Attached June & July shootings/shots fired. Note this largely happens in the evening.
- June & July.pdf (99.12 KiB) 0
thats cute- give the City personnel a call and ask to see my resignation letter should be public record, if making up bs helps you sleep at night go for it. I think the social media policy got “suspended” after blow back from elected officials- don’t know if it got reinstated before I left for another job.bradwaldrop wrote:
I find it interesting Denis Beganovic tries to be cordial in person but rants about me here behind dbinSouthCity and also on Twitter. It’s doubly interesting he was fired from the City of St. Louis Streets Department for violating their social media policy while tweeting from behind his day job's desk. I guess UrbanSTL.com allows this same type of behavior.
No popcorn necessary, you can't debate someone that is a professional liar/delusional and possibly mentally unstable. did anyone expect him to come here and admit he is a racist? although the equivalent of "i have black friends" or tenants should have been a first clue.sc4mayor wrote: ^ I'll get the popcorn!
There are so many stupid things in this rambling but this one is top notchbradwaldrop wrote:
At the end of the day policing is down city wide post-Ferguson; the City is having trouble attracting and retaining cops; **police themselves are making 20-30% fewer arrests in the post-Ferguson environment; and, specifically at night (not during the day), downtown is suffering. We cannot just shuttle through $500 licenses and continue to concentrate behaviors when we aren't even allotted an adequate amount of police downtown. It's not logical. **NOTE: lately and I suspect for some time to come, you will hear "crime stats are actually trending down in downtown ..." or "this sector of crime is actually down in such and such neighborhood in the the City of St. Louis ..." these are lies being perpetuated by people in charge that are not taking into account that data collection has changed downwardly by cops not interacting as often with criminals. The reality is police are interacting less with criminals/behaviors on a daily basis and the result is that crime stats show crime is down, when crime is actually up. Some cops are staying in their cars because they are spread too thin, so thin that they are one per vehicle (and it is easier to take down a criminal with two cops versus one). Some cops are staying in their cars because every person in the city seems to carry a weapon these days thanks to our rural politicians and their constituents.
What does this even mean? Did you use some Trump Phrase generator software?!? "love good cops"?!?! developer is synonymous with cop?!? What is that? what you’ve just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent post were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this forum is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soulbradwaldrop wrote:
Where is this vitriol coming from? Denis, is it because I love good cops, good policing and a strong business environment? Alex, is it because I think we have enough low income housing already in and around downtown? I assume you also have a problem with me liking good police and good policing. These days the word "developer" is synonymous with "cop" ... maybe it's a generational thing. I feel just fine in that company.
Totally agree. With Downtown we need more of an "all of the above" mentality to get it where it needs to be. What are some examples of relatively inexpensive things that could be done to fix the street frontage issue?KansasCitian wrote: I completely agree with that quote about how improving downtown street frontage will also improve downtown safety.
Some residents, especially those that post on social media, oftentimes say that safety needs to be addressed first, before investment goes downtown. I completely disagree. Tackle both at the same time and you'll see vast improvements.
The topgolf comment for Lacledes landing made me laugh.MRNHS wrote: Regarding the article on Interface Studio above, there is a link set up to provide feedback. See below, there is an interactive map where you can provide input on specific places as well as a survey.
https://downtownstl.org/design-downtown-stl/
rumor has it that topgolf originally wanted to be at 44 and Hampton where the City Street Dept is located at but City wouldnt move.jshank83 wrote:The topgolf comment for Lacledes landing made me laugh.MRNHS wrote: Regarding the article on Interface Studio above, there is a link set up to provide feedback. See below, there is an interactive map where you can provide input on specific places as well as a survey.
https://downtownstl.org/design-downtown-stl/
A few suggestions :SouthCityJR wrote:Totally agree. With Downtown we need more of an "all of the above" mentality to get it where it needs to be. What are some examples of relatively inexpensive things that could be done to fix the street frontage issue?KansasCitian wrote: I completely agree with that quote about how improving downtown street frontage will also improve downtown safety.
Some residents, especially those that post on social media, oftentimes say that safety needs to be addressed first, before investment goes downtown. I completely disagree. Tackle both at the same time and you'll see vast improvements.

