704
Senior MemberSenior Member
704

PostApr 11, 2025#251


98
New MemberNew Member
98

PostApr 13, 2025#252

STLrainbow wrote:
Apr 11, 2025
I'm hearing the region's first dispensary/car wash combo.
It better be called High & Dry.

259
Full MemberFull Member
259

PostApr 14, 2025#253

dirt moving at cardinal & washington

2,620
Life MemberLife Member
2,620

PostApr 14, 2025#254

Construction has also FINALLY begun on The Sovereign

1,044
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,044

PostApr 20, 2025#255

dylank wrote:
Apr 14, 2025
dirt moving at cardinal & washington
I also think the building renovation across the street that Midtown Church did turned out well.

2,620
Life MemberLife Member
2,620

PostJul 29, 2025#256

3201 Locust has finally been put up for sale by Washington Tabernacle. They are hurting for money to fix their building so they are finally giving up on the demolition by neglect on the important structure. 

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

PostJul 29, 2025#257

Huzzah!

PostNov 11, 2025#258

Sigh

StlToday - St. Louis treasurer considers new parking garage in Midtown near SLU


https://www.stltoday.com/news/local/gov ... 52d8a.html

2,620
Life MemberLife Member
2,620

PostNov 11, 2025#259

Let me guess: the former BP lot on Compton

2,672
Life MemberLife Member
2,672

PostNov 11, 2025#260

Ah yes, trusted source on parking demand… the treasurer


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

2,260
Life MemberLife Member
2,260

PostNov 11, 2025#261

Bonds for more car infrastructure ✅️✅️✅️

Bonds for transit infrastructure ❌️❌️❌️

2,672
Life MemberLife Member
2,672

PostNov 14, 2025#262

Plan to buy Midtown St. Louis parking lots is on hold. 
https://www.stltoday.com/news/local/gov ... 24e5e.html

The whole thing smells like a back door deal between the Treasurer and property owner. Treasurers office shouldn't be in the parking business. Simple as that. Not a single piece of evidence could be provided that would justify this deal or the Treasurers involvement in deciding where parking goes. 

First, there is a parking garage across the street with low occupancy. Second, developers will build parking if they need parking. Third, who are these developers and why are they working with the Treasurers office? Why would SLDC not be involved if true? Finally, why is the only evidence the property owner who is setting the price. 

9,525
Life MemberLife Member
9,525

PostNov 14, 2025#263

addxb2 wrote:
Nov 14, 2025
Plan to buy Midtown St. Louis parking lots is on hold. 
https://www.stltoday.com/news/local/gov ... 24e5e.html

The whole thing smells like a back door deal between the Treasurer and property owner. Treasurers office shouldn't be in the parking business. Simple as that. Not a single piece of evidence could be provided that would justify this deal or the Treasurers involvement in deciding where parking goes. 

First, there is a parking garage across the street with low occupancy. Second, developers will build parking if they need parking. Third, who are these developers and why are they working with the Treasurers office? Why would SLDC not be involved if true? Finally, why is the only evidence the property owner who is setting the price. 
This isn't going to happen for many reasons but there is no relationship between Layne and property owner.  Also, the fact that a privately owned garage across the street has low occupancy is irrelevant. 

7,798
Life MemberLife Member
7,798

PostNov 14, 2025#264

addxb2 wrote:
Nov 14, 2025
Plan to buy Midtown St. Louis parking lots is on hold. 
https://www.stltoday.com/news/local/gov ... 24e5e.html

The whole thing smells like a back door deal between the Treasurer and property owner. Treasurers office shouldn't be in the parking business. Simple as that. Not a single piece of evidence could be provided that would justify this deal or the Treasurers involvement in deciding where parking goes. 

First, there is a parking garage across the street with low occupancy. Second, developers will build parking if they need parking. Third, who are these developers and why are they working with the Treasurers office? Why would SLDC not be involved if true? Finally, why is the only evidence the property owner who is setting the price. 
Because isn't parking money the treasurers and nobody is allowed to see the ledgers? Am I remembering things incorrectly?

547
Senior MemberSenior Member
547

PostNov 14, 2025#265

dbInSouthCity wrote:
Nov 14, 2025
addxb2 wrote:
Nov 14, 2025
Plan to buy Midtown St. Louis parking lots is on hold. 
https://www.stltoday.com/news/local/gov ... 24e5e.html

The whole thing smells like a back door deal between the Treasurer and property owner. Treasurers office shouldn't be in the parking business. Simple as that. Not a single piece of evidence could be provided that would justify this deal or the Treasurers involvement in deciding where parking goes. 

First, there is a parking garage across the street with low occupancy. Second, developers will build parking if they need parking. Third, who are these developers and why are they working with the Treasurers office? Why would SLDC not be involved if true? Finally, why is the only evidence the property owner who is setting the price. 
This isn't going to happen for many reasons but there is no relationship between Layne and property owner.  Also, the fact that a privately owned garage across the street has low occupancy is irrelevant. 
Market occupancy is relevant when building anything.  If I recall, I read an article that stated the bonds would be paid off by parking revenue.  Revenue is tied to occupancy. 

9,525
Life MemberLife Member
9,525

PostNov 14, 2025#266

I meant it as it’s low occupancy by design, SLU doesn’t open it for just anybody to park there.

2,620
Life MemberLife Member
2,620

Post3:48 PM - Jan 08#267

There is a liquor license application up in the windows of the old Small Change space

Also 3201 Locust Street now has a professional listing which means the church is really trying to move it. Only 700k!

1,676
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,676

Post7:13 PM - Jan 08#268

About skipped a beat thinking you meant small change in benton park.  I'm assuming you mean Small Batch.  Great news.

Also delighted to see the church moving on from this.  Every time I go to UCBC over the years it's been a head scratcher.

950
Super MemberSuper Member
950

Post7:36 PM - Jan 08#269

Craft Breweries Struggle as Sales and Appetites Wane
Once the darling of the alcohol industry, small-batch beer makers are shutting down because of increased competition and flagging interest.

https://archive.is/GNGiJ#selection-479.0-483.139

406
Full MemberFull Member
406

Post7:37 PM - Jan 08#270

What's the deal with this? 3040 Washington Avenue. Small building was demo'd for this... but it looks to have stopped construction at this point. 

Screenshot 2026-01-08 133511.png (1.7MiB)

259
Full MemberFull Member
259

Post8:00 PM - Jan 08#271

yea. either waiting for framing delivery, or stopped. 

2,430
Life MemberLife Member
2,430

Post8:19 PM - Jan 08#272

^ It may be foundation related; iirc a permit was issued for foundation repair not too long ago. Hopefully just a hiccup.

13K
Life MemberLife Member
13K

Post2:44 AM - Feb 02#273

On the Feb 11 Board of Adjustment agenda

APPEAL #11999 – Appeal filed by Obsidian Bran, c/o Kristin Kendrick of JEMA Architecture Firm, from the determination of the Building Commissioner in the denial of a building permit, authorizing the Petitioner to make interior and exterior alterations for an automotive adaptation shop (historic vehicles to electric vehicles) with cigar/wine bar, per plans (zoning only), at 2831-35 Olive St. WARD 11 #AB-587268-25 ZONE: "H" - Area Commercial District


A $0 zoning-only building permit application was summitted Sep 10, 2025. Property taxes for 2024 and 2025, $26,287.11, have not been paid.

2,620
Life MemberLife Member
2,620

Post4:42 PM - Feb 02#274

I don't hate this if it's done tastefully. Automotive Row is the perfect landing spot for concepts like this. 

Read more posts (-1 remaining)