1,793
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,793

Post12:25 AM - Jan 30#26

St. Regis condo association is probably coming unglued lol

139
Junior MemberJunior Member
139

Post12:50 AM - Jan 30#27

In my mind, it makes most sense to go slightly taller than 100 on this site from a developers perspective. Start to get in the 40 story/400 ft range and things get real expensive for construction but there may be some premium in the upper floors

502
Senior MemberSenior Member
502

Post1:14 AM - Jan 30#28

keepstlbrick wrote:
12:50 AM - Jan 30
In my mind, it makes most sense to go slightly taller than 100 on this site from a developers perspective. Start to get in the 40 story/400 ft range and things get real expensive for construction but there may be some premium in the upper floors
I could see that. Would require a variance to the form based code (12-stories, 130ft maximum currently). In that scenario, I could see the Koplars looking at that site too because I know Albion, while nice, isn't what was intended there in any of the iterations prior to Albion's unveiling.

547
Senior MemberSenior Member
547

Post2:23 AM - Jan 30#29

keepstlbrick wrote:
12:50 AM - Jan 30
In my mind, it makes most sense to go slightly taller than 100 on this site from a developers perspective. Start to get in the 40 story/400 ft range and things get real expensive for construction but there may be some premium in the upper floors
I hear somewhere in the 5-12 story range.  It will be mixed use.  The site is important because it connects  the CWE in every direction.  It is a very important piece the be developed for that reason. The site looks pretty similar in size to the Orion.  It's a tough development market so I wouldn't expect anything anytime soon.  

6,117
Life MemberLife Member
6,117

Post6:23 AM - Jan 30#30

5-12 sounds fine for that corner, so long as it masses well with the other condos along Lindell.

5,703
Life MemberLife Member
5,703

Post2:58 PM - Jan 30#31

My wishfull thought is Euclid would have a modern low floor no fare streetcar.   Go south through Barnes Jewish with future phase across the freeway and into the The Grove.  Go north, make a left on Delmar until you get to the loop or at least Delmar metrolink station.    Job centers, Academia, Commercial/Entertainment and Residential (dense to single residential) all nicely tied together along with connections to the greater light rail spine/Lambert.    

2,672
Life MemberLife Member
2,672

Post2:59 PM - Jan 30#32

speaking of condos… It should be condos not apartments.

1,092
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,092

Post3:14 PM - Jan 30#33

addxb2 wrote:
2:59 PM - Jan 30
speaking of condos… It should be condos not apartments.
Agree, but condos are hard to build, some tax code change after 2008 made them way less common

1,793
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,793

Post3:27 PM - Jan 30#34

I like the idea that at least a portion of the site goes tall (200+ft). Preferable at the corner of Lindell/Euclid. It would be an impressive street wall enhancement for both.

166
Junior MemberJunior Member
166

Post4:01 PM - Jan 30#35

some tax code change after 2008 made them way less common
Please elaborate Thank You

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

Post4:50 PM - Jan 30#36

dredger wrote:
2:58 PM - Jan 30
My wishfull thought is Euclid would have a modern low floor no fare streetcar.   Go south through Barnes Jewish with future phase across the freeway and into the The Grove.  Go north, make a left on Delmar until you get to the loop or at least Delmar metrolink station.    Job centers, Academia, Commercial/Entertainment and Residential (dense to single residential) all nicely tied together along with connections to the greater light rail spine/Lambert.    
Reminds me how Metro removed bus service from Euclid. Rage

1,092
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,092

Post6:40 PM - Jan 30#37

I can't say I that I understand the why very well (like the exact tax code change) but what happened as a result is very noticeable:
MFBFR-1q22-scaled.jpg (491.03KiB)

502
Senior MemberSenior Member
502

Post6:56 PM - Jan 30#38

I thought what made condos tricky to build was the requirement to pre-sell over half of the units in a building over a certain scope prior to financing being locked up.

But for the CWE, some condos should hypothetically sell. 4101 Laclede and Artizen are the most recent examples of two condo properties doing well. Offering at least a few at Lindell and Euclid should work. You’re competing with Clayton’s product there.

1,607
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,607

Post7:10 PM - Jan 30#39

Isn't that chart reflective of the 2008 financial crash and recovery? 

5,703
Life MemberLife Member
5,703

Post8:44 PM - Jan 30#40

PeterXCV wrote:
3:14 PM - Jan 30
addxb2 wrote:
2:59 PM - Jan 30
speaking of condos… It should be condos not apartments.
Agree, but condos are hard to build, some tax code change after 2008 made them way less commona
Why condos?  Guessing that you are thinking along the lines as  form of equity over time without being limited to a single residential home as only avenue.   Considering home ownership for majority is where the wealth is concentrated.   However, guess on my part so curious by statement opost
To Peter comment as well.   Hard to build if you can't sell as well

U.S. condo sales are experiencing their worst slump since 2012, with prices falling 1.9%–2.2% year-over-year in late 2025 and early 2026 as sales plunged by over 11%. A massive supply imbalance, driven by roughly 80% more sellers than buyers, high HOA fees, and rising insurance costs, is driving this decline, especially in urban and second-home markets. 

Read more posts (-10 remaining)