5,705
Life MemberLife Member
5,705

PostJun 02, 2016#626

^ Construction News Record St. Louis posted article earlier in the week. Initial timeline is too have site cleared and ready for construction by September 2017
as reported.

http://stlouiscnr.com/departments/news/ ... n-project/

403
Full MemberFull Member
403

PostJun 02, 2016#627

I'm thinking this was the final decision great news for the city!

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostJun 03, 2016#628

On nextSTL FWIW - the NGA record of final decision, etc.: https://nextstl.com/2016/06/final-decis ... 1-75b-nga/

9,558
Life MemberLife Member
9,558

PostJun 03, 2016#629

^ :?

2,430
Life MemberLife Member
2,430

PostJun 07, 2016#630

McKee announces housing partnership in the area.... 500 units in first phase:

http://news.stlpublicradio.org/post/mck ... ign=buffer

"We have the development rights for 3,000 housing units over the life of Northside Redevelopment project," McKee said. "We would very much like Telesis and Clayco Realty Group to stay involved with us for all 3,000, but the partnership is for Phase I."

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostJun 08, 2016#631

I'll get excited when I see actual walls going up.

428
Full MemberFull Member
428

PostJun 08, 2016#632

framer wrote:I'll get excited when I see actual walls going up.

Yea with McKee I won't believe a single word he says until construction actually starts

613
Senior MemberSenior Member
613

PostJun 08, 2016#633

^If this is truly moving forward he should be shoring up the existing housing stock he has there now.

I'll believe it when I see it.

2,430
Life MemberLife Member
2,430

PostJun 08, 2016#634

^ looks like they plan for for a combo of rehab and infill.

I agree with the comments that McKee has earned skepticism, but this time around he now has the financial backing of the AFL-CIO Housing Investment Trust and other partners like Telesis so it looks like something will be happening. Telesis has done some interesting work on mixed-income projects with a focud on the D.C.-Baltimore area. You can take a look here:
http://www.telesiscorp.com/

985
Super MemberSuper Member
985

PostJun 08, 2016#635

It would be nice to see how the rehab and infill will work together. Hopefully there will be architectural consistency. Speaking of that, not sure if there are historic district designations for the area that could impact the design.

And is there any talks planned yet on what to do with the area the NSA is leaving yet? I remember some ideas of development in that area and the use of the historic buildings on the site.

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostJun 08, 2016#636


613
Senior MemberSenior Member
613

PostJun 08, 2016#637

A glance at the Telesis site makes me more optimistic for good urban form IF the project moves forward.

1,585
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,585

PostJun 08, 2016#638

Good urban form is a must, but I'd love to see a variety of architectural styles. This part of the city allows for more innovation.

Now, I'm expecting your basic vinyl infill. But I can dream.

Sent from my HTC Desire 610 using Tapatalk

3,429
Life MemberLife Member
3,429

PostJun 13, 2016#639

Question: I am pretty sure guns are not allowed within the NGA perimeter. If the NGA built a second manned perimeter fence out into the surrounding community, with the resident's permission, similar to perimeters at bases that include base housing, could that be a way to reduce property and violent crime in the area surrounding the NGA.

It could be justified as a security measure. I would only think they should consider this if they could get near unanimous approval from the residents that would be within the perimeter. Residents would always enter and exit through a single car entrance that has a 24-hour manned base guard station. It would be like a gated community on steroids. The advantage for residents would be a huge reduction in crime. I would think houses inside this perimeter would go up in value as a result. Maybe a lot of people who work at NGA would want to buy a house inside this perimeter and walk to work.

From what I've read online, at most bases with base housing, guns are not permitted in barracks style housing -- they must stay in a locked common armory-like area. But for individual houses, the residents can have individual guns, but they must all be registered and tracked by officials at the base.

985
Super MemberSuper Member
985

PostJun 13, 2016#640

^ That would likely have some serious constitutional issues. And even if it was somehow allowed the Missouri Legislature would do everything they could to block it.

3,429
Life MemberLife Member
3,429

PostJun 13, 2016#641

imperialmog wrote:^ That would likely have some serious constitutional issues. And even if it was somehow allowed the Missouri Legislature would do everything they could to block it.
The Missouri legislature cannot force NGA to allow individuals to bring guns unregulated onto NGA property currently. (Or private property for that matter such as Boeing. Can citizens band together and form a private association that bans guns? Similar to a gated community?)



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

1,585
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,585

PostJun 13, 2016#642

I really don't see how that would solve anything. Are you going to search every vehicle that enters the neighborhood?

Sent from my HTC Desire 610 using Tapatalk

1,792
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,792

PostJun 14, 2016#643

That's kind of an interesting constitutional question though. Could an HOA restrict someone from owning a gun within the neighborhood. To buy in the hood the owner would have to agree to the terms of the HOA which say no firearms allowed. I suspect it would be crush on a right to privacy challenge, but it'd be interesting to see the arguments at the SCOTUS. Someone should try it if for no other reason as to force a decision.

4,553
Life MemberLife Member
4,553

PostJun 14, 2016#644

Look no further than one of St. Louis's most famous SCOTUS cases - Shelley v. Kraemer - for a primer on how the Supreme Court would view a private covenant or contract that restricts an individual constitutional right.

2,037
Life MemberLife Member
2,037

PostJun 14, 2016#645

wabash wrote:Look no further than one of St. Louis's most famous SCOTUS cases - Shelley v. Kraemer - for a primer on how the Supreme Court would view a private covenant or contract that restricts an individual constitutional right.
The NGIA site is only a few blocks away from the house in question in that case.

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostJun 15, 2016#646

Nothing new, but here's a blurb about the possible Buster Brown Building relocation. Says it would be the 3rd biggest building ever moved, anywhere:

http://www.constructforstl.org/possible ... -nga-site/

19
New MemberNew Member
19

PostJul 22, 2016#647

NGA director signals closer ties with community at new north side headquarters
When the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency opens its new facility on the city’s North Side early next decade, it doesn’t want to be an obscure federal agency tucked away in an industrial corridor anymore.

Instead, NGA Director Robert Cardillo on Thursday signaled a profound shift in how he envisions its new western headquarters — and the agency as a whole — interacting with the community around it.

The new 100-acre campus for the mapping agency that helped plan the raid that killed Osama bin Laden could include green space, a community education center and even shared offices for another government agency or private companies working with the NGA.

“I have no interest in creating a moat and big walls,” Cardillo said in an interview with the Post-Dispatch at the spy agency’s existing 23-acre campus on Second Street near the Anheuser-Busch Brewery.
http://www.stltoday.com/business/local/ ... ign=LEEDCC

428
Full MemberFull Member
428

PostJul 22, 2016#648

Dogtown Dog wrote:NGA director signals closer ties with community at new north side headquarters
When the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency opens its new facility on the city’s North Side early next decade, it doesn’t want to be an obscure federal agency tucked away in an industrial corridor anymore.

Instead, NGA Director Robert Cardillo on Thursday signaled a profound shift in how he envisions its new western headquarters — and the agency as a whole — interacting with the community around it.

The new 100-acre campus for the mapping agency that helped plan the raid that killed Osama bin Laden could include green space, a community education center and even shared offices for another government agency or private companies working with the NGA.

“I have no interest in creating a moat and big walls,” Cardillo said in an interview with the Post-Dispatch at the spy agency’s existing 23-acre campus on Second Street near the Anheuser-Busch Brewery.
http://www.stltoday.com/business/local/ ... ign=LEEDCC

Very good to hear. Hope it really does start revitalizing the area around it and this is certainly a start

1,585
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,585

PostJul 22, 2016#649

Sounds like a paradox that I'd be interested to hear how they solve. Yeah, green space, softball fields, and offices are all good, but "a moat and big walls" is pretty much what the security requirements were for the NGA project. A simple solution would be to put the community-friendly extras outside of the perimeter of the actual NGA headquarters, but that would defeat the purpose of the 100-ft. or whatever it was "buffer zone".

I think of a military base where if you're in the military, a dependent, or a government civilian it's easy to get on and off post if one wants to come on to shop at the commissary or PX, play softball, go to the gym, whatever. But if you don't have a government ID or aren't escorted by someone who does then your car needs to be thoroughly searched before coming on post. Pop the trunk, bring the dog over, the whole nine yards. So on one hand, if the extras are located inside the perimeter then it'll be burdensome for the community to easily interact. If they loosen the security requirements to allow better interaction with the community, well, that simply seems irresponsible from a security perspective.

Again, a paradox that I'm interested to see how they attack.

7,806
Life MemberLife Member
7,806

PostJul 22, 2016#650

Would moving the FBI to the campus make a MLS stadium to the west of Union Station a more likely?

Read more posts (406 remaining)