139
Junior MemberJunior Member
139

Post6:25 PM - Jan 23#51

Parking lot bigger than the building.

Drive thru bank slip is where they ended up?

Remind me of the US bank drive thru downtown StL at Olive/Tucker. That parcel drives me insane, such a waste

27
New MemberNew Member
27

Post5:16 PM - Mar 12#52

Looks like this was supposed to be on the upcoming planning commission meeting but was struck from the agenda. 

962

Post1:39 AM - Mar 24#53

I have a feeling this might get rejected. Too prime of real estate for something that low of tax producing and uninspiring. Mostly a private parking lot


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

680
Senior MemberSenior Member
680

Post6:09 PM - Mar 24#54

But if it's rejected, we'll never to get enjoy the "plaza [that] has been intentionally designed as a strategic anchor for district activity."

Think of all the "pop ups, seasonal installations, small markets, arts events, music, wellness programming, and family oriented activities" that we'll miss out on!!!

"The plaza provides a continuous, outward facing public amenity that generates predictable daily activity exceeding the outcomes of traditional retail frontage."

422
Full MemberFull Member
422

Post6:11 PM - Mar 24#55

Tim wrote:
6:09 PM - Mar 24
But if it's rejected, we'll never to get enjoy the "plaza [that] has been intentionally designed as a strategic anchor for district activity."

Think of all the "pop ups, seasonal installations, small markets, arts events, music, wellness programming, and family oriented activities" that we'll miss out on!!!

"The plaza provides a continuous, outward facing public amenity that generates predictable daily activity exceeding the outcomes of traditional retail frontage."
DO NOT challenge the Plaza ☝👹

2,661
Life MemberLife Member
2,661

Post1:46 PM - Mar 26#56

That plaza is pretty pathetic. I suspect the only programming it will have is the occasional Jehovah's Witness and maybe a couple booths during the Clayton Art Fair

27
New MemberNew Member
27

Post10:00 PM - 11 days ago#57

A revised proposal  is on the city's pending applications page. A retail space was added on Bemiston. The garage was replaced with a parking lot. 

681
Senior MemberSenior Member
681

Post10:05 PM - 11 days ago#58

Sterling could get get building signage and naming rights to a building downtown but instead they do this lol.

I don't think Clayton should approve this. I don't see how one could justify tearing down what's there right now for what they're proposing.

Sent from my SM-S936U using Tapatalk



8,923
Life MemberLife Member
8,923

Post1:27 AM - 11 days ago#59




I wish Sterling would move their headquarters here and do a bigger project. And push that building to the corner please.

6,157
Life MemberLife Member
6,157

Post2:45 AM - 11 days ago#60

^This is still a horrible little waste of space. There really should be laws that prevent demolition by neglect in projects like this.

Read more posts (-15 remaining)