5,705
Life MemberLife Member
5,705

PostJul 08, 2014#76

^ Shaddrach, what growth would Metro East see out of such a move? Most likely the employees will just end up driving farther to work. Yes, they will get a shiny new building to put on a brochure. Most likely the county will give a free pass or abatements on property tax. Even if they move, now one region, specifically the city of St. Louis City (loss tax revenues) and South County takes a big hit for the sake of Metro East. How does that promote growth? I think it does a great job of promoting sprawl and is telling how much more clout Durbin has over the MO Senate delegation.

Another way to look at it, Metro East continues to be utterly dependent on the Federal Dollars to support most of the gains in jobs over the last several years. Nor do I see this promoting growth in outside private capital, jobs and population because they have had a presence in the region for a while now. I literally can't think of any major southern Illinois, outside of Wood River Refinery expansion that did not involve federal dollars or backing of the State of IL. Yes, you had some activity at Mid America but that is heavily subsidized and both Lambert and Downtown St. Louis Airport, another Metro East Airport, could have easily support what is being done.

This is one of the reasons of why I think the St. Louis metro area straddling two states is a big disadvantage when competing with other metro areas. You literally have national politicians promoting a relocation because it looks good for them, hurts their neighbor and region doesn't gain anything as a whole. Heck, you probably got support for a greenfield move to SAB from the White House that is ran by a former IL Senator just as it was politically easier to close auto plants near St. Louis than Detroit. The reality is that federal policy and decisions have been hurting the regions core just as much as everything else. Moving to SAB will be a big hit for St. Louis City and South County just as Chrysler plant closing was a big hit for West County/Franklin County and Ford plant closing for North County.

1,218
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,218

PostJul 09, 2014#77

1/6 chance of keeping jobs in St. Louis. The odds are stacked against the city; let's hope our leadership that is advocating for these important, high-paying jobs can muster up a better argument than the last time:


3,235
Life MemberLife Member
3,235

PostJul 09, 2014#78

It matters more on how much Federal pull a state has. McCaskill and Blunt have less pull than Durbin who is pulling hard for SAFB. An Illinoisan is also in the White House. I see SAFB as the front runner.

1,218
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,218

PostJul 09, 2014#79

local leadership has a big part. The incentives start here and Fenton, St. Chuck, Belleville/O'Fallon, etc are going to be ready. Then state and fed. They are all important and need to be working together. My fear is that the other 5 municipalities are going to press harder and smarter than St. Louis. This is a big deal and if Slay/Rainford pull another "what's good for the region is good for STL, better together" cop out, we need to demand answers on what they did and how it failed (if it lands in the burbs/Illinois). I'm hopeful they can do their part to make this work for STL. We have to keep these jobs here for our tax base and vibrancy, etc.

2,327
Life MemberLife Member
2,327

PostJul 09, 2014#80

Wouldn't the new joint Economic Development be offering up various choices throughout City/County.
Not sure how much St. Louis, Fenton, Bridgeton (?) would be independently pushing their sites. Wasn't that the point of combining the two Econ Dev septs? A unified proposal with site options rather than all these munis behaving like carnival barkers?

Asking cuz I don't know.

3,760
Life MemberLife Member
3,760

PostJul 09, 2014#81

On the flipside, what will happen to the current site of the NGA, once the move is complete? Will the government hold on to this site or sell the land. AB might be a potential buyer, considering how close their operations are to the NGA building. I'm not sure how outdated the building is or if it can be converted, but it will be interesting to see what happens to that property and building.

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostJul 09, 2014#82

^ That is my interest as well... the worst case scenario is that we lose the jobs from the city and have the NGA site sitting for years not producing any jobs or taxes. Conversely, if they move to P-I and it opens up a prime spot that others will jump on that could work out pretty well.

But I'd also like to know who else may be seeking/needing that much land... for example, I believe Schlafly probably would be a better fit for the neighborhood from a use perspective but may not have as many jobs.

3,760
Life MemberLife Member
3,760

PostJul 09, 2014#83

It all hinges on what this building and property can be repurposed for. If the building is nothing more than an office, of course it has a purpose beyond NGA.

1,792
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,792

PostJul 09, 2014#84

it will be interesting to see what happens to that property and building.
I could be wrong but I think several of the structures in the parking lots are of historic significance dating back to the days when the site served as an actual military post. I would not be against extended Lyon's Park to encompass and incorporate this site and these structures even though I realize it sacrifices the ability for its use as tax producing.

1,218
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,218

PostJul 09, 2014#85

STLEnginerd wrote:I would not be against extended Lyon's Park to encompass and incorporate this site and these structures even though I realize it sacrifices the ability for its use as tax producing.
Oh boy, we already have 111 parks in St. Louis, a city of ~315,000 people. That is ~3,250 acres of park space...and you're suggesting more. The most successful/loved parks in the city are the ones that have lots of people living around them...using them. Kosiusko has maybe 10 residents, I believe. We need more greenspace like we need a hole in the head. We need jobs and people and tax generation. F more park space in a 100% dead part of town...this is an industrial, not residential part of St. Louis. Parks won't work here to activate the area or contribute to a better city.

284
Full MemberFull Member
284

PostJul 09, 2014#86

I would think the NGA's top choice would be to stay int the city if at all possible.
Then it be Scott Air force Base
I wouldn't be thrilled if it went out to Fenton however it wouldn't surprise at all either.
I think Slay needs to get over the mindset that what good for the county is good for Saint.Louis cause the county isn't thinking that way or feeling the same way as the city.
If i were Slay i would be all over this & then some. This is tax revenue the city has a likely chance of losing if it doesn't be beyond aggressive about.
Illinois is already corrupt sorry to be very harsh but it's reality & i could very well see Durbin suggesting those jobs be relocated to the Chicago area.
I'm sure they already have a package waiting in the wings to uproot Scott Airforce Base & move it into the Chicago Region including those Jobs.
If the city doesn't get NGA to stay in the City then i really will have a hard to believing if the city will ever come back This is very important.

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostJul 09, 2014#87

Interesting how McKee's plans for the urgent care facility is related to trying to lure NGA:

McKee said he has been working for 18 months to lure the agency to the Pruitt-Igoe site, on which he has an option to purchase, or his Northpark development near Interstate 70 and Hanley Road in St. Louis County.

Government officials will not consider relocating NGA and its thousands of workers to the Pruitt-Igoe site without health care facilities nearby, McKee said.

“They wouldn't come without it,” he said.


I was kind of wondering why that particular site was selected for the facility.

1,218
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,218

PostJul 09, 2014#88

TheNewSaintLouis wrote:I think Slay needs to get over the mindset that what good for the county is good for Saint.Louis cause the county isn't thinking that way or feeling the same way as the city.
If i were Slay i would be all over this & then some. This is tax revenue the city has a likely chance of losing if it doesn't be beyond aggressive about.
Exactly. In a zero to negative growth region, we are all fighting for the same scraps. It is every municipality for itself; I'm sure we all wish it weren't like that, but it is. If the region were growing and people/businesses were standing in line to get into the city/suburbs it'd be different. That simply is not the case. Our biggest competition is the county and Illinois to retain and grow a residential and biz base. I feel the urgency around this as a resident and STL school advocate. Each smart and caring and capable person/parent that leaves STL for Maplewood, UCity, Belleville or St. Charles is a blow to St. Louis. We simply can't lose people who do the right things...they need to be the ones voting and working for change that you simply can't affect when you are on the sidelines in the burbs. Our biggest competition for decent people and jobs is the county. I don't feel like our leaders understand this sense of urgency that many other do. I feel if we lose these jobs it is going to be a major blow to our situation.

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostJul 09, 2014#89

^^^ Mark, I agree we have enough parks in general and I'd actually like to see some sites examined for potential development and use some of those proceeds for enhancing some undervalued ones. However, I think the potential exists for enhancing Lyon Park and South Riverfront Trail as part of a redevelopment of the property. Not saying it should be all park, but I think a creative project could enhance both economic development and cultural/recreational assets.

Another thing I'd love to see examined is whether a Colonial Saint Louis recreation could fit somewhere in Chouteau's Landing/Koskiosko area. A great shame is we have no extant buildings of our French/Creole/Spanish era. It would have been amazing if we still had Choteau's home rivaling Monticello and Mount Vernon; of course that also would have meant we would have had a much different post-1850s riverfront.

1,518
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,518

PostJul 10, 2014#90

DogtownBnR wrote:On the flipside, what will happen to the current site of the NGA, once the move is complete? Will the government hold on to this site or sell the land. AB might be a potential buyer, considering how close their operations are to the NGA building. I'm not sure how outdated the building is or if it can be converted, but it will be interesting to see what happens to that property and building.
The site is a former arsenal, it is surrounded by a handsome and somewhat intimidating stone wall and iron fence. there are still historic barracks on the campus and the remains of a parade ground.

The main building is huge and runs parallel to the river - I think this is an opportunity to reuse the existing buildings and create what could be one of the most unusual "micro" neighborhoods in the country with the main building as lofts and the out buildings converted to single families and new infill - views of the river - historic walled compound - old parade ground as a common "green" - adjacent to Lyon park - next to AB - adjacent to Soulard- close to Cherokee - next door neighbor to the Lemp Brewery - Most likely a shoe in for national historic landmark

A hotel? mixed use? all residential? lots of options - a tear down for industry should not be one of them

1,792
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,792

PostJul 10, 2014#91

Oh boy, we already have 111 parks in St. Louis, a city of ~315,000 people. That is ~3,250 acres of park space...and you're suggesting more. The most successful/loved parks in the city are the ones that have lots of people living around them...using them. Kosiusko has maybe 10 residents, I believe. We need more greenspace like we need a hole in the head. We need jobs and people and tax generation. F more park space in a 100% dead part of town...this is an industrial, not residential part of St. Louis. Parks won't work here to activate the area or contribute to a better city.
I'd agree that St. Louis doesn't really NEED the greenspace. But it does NEED to preseve its heritage. I'm not deaf to your point but I think there must be a compromise solution here.

One thing to consider might be an exchange of sorts. Allowing development of Cherokee Park (which has no historic structures), and in exchanges Lyons Park is expanded to include the historic barracks. The neighborhood retains the same amout of total proximate greenspace, but that space is more accessible by the larger city. New construction on Cherokee Park could spur more revitalization along Arsenal and Cherokee, including the long anticipated Lemp Brewery. Not sure what Benton Park or Marine Villa residents would think of such a proposal and its just one option but I think one worth exploring.

8,907
Life MemberLife Member
8,907

PostJul 10, 2014#92

I know this isn't necessarily practical but......

There is significant parking lot space on this property. It would be neat if they could stay in the same location while building a new facility on the current parking lot a la Busch 2 and 3.

I imagine they could secure off site parking in Kosciuko and shuttle employees in or temporarily pave over portions of Lyon park.

1,792
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,792

PostJul 10, 2014#93

Also why wasn't Carondolet Coke an Option...?

5,705
Life MemberLife Member
5,705

PostJul 10, 2014#94

^ I believe GreenStreets is on its way to have a number of tenants lined up for the Carondolet site. I understand that they had one client ready to sign a tenant/lease agreement in near future for 150-200k sf buidout as well as the possibility of breaking ground before the year is out on additional spec space. But haven't seen or ready anything new in a while as it seems things went quiet. Think it is a great location for a regional brewhub with its rail, highway, industrial access and infrastructure and my second choice for Schafley (still want north riverfront with its urban farm along the river).

However, great point and you wonder if this was happening a year or two earlier if GreenStreets would be competing directly with McKee for making the site the city's preferred choice. Plenty of space that would offer a secure stand alone facility, located just down the road along I55, and assume most of the employees would give a thumbs up.

3,762
Life MemberLife Member
3,762

PostJul 10, 2014#95

Government officials will not consider relocating NGA and its thousands of workers to the Pruitt-Igoe site without health care facilities nearby, McKee said.
What health care facilities are near the current location? Alexian Brothers?

8,155
Life MemberLife Member
8,155

PostJul 10, 2014#96

^ Not sure what is closest currently, but I think what he is saying is that his new proposed facility three blocks from P-I would satisfy the NGA's needs. I also saw him say that the existing P-I site isn't large enough on its own for NGA needs so it would take up some additional space.

8,907
Life MemberLife Member
8,907

PostJul 10, 2014#97


3,762
Life MemberLife Member
3,762

PostJul 10, 2014#98

roger wyoming II wrote:^ Not sure what is closest currently, but I think what he is saying is that his new proposed facility three blocks from P-I would satisfy the NGA's needs. I also saw him say that the existing P-I site isn't large enough on its own for NGA needs so it would take up some additional space.
right, i'm just wondering if it was one of their needs when they moved into the Kosciusko site or if it's a more recent consideration. strikes me as a little odd but i suppose it's never a bad idea to have medical facilities nearby.

PostJul 10, 2014#99

moorlander wrote:
"i mean, if that's okay with everyone else."

9,553
Life MemberLife Member
9,553

PostJul 11, 2014#100

If I was betting...
Round 1
Fenton 5%
North park 10%
Melville 1%
Weldon springs 8%
St.Clair County (ScottAFB) 40%
City(PI) 36%

Round 2 after the 4 MO losers are dropped
St.Clair CO 45%
City 55%

If pols were not involved and sane people made the decision , the city wins easily. NGA plans to expand to 5000 I believe, that many jobs in north city would do wonders for the north city, the city as a whole which in turn would change the way the outsiders look at the city thus the whole region would benefit from a better image of the city

Read more posts (956 remaining)