678
Senior MemberSenior Member
678

PostJun 16, 2013#126

Possibly, but a doc crew wouldn't be using a boom or jib generally. Sounds more like a scripted production, unless they are making a intro for Sweetie Pies.

14
New MemberNew Member
14

PostJun 17, 2013#127

I second that it was Sweetie Pie's. We live right around the corner over there and were driving out early; my girlfriend and I both commented to each other that they were filming something for the show.

My girlfriend works with one of the members of the family, I'll see if I can confirm.

1,877
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,877

PostJun 17, 2013#128

ImprovSTL wrote:Possibly, but a doc crew wouldn't be using a boom or jib generally. Sounds more like a scripted production, unless they are making a intro for Sweetie Pies.
Remember, this is a reality show. Those are much closer to scripted productions than they are documentaries...

-RBB

14
New MemberNew Member
14

PostJun 17, 2013#129

rbb wrote: Remember, this is a reality show. Those are much closer to scripted productions than they are documentaries...
-RBB
REALITY: More scripted than documentaries. :lol: It's funny because it's true...

296
Full MemberFull Member
296

PostJun 18, 2013#130

Yes, this was for Sweetie Pies. They were taking some exterior shots. They shoot in my alley quite often, and they do multiple takes of everything. The entire thing is scripted, even the heated arguments. It was fun having them as neighbors at first, but it gets old very fast.

655
Senior MemberSenior Member
655

PostNov 21, 2013#131

Lot upcoming in the Grove right now. There's a plan to renovate the building at 4301 Manchester (Manchester and Tower Grove) as a Reliance Bank. Images are from the Park Central Development packet:

Site plan:


Rendering:


I'm glad to see this building reutilized, but I don't love the traffic flow/curb cuts. Not sure if it could be improved, though. Any suggestions on how to better handle the parking lot/drive through/curb cuts?

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostNov 21, 2013#132

FWIW the curb cuts are already there. What bothers me is that they aren't going to leave the building red.

655
Senior MemberSenior Member
655

PostNov 21, 2013#133

Also being discussed at Tuesday's Development meeting is the hotel proposal for the corner of Taylor and Chouteau (nextSTL article. It's by the same developers as the Aventura and the townhomes at Tower Grove and Chouteau. A 4-story 107-room hotel is proposed. It will be a Home 2 Suites by Hilton, an extended stay hotel. There's no plan for a retail component. Images are from the Park Central Development packet

Proposed site plan:


They are not interested in building on the proposed pocket park at the corner due to environmental concerns, so it may become some sort of neighborhood green space (a block away from Chouteau's Park and Rainbow Park and pretty close to the playground at the southwest corner of Forest Park) or a dog park for the neighborhood.

There are several potential color schemes, but the buildings all have the same pre-fab materials and appearance:


They are asking for 10 years of tax abatement. Park Central recommends the tax abatement if they agree to reign in the fence, replace the EIFS on the public facades with brick, and present a landscaping plan. The developers presented at last night's neighborhood association meeting and don't really seem interested in compromising with the neighborhood on anything, really, with the possible exception of lowering their proposed fence rather than continuing the minimum-security prison Aventura fence. They did move the hotel from the center of a sea of parking to having parking in the back (though still visible from Chouteau), so that's something, I guess.

PostNov 21, 2013#134

quincunx wrote:FWIW the curb cuts are already there. What bothers me is that they aren't going to leave the building red.
Agreed about painting the building. I'm not a big fan of painted brick.

Also, the curb cuts are already there, but the Manchester one is currently gated off, so from the pedestrian view it's pretty much non-existent. That will change with this proposal, putting a driveway onto Manchester.

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostNov 21, 2013#135

The hotel is just horrible. Deny the tax abatement. Have the courage to say no.

455
Full MemberFull Member
455

PostNov 21, 2013#136

The design of this hotel looks like it was pulled straight from the 70s. Send them back to the drawing board with instructions for ground floor retail and hidden parking. St. Louis deserves better than this, especially given that this will be a prime location for people going for business trips to the companies in Cortex.

4,553
Life MemberLife Member
4,553

PostNov 21, 2013#137

An ugly hotel, made of cheap materials, surrounded by fences, walls, "buffers", and of course parking. This developer needs to wake up and smell what people are actually trying to make the Grove into.

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostNov 21, 2013#138

Form-based code stat!

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostNov 21, 2013#139

Wow, that hotel is just stunningly ugly! Highway frontage, and that's the best they come up with?

655
Senior MemberSenior Member
655

PostNov 21, 2013#140

quincunx wrote:Form-based code stat!
At the most recent neighborhood meeting, Alderman Roddy said that H3 has been hired for the form-based plan in FPSE (they also did the one for the CWE and have done planning studies for Skinker-Debalviere and I think Parkview Gardens). They hope to begin public meetings soon but completion is probably a year or so out, so until then tax abatement is one of the few points of leverage for the neighborhood.

The hotel is pretty bad, but I think a brick facade would help it at least fit in to the neighborhood better.

7,803
Life MemberLife Member
7,803

PostNov 21, 2013#141

What's sad is the hotel developers saw the Aventura project and said to themselves "Hey, we can drop whatever we want into this neighborhood!"

1,320
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,320

PostNov 21, 2013#142

I don't think the hotel design is all that bad in and of itself, except that they got the windows from the same place as the County Justice Center. Still, the narrow windows should be great for vampires and may prevent a suicide jump at some point.

What is inexcusable is the disregard for the urban fabric. Build it on the corner or do not build it. We don't need your hotel. You are not doing us a favor. We owe you nothing. This is our city. Play with our team or you cannot play.

Thank you.

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostNov 28, 2013#143

The paramount problem with the hotel is the site plan.

StlToday - Forest Park Southeast committee backs projects, with conditions
A development committee is backing tax abatement for a hotel and a bank branch proposed for the city's Forest Park Southeast neighborhood.

But support from the Forest Park Southeast Development Committee carries some conditions. Committee members prefer exterior materials different than the type of panels proposed by the hotel developer.
http://www.stltoday.com/business/column ... dab27.html

PostDec 14, 2013#144

Does anyone know why the properties at the NE corner of Kingshighway and Manchester are owned by the ST LOUIS SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION? Do they plan to do anything with it?

525
Senior MemberSenior Member
525

PostDec 14, 2013#145

Isn't/wasn't there a little science park there?

655
Senior MemberSenior Member
655

PostDec 15, 2013#146

Apparently the site has major environmental contamination from a previous tenant on at least one of the three lots. Two of the lots were owned by Anheuser-Busch, and one was an LRA lot (property ownership in Geo St. Louis only goes back to 1997, I don't know what the deal was prior to that). According to Geo St. Louis, there was a permit to "DEMOLISH 1-STORY BRICK SERVICE STATION BLDG" on the Manchester-Kingshighway lot in 1988, to "WRECK 1 STORY BRICK COMMERCIAL BLDG" on the adjacent lot to the east after an emergency board-up/condemnation in 1990, and to "WRECK 1 STORY COMM GAS STATION " on the easternmost lot in 1994. I'm not sure if one of these properties is responsible for the contamination or it's some combination. Science Center took control of the site in 2001, I think via donation.

Years ago there was a little garden there using elevated beds to avoid soil contamination problems, but it has since fallen into disrepair. There was a gazebo as well, and a few other small structures like a geodesic dome and a wind turbine. I don't recall it ever being well-utilized, though. The Science Center has said they are working on a plan to revitalize the corner but they have not released any plans yet. From what I have heard they are thinking more along the lines of garden and art space rather than constructing building, but hopefully they will release a plan soon. Some new construction on at least part of the lot would be nice, it's a very big space.

54
New MemberNew Member
54

PostDec 15, 2013#147

It was mentioned at the FPSE Neighborhood meeting that the Science Center will be making "improvements" to this area in the Spring.

7,803
Life MemberLife Member
7,803

PostMar 18, 2014#148

I stayed at a Home 2 for the first time this last weekend in Nashville. If pretty much the same design as the West End/Vanderbilt location, it actually looks a lot better in person.



While not perfect, it did fit in very well with the urban fabric of that area.

151
Junior MemberJunior Member
151

PostMar 18, 2014#149

not in the grove but close and not sure were to put it
http://www.bizjournals.com/stlouis/blog ... toric.html

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostMar 18, 2014#150

^ I had put it in Tower Grove Mews and there is a bit of discussion in 2014 projects. I think technically it is in the Botanical Heights neighborhood, but fits into UIC's vision for "Vandergrove."

Read more posts (1246 remaining)