yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, and yes.imran wrote:
A few suggestions :
Dis-incentivize obscured storefronts/frosted glass. There needs to active surveillance of sidewalks by people within.
Divide large vacant retail spaces into smaller more affordable rental spaces that provide an easier entry for an entrepreneur
Re-evaluate all yellow curbs, curb cuts and ‘no parking zones’ . Street parking with rapid turnover and the foot traffic it generates is a big part of sidewalk activity.
Restore two-way streets so motorists drive slower/more carefully through the CBD, noticing an interesting store or business in the process as well as ‘patrolling’ the area and reporting a problem if they see one.
- 2,626
Would like to see a program like Arch Grant's, but targeted towards smaller retail concepts with the end goal of getting them set up downtown. Really looking forward to the fashion incubator to start paying dividends too.
- 9,549
I had a plan to put in a 2 way multi use path on tucker from Washington to the bridge by the federal building. Asked Bird for $40,000 for design and eventually another $100,000 for construction (other $ from alders). I left the City and I don’t think anyone picked up the project since (9 months now)
^ While I can’t speak to your personal experiences with this plan I thought I remember seeing someone comment recently on this site (can’t remember the thread) about a separated bicycle track currently being designed for Tucker. Hopefully someone can chime in with some details.
Either way, Tucker (at least south from Washington) has more than enough width to fit some alternative transit modes in there. Here’s hoping they can figure it out.
Either way, Tucker (at least south from Washington) has more than enough width to fit some alternative transit modes in there. Here’s hoping they can figure it out.
- 9,549
That’s the Trailnet plan. But trailnet cant implement anything and they are extremely difficult to work with but that’s because of their last CEO- he has departed and I feel confident that the current will be much bettersc4mayor wrote: ^ While I can’t speak to your personal experiences with this plan I thought I remember seeing someone comment recently on this site (can’t remember the thread) about a separated bicycle track currently being designed for Tucker. Hopefully someone can chime in with some details.
Either way, Tucker (at least south from Washington) has more than enough width to fit some alternative transit modes in there. Here’s hoping they can figure it out.
The extremely difficult team at Trailnet secured that $40k and engineering is underway by the city’s on call firm, CBB.
- 9,549
The team is great, the CEO was the difficult one. That’s why a few people left too. The new leader (Cindy Mense) is great, I’ve had a pleasure of working with her a while back when I was at modot and administered some Federally funded Save Routes to School grants for themaddxb2 wrote: The extremely difficult team at Trailnet secured that $40k and engineering is underway by the city’s on call firm, CBB.
Trailnet is/was getting $1 day per scooter from Lime.
It sucks that the Metro hub is basically at 14th and Clark, necessitating the proposed N/S alignment travel to. It would have been great to see the Link go down Tucker, and give that sucker a much needed diet. Combined with protected bike lanes and we might actually have a real mixed use thoroughfare again.
- 9,549
Tucker at Market is 110 feet wide! You could land a plane on tuckerbwcrow1s wrote: It sucks that the Metro hub is basically at 14th and Clark, necessitating the proposed N/S alignment travel to. It would have been great to see the Link go down Tucker, and give that sucker a much needed diet. Combined with protected bike lanes and we might actually have a real mixed use thoroughfare again.
They delivered on the $1 per day per scooter one month. Promised much more but never happened. Then after six months of asking, Lime said a “change in leadership at Lime” made it impossible to deliver on their invoices.dbInSouthCity wrote: Trailnet is/was getting $1 day per scooter from Lime.
Trailnet finalized design requirements with the City, anticipating using some of promises funds to develop multiple of these ...

Unfortunately...
- 2,386
^So what about Bird? Can we start throwing these things away when we see them? They're tearing up the sidewalks and adding minimal to negative value at best.
- 8,907
Nestle IT department downtown is restructuring again. They just let 80 people go.
Not sure if this is the right place for this, but I know we were discussing WeWork here before.
Little background on their IPO:
https://www.stltoday.com/business/local ... 68fe5.html
Little background on their IPO:
https://www.stltoday.com/business/local ... 68fe5.html
- 2,386
^The IPO is never happening. The company has been operating in structural insolvency since inception.
- 9,549
Just wait until the economy tanks- they’re dead as a door nail because usually a company will unload assets to get cash when things go bad, We Work has zero assets, they’re just holding a lot of expensive leases
Terrible press on the WeWork CEO was all over newspapers yesterday.
- 952
- 2,419
I took a leisurely drive down Locust St. last night, and it is astonishing how much potential that corridor has.
I can't wait to see that corridor five years from now.
I can't wait to see that corridor five years from now.
Here is some more bad press today:kipfilet wrote:Terrible press on the WeWork CEO was all over newspapers yesterday.
https://www.bizjournals.com/stlouis/new ... s_headline
WeWork is suspending all new office leases in preparation of laying off over 12,000 people. My guess is their Met Square lease is on ice for the time being.
Here is the text:
WeWork has put a halt to the signing of new lease agreements with property owners as the lossmaking group tries to rapidly rein in costs, according to people briefed on the matter. The move will rattle commercial property owners across the globe who rented to WeWork, which often upgraded the spaces so the group could re-let the buildings to its own customers. Landlords have been bracing for the possibility that WeWork, which has become the biggest office tenant in New York and one of the largest in London, could suspend its expansion. The decision to put all new leases on ice comes as WeWork’s parent group, the We Company, readies to lay off thousands of its 12,000-plus employees in the coming weeks.
On Thursday, the company was planning to cut the jobs of roughly 20 employees with close ties to co-founder Adam Neumann, including some of its top managers, those who had been briefed said. Among the senior figures under pressure are vice-chairman Michael Gross and Chris Hill, a brother-in-law of Mr Neumann’s wife, Rebekah. Mr Gross was among the most senior executives and accompanied Artie Minson, who was elevated to co-chief executive of WeWork this week alongside Sebastian Gunningham, on investor roadshows last year. Others, in what was described as “Adam’s posse” by one insider, caught up in the cuts include a company driver for Mr Neumann’s Maybach luxury car. The new co-CEOs have also put up for sale a Gulfstream G650 jet which WeWork bought new for more than $60m last year.
Mr Hill rose quickly through the company ranks, holding titles including “chief We officer” of its Japanese operations and most recently chief product officer of the whole group. Jennifer Berrent, the chief legal officer who was seen as having been sidelined by the promotion of Mr Minson and Mr Gunningham to co-CEOs, was expected to remain at the company, some of the people added. Ms Berrent was co-president alongside Mr Minson before he stepped up this week. The company’s Chelsea headquarters has been gripped by crisis since Mr Neumann was pushed out as chief executive on Tuesday in the wake of the dramatic collapse of its initial public offering. WeWork, which had been expected to be a highlight in a banner year for IPOs, is now trying to secure a new financing lifeline. The group has burnt through capital as it expanded to more than 500 offices in 111 cities, and last year it reported a loss of $1.6bn on sales of $1.8bn. Creditors have raised concerns over its capital reserves, which stood at roughly $2.5bn at the end of June, and on Thursday analysts S&P Global cut the company’s credit rating deeper into junk territory. The yield on WeWork’s debt surged above 10 per cent on the downgrade, in a sign of the financial strain on the group.
The company is due to receive a $1.5bn capital injection next year from its largest backer, Japan’s SoftBank. The two sides have been in talks over an increase to the sum SoftBank would pump in of at least $1bn, with negotiations centred on the valuation cut WeWork would be dealt in the transaction. Fresh capital is critical for WeWork, which is also seeking to clinch a much-reduced $3bn to $4bn loan from a group of Wall Street banks. The lenders are refusing to bankroll a deal of that size unless WeWork first raises new equity, according to multiple sources.
Former staff said the cost cuts indicated that Mr Minson and Mr Gunningham were sending a signal to Wall Street that they were serious about changing a culture known for its excesses. The looming departures of the employees with close ties to Mr Neumann was earlier reported by The Wall Street Journal. The co-CEOs have also decided to sell three of the acquisitions made under Mr Neumann — Conductor, Managed by Q and Meetup — for which they have already received tentative expressions of interest in recent days, two people briefed on the matter said. The company is expected to retain Flatiron School, a coding education business it bought two years ago. The unravelling of the IPO has already shown up in the accounts of several of WeWork’s investors. The investment bank Jefferies late on Thursday took a $146m writedown on a stake it purchased in the co-working space provider in 2013. Jefferies said it had reduced its valuation based on an estimate it made on August 31, which included a “significant discount due to uncertainty regarding the timing and pricing of We’s IPO”, and that it could face further writedowns in the future.
- 2,419
I don't know if that is bad press or just what everybody with business sense has expected for quite some time.
I'd rather a deal with WeWork never happen, than have people hired and then quickly laid off.
I'd rather a deal with WeWork never happen, than have people hired and then quickly laid off.
^ It was definitely expected by anyone with business sense, but it is also very, very bad press.
- 2,419
I meant that it isn't bad press for Met Square or for St. Louis.
It's catastrophic press for WeWork.
It's catastrophic press for WeWork.





