Wouldn't it suck to be Memphis?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Maybe? But I'd sooner go to Memphis than most of its "peer" cities. Not to knock any of them in particular, mind. But . . . Memphis is not uncool.
http://cb14.raimistdesign.com/wp-conten ... x300px.jpgSTLrainbow wrote: ↑Aug 11, 2017^ ooh, that would be sweet! I wonder what was there across from the Chestnut side before being cleared for the mall. I also assume an additional building existed across on Pine where the motor entrance for the Magestic is.
(Sorry for yet another off topic post but...) How did I not know Hugh Ferriss was from St. Louis??? For those of you not familiar, the above claim is 100% grounded. He was known to take such liberty with his renderings that developers would ask architects to go back and modify their plans to match Ferriss' rendering.
In exchange for Church Street Park, Giarratana would commit as much as $7 million to create a park elsewhere downtown, on land he would give to Metro, and to overhaul the look of Anne Dallas Dudley Boulevard, which borders Church Street Park. Giarratana also would oversee construction of an 11-story building downtown that would contain 100 to 150 low-income apartments and a services center for the homeless. Metro would fund construction but not pay Giarratana developer fees.
Well I just read all 16 pages of that...and wow. That really got off the rails...especially when they all dove head first into the racial stuff towards the end lol. Regarding the comparison to STL I don't think it's something I would worry about, at least in the City. Much of the City is covered by preservation overlays or historic districts that would keep the kind of unregulated growth in cities like Houston or Nashville in check. St. Louis is also likely a long way off from seeing that kind of growth, if it ever does.Trololzilla wrote: ↑Jan 05, 2019It would appear that a somewhat heated and rather lengthy discussion has opened on SkyscraperPage over the past few days regarding the gentrification of Nashville and the iconoclastic nature of modern home design within the existing fabric of Nashville's inner neighborhoods.
http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=237195
Thought it was interesting to see the different takes on the subject as well as just how quickly the thread exploded. Should it be viewed as a cautionary tale for us here in STL or simply the ramblings of one who laments all the change and wishes things could "go back to the way they were"?
You know, that is very true. I saw a lot of those pictures there when I first read the thread with the utility poles straight up being in the middle of someone's front yard and was quite... amused.The Mayor wrote: ↑Jan 05, 2019St. Louis also already has much of the infrastructure in place to do things right. Nearly all of the City and inner-ring suburbs have sidewalks, curbs, utilities, paved streets, and other stuff. Seems like a lot of the complaints with Nashville were the lack of those things as the city grew outward (utility poles in front yards, gravel streets, poor setbacks, front facing garages, etc, things that would largely be prohibited in St. Louis). Developers and architects in St. Louis are also likely going to build things that fit more in the current environment, and I think we'd all agree that St. Louis' built environment is far superior to Nashville or any other "sun-belt/southern" city.
Makes me appreciate Wash. U.'s execution of collegiate gothic when they really go for it - Brauer Hall, Green Hall, the external facing portions of McKelvey Hall, etc....urban_dilettante wrote: ↑Dec 14, 2020sorry, but i just don't understand the Nashville hype. yeah, they've got some shiny new high-rises but everything else is pretty unimpressive, IMO. (i do like the spire on the new Vanderbilt dorm, but i don't get the weird stonework at the corners.)
https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/showthread.php?t=245097
I'm with you. Nashville does nothing for me. In fact most of the "hot" cities don't. There is very little historical urban density in the south/west/sunbelt. I feel outside of Chicago and St. Louis (maybe Pittsburgh and Cincy too) most Midwest cities are the same way. Some cool development downtown...and then just ugly sprawl from there.urban_dilettante wrote: ↑Dec 14, 2020sorry, but i just don't understand the Nashville hype. yeah, they've got some shiny new high-rises but everything else is pretty unimpressive, IMO. (i do like the spire on the new Vanderbilt dorm, but i don't get the weird stonework at the corners.)
https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/showthread.php?t=245097


