1,877
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,877

PostSep 23, 2019#626

imran wrote:agenda for monday with more details (even though the title still says 'preliminary'
https://www.stlouis-mo.gov/government/departments/planning/cultural-resources/documents/upload/FINAL-AGENDA-9-23-2019.pdf
There are shotgun houses and then there's  2216 S. 11th Street.
 Beyond the front block, which generally duplicates the ME, the house extends more than 100 feet to the rear.


-RBB

6,118
Life MemberLife Member
6,118

PostSep 23, 2019#627

^You know, I think I actually like that house. Should make the mowing easy. Has a deck. The attached garage on the alley side is pretty sweet. Generally I favor the elephant gun house.

4,553
Life MemberLife Member
4,553

PostSep 23, 2019#628

^Thats actually a shotgun. For ducks, not elephants.

6,118
Life MemberLife Member
6,118

PostSep 23, 2019#629

Maybe elephant is a visual description of the thing. ;-) And yes, you should probably duck when someone points that kind of halfway in your direction.

I figured it was a shotgun, actually. Quite forgot it was a duck gun. I've seen the picture, just . .  not recently.

1,465
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,465

PostOct 19, 2019#630


PostOct 25, 2019#631


PostNov 26, 2019#632

This month's PB meeting cancelled.

PostDec 07, 2019#633


PostDec 13, 2019#634


PostDec 16, 2019#635

Yesterday's PB meeting cancelled due to weather.

Now moved to monday dec 23. same agenda.

PostJan 19, 2020#636

preliminary January agenda. so far no demos :) + some awesome candidates for the National Register of Historic Places.
https://www.stlouis-mo.gov/government/departments/planning/cultural-resources/documents/upload/PREL-AGENDA-1-27-2020.pdf

PostJan 24, 2020#637


13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostFeb 15, 2020#638


PostFeb 21, 2020#639


677
Senior MemberSenior Member
677

PostFeb 25, 2020#640

I understand the need for standards, but some things (like the window replacement denial for 3008 Missouri) seem excessive.

1) The replacement windows will match the existing windows, which were grandfathered in when the district was established.
2) Every other house on the street (except for the one used as reference in the denial) appears to have the same general setup, where "the proposed window profile of the top sash of the proposed windows [probably] does not match the original profile".

It would be one thing if they wanted to replace original windows with non-compliant windows, but to deny like-for-like replacement seems excessive. If they ever want to replace the existing windows they will have to modify the inside wall of the house, and revert the windows back to their presumed original appearance.

While I'm at it, the CWE shingle denial seems like overkill too.
Are they visible? Yes
Should they have known better? Yeah, probably
But, when viewing the porch roof from a sharp angle (like from the street level) is the difference between a GAF Timerline shingle and a GAF Slateline shingle really that obvious? Making the owners remove their roof over this somewhat minor discrepancy seems excessive, and wasteful.

3
New MemberNew Member
3

PostFeb 27, 2020#641

Tim, 
Do you think the neighborhoods should rewrite their design guidelines to be less restrictive or do you think CRO Staff and the Board should be more permissive?  

1,465
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,465

PostMar 19, 2020#642

The agenda for monday 3/23(if the meeting does infact take place)
https://www.stlouis-mo.gov/government/departments/planning/cultural-resources/documents/upload/PREL-AGENDA-3-23-2020.pdf

The ?UMSLrequest for demolition on Oakland appears

6,660
AdministratorAdministrator
6,660

PostMar 19, 2020#643

^The March meeting will in fact not take place. That's the right call, being non-essential.

1,864
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,864

PostMar 19, 2020#644

Can any of these meetings be shifted to virtual or teleconference?

1,155
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,155

PostMar 19, 2020#645

imran wrote:
Mar 19, 2020
The ?UMSLrequest for demolition on Oakland appears
You mean STLCC? 

1,465
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,465

PostMar 19, 2020#646

aprice wrote:
Mar 19, 2020
imran wrote:
Mar 19, 2020
The ?UMSLrequest for demolition on Oakland appears
You mean STLCC? 
Yes. Thank you

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostMar 19, 2020#647

Philistines! 

Harry Weese was one of the most important mid-century architects in the country, and this building makes up part of one of the best Brutalist-style ensembles anywhere (and yes, Brutalism is back in fashion again). Thirty years from now our children are going to furious about this, wondering how the hell we let this happen.

https://nextstl.com/2017/04/weese-kiley ... hreatened/

http://thescenefp.com/2018/06/29/plans- ... ntroversy/

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostMar 20, 2020#648

Back in fashion in what sense? It's inhumanity was, is, and will be inherent. It should be preserved in a museum. Unfortunately preserving it means continuing people's suffering.

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostMar 20, 2020#649


3,762
Life MemberLife Member
3,762

PostMar 20, 2020#650

^ i love Brutalism in a sculptural sense, but some examples of the style are more inhabitable than others. the Weese STLCC@FP buildings are wonderful sculptures but they might as well be windowless. Not that I want them demolished, but I imagine being inside them is pretty miserable.

Read more posts (208 remaining)