustrative stories:

1) An old friend of mine inherited his great-aunt's house in Bevo. Shotgun-style, 1.5 bedroom, 1 bathroom, hadn't been updated since the 1960s. The family owned it since 1919. It was worth (maybe) $30K. They put $15K into it to get it habitable for the 21st century and are now renting to some guys who passed a tenant screen. But the land isn't going up in value because a lot of the neighbors are tenants who aren't screened, which means some sketchy folks. It won't sell for $55K, so they're kind of stuck with it.

2) Rockwood School District's recent long-term planning study for enrollment noted that they have a looming problem: the district isn't "regreening". The planners said the district's home values are so high in some areas that young couples can't afford to buy into the area, so elementary schools in some places are emptying out. It's a weird problem to have, but as the burbs get older, it's not surprising. After all, what young couple can buy a 4 bedroom for $575K in Chesterfield when they can get the same house for $275K in St. Peters?

455
Full MemberFull Member
455

PostJan 20, 2014#167

^^ I'm not an urban planning expert but I hypothesize that this becomes an issue anytime you have a neighborhood of essentially the same age demographic without major inflow after the initial settlement. Why did this happen in the US and not many other countries? The Great Depression and World War II! There was very little housing construction for nearly two decades during that era and after the troops came home, all of a sudden they wanted to move out of their parents homes in the 50s. For the first time ever in the history of the US, a single age demographic migrated en mass. So all the young people moved out of the cities to the new suburbs. The problem was that when their parents retired or passed in the 60s and 70s, there were fewer young people left in the cities than in generations past.

1,064
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,064

PostJan 20, 2014#168

But the land isn't going up in value because a lot of the neighbors are tenants who aren't screened, which means some sketchy folks.
Can a "public good" case be made for requiring landlords to document and adhere to certain standards for tenant screening? Neighborhood residents can already file a neighborhood impact statement to increase the odds that a judge will issue a real sentence after the trash commits a crime. Why not also issue impact statements to shut down and/or punish landlords that do not screen their tenants to the standards of the surrounding neighborhoods?

For instance, read through the comments on here regarding crime issues in TGS - https://www.facebook.com/groups/TowerGroveSouth/

I would wager that a large volume of the cited crime originates in high poverty, rental-heavy, slumlord heavy (no credit check/criminal history check landlords) neighborhoods adjacent to TGS - Gravois Park, Dutchtown, etc - and that a lot of it could be stopped if the adjacent neighborhoods pressed hard for the city to force landlords to screen tenants to the desired credit/criminal history standards on the grounds of neighborhood impact.

542
Senior MemberSenior Member
542

PostJan 20, 2014#169

stlhistory wrote: 1) An old friend of mine inherited his great-aunt's house in Bevo. Shotgun-style, 1.5 bedroom, 1 bathroom, hadn't been updated since the 1960s.
I'm not sure I've ever seen a half bedroom. What does that look like?

455
Full MemberFull Member
455

PostJan 22, 2014#170

For Bus Riders, Real-Time Arrival Data Is More Important Than Better Service
http://www.theatlanticcities.com/commut ... -bus/8158/
In surveys of these OneBusAway users, 92 percent of them reported that they were more satisfied with public transit as a result of using the app, And the regional transit agency, King Country Metro, didn't have to reduce fares or invest in new buses or even increase service frequency to get it.

In fact, their results (Watkins has now extended this research to other cities) suggest that transit agencies might get a better payoff by telling people when buses will arrive than by making them arrive more often.

"We’d rather have real-time [data] than more frequent service," Watkins says.
I think this is an important lesson. In Toronto, many of the bus stops have little screens saying when the expected ETA of the next bus is. This is present at lots of metro stations in other cities too. Having an app on the cell phone that locals could use would be helpful too. Google maps already does a good job with this in terms of managing schedules but it can be improved with real time data about where the buses or trains actually are.

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostJan 22, 2014#171

Metro said real time info will be in Google Maps later this year.

5,631
Life MemberLife Member
5,631

PostJan 22, 2014#172

quincunx wrote:Metro said real time info will be in Google Maps later this year.
Yeah, I asked them about this a while ago. Great technology that's in the works for Metro.

907
Super MemberSuper Member
907

PostJan 23, 2014#173

Wow...if they have real time, I would actually take the bus.

215
Junior MemberJunior Member
215

PostJan 23, 2014#174

Where is Metro on the smart card technology? Eliminating the hassle of paying cash is another hurdle to clear to increased bus ridership.

455
Full MemberFull Member
455

PostJan 23, 2014#175

^^ Thats great that we are getting tracking! I'm actually quite excited now. Yeah I do wonder if we are ever going to get a card system. Any plans for putting in turnstiles in the future? I suspect they would be hard to enforce with open metro stations but I also suspect that we are likely undercounting riders and losing out on revenue.

Read more posts (933 remaining)