PostAug 11, 2007#301

wheelscomp wrote:There are many teams in Englan's Premier League that are "United" not just Manchester United. There are also many FC's and AC's internationally as well.
Stylux wrote:
Correct. I'm surprised that it wouldn't be called plainly St. Louis City if they wanted to get off the United bus. But seriously if we are to get a MLS team (which the "soccer capital of the US" should rightfully have) we better not get screwed with a stupid name ... like Chicago did ... go Fire?
Stylux wrote:wheelscomp wrote:There are many teams in Englan's Premier League that are "United" not just Manchester United. There are also many FC's and AC's internationally as well.
Correct. I'm surprised that it wouldn't be called plainly St. Louis City if they wanted to get off the United bus.
Blzhrpmd2 wrote:
The logo makes it look like ST LOUIS CRUSADE SOCCER
Grover wrote:Not to be too PC, but using "Crusaders" may not be the best idea. For many, many people a "crusade" and uses of it controversial.
Bastiat wrote:
Maybe if you're a Muslim.
Grover wrote:Not to be too PC, but using "Crusaders" may not be the best idea. For many, many people a "crusade" and uses of it controversial.
shadrach wrote:^ Real St. Louis or St. Louis United has a nice sound to it.
Most St. Louisans wouldn't know how to properly pronounce "Real."
publiceye wrote:Most St. Louisans wouldn't know how to properly pronounce "Real."
Pretty ironic post from someone who uses the handle "DeBaliviere"
DeBaliviere wrote:shadrach wrote:^ Real St. Louis or St. Louis United has a nice sound to it.
Most St. Louisans wouldn't know how to properly pronounce "Real."