13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostFeb 16, 2014#51

They've broken ground on the aforementioned homes. Must be in a hurry considering how crappy the working conditions are.

PostOct 22, 2014#52

Permits pulled for 5792, 5794, 5796, and 5798. They've broken ground.

114
Junior MemberJunior Member
114

PostOct 23, 2014#53

can you elaborate any?

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostOct 23, 2014#54

single family, 2,200 sf with basement. I hope they're the variety with the roof peak facing the street.

Here's the listing

http://www.cbgundaker.com/property/deta ... Sold=False

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostOct 23, 2014#55

A little extra info:

1,064
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,064

PostOct 23, 2014#56

Is it really so difficult to design an exterior that doesn't look like it belongs in Wentzville? The columns are tiny (and the massing of porch elements is pretty weak all around), the third floor window aligns to...nothing, there is no decoration in the brickwork pattern, not enough overhang, no kneebraces or other rafter decoration, the windows look like cheap vinyl with frames that are too thin, the vinyl section has no decoration bordering it in the eave or at the top of the brick. Attic vent detail is completely MIA. And for the love of God, there are colors besides white that do a vastly better job complementing brick. I mean, for *****'s sake, can these developers at least put forth some effort? This is just sad and pathetic.

8,908
Life MemberLife Member
8,908

PostOct 23, 2014#57

I don't find them to be particularly attractive either but still it's great for the neighborhood.

4,553
Life MemberLife Member
4,553

PostOct 23, 2014#58

onecity wrote:Is it really so difficult to design an exterior that doesn't look like it belongs in Wentzville?
Exactly! There are some good design examples around town that more developers need to adopt. Some of the Gas Light Square houses managed to execute a conservative contemporary design rather nicely. And these newer homes on the Hill turned out well:

9,558
Life MemberLife Member
9,558

PostOct 23, 2014#59

^ have you seen the sides of those? :D

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostOct 24, 2014#60

onecity wrote:Is it really so difficult to design an exterior that doesn't look like it belongs in Wentzville? This is just sad and pathetic.
No doubt; for $320,000, I'd expect something better.

1,064
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,064

PostOct 24, 2014#61

Wow. Whoever pays $320k for that is getting screwed hard.

180
Junior MemberJunior Member
180

PostOct 24, 2014#62

I can't imagine they're actually expecting to get 320k for those.. maybe just a way too high asking price scenario?

This nice looking 1916 house with more sq ft, albeit a pretty retro interior, sold for 100k less: http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/5923- ... 5972_zpid/

Real close by, this rehabbed 1911 with only 1900 sq ft sold for 250k: http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/5774- ... 6304_zpid/ so if they're looking for people who want something brand new (and also gross looking, but hey different strokes)... maybe it's in the ballpark.

Also anyone got/know if there's any pics of the neighborhood before all the infill and rehabbing? Must've looked pretty grim a couple decades ago.

9,558
Life MemberLife Member
9,558

PostOct 24, 2014#63

wabash wrote:. And these newer homes on the Hill turned out well:
sides...

1,064
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,064

PostOct 24, 2014#64

This nice looking 1916 house with more sq ft, albeit a pretty retro interior, sold for 100k less: http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/5923- ... 5972_zpid/

Real close by, this rehabbed 1911 with only 1900 sq ft sold for 250k: http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/5774- ... 6304_zpid/ so if they're looking for people who want something brand new (and also gross looking, but hey different strokes)... maybe it's in the ballpark.
What separates those two houses from the new construction is they both appear to have had an architect spend more than 30 seconds on the design phase.

And, What re the lack of side windows. Does the developer not think a buyer will pay an additional $10k for decent light and side decor?

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostOct 24, 2014#65

Someone paid $344,500 for one on the other side of the street in July and $351,500 in Aug. Probably had some upgrades.

Some buyers want the location, but want new. I guess they're more concerned with inside features than the exterior.

These have windows on the sides in case there's some confusion.

265
Full MemberFull Member
265

PostOct 25, 2014#66

https://fbcdn-sphotos-h-a.akamaihd.net/ ... 68256607e8

Look at this urban infill how good it looks. The 3 houses are going up in old north they will be not low income but some but little below market rate. Unlike the rendering they are going to build right up to the side walk. We can get great new housing if developers try,

1,320
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,320

PostOct 25, 2014#67

These will sell for full asking price. It's the location. The Parkview neighborhood to the west is a lot more expensive. And the next single family homes to the east are million dollar private streets. There is demand for these.

I wish the developer would hire an architect. The product would be much better.

4,553
Life MemberLife Member
4,553

PostOct 25, 2014#68

Presbyterian wrote:These will sell for full asking price. It's the location.
Undoubtedly the product of being surrounded by Wash U., Forest Park, The Loop, and Metrolink Stations.

3,311
Life MemberLife Member
3,311

PostOct 27, 2014#69

They are hideous.

73
New MemberNew Member
73

PostOct 27, 2014#70

Its decent infill though I'm glad the city is adding new homes to the neighborhood

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostOct 27, 2014#71

Take a ride down Delmar to see hideous infill. Or 3900 W. Belle - not so much ugly rather on lots too wide that should have many houses or a multi-million dollar house. .

284
Full MemberFull Member
284

PostOct 28, 2014#72

Westmoreland homes are the most expensive homes in the city not terribly far from Delmar

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostOct 30, 2014#73

This infill home in U. City is much, much worse:



http://www.cbgundaker.com/property/deta ... Sold=False

1,064
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,064

PostOct 30, 2014#74

Wow. A certain architect and/or builder has obviously never seen a bungalow. If I were their neighbor, I'd be kind of pissed.

8,908
Life MemberLife Member
8,908

PostOct 30, 2014#75

These new UCity infill homes aint bad tho....Although the they're probably 5x the price.

https://www.google.com/maps/@38.6481655 ... 5PsIBg!2e0

Read more posts (441 remaining)