^ Construction News Record St. Louis posted article earlier in the week. Initial timeline is too have site cleared and ready for construction by September 2017
as reported.
"We have the development rights for 3,000 housing units over the life of Northside Redevelopment project," McKee said. "We would very much like Telesis and Clayco Realty Group to stay involved with us for all 3,000, but the partnership is for Phase I."
^ looks like they plan for for a combo of rehab and infill.
I agree with the comments that McKee has earned skepticism, but this time around he now has the financial backing of the AFL-CIO Housing Investment Trust and other partners like Telesis so it looks like something will be happening. Telesis has done some interesting work on mixed-income projects with a focud on the D.C.-Baltimore area. You can take a look here: http://www.telesiscorp.com/
It would be nice to see how the rehab and infill will work together. Hopefully there will be architectural consistency. Speaking of that, not sure if there are historic district designations for the area that could impact the design.
And is there any talks planned yet on what to do with the area the NSA is leaving yet? I remember some ideas of development in that area and the use of the historic buildings on the site.
Question: I am pretty sure guns are not allowed within the NGA perimeter. If the NGA built a second manned perimeter fence out into the surrounding community, with the resident's permission, similar to perimeters at bases that include base housing, could that be a way to reduce property and violent crime in the area surrounding the NGA.
It could be justified as a security measure. I would only think they should consider this if they could get near unanimous approval from the residents that would be within the perimeter. Residents would always enter and exit through a single car entrance that has a 24-hour manned base guard station. It would be like a gated community on steroids. The advantage for residents would be a huge reduction in crime. I would think houses inside this perimeter would go up in value as a result. Maybe a lot of people who work at NGA would want to buy a house inside this perimeter and walk to work.
From what I've read online, at most bases with base housing, guns are not permitted in barracks style housing -- they must stay in a locked common armory-like area. But for individual houses, the residents can have individual guns, but they must all be registered and tracked by officials at the base.
^ That would likely have some serious constitutional issues. And even if it was somehow allowed the Missouri Legislature would do everything they could to block it.
imperialmog wrote:^ That would likely have some serious constitutional issues. And even if it was somehow allowed the Missouri Legislature would do everything they could to block it.
The Missouri legislature cannot force NGA to allow individuals to bring guns unregulated onto NGA property currently. (Or private property for that matter such as Boeing. Can citizens band together and form a private association that bans guns? Similar to a gated community?)
That's kind of an interesting constitutional question though. Could an HOA restrict someone from owning a gun within the neighborhood. To buy in the hood the owner would have to agree to the terms of the HOA which say no firearms allowed. I suspect it would be crush on a right to privacy challenge, but it'd be interesting to see the arguments at the SCOTUS. Someone should try it if for no other reason as to force a decision.
Look no further than one of St. Louis's most famous SCOTUS cases - Shelley v. Kraemer - for a primer on how the Supreme Court would view a private covenant or contract that restricts an individual constitutional right.
wabash wrote:Look no further than one of St. Louis's most famous SCOTUS cases - Shelley v. Kraemer - for a primer on how the Supreme Court would view a private covenant or contract that restricts an individual constitutional right.
The NGIA site is only a few blocks away from the house in question in that case.
NGA director signals closer ties with community at new north side headquarters
When the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency opens its new facility on the city’s North Side early next decade, it doesn’t want to be an obscure federal agency tucked away in an industrial corridor anymore.
Instead, NGA Director Robert Cardillo on Thursday signaled a profound shift in how he envisions its new western headquarters — and the agency as a whole — interacting with the community around it.
The new 100-acre campus for the mapping agency that helped plan the raid that killed Osama bin Laden could include green space, a community education center and even shared offices for another government agency or private companies working with the NGA.
“I have no interest in creating a moat and big walls,” Cardillo said in an interview with the Post-Dispatch at the spy agency’s existing 23-acre campus on Second Street near the Anheuser-Busch Brewery.
Dogtown Dog wrote:NGA director signals closer ties with community at new north side headquarters
When the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency opens its new facility on the city’s North Side early next decade, it doesn’t want to be an obscure federal agency tucked away in an industrial corridor anymore.
Instead, NGA Director Robert Cardillo on Thursday signaled a profound shift in how he envisions its new western headquarters — and the agency as a whole — interacting with the community around it.
The new 100-acre campus for the mapping agency that helped plan the raid that killed Osama bin Laden could include green space, a community education center and even shared offices for another government agency or private companies working with the NGA.
“I have no interest in creating a moat and big walls,” Cardillo said in an interview with the Post-Dispatch at the spy agency’s existing 23-acre campus on Second Street near the Anheuser-Busch Brewery.
Sounds like a paradox that I'd be interested to hear how they solve. Yeah, green space, softball fields, and offices are all good, but "a moat and big walls" is pretty much what the security requirements were for the NGA project. A simple solution would be to put the community-friendly extras outside of the perimeter of the actual NGA headquarters, but that would defeat the purpose of the 100-ft. or whatever it was "buffer zone".
I think of a military base where if you're in the military, a dependent, or a government civilian it's easy to get on and off post if one wants to come on to shop at the commissary or PX, play softball, go to the gym, whatever. But if you don't have a government ID or aren't escorted by someone who does then your car needs to be thoroughly searched before coming on post. Pop the trunk, bring the dog over, the whole nine yards. So on one hand, if the extras are located inside the perimeter then it'll be burdensome for the community to easily interact. If they loosen the security requirements to allow better interaction with the community, well, that simply seems irresponsible from a security perspective.
Again, a paradox that I'm interested to see how they attack.