11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostOct 30, 2007#226

Good question - if a hat and t-shirt shop can't make it in Union Station, it's not going to make it here. Anyway, how many baseball fans make it close to Washington Avenue? Hockey fans? Football's right there, eight times a year.

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostOct 30, 2007#227

trent wrote:Seriously, I don't think DeB was trying to say that. I think he was saying that vollum was using the phrase 'that group' in a derogatory manner.


I'm not sure what I even meant by that anymore. :)



I think what I was trying to convey (and could have done a better job of doing) was that I'm a little disappointed to hear that Mercantile Exchange, which is being positioned as an upscale retail development, will have a component that caters to "sports fans." I think we have enough to cater to that demographic already. So, instead of an upscale clothing store, we'll get a store that sells Pujols jerseys or instead of a nice restaurant, we'll get Sammy Hagar's Cabo Wabo. Maybe I'm reading too much into that statement, but it reminds me of hearing about Macy's not stocking its St. Louis stores with its more stylish clothing lines because it thinks we're (collectively) out of touch when it comes to fashion.



Disclaimer: I am a Rams season ticket holder, a Billiken season ticket holder, and attend 20+ Cards games and a few Blues games each year.

6,775
Life MemberLife Member
6,775

PostOct 30, 2007#228

DeBaliviere wrote:
trent wrote:Seriously, I don't think DeB was trying to say that. I think he was saying that vollum was using the phrase 'that group' in a derogatory manner.


I'm not sure what I even meant by that anymore. :)



I think what I was trying to convey (and could have done a better job of doing) was that I'm a little disappointed to hear that Mercantile Exchange, which is being positioned as an upscale retail development, will have a component that caters to "sports fans." I think we have enough to cater to that demographic already. So, instead of an upscale clothing store, we'll get a store that sells Pujols jerseys or instead of a nice restaurant, we'll get Sammy Hagar's Cabo Wabo. Maybe I'm reading too much into that statement, but it reminds me of hearing about Macy's not stocking its St. Louis stores with its more stylish clothing lines because it thinks we're (collectively) out of touch when it comes to fashion.



Disclaimer: I am a Rams season ticket holder, a Billiken season ticket holder, and attend 20+ Cards games and a few Blues games each year.


I agree. I would also hate to see stores catering to idiot tourists too. So no St. Louis t-shirt and souvenier shops either. There are enough other places where they can buy that crap.

2,386
Life MemberLife Member
2,386

PostOct 30, 2007#229

That makes a bit more sense DeBal :D . IMO, and this is just mine, downtown retail and downtown as a whole isn't going to truly thrive unless you make the destinations *better* than those in the county. Ordinary retail will be able to exist, and most likely survive for sure as of this point. In order to truly thrive however, and change the perceptions about downtown, these destinations need to be bigger/badder/pimped to the extreme (if you will) in comparisson to other areas in the region. Teens and parents from the counties will WANT to come downtown to shop if there are two story apple stores with the 30 foot tall color changing apple on the front of the building, the nike towns, the 3 story abercombies, etc. (Newstl hates abercrombie and anything associated with it, fyi. Just making the statement.)



I know this will garner some flak from others on this forum, but it's the un-watered down truth. Consumerism and utter materialism and light and glitz is what attracts the majority of the public. Want to turn people on to downtown St. Louis? How about the first Polo Store in the midwest outside of Chicago. There is a prestige in shopping at THE POLO STORE as opposed to buying polo at macys, and like it or not this intrigues people and is a huge draw for most people. If this is done half-ass, it will never truly succeed.



I echo the signature of a member of this board, "mediocrity will never make St. louis a world-class city."



Editied - Because Reason isn't the same as Region :wink: .

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostOct 30, 2007#230

newstl2020 wrote:How about the first Polo Store in the midwest outside of Chicago. There is a prestige in shopping at THE POLO STORE as opposed to buying polo at macys, and like it or not this intrigues people and is a huge draw for most people. If this is done half-ass, it will never truly succeed.


There used to be one at Plaza Frontenac for several years. I was surprised that it closed. I would LOVE to have one downtown, especially with Macy's refusal to carry RL in their downtown store.

PostOct 30, 2007#231

BTW, Pyramid has put up a nice Mercantile Exchange sign over the old Boatmen's sign on the Sixth Street side of the Mercantile Library.

5,433
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
5,433

PostOct 30, 2007#232

DeBaliviere wrote:I think what I was trying to convey (and could have done a better job of doing) was that I'm a little disappointed to hear that Mercantile Exchange, which is being positioned as an upscale retail development, will have a component that caters to "sports fans." I think we have enough to cater to that demographic already. So, instead of an upscale clothing store, we'll get a store that sells Pujols jerseys or instead of a nice restaurant, we'll get Sammy Hagar's Cabo Wabo. Maybe I'm reading too much into that statement, but it reminds me of hearing about Macy's not stocking its St. Louis stores with its more stylish clothing lines because it thinks we're (collectively) out of touch when it comes to fashion.


Maybe it's because I've been reading what you've been writing for several years now, but I knew what you meant.



And I thought the same thing myself. I'd hate to see cheesy tourist shops and more places to buy sports apparel downtown. And why are they needed, when the Cardinals and Blues team stores at Busch Stadium and Scottrade Center have anything a fan would want or need? I wouldn't mind seeing a Rams team store in or near the Edward Jones Dome, though.



If Sammy wants to build a damn Cabo Wabo here, I suggest putting it near Paddy O's and Al Hrabosky's Tool Shed, where the crowd that prefers that crap feels the most comfortable. :wink:

3,552
Life MemberLife Member
3,552

PostOct 30, 2007#233

newstl2020 wrote:That makes a bit more sense DeBal :D . IMO, and this is just mine, downtown retail and downtown as a whole isn't going to truly thrive unless you make the destinations *better* than those in the county. Ordinary retail will be able to exist, and most likely survive for sure as of this point. In order to truly thrive however, and change the perceptions about downtown, these destinations need to be bigger/badder/pimped to the extreme (if you will) in comparisson to other areas in the region. Teens and parents from the counties will WANT to come downtown to shop if there are two story apple stores with the 30 foot tall color changing apple on the front of the building, the nike towns, the 3 story abercombies, etc. (Newstl hates abercrombie and anything associated with it, fyi. Just making the statement.)



I know this will garner some flak from others on this forum, but it's the un-watered down truth. Consumerism and utter materialism and light and glitz is what attracts the majority of the public. Want to turn people on to downtown St. Louis? How about the first Polo Store in the midwest outside of Chicago. There is a prestige in shopping at THE POLO STORE as opposed to buying polo at macys, and like it or not this intrigues people and is a huge draw for most people. If this is done half-ass, it will never truly succeed.



I echo the signature of a member of this board, "mediocrity will never make St. louis a world-class city."



Editied - Because Reason isn't the same as Region :wink: .


I agree with you, this cannot just be a shopping destination it has to be unique or people will not support it. For example, look at what happened to St. Louis Centre, it was just a mall, same sh*t in the suburbs people. This place has to have the neon lights, big screen projections, and unique shops that will attract people (almost like our own little version of times square). I think St. Louis needs a district like this and I think that is what Downtown should become, a unique district that is for residents and tourists alike.

2,190
Life MemberLife Member
2,190

PostOct 30, 2007#234

Well, in all fairness, when St. Louis Centre first opened, it really wasn't just the same as the surburban malls. There were a whole bunch of one-of-a-kind-in-the-area stores (both there and in Union Station). The problem was that it was pretty easy for suburban malls to horn in on the action and reproduce anything that St. Louis Centre and Union Station had to offer, minus the parking fees. And that's a risk for Mercantile Exchange and any downtown retail or entertainment.

5,433
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
5,433

PostOct 30, 2007#235

bonwich wrote:And that's a risk for Mercantile Exchange and any downtown retail or entertainment.


Hopefully Steffen and Company realize that was the biggest mistake made by developers of similar retail centers downtown.



People commonly assume building indoor malls in downtown was the biggest mistake. Maybe so, as it wasn't the right idea by any means, but I would argue the lack of free or reasonable parking had much more to do with the demise of downtown's two retail centers, along with the demise of one department store (Stix Baer & Fuller/Dillard's) and the decreased relevance of another (Famous-Barr/Macy's).

291
Full MemberFull Member
291

PostOct 30, 2007#236

Maybe I have this all wrong. But, I think the developers of the Mercantile are trying to develop a district that sells an experience above and beyond or perhaps in addition to shopping. Hence, the emphasis on and scheduled early implementation of the streetscape/public amenities. If this is the case, the uniqueness of the shops and the goods offered within the shops may be important, but they may not be makers or breakers of success for the district.

1,517
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,517

PostOct 30, 2007#237

It's interesting that when this topic died down a bit, and the excitement over it has with it, that comparisons to the St. Louis Centre and caveats now are accepted.



Just look at pages 2 through 12 to see that I already brought that point up and was more than castigated for doing so! :o



Anyway, I still have my reservations about the intent of this project. It needs unique retail (either non-chain, or chains not currently present in St. Louis), but the time is not right. It does run the risk of becoming an outdoor St. Louis Centre.

5,631
Life MemberLife Member
5,631

PostOct 30, 2007#238

bonwich wrote:Well, in all fairness, when St. Louis Centre first opened, it really wasn't just the same as the surburban malls. There were a whole bunch of one-of-a-kind-in-the-area stores (both there and in Union Station). The problem was that it was pretty easy for suburban malls to horn in on the action and reproduce anything that St. Louis Centre and Union Station had to offer, minus the parking fees. And that's a risk for Mercantile Exchange and any downtown retail or entertainment.
Well then, what makes places like Michigan Avenue and closeby downtown Chicago attractions successful? Parking constraints are similar, aren't they? I seem to recall paying around $25 a day for parking downtown there. Perhaps one factor is that their public transit system is much better than St. Louis. But foremost, I think it's because the experiences there are many, in dense and walkable areas, and can't be so much be duplicated in the suburbs. They've got amazing theaters, museums, Millenium Park, restaurants and shopping right there.



I don't know if MX is a godsend, although it does improve the landscape downtown. You can find representative stores of GG in the suburban malls. On Michigan Avenue, I believe the selection of stores is more upscale.



I think for MX to bloom, the downtown St. Louis experience needs to improve. Fix the archgrounds and linkages, the Gateway Mall, better connect the St. Louis MSA to downtown via Metro expansions, more infill, quick and good eating options that stay open past normal business hours. You know, the glue... Make downtown stickier. It'd say we're more like Elmer's as opposed to Super Glue.

1,517
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,517

PostOct 30, 2007#239

If we had 1/100,000th of the tourist/business traffic of Chicago, and specifically in proximity to Michigan Avenue, we could begin to make comparisons.



There's just no comparison. Downtown St. Louis is a business district with a meager residential population. Downtown Chicago has, according to an article I pulled up here, 42,000 people. I don't know how downtown is defined, but I will bet you that population will be much, much higher by 2010. I have also read that DT Chicago has over 50,000 students. Retail works from sheer numbers and from sheer income density as well.

5,631
Life MemberLife Member
5,631

PostOct 30, 2007#240

So what was the population range of downtown residential and the business crowd from when St. Louis Center was instantiated to when it ended? Was it ever considered successful? What triggered its demise? White Flight? The onset of the suburban mall?



I think that a sizable percentage of downtown residents and a moderate amount of business-people would shop at MX instead of schlepping out to the suburban malls. From what I understand, the Pyramid folks are saying that MX can be sustainable via both the current downtown residential market and business crowd.

1,517
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,517

PostOct 30, 2007#241

It's too easy to drive anywhere in St. Louis for downtown to contemplate beating suburban shopping centers at their own game. That was the problem with St. Louis Centre and Union Station alike.



Even the most liberal estimates of the downtown population that claim 15,000 people by 2008 won't sustain retail after 5pm. I do hope I'm wrong though...don't let me fool ya.



By the way, I believe downtown had over 100,000 workers in 1980, with a residential population probably a bit smaller than today. And the Centre did fine, even well, for a couple years until the Galleria expansion hit it hard. A lot of the unique stores fled or opened larger stores in the Galleria. The expansion started in 1989 and ended 1992, I believe. So that gave the Centre about four years of relative prosperity. From 1992 to 1999, it was doing just okay. They thought the doorstep Metrolink service would help, and maybe it did a bit, but by that time a bad reputation was beginning to take hold...

1,510
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,510

PostOct 30, 2007#242

innov8ion wrote:
I think that a sizable percentage of downtown residents and a moderate amount of business-people would shop at MX instead of schlepping out to the suburban malls. From what I understand, the Pyramid folks are saying that MX can be sustainable via both the current downtown residential market and business crowd.


I would say that most of the downtown workers wouldn't consider that "schlepping" as much as "going home"

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostOct 30, 2007#243

The fact that St. Louis Centre basically shut down at 5 p.m. didn't exactly help its chances any.

1,517
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,517

PostOct 30, 2007#244

From an article entitled "Walking Tall: Plans Outlined for Malls Downtown" in the St. Louis PD on September 9, 1990:


TO THEIR ultimate dismay, many American cities reshaped their downtowns by following a definition of ''mall'' that calls it ''a street for pedestrians only, with shops on each side.'' St. Louis goes by another definition of mall: ''a shaded walk or public promenade.'' To judge by the swelling number of plans for such malls here, St. Louis may have the better idea. The other type of mall was tried in downtowns from Norfolk and Memphis to Kalamazoo, Mich. ''But by and large, most are taking them out now,'' says Richard Bradley, president of the International Downtown Association, based in Washington. ''They did the malls in part because of an anti-car bias and a desire to create something comparable with suburban shopping malls. ''They did it - create attractive parks - but the retail usually died.'' Today, he says, cities are ''getting into broader concepts of 'streetscaping.' '' They are moving away from the notion of the pedestrian malls, with closed-off streets, and looking at some of the lessons that came out of the 1980s.'' What St. Louis planners are doing these days seems to fit in with those lessons. Over the summer months, the planners revised their thinking about the nearly completed Gateway Mall. They put forth a proposal for a Cupples Mall, along with other new ideas for pedestrian-related projects. Nobody mentioned closing streets. To help with the planning, the city has hired Environmental Planning and Design, a firm from Pittsburgh.fw Following is a summary of what is on the drawing boards: Completing the Gateway Mall. The mall has been built in pieces for decades, based on an old idea of a monumental, block-wide series of parks from the Gateway Arch westward to 21st Street between Market and Chestnut Streets. A group of civic and construction union leaders has been trying, for nearly eight years, to complete the mall, but with three blocks developed as a mixture of new buildings and open space. Now, city officials prefer to keep the blocks open, with no buildings, and are looking for ways to finance that approach. Redesigning the western stretch of the Gateway Mall between Tucker Boulevard and 21st Street near Union Station. Most people use a sidewalk on the south side of Market, rather than the mall, to walk between downtown and Union Station. Donald Royse, the city's urban design director, says the mall needs a new look to encourage people to walk through and use it. Building a Cupples Mall. This half-block-wide landscaped pathway would extend about 10 blocks northward from Ralston Purina at Gratiot Street, through the nearly vacant Cupples Station warehouses, to Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.'s tower. The goal is to get people walking through the Cupples Station warehouses (and thus help get the buildings redeveloped) and to link the Ralston complex with the rest of downtown. The north block in the Cupples mall is in the uncompleted part of the Gateway Mall. Building a pedestrian pathway between the Cervantes Convention Center and Laclede's Landing. A proposal for doing that is being designed by Skidmore, Owings & Merrill of Chicago, an architectural and planning firm, as part of a development plan for that area. Building a pedestrian pathway to link several downtown attractions between Union Station and Laclede's Landing. The pathway idea originated with city planners, who suggested it become part of the master landscape plan. The pathway would have wide sidewalks and landscaping along streets and possibly new lighting, street furniture and other amenities. The pathway would run from Union Station eastward along Clark Avenue past the back of Kiel Auditorium, and past sites proposed for a hockey arena and an equestrian center. It would continue past City Hall and Cupples Station to Busch Stadium. There it would go north along 8th Street through downtown to the new entrance under construction on Washington Avenue for the Cervantes Convention Center. It would then continue northward, on Seventh Street, to Convention Plaza, and eastward into Laclede's Landing. Royse and J. Christopher Grace, the city's top development official, say all the proposals are important to help boost growth and development. The malls and attractively landscaped pedestrian pathways would help tie together the scattered attractions downtown. They would encourage more people to stroll; that, in turn, would give downtown life and vitality and help attract office and housing development, they say. For the most part, the plans are getting good reviews. Among the supporters is Edward Ruesing, president of Downtown St. Louis Inc. Ruesing says both the Gateway and Cupples malls projects are ''economic development tools that would enhance the development potential of property bordering them.'' To back that up, he cites development along the south side of Market, overlooking the Gateway Mall. ''People who built there in the last 10 to 20 years did so with the expectation that they were building in a prestigious location, overlooking a major public space,'' he says. Ruesing says downtown has plenty of people who could use the malls and pathways on a daily basis. Among them: About 110,000 office workers. Roughly 5,000 permanent residents. A varying number of tourists, conventiongoers and other visitors, depending on the season. That last group is expected to increase after completion of the convention center expansion now under way and the stadium addition being planned. t da But not everyone is happy with what's on the drawing boards. Some say the pretty drawings and plans divert attention from what they say downtown really needs - housing, more development and more residents. Others charge that the city already has stacks of dusty plans and proposals for malls and tree-lined boulevards, some dating back to the early 1900s. The city lacked the money to carry them out, these critics say, and it lacks the money today. One critic is Carolyn Toft, executive director of the Landmarks Association of St. Louis Inc. ''I think that at the moment, a discussion of visionary malls is impractical and deflects the proper discussion of what is important to the rejuvenation of downtown,'' she says. ''What's important is housing. Until you get people living in downtown - people who cause it to become their neighborhood, and who are there on a 24-hour basis to support the retailers and the restaurants - you are not going to have a vibrant downtown, no matter what you do.''

2,190
Life MemberLife Member
2,190

PostOct 30, 2007#245

Wow. I was just looking for similar background in our archives:


P-D, 1982, excerpted wrote:Urban Identity To Distinguish St. Louis Centre

By Laszlo K. Domjan

Of the Post-Dispatch Staff



A varied combination of 200 retail establishments will give the $110 million St. Louis Centre downtown an urban identity distinguishing it from suburban shopping malls, the project's developers say.



The urban atmosphere will be reinforced by the design of the two- block, four-level mall, said Gregory R. Glass, president of May Centers Inc. May is developing the mall as a limited partner of Melvin Simon & Associates of Indianapolis, the project's general partner.



The enclosed mall will be bounded by Washington and Locust streets and by Sixth and Seventh streets. It will connect the Famous-Barr and Stix Baer & Fuller department stores, which -- in the style of suburban centers -- will be the anchors for the center.



From the outside, the mall will bear somewhat of a resemblance to a giant paddlewheeler.



'The architect obviously had the Arch and river in mind in designing the exterior facades, 'Glass said. 'The logo for the center will reflect this even more. It's very tasteful. '



The project has been in the making for almost 10 years. The way was cleared for work on the mall last week when developers signed an 81-page redevelopment agreement with the St. Louis Land Clearance for Redevelopment Authority. The agreement is part of a complicated, eight-tier financing arrangement.



(snip)





Glass said the developers were making initial contacts with potential tenants. He said he expected the 200 retail establishments in the mall to include the basic shopping-center stores selling shoes, clothing and other merchandise. But other retailers, he said, would offer specialized services and merchandise unlikely to be available in suburban centers.



'We'll bring in a broader mix of mall tenants than suburban malls, 'Glass said. 'People who walk in will immediately recognize that this is different.



'We're not talking about boutiques. We're hoping to bring in some of the better-known St. Louis restaurants to establish branches. We might have a gift shop selling merchandise available only in St. Louis, like St. Louis Zoo mementos, items related to the Cardinals and that sort of thing. '



(snip)



Glass walls will be prominent features of the complex. They will enable visitors to see downtown activity from inside the mall, Glass said.



'Ours is clearly an urban project as opposed to a suburban one, 'Glass said. 'Instead of the wide-open spaces of suburban centers, we'll have the taste and feel of a much closer environment.



'The feel of activity will be greater with four levels. A lot more will appear to be going on. It will appear more crowded. '



Herbert Simon, president of the Simon firm, said the developers hoped to attract to the center people from the suburbs as well as city residents, downtown workers and tourists.



'We will draw on the whole metropolitan area, 'Simon said. 'We have to offer the public as much diversity as the suburban centers and add some different touches.



'We'll offer reasons for suburban shoppers, office workers and conventiongoers to all shop there. It's in a strategic location with good access to highways. '



(snip)



Mayor Vincent C. Schoemehl Jr. said he was pleased to see that St. Louis Centre was finally getting under way. He said the project would reverse a trend of smaller retailers leaving downtown.



'It will be a tremendous boost to the city, 'Schoemehl said. 'Certain people will never come downtown. Other people will find in downtown a certain ambiance. We won't get all the people downtown, but we'll get some of them. '



W. Lynn Edwards III, Schoemehl's executive director of development, said the project would create 2,400 permanent jobs in retailing.



'Their economic impact is substantial, 'Edwards said.



(snip)



Financing for the St. Louis Centre includes $12 million in equity money from May, the Land Clearance for Redevelopment Authority and Simon; $18 million in federal Urban Development Action Grant funds for land purchase and acquisition; tax- exempt authority bonds bought by Boatmen's National Bank; a conventional mortgage to finance redevelopment of the Stix building; leasehold mortgage financing to cover tenant-finishing work; long-term mortgage money from Teachers Insurance & Annuity Association of New York; and an interim construction loan and authority bonds bought by Mercantile and Centerre Bank.



Simon said plans called for the top two floors of the Stix building, now housing the department store, to be converted into offices. He said those plans might be changed to use those two floors for a hotel instead.



5,631
Life MemberLife Member
5,631

PostOct 30, 2007#246

Thanks for the excellent articles, MTDH & bonwich. On the surface, maybe it doesn't appear as if there is much differentiation between the failed St. Louis Centre (SCL) and Mercantile Exchange MX. However, let's take a closer look.



A description of SLC from EoA (http://tinyurl.com/2rtuhw): "All of the design flaws create a building that is wholly resistant to natural circulation. Beside the fact that downtown is not a place where a shopping mall will help create life, the mall's architecture is too confused to be inviting and too confusing to be useful. Consequently, the mall has been in decline since its opening."



From what I understand, MX isn't going to be another SLC or suburban mall. It's being marketed as a "shopping district" spread across four buildings. Its design should make its stores more easily accessible and provide a stronger feeling of connection to street-level activity. Can others confirm this theory and if so, isn't it a critical improvement over SLC?



I don't know if this factor is enough, in and of itself, but residential numbers are also increasing at a modest clip. Also remember that it includes office towers, hotels, and a residential component. I tend to think that MX retail will start out in a limited fashion and scale as appropriate. So I see the concern in repeating SLC's past, but I feel that Pyramid is cognizant of the past and is making smart decisions.

1,510
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,510

PostOct 30, 2007#247

'We're not talking about boutiques. We're hoping to bring in some of the better-known St. Louis restaurants to establish branches. We might have a gift shop selling merchandise available only in St. Louis, like St. Louis Zoo mementos, items related to the Cardinals and that sort of thing. '


Brilliant.


'The feel of activity will be greater with four levels. A lot more will appear to be going on. It will appear more crowded. '


...because why bother with making it actually more crowded?

PostOct 30, 2007#248

Glass walls will be prominent features of the complex. They will enable visitors to see downtown activity from inside the mall, Glass said.


Like a zoo.

801
Super MemberSuper Member
801

PostOct 31, 2007#249

Matt Drops The H wrote:It's interesting that when this topic died down a bit, and the excitement over it has with it, that comparisons to the St. Louis Centre and caveats now are accepted.



Just look at pages 2 through 12 to see that I already brought that point up and was more than castigated for doing so! :o


Nice try. Many people have their concerns about retail succeeding downtown but comparing this to St. Louis Center is still *RETARDED*.



What do we have right now? Lots of vacant storefronts facing the streets. What does Pyramid want to do? Put lots of stores in those storefronts.

What's the worst that could happen? The stores go out of business and we have vacant storefronts.



So, even worst case scenario, we only fall back to the starting point.



I won't insult the intelligence of others on this board by explaining how different it would be to redevelop storefronts in a giant white and and green eyesore that would only have people passing through who intended to shop (opposed to a street) and is easily "taken over" by gangs.



St. Louisans may not make the MX a success, but that would be due to inherent problems with the region, not because this is the same thing as the St. Louis Center.

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostOct 31, 2007#250

This all makes we wonder how Circle Center in Indianapolis has been so successful for the past decade . . . maybe it's something in the worter.

Read more posts (231 remaining)