2,929
Life MemberLife Member
2,929

PostJul 26, 2019#76

What was Doe Run is now becoming the Port of Herculaneum. The site is being converted from a shipping-out point for locally produced commodities into a true harbor for goods going in and out. The basic infrastructure needs, as I understand them, will be to (1) transfer containers on and off ships, (2) transfer containers across other modes of transport, such as trucks, (3) retaining cargo containers on site, and (4) maintaining cargo vessels, including refueling via LNG. They're going to have to be able to have docked at least two vessels at a time, the primary long-haul vessel that goes between Herculaneum and Plaquemines, and the mid-haul vessels that'll go from Herculaneum to the STL area. The existing capacities at the site make it ideal for harbor conversion. 

Meanwhile, the leadership of the STL Regional Freightway are incredibly professional and accomplishing great things for the region, even as they receive comparably little credit or praise. Much is deserved. I also know the Director of the Port Authority in Jefferson County, and I'm glad to say they're under sound leadership. 

6,118
Life MemberLife Member
6,118

PostJul 27, 2019#77

^All right, I confess, that's a very sound argument and makes the thing just that much more exciting. 

2,419
Life MemberLife Member
2,419

PostAug 19, 2019#78

What can St. Louis/Jefferson County reasonably expect to see happen with this? 

PostAug 19, 2019#79

I just hope that means tons of jobs added to the region. 

I'd love to see this drive some real economic growth. 

2,327
Life MemberLife Member
2,327

PostAug 19, 2019#80

I've put this in the "Hyperloop/TransitX" bucket but this is looking like more of a real possibility. If so, it would be great!
I just wish it was closer to downtown. Like being at the Arch ground and staring across to a busy, giant container port with cranes and all.

3,541
Life MemberLife Member
3,541

PostAug 19, 2019#81

^ There is really no excuse for St. Louis not to have a more built out and modernized port district. It just shows that the region has dropped the ball on economic development when it comes to logistics. No reason FedEx should be based in Memphis. No reason Indianapolis and Nashville should be eating our lunch on as logistic hubs either. We have the railroads, rivers, and highways to do it much bigger. Chicago got the drop on us in the 1800s, Dallas and Atlanta did the same in the 1900s, we can't lose the 2000s to the likes of Indy and Nashville. 

1,864
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,864

PostAug 19, 2019#82

Is that due to bridge height?  

5,704
Life MemberLife Member
5,704

PostAug 19, 2019#83

chaifetz10 wrote: Is that due to bridge height?  
I assume it has to do with river depth 

Logistical I don't see why you would take off one vessel only to put it on another barge to get into Metro Area.  I'm assuming trucks would head to St. Louis, Memphis, Indy, etc.  once it comes off the larger river vessel. 

sc4mayor
sc4mayor

PostAug 19, 2019#84

^ I've heard bridge height (especially during a flood) is the reason the larger vessels won't come up past Herculaneum.  I would imagine freight bound for St. Louis locations would be trucked into the area from Herculaneum, but I could see the need for smaller container carrying vessels that could travel to other cities further up the Mississippi and Missouri River systems.  Maybe a potential container unloading area at the MRT, but I wouldn't know.  This stuff is a bit out of my league, tbh.

1,190
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,190

PostAug 19, 2019#85

It has to do with bridge clearance.  The Eads has a low clearance.  For reference, most river traffic needs to be above a 9ft draft I believe.

2,929
Life MemberLife Member
2,929

PostAug 20, 2019#86

It is reasonable to anticipate STL becoming a significant continental hub for logistics management. Should APH’s plans come together, we should have thousands of additional cargo containers being moved through the STL region weekly compared to what we have now, which is already a significant amount when including rail and road networks. It cannot be overstated that the potential to offer cost savings of 30-40% would fundamentally change how imports and exports are shipped across much of the US and even Canada.
 
This inflow of cargo movement could lead to multiple specific outcomes, including:
· Increased rail traffic through our six Class I railroad hubs, shipping these cargo containers to their final destinations across the country. There is potential for the STL rail networks to see significant enough new gross traffic to compete with Chicago for volume.
· Construction of multiple warehouses for the storage of these goods. They would service both US goods meant for export and what we receive as imports, everything from clothing to high end manufacturing. Warehouse developments like what can be found at I-255/I-270 near Edwardsville and along I-370 near St. Peters could become more commonplace. I can see significant developments in the near East Side along I-255, such as Dupo.
· Expansion of the Port of St. Louis and America’s Central Port in Granite City, including the addition of cargo cranes, to welcome and service the mid-sized cargo vessels.
· New manufacturing operations locating in the STL region for proximity to this new shipping hub, from parts & pieces of components to finished goods ready for export.
· Professional logistics management companies increasing their operations in STL, perhaps setting up their offices in Downtown.
· Very significant economic development in Jefferson County as Herculaneum becomes the primary hub for the STL region.
· Thousands of new jobs across the region.
 
Regarding why the biggest vessels would go to Herculaneum and the mid-sized ones coming to STL, I’ve heard it’s all about bridge height. When the river runs high, it won’t be possible to run the largest vessels any further north than Herculaneum because they wouldn’t be able to cross under the Jefferson Barracks Bridge in South County.

2,419
Life MemberLife Member
2,419

PostAug 20, 2019#87

I hope all of that falls into place. 

I'd love to see St. Louis become an inland exporting/importing monster.

If the demand to go through St. Louis will become so high, and we are seeing traffic delays in Chicago and Long Beach, what can St. Louis do to ensure that it can avoid those same delays and continue to provide expedited services to companies freighting goods through the region for years to come? 

5,704
Life MemberLife Member
5,704

PostAug 20, 2019#88

^ Don't forget that competition is coming from East Coast just as much as the West Coast.   NY/NJ, Baltimore, Norfolk, Charleston, Savannah to Jacksonville have all spent heavily on channel deepening, container facilities, cranes and dock to rail operations as well as significant effort by rails to make sure they have clearance for double stacking containers on rail cars moving from east to west.  

2,929
Life MemberLife Member
2,929

PostAug 20, 2019#89

KansasCitian: Advocacy for STL's growth in shipping and logistics is centered upon the St. Louis Regional Freightway. They've led the charge to make sure the region has the capacities to draw new business and handle their growth. Their efforts to lead the fundamental redevelopment the Merchants Bridge, as a private-public partnership after the project was denied Federal funding, has been remarkable and absolutely essential to keeping the region a major national rail hub. As a part of Bi-State, they're leading the efforts to fully meet all of STL's logistic needs (like redoing I-270 in North County). Otherwise, worrying about the region being at capacity for total shipping efficacy is a problem we should all hope to have some day. Should that ever happen, the simple answer is to either build more rail and highways or increase capacities at what we already have. 

Dredger: You're right, everyone's jumping after logistics hubs and spending monies on them. I'd say APH's advantages are lower costs, new technologies, and the catchment area of the country's geographic center. Consider that the smaller vessels APH has designed are meant to go through the locks & dams. This will connect the Mississippi River to other national river networks, including the Missouri (Kansas City, Jefferson City, Omaha, Sioux City, even the Dakotas and Montana), the Illinois (Peoria, the exurbs of Chicago near Joliet), and the Ohio (Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Louisville, and parts of both Indiana and West Virginia meeting at Cairo IL). Hypothetically, if steel made in Pittsburgh bound for Asian markets can be shipped via APH's vessels down the Ohio River to the Mississippi all the way to the Gulf of Mexico, at costs less than shipping it via rail or truck to an Atlantic port, then they'll go with APH down the less expensive route. We'll just have to wait and see what's the more affordable option; whatever it is will win. 

1,610
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,610

PostAug 21, 2019#90

^He specifically said "Consider that the smaller vessels APH has designed are meant to go through the locks & dams. This will connect the Mississippi River to other national river networks"

2,419
Life MemberLife Member
2,419

PostAug 21, 2019#91

What would the route between St. Louis and Kansas City look like?

sc4mayor
sc4mayor

PostAug 21, 2019#92

KansasCitian wrote: What would the route between St. Louis and Kansas City look like?
Here is a little background on the Missouri River with regards to shipping.
https://www.waterwaysjournal.net/2019/0 ... uri-river/

There isn't a whole lot of shipping on the Missouri River, especially with recent flooding.  There are efforts to revive it, but that effort is still in the early stages.  It would definitely be possible to send these vessels between the two cities though.  There is already a little barge traffic on the river when water levels are acceptable.

6,118
Life MemberLife Member
6,118

PostAug 21, 2019#93

^I believe the extended droughts and commensurate low summer water levels of a few years back also played havoc on Missouri River shipping. (Which, as it happens, also come up in the article.) For many years the navigation season was quite restricted since states upstream were fighting to have water held in reservoirs during the summer, primarily for recreational purposes, though also to some extent for irrigation. That meant that during the fall harvest there just wasn't any way to ship grain downstream economically. Barges could only be loaded to perhaps half their capacity and so forth. That hasn't been so much the case recently, but the Missouri is still much more sensitive to flood and drought cycles than the Mississippi. (And probably always has been. It's really a much smaller river, in spite of appearances. Much lower flow volume, typically.)

2,929
Life MemberLife Member
2,929

PostAug 22, 2019#94

Missouri Port Authorities Team Up To Advance Plan For Statewide Initiative That Focuses On Innovative Inland Waterway Container-On-Vessel Freight Service

Article from the STL Regional Freightway on meetings recently held in Herculaneum, site of the Port of Jefferson County. 

From Governor Parson: 
We’re going to put everything on the table that we can to find a solution.
Key takeaways from the article: 
  • Freight volumes are to increase nationally by 40% in the next three decades, most of which will be containerized freight. Ten billion tons of new freight is anticipated to come to market in the next ten years. 
  • The State of Missouri is focusing on connecting its major port cities of Kansas City, Jefferson City, and Saint Louis with the planned hub at Herculaneum, which is being called the Gateway Terminal. American Patriot Holdings, the developer of the COV vessels, is focusing on these Missouri ports as its northernmost potential markets at this time (as well as Granite City). 
  • Missouri has multiple competitive advantages, based on our geography as well as our existing transportation infrastructure (rail, road, river, runway), to be an ideal location in the US for basing logistics operations and receiving imports & exports for distribution. 
  • The Port of Jefferson County is in negotiations with Doe Run for land acquisition for maximum build-out of the Gateway Terminal as a logistics hub. 
  • APH's due diligence is anticipated to be complete by March 2020. 
  • APH expects to begin full shipping operations by March 2022. 
  • Gov Parsons is working to build consensus in the Missouri legislature to facilitate public sector support for APH and their COV freighters with these Missouri ports. The Port of Jefferson County is putting together a "working group" to help define what will be sought. 
  • APH is applying the impacts of recent high river waters into their strategic planning as they anticipate their 2022 launch. 

PostNov 04, 2019#95


PostNov 04, 2019#96


PostNov 04, 2019#97


PostNov 04, 2019#98


PostDec 23, 2019#99


PostDec 23, 2019#100

Saint Louis CNR (Construction News and Review): St. Louis Regional Freightway’s 2020 Priority Projects List Advance to Construction
Representing the infrastructure needs of the manufacturing and logistics industries, the updated list for 2020 reveals that eight of the 20 projects on the list have advanced to various stages of construction. Collectively, those eight projects represent an investment of more than $830 million in the region’s freight network, with an emphasis on enhancing key bridges and interstates utilized by the trucking industry, which moves more than 200 million tons of freight through the region annually.

Read more posts (365 remaining)